S?bado, 15 de octubre de 2011

Dear Congressmen: Does the Constitution Matter?


October 15, 2011

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a certified copy of Obama's original Hawaii birth certificate. There is no embossed seal and the word "THE" is misspelled as "TXE" in the registrar's stamp.

Dear Editor:

This is a letter that I am sending to my two Senators (Rubio and nelson) and Representative (West). I don’t expect any responses.

I realize that you, and Congress, have no interest in addressing the matters of Obama’s ineligibility, fraudulent use of a SSN and allowing two forged birth documents to be posted on line. Nevertheless, I will just share the following which is so typical of the treatment received by attornies trying to get a court to hear the plethora of evidence supporting these claims. (Actually, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments back on May 2, 2011, but has yet to render a decision. What do you suppose is taking them so long?)

Remember back in January 2011 when Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie said he would settle the dispute over Obama’s birth certificate by doing the research himself? Well, he tried and all he could come up with was, “something written down in the archives” and concluded that “there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii.” Surely the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) knew that he was making this search so why didn’t they just tell him that they have it but can’t release it because of privacy? Then there was Tim Adams, the senior Hawaii elections worker who has sworn by affidavit that, according to his supervisors (and Gov. Abercrombie) there is no Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama. And we musn’t forget former HDOH Director, Chiyome Fukino, who said that she had seen Obama’s birth certificate and that it is “half written and half typed.” Then came the big day on Apr. 27, 2011 when Obama showed the world his birth document – A FULLY TYPED FORGERY.

I should also include the Hawaiian birth certificates of the Nordyke twins, Gretchen and Susan, born on Aug. 5, 1961, and whose certificate numbers (10637, 10638) were lower than  Obama’s certficate number (10641), yet he was born one day before them on Aug. 4, 1961. How does Obama get a higher number being born a day earlier?

In the District Court of Hawaii, on Oct. 12, 2011, attorney Orly Taitz sued to have Obama’s “vault sealed” birth certificate produced for comparison with the one he showed the world last April. She was also prepared to produce evidence showing that “expert after expert” examined Obama’s birth certificate and that every one of them concluded it is a forgery. The attorney arguing for Obama, Jill Nagamine, told the court that the new Director of HDOH, Loretta Fuddy, has “verified” that Obama’s BC is on record. That was the substance of her argument. So the American people only need to trust Director Fuddy and take her word that Obama’s fully typed and forged birth certificate does exist in the HDOH records. And what was Judge Nishimura’s ruling? “Case dismissed!”

Is Congress to stand idly by again and allow Obama to run for re-election without bringing up his ineligibility and criminal acts? Does the Constitution matter?

Orly Taitz has two more cases pending (Taitz v Astrue – CV-11-00402/Taitz v. Ruemmler 1:11-cv-01​421). I see no reason to expect justice from these either.


J. Black

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 20:36
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar