Viernes, 23 de septiembre de 2011


“An Historical Cover-Up”



by Dwight Kehoe, blogging at TPATH

(Sep. 23, 2011) — (TPATH) For over two years now many patriots, lawyers, media outlets and a small cadre of talk show hosts have followed the numerous twists and turns of the “Obama Identity Crisis.”

With the sealing of records and clamming up of public officials, the authorized and unauthorized document leaks, the “birth” of the Birthers Movement, coupled with the “cult-like” defenders of anything Obama, better known as “OBOTS,” an atmosphere of contention has emerged, the likes of which that have never before been seen in the “Social Media.”

The term Social Media is used here because that is the only place where this identity crisis is being discussed and investigated as of this past April.  The mainstream media, politicians (both elected and/or campaigning),  talk show hosts, magazines, periodicals, and TV newscasts are all, missing in action......MORE

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:52
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 20 de septiembre de 2011

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

KTVK-3TV Video: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Inquiring Into Obama's Birth Certificate

Arizona's KTVK-3TV: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Inquiring Into Obama's Birth Certificate - 9/19/2011 - VIDEO HERE Original? If what Obama posted online is an "original birth certificate" from 1961 then I'm from...

Monday, September 19, 2011

Pixel Patriot: Strunk v NYS BOE; State of New York Defines Natural Born Citizen

STATE OF NEW YORKDEFINESNATURAL-BORN CITIZENBy Pixel PatriotSeptember 20th, 2011 THE COURTSupreme Court of the State of New YorkCounty of KingsSupreme Court Complex360 Adams StreetBrooklyn, New York...

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Africa Travel Association: Security Concerns for Tourism as Kenyan Born Obama Jets into Kenya

* CLICK TO ENLARGE * Mission The Africa Travel Association (ATA) was established as an international travel industry trade association in 1975 to promote travel, tourism and transport to and within...

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Picks Elite Team of 5 to Investigate Obama's Birth Certificate

Elite team of 5 assigned to seek truth on ObamaSheriff Joe picks 'Cold Case Posse' to investigate president's eligibilityJerome Corsi Arizona's Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio told WND he has assigned...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:17
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Domingo, 18 de septiembre de 2011

Orly Taitz: Update on Hawaii Cases and Her Upcoming Visit to Washington, DC


by Sharon Rondeau

Orly Taitz speaking with Dr. Robert Newman of Christian Coalition at the California Republican Convention on September 17, 2011. Photo credit: George Miller, Ventura County Tea Party

(Sep. 18, 2011) — While en route to the California Republican Convention, Dr. Orly Taitz contacted The Post & Email to provide an update on her two lawsuits filed in Hawaii.  One is a state case with a hearing date scheduled for October 12, while the other is federal and has a hearing scheduled for November 21, 2011.

In the latter case, Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta Fuddy had been under subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Honolulu to make available for inspection the original birth record of Barack Hussein Obama by August 8, 2011.  Taitz has gathered evidence from several private investigators indicating that Obama is using a social security number issued in the state of Connecticut when he never worked nor lived there, resulting in her lawsuit, Taitz v. Astrue filed in February 2011.

Taitz and two document examiners flew to Honolulu in advance of the August 8 deadline to inspect the birth record.  However, Fuddy did not appear, and instead, a letter was presented to Taitz explaining that Obama’s original birth record could not be produced for inspection due to “privacy concerns.”  Taitz has stated that Fuddy “broke federal law” by refusing to produce the records under subpoena.

The image presented to the public on April 27, 2011 purported to be a certified copy of Obama’s original birth certificate has been called “a bad forgery.”

Last year, former White House spokesman Robert Gibbs failed to address a reporter’s question about Obama’s Connecticut social security number, but rather, laughed nervously, stuttered, and mocked “faithful readers” of WorldNetDaily who were still questioning “the president’s birth certificate.”  Gibbs also claimed that he “put it [the birth certificate] on the internet.”

It is unknown where Fuddy was on August 8, and the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to release her work schedule to The Post & Email after we filed a request for it under Hawaii’s UIPA, or open records, law.  After filing an appeal to the Office of Information Practices, Attorney Linden Joesting supported the DOH’s contention that Fuddy’s work schedule could be kept confidential because Fuddy “keeps her work and personal appointments in one place and shares it only as needed with her personal secretary.”  The Post & Email will be publishing a full report on this development in the near future.

Taitz has submitted a reply to the government’s opposition to the subpoena commanding her to produce the birth certificate and is represented by Hawaii Assistant Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine. “They’re claiming privacy, and I provided information questioning ‘what privacy,’ as Obama has posted this document on, but he also posted it on mugs and T-shirts that are being sold by the Democratic National Committee.  The man is a criminal.  He’s using a forged document, and he’s bragging with the forgery; he is flaunting this forgery in front of the whole nation.  It’s shocking that our federal judges, our congressmen and senators are allowing this to go on.  This is criminal.  There is no privacy; it was specifically made public.  The interest of the country not to have a criminal in the White House supersedes all notion of privacy which was waived a long time ago.”

Obama’s campaign website is also selling the merchandise.  In regard to the questions about Obama’s birthplace, Obama’s deputy campaign manager, Julianna Smoot, reportedly said that “There’s really no way to make this stuff completely go away. The only thing we can do is laugh at it — and make sure as many other people as possible are in on the joke.”

Obama’s birthplace may be irrelevant to his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, as his father was a foreigner and never a U.S. citizen.  Some researchers have contended that the citizenship of the father or both parents is a factor in whether or not a child is considered a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Taitz is seeking the original birth record, if there is one, because of “information showing that Obama’s birth certificate was fraudulently obtained” and “We already have paperwork from SSA saying that this number was never assigned.”

After Judge Royce Lamberth granted the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement on August 30, Taitz filed a Motion for Reconsideration.  Taitz included as new evidence Obama’s 2009 tax returns which show the social security number that he is using begins with the digits “042.”  “They forgot to flatten the PDF files that they worked on in Adobe Illustrator, and Obama’s full social security number was right there.  I provided that to the judge.  They posted his whole social security number.  It starts with ’042,’ which is the state of Connecticut where Obama was never a resident.  That’s evidence of fraud right there,” Taitz said.

Lamberth had contended that Selective Service documents can be used to check only one’s own Selective Service registration.  To that, Taitz said, “That’s not the case.  I also showed that I used the same Social Security number in conjunction with Selective Service.  You can check anyone’s Selective Service registration as long as you provide his name, date of birth and his social.  I provided Obama’s name, date of birth and social that he himself signed for his tax return, and he showed that he’s been using this number on his Selective Service registration as well.  I provided E-Verify, showing that this number was never assigned to him.  This is a crime.  It is outrageous criminal behavior for which he should have been handcuffed and moved from the White House to the Big House, and only because we have corrupt judges and congressmen is this going on.”

Taitz stated that if the federal case is dismissed, the unrelated state case will continue.  The latter is based on the state UIPA statute, while the federal case is based on the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

When The Post & Email asked Taitz if the attorneys for the Department of Health have any other strategy other than claiming “privacy,” she answered, “Their strategy is that all of our judges are equally corrupt.  There is nothing else aside from utter corruption that is working in Obama’s favor.  The only reason he is being protected and is able to get away with the crime of the century for two and a half years is because of corrupt judges.”

Taitz also said that the United States’ economic climate is deteriorating and that “there is serious discontent with his policies on both sides of the aisle.”  Citing foreclosures and increasing numbers of people sinking into poverty, she stated she is hoping that one judge will say, “I’m not afraid of persecution; I’m not afraid that they’re going to go after me; I’m going to do the right thing; I will follow the law and the Constitution.”

Recently singer Pat Boone stated publicly that he believes that Obama was born in Kenya and that the image released on April 27 is “created.”  Boone stated that he has visited Kenya “about a year and a half ago” and that “everybody there says, ‘You know, your president was born here.’”  Boone described the birth certificate as “a photoshopped fraud.”

Taitz confirmed that she will be meeting with key people in Congress on Thursday, September 22, 2011, but was unable to give details at this time.

She is asking that people call their representatives in Congress to arrange meetings with them. “I’m trying to see as many congressmen and senators as possible.  I’m asking supporters to call; don’t write.  I’m looking for people to visit the Washington offices of their congressmen and senators if they happen to be in Washington, DC.  If they’re not in Washington, DC, call and be persistent.  Stay on the line and provide information that we have clear evidence of treason committed; we have a person with a stolen social security number sitting in the White House; we have his tax returns which he signed himself showing a Connecticut social security number even though he was never a resident of Connecticut.  E-Verify shows that this number was never assigned to him.  It is extremely important for people call and stay on the line until they can get me an appointment with their congressman or senator, and let those congressmen and senators know that if they refuse to cooperate and prosecute this crime of the century, this clear evidence of treason, social security fraud and election fraud, then sooner or later, they will be prosecuted together with Obama and others.”


Editor’s Note: The website for the Ventura County Tea Party is here.


© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 16:29
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
S?bado, 17 de septiembre de 2011

aitz v Astrue exhibits A-H reply to opposition

ECF code did not work, so it was submitted by fedex

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Attorney Pro Se

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Ph 949-683-5411 F949-766-7603

[email protected]





DR. ORLY TAITZ,                           :


Plaintiff,                  :      Case #: 1:11-cv-00519-SOM-RLP

:      The Honorable Susan Oki Mollway

v.                                                     :      The Honorable Richard L. Puglisi


MICHAEL ASTRUE,                               :      PENDING IN THE DISTRICT

Commissioner of the Social         :      of Columbia

Security Administration,                     :      Civil Action No. 11-cv-00402-rcl

:      The Honorable Royce C.

:      Lamberth

Defendant.               :

____________________________    :   Hearing on Docket #1

Date: November 21, 2011

Time: 10:00 AM

Judge: The Hon. Richard L. Puglisi



This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Emergency Order to Show Cause and to Compel Attendance for Production of Documents and for Attorney’s Fees and Costs [1], which the Court directed be heard as a Motion to Compel in the normal course, which it Noticed for Hearing on November 21st, 2011 [4], and in reply to third-party witness Fuddy’s opposition thereto [9].


Plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz, seeks an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 45 compelling third party witness Loretta Fuddy’s (hereinafter “Fuddy&rdquoGui?o, Health Department, State of Hawaii, 1250 Punchbowl Street, Room 325, Honolulu, HI  96813 attendance for production of documents as previously scheduled in the subpoena which was issued and served upon Fuddy. 

The underlying action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,  Civil Action No. 11-CV-00402-RCL, decided August 30, 2011 but not yet final, (motion for reconsideration and motion to stay judgment pending appeal are being submitted within ten days) involves a refusal of the Social Security Administration (SSA) to produce a Form SS-5 requested under the Freedom of Information Act.  Evidence suggests that the Social Security Number (SSN) issued as a result of that application was fraudulently obtained or has been fraudulently used by someone other than the person to whom issued.  The SSA, citing privacy concerns and 5 U.S.C. ‘ 552(b)(6), has refused to supply the information requested.  Plaintiff reasonably believes that the birth records the subject of the subpoena in issue here are relevant to and may have been the basis of the SSN application the subject of the superior action, or the subsequent fraudulent use of that SSN by a different and illegal holder.


A.    The Subpoena Was Properly Served.

Fuddy was subpoenaed to appear at the offices of the Health Department, State of Hawaii, 1250 Punchbowl Street, Room 325, Honolulu, HI  96813 on August 8, 2011 and produce documents and things.  See EXHIBIT A. The subpoena was properly issued and served upon Fuddy, by Federal Express directly at the offices of the Health Department, State of Hawaii, 1250 Punchbowl Street, Room 325, Honolulu, HI  96813.  Service was done both by Certified Mail – Return Receipt Requested to Fuddy’s attorney, Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine and by Federal Express directly to Fuddy.  See Exhibits B, C.   

Fuddy’s own Exhibit B establishes that she actually received the subpoena on July 28, 2011.  Fuddy now exalts form over substance, a position that should not be permitted to stand in the face of her failure to timely file and serve her Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel.

Such method of service by mail or courier is designed to and did result in actual notice of the subpoena to Fuddy.  Neither Fuddy nor her agent Jill T. Nagamine contacted plaintiff or otherwise sought relief from the subpoena, and multiple efforts by Plaintiff to contact Fuddy and Nagamine personally were unavailing.  See attached Declaration of Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.  Nagamine’s failure to return those calls, evidently part of a scheme to avoid declaring the Attorney General’s position on service of the subpoena, may in fact have been in violation of local Bar rules.

In the letter of July 27th Fuddy was advised of the substantial costs that would be incurred in plaintiff’s travel to Hawaii, and that of two experts retained to inspect, copy, test, or sample the subpoenaed document(s), and requested to advise if she would refuse to comply, so that damages could be mitigated.  Fuddy did not reply. 

On the morning of August 8, 2011, having received the subpoena, properly issued under Rule 45, Fuddy failed to appear as ordered by the subpoena and she failed to produce any documents or things.  Instead of having the subpoenaed document(s) produced for her, Joshua Wisch, special assistant to the attorney general, in a display of gamesmanship based in the Attorney General’s heretofore unstated objection to the manner of service of the subpoena, Asked Taitz if there was anything she wanted to serve on the Director or myself [Yamamoto] as the Director’s designee (Yamamoto Declaration), and then handed plaintiff a letter addressed to her from Jill T. Nagamine, Deputy Attorney General for the State of Hawaii, Fuddy’s agent as described above, dated August 8, 2011.  See Fuddy’s Exhibit A.  That letter, purporting to be a written objection pursuant to Rule 45(c)(2)(B), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, did not describe the nature of the withheld documents . . .  in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the [email protected] pursuant to Rule 45(d)(2)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  Plaintiff has incurred substantial damages as a result of Fuddy’s failure to comply with these Rules.  

B.    Disclosure of the Records Sought by Plaintiff is Permitted Under Hawaii State Law.

If the document subpoenaed is, as it has been purported to be, a Certificate of Live Birth issued by the Hawaii Department of Health in connection with the birth of Barack Hussein Obama, II on August 6, 1961, plaintiff’s right to inspect or obtain a copy of the record can be established by order of this Court as a court of competent jurisdiction, pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes Section 338-18(b)(9).  Further, any claim of privilege or confidentiality has been waived by a) dissemination by Barack Obama of a purported copy through the White House website.  See Exhibit E, attached[1], and b)  release by Barack Obama to the Democratic National Committee of a purported copy of that document, for reproduction and sale on coffee mugs, See Exhibit F, attached, and c) the waiver for its release executed by Barack Obama, as processed by his counsel, Judith L. Corley, Esq.[2]  See Exhibit H, attached.  These actions constitute a waiver of privilege under Hawaiian law.  This principle has been recognized in Metzler Contracting Co. LLC v. Stephens, 642 F.Supp2d 1192, 1203 (U.S.D.C. D Hawaii 2009): Voluntary disclosure of privileged information to a third-party results in a waiver of the privilege as to communications on that subject. 

C.  The Information Sought by Plaintiff is Relevant to the Underlying Lawsuit.

Section B, above, establishes that the information sought is no longer privileged.  The only remaining issue addressed by Fuddy, it being questionable whether Fuddy has standing to raise this issue not being a party to the underlying lawsuit, is whether the matter sought is relevant to any party’s claim or defense including the   . . .  identity of persons who know of any discoverable matter. Federal Rules of Civil procedure Rule 26(b)(1).  That is exactly the issue the subject of the underlying lawsuit . . .  Who is this person, apparently alleged to be born in Hawaii, who obtained a Social Security Number in a series allocated to Connecticut, issued at the time when number sequences were based on geographic location, who had no known connection with the State of Connecticut.


Inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the subpoenaed document(s) to include, but not be limited to, analysis of paper and/or ink to establish the authenticity of the document(s),  is required to verify the accuracy of the information released in the purported copy, which is relevant to the subject of the underlying action here.  Expert examination of that copy has resulted in uniform opinion that it has been created by various processes not consistent with making a copy of an existing document, and is not a true copy of the original record.  See Exhibits H, I, attached.

On August 30th this court had a hearing with District judge Hon. Susan Mollway. At the hearing Defendants raised and issue of the order by the USDC in the district of Columbia to grant the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff responded, that a motion for reconsideration is being filed. Plaintiff attached herein the motion for reconsideration,(Exhibit J) which shows that compliance with above subpoena is essential and serves in crime prevention, represents necessity in the interest of the National security in furtherance of this court’s oath of office to preserve and protect the U.S. constitution.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays that the Motion to Compel attendance for production of documents be granted and the requested relief be ordered, and that third party witness Fuddy should be barred from now filing any further opposition to the pending Motion to Compel, and a later hearing be scheduled on plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Respectfully submitted:


/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Tel.: (949) 683-5411

Fax: (949) 766-7603

Email: [email protected]






DR. ORLY TAITZ,                           :


Plaintiff,                  :      Case #: 1:11-cv-00519-SOM-RLP

:      The Honorable Susan Oki Mollway

v.                                                     :      The Honorable Richard L. Puglisi


MICHAEL ASTRUE,                               :      PENDING IN THE DISTRICT

Commissioner of the Social         :      of Columbia

Security Administration,                     :      Civil Action No. 11-cv-00402-rcl

:      The Honorable Royce C. Lamberth

Defendant.               :

______________________________     :



This court, having considered plaintiff’s motion for an order to compel attendance for production of documents, the memoranda of the interested parties, if any, and the whole record herein, and no opposition to the motion pursuant to LR7.4 having been filed by or on behalf of third-party witness Loretta Fuddy, that witness having been properly served with the motion and notice of hearing scheduled in this matter for 10:00 AM on Wednesday, November 21, 2011, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Loretta Fuddy, Health Department, State of Hawaii, 1250 Punchbowl Street, Honolulu, HI  96813, is hereby barred pursuant to LR 7.4 from filing any further opposition to plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, and it is further

ORDERED that Loretta Fuddy appear in the United States District Court, in and for the District of Hawaii, in courtroom 6 before Judge RICHARD L. PUGLISI, on the 21st day of Npvember, 2011, at 10:00 AM, and there produce original 1961 handwritten birth certificate for Barack Obama, II, described in the subpoena which was issued and served upon Fuddy, and permit inspection, copying, testing or sampling of the material, to include, but not be limited to, analysis of paper and/or ink, under supervision of the court.

Dated at Honolulu, Hawaii this the ____ day of _____________________, 2011.






Read more at Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:41
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar



Dr. Ron Polland has released a statement to Obama Release Your Records that the Nordyke Twins’ Birth Certificates are FAKE!  Many have relied upon those documents as true and valid birth certificates.  Susan and Gretchen Nordyke’s birth certificates were used to compare and contrast to Obama’s  by utilizing the difference in the number sequencing as  presented by the Obama regime.

In a July 28, 2009 WND” article,  “Unveiled! Hawaii’s 1961 long-form birth certificates” regarding the birth certificate’s numbering,  Mrs. Nordyke said that her daughters’ birth certificate numbers  were 10637 and 10638.  Obama’s was 10641.  She believed that Ann must have come to the hospital after she did, and that is why there was a skip in the numbering sequence.   Mrs. Nordyke said she never met Obama’s mother, although she would have been in the same maternity ward as Ann Dunham, if Ann was at Kapliolani Hospital on August 4, 1961.

Mrs. Nordyke Showing Off the Twin's Birth Certificates - WND and Honolulu Advertiser

We have had our concerns about those birth certificates being valid or real because we found that Eleanor Nordyke was involved with the East West Population Center that was a hotbed for communists during that time frame.  WTPOTUS research found others in the Obama family were also associated with the East-West Center:  Lolo Soetoro, Barack Obama Sr.,  and Ann Dunham.

Our research also led us to believe  that Eleanor Nordyke wasn’t a exactly trusted source for information because of her associations and connections. 

Eleanor C. Nordyke, Research Fellow at the East-West Population Institute, is author of The Peopling of Hawaii (1989) and is a frequent contributor to the Journal.

The Chinese in Hawai’i: A Historical and Demographic Perspective was written by ELEANOR C. NORDYKE and RICHARD K. C. LEE.  Richard K. C. Lee was another name on the birth certificates.

Another story presented by World Net Daily suggested that Barry’s long form birth certificate was forged utilizing the Nordyke twin’s birth certificates as its base.     So now we have a forgery making a forgery?

Dr. Polland says,

On July 28, 2009, the Honolulu Advertiser ran a story about Eleanor Nordyke and a photo of her holding two “photostats” of the long-form birth certificates allegedly made for her twin daughters, Susan & Gretchen. Everyone has referred to these as examples of “genuine long-form birth certificates” and nobody ever thought to question their authenticity.

That is, until I came along and analyzed them.

Not only was Gretchen’s birth certificate image a cut-and-paste job from Susan’s, both of their certificate numbers (10637 & 10638) are more than a tad off the mark.

~ Dr. Polland

View Dr. Polland’s video.  Another video showing how the birth certificates were produced will be released shortly.

We must now wonder and question why this bogus information was presented by Mrs. Nordyke. 

What was her inclination or motivation to do so?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:37
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 13 de septiembre de 2011

Google has put out a warning on New Zeal and NoisyRoom as well since we linked to two pics of Trevor’s yesterday. We have removed those pics temporarily and notified New Zeal.

There is no malware on this site and Google’s warning is mistaken. Just a note to our viewers to ease your minds. I also sincerely doubt there is any malware on Trevor’s site. I’ll let you draw your own conclusions.



Mark Hatfield: Leftist Oregon Senator Was Targeted by Soviets

Submitted by Trevor on September 12, 2011 – 9:02 pm EST2 Comments

Former Oregon Senator Mark O. Hatfield, died  in Portland last week, aged 89. He served in the US Senate from 1966, until his retirement in 1997.

Mark O. Hatfield

Though nominally a Republican, the Senator was so far left and so committed to non-confrontation  in the face of America’s enemies, the Soviet Embassy in Washington DC marked him out for special attention.


The memo stated:

A review of information we have developed through our coverage of Soviet officials and establishments in Washington, D. C., has disclosed a continuing interest by representatives of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) to maintain contacts with and cultivate members or staff personnel of the U.S. Congress. There appears below a compilation of such contacts which have come to our attention from January 1, 1967, to date…

Based on a review of the information disclosed through our coverage, it appears that soviet officials are making more contacts with the following Congressmen or members of their staff than with other U. S. Legislators:

Click to enlarge

Most of those listed above, with the exception of leftist Republican Edward Brooke, were well known leftist Democrats. Almost all were vocal opponents of the Vietnam war and as such were clearly of interest to the Soviet Union.

Why was Mark Hatfield one of the few Republicans singled out for Soviet attention?

Hatfield too was an extreme “liberal” and a vocal opponent of America’s wars against communism.

In 1966, while still governor of Oregon, when the National Governors Association passed a resolution reaffirming its support for the war in Vietnam, Hatfield cast the only dissenting vote.

In 1970, Hatfield partnered with another Soviet target, Democratic Senator George McGovern of South Dakota to propose legislation that would have set a deadline for the end of U.S. military operations in Vietnam. Strongly opposed by President Richard Nixon, the so-called McGovern-Hatfield amendment was defeated, 55 to 39.

In 1979, the Communist Party USA controlled U.S. Peace Council organized a National Conference on Nicaragua, along with several other radical groups, to discuss a strategy to ensure that the Marxist-Leninist Sandinistas took control.

Three Congressmen and two Senators lent support to this Conference: far leftists Ron Dellums, Tom Harkin and Walter Fauntroy in the House and Mark Hatfield and fellow Soviet target Edward Kennedy in the Senate.

Mark Hatfield continued his anti-anti-communism well into the Reagan era.

As chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee for the first six years of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, he succeeded in diverting $100 billion from Reagan’s military buildup to social programs. He joined Democrats in mocking Reagan’s plans for the space-based missile-defense system known as Star Wars.

He derided as “sheer madness” Reagan’s request to resume production of nerve gas for chemical warfare. In 1982 he joined with Democrat Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts to propose an immediate nuclear-weapons freeze in the U.S. He opposed development of the mobile, multiple-warhead nuclear MX missile, which he deemed “a monument to madness.” In 1986, he criticized as an “immoral act” the U.S. bombing raid on Libya.

He and Charles Grassley of Iowa were the only two Republicans to oppose the 1991 Senate resolution authorizing military action to evict Iraqi forces from Kuwait.

“I’m often pegged as a pacifist. In fact, I am not,” Hatfield  wrote in a 2001 memoir. “I’m not totally opposed to military force (for example World War II), yet I believe force should not be used until all other options have been exhausted. And most critically, we ought to address the causes of war — poverty, lack of education, health, racism, militarism, or conflict over raw materials (such as oil) — and work to prevent war in the first place.”

Mark Hatfield’s pacifism was indeed selective. Fighting fascism was acceptable. Fighting communism was not.

Like current U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, Hatfield was also affiliated with the Washington DC based Institute for Policy Studies – an organization so close to the Soviets, it was described in 1978 by Brian Crozier, director of the London-based Institute for the Study of Conflict, as the “perfect intellectual front for Soviet activities which would be resisted if they were to originate openly from the KGB.”

Mark Hatfield endorsed IPS’s 20th anniversary April 5, 1983, 20th reception at the National Building Museum in Washington DC.

The Washington School, founded by the Institute for Policy Studies in 1978, was an important means of influencing Congress and the Democratic Party. Courses on defense, foreign affairs and domestic policies were taught there by IPS officers and staffers and other American or foreign radical “experts.” A large number of members of Congress and staffers attended these schools. Several legislators also taught there including Mark Hatfield and far leftists such as Tom Harkin, John Conyers, Ron Dellums and James Abourezk.

Mark Hatfield was also well funded and endorsed by the US’ largest “peace” Political Action Committee, the Council for a Livable World.

Founded in 1962 by long-time socialist activist, atom bomb scientist and reported Soviet agent, Leo Szilard, Council for a Livable World is a non-profit advocacy organization that seeks to “reduce the danger of nuclear weapons and increase national security,” primarily through supporting “progressive,” congressional candidates who support their policies.

Council for a Livable World has supported literally hundreds of leftist Democrats from Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Sherrod Brown, Nancy Pelosi, Dennis Kucinich, Barney Frank, Tammy Baldwin and Jan Schakowsky.

While claiming to be bipartisan, Council for a Livable World, has besides Hatfield, only funded a handful of Republicans in its 40 year existence – Indiana Senator and START Treaty zealot Richard Lugar being the only current example.

Some obituary writers have described Mark Hatfield as a principled man.

He may well have been, but it wasn’t on the side of freedom.

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:55
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

WND Exclusive

E-Verify 'flags' Obama's

Social Security Number

System crunches prez's data,

determines 'likely fraudulent'

Posted: September 12, 2011
8:14 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WND

A private investigation reveals that the Social Security Number being used by Barack Obama does not pass a check with E-Verify, the electronic system the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has created to verify whether or not prospective employees have the required authorization to work legally in the United States.

Over the past few years, the E-Verify system has received national attention because of its ability to determine if prospective employees are illegal immigrants who have entered the United States without the legal authority to work.

Autographed copies of Jerome Corsi's "Where’s the Birth Certificate?" are available only from the WND Superstore

By flagging fraudulent documents, including faked Social Security Numbers, the E-Verify system can assist an employer in the effort to make sure all prospective hires have authentic identification papers, including valid Social Security Numbers, issued to them and not to someone else.


Now WND has obtained a copy of an affidavit from Linda Jordan, a private citizen who entered Obama's Social Security Number into the "Self Check" section of the E-Verify website, only to find out that Obama's Social Security Number was flagged by E-Verify as likely being fraudulent.

The document:

Jordan told WND she is a wife, mother and homemaker. She described herself as "an average citizen with reasonable research skills."

She said she became concerned when she realized that Congress was not willing to investigate issues concerning Obama's identity, including whether or not he currently is using a fraudulent Social Security Number, and that federal law enforcement authorities also were doing nothing.

"Between October 2008 and May 2011, I submitted several requests to agencies and people with the legal responsibility and authority to investigate the use of forged documents and election fraud, concerning Obama's birth records and Social Security Number," she stated in her affidavit. "To date no one with the legal responsibility and authority has responded to any of these requests."

Jordan told WND she finally decided to investigate Obama on her own initiative.

"I did my own research and I found allegations that Obama was using a fraudulent Social Security Number and that his birth certificate had been forged were more than credible," she said. "Then I saw many brave people putting their reputations on the line to get the truth concerning Obama, including military officers like Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, and I decided I could no longer just sit back and watch."

Jordan finally decided to take matters in her own hand.

"I considered myself to be one of the employers of the president of the United States," she said, "so I decided to sign up for E-Verify and see if I could determine whether or not I could find out something about his true identity."

In May 2010, WND reported two private investigators working independently were asking why President Obama was using a Social Security Number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in that state.

In addition, the records indicate the Social Security Number Barack Obama is using was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at an ice cream shop in Hawaii.

E-Verify reports suspected fraud

As seen in Exhibit 1, after Jordan entered Obama's Social Security Number into the E-Verify Self Check, the system indicated Obama's Social Security Number produced a mismatch that warranted a visit to the Social Security Administration to investigate the discrepancy.

Exhibit 1, E-Verify notification of 'mismatch' in Obama Social Security Number self check

More detailed analysis of Exhibit 1 shows the checked reason for the mismatch notice was: "SSA record does not verify. Other reason. SSA found a discrepancy in the record."

Exhibit 2 shows a Social Security Online page that indicates the response "SSA record does not verify, other reason" is to be interpreted as "Special indicator present," with the reference to three E-Verify sections.

Exhibit 2, Social Security Online page explaining response "SSA record does not verify, other reason."

Further research revealed that the SSA adds "Special Indicator codes" to identify Social Security Numbers that individuals obtained fraudulently.

According to an audit report authored by the Office of the Inspector General, Social Security Administration, titled "Effectiveness of Special Indicator Codes on the Social Security Administrations Numident File," dated August 2008, there were 9 special indicator codes as of November 2008:

  1. False Identity
  2. Noncitizen Not in Status
  3. Multiple SSNs with Different Identities
  4. Scrambled Earnings with New SSN Assigned
  5. SSN Obtained Using Fraudulent Documentation
  6. SSN Assignment Based on Harassment/Abuse/Life Endangerment
  7. Fictitious Identity
  8. Fraud – OIG Investigated
  9. Fraud SSN Misuse

"Eight of the Special Indicators have to do with fraud of some kind," Jordan said. "It looks to me like the SSN Obama is using has been flagged with a Special Indicator suggesting fraud."

WND's phone call to the media office of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security went unanswered.

Whose Social Security Number is Obama using?

As seen in Exhibit 3, U.S. Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister, retired, has obtained from the Social Security Administration verification that the Social Security Number currently being used by Barack Obama is a number that was never issued to Obama.

Exhibit 3, SSA verification that the Obama's Social Security Number (redacted above) was not issued to Obama

Yet, WND has independently verified that Obama is using the Social Security Number in question.

As seen in Exhibit 4, WND has further confirmed that Obama's Social Security Number links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service system; inserting Obama's Social Security Number into the online Selective Service search engine produces a valid Selective Service number identified with Obama.

Exhibit 4, Selective Service online search engine links Obama's Social Security Number to his Selective Service number

Researcher Felicito Papa has further confirmed, in an affidavit filed on lawyer Orly Taitz's website, that Obama's Social Security Number is clearly legible in a non-redacted layer of the electronic file when Obama's 2009 federal tax return is viewed in Adobe Illustrator.

On Aug. 30, 2011, Judge Royce C. Lamberth, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, granted summary judgment dismissing a federal lawsuit brought by Taitz, asking for FOIA disclosure of Obama's Social Security information.

Taitz had alleged Obama was engaged in Social Security identity fraud, using a Social Security Number that had not been issued to him; Lamberth ruled that privacy restrictions prevented the Social Security Administration from releasing the requested files, despite the fact Obama is a public figure.

Read more: E-Verify 'flags' Obama's Social Security Number

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:17
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Lunes, 12 de septiembre de 2011

Monday, September 12, 2011

Video: Barry I've Got Your Number

Barry I've Got Your Number: 042-68-4425

A continuing call to action by CDR Kerchner (Ret): New Wash Times Ad: Obama Using Stolen SSN and Forged Birth Certificate. Why Isn’t Speaker John Boehner Investigating? – 12 Sep 2011 Wash Times National Weekly pg 5 MORE HERE

Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Latest Piece on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants. MORE HERE

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. MORE HERE

Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration

Obama Using Stolen SSN & Forged Birth Certificate - Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Sep 2011 - pg 5

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:27
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
S?bado, 10 de septiembre de 2011

Friday, September 9, 2011

Taitz v Astrue Motion for Reconsideration: New Details; SSA Found Discrepancy in Obama's Social Security Number Record

Taitz v Astrue: Motion for Reconsideration with Exhibits 1-5
Obama's SSA Record Does Not Verify, SSA Found a Discrepancy in the Record.

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz&rdquoGui?o submits this motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.

While generally disfavored, a motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 59(e) may be granted in circumstances where a party presents new evidence not reasonably available prior to the judgment, or where it is shown that the prior ruling was clearly erroneous or manifestly unjust. See e.g., Lake Hill Motors, Inc. v. Jim Bennett Yacht Sales, Inc. (7th Cir. 2000).

In support of the instant motion, Taitz presents both newly discovered evidence and argues clear error and manifest injustice of this Honorable Court's August 30, 2011 Memorandum Opinion granting the Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion. Taitz presents the following for this Honorable Court's consideration:

Newly Discovered Information and Evidence Warrants Reconsideration and Denial of Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion.

a. Plaintiff Presents New Evidence Regarding Waiver of Privacy by Prior Public Release of Social Security Number...

After Taitz submitted her opposition to motion for summary judgment, she appeared on a number of radio shows. During one of the shows, talk show host, Mr. Doug Hagmann, who is also a private investigator, related to Taitz that when Mr. Obama originally posted his tax returns on, he left his full Social Security number on one of the pages, and it was the same Connecticut social security number which is listed in the sworn affidavits of investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson which were previously submitted to this court.


A third piece of new evidence, received by Taitz, is a sworn affidavit of witness Linda Jordan, showing, that according to Ms. Jordan's affidavit, she was greatly concerned by the reports of licensed investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson, which were provided to your Honor in this case and in Taitz v Obama 10-cv-151RCL. Ms. Jordan repeatedly requested the social Security administration and other authorities to provide the public with information regarding whether Mr. Obama, is indeed fraudulently using a Social Security number which was never assigned to him.

Ms. Jordan never received any response from the Social Security administration. Ms. Jordan decided to investigate further. When any other individual but the President is concerned he has an employer or another individual above him in the chain of command. Such employer would do e-verify or SSVS verification, showing his employee's citizenship status and validity of the Social Security card, provided by this employee.

When President of the United States is concerned he does not have a specific individual who is higher than him in the chain of command. The U.S. President does not have one specific employer, who is supposed to do e-verify or SSVS check, to see that he has proper credentials. Citizens of the United States collectively employ him and pay his salary through their taxes. As such Ms. Jordan went to e-verify and submitted a request for verification.

Ms. Jordan entered Mr. Obama’s name and Connecticut Social Security number that was submitted by investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson and which she verified through the official US government selective service website as one being used by Barack Obama since 1980.

According to the official government site e-verify, the number Mr. Obama uses on his own tax returns and according to the official U.S. government selective service web site was never assigned to him. E-verify shows, that there is no match between Obama’s name and the social security number he is using. (Exhibit 3, hereto, the Affidavit of Linda Jordan and official e-verify response, showing no match between Obama's name and Connecticut Social Security number that Obama is using).

Ms. Jordan did this e-verify not by misrepresentation but in the good faith belief that every U.S. citizen is an effective “employer” of the U.S. President and after she undertook all efforts to get cooperation from the Social Security administration, and after she encountered unprecedented corruption within the SSA, she personally performed e-verify. This simple e-verify was supposed to be done by the employees of the SSA. Why didn’t they do it? Using lexicon of this Honorable Court, they “were toying with this court and the whole nation or they showed their stupidity.”

d. ...and that a number of members of Obama's family improperly and illegally used social security numbers:

On August 29, 2011 Mail on Line, The Australian, The Washington Times, and many other papers and radio shows around the world reported on an arrest of Barack Obama's uncle Omar Obama, who was in U.S. Illegally, and was ordered deported from the United States.



Taitz v Astrue - Motion for Reconsideration(Draft) - Obama's Social Security Number

Taitz v Astrue - Motion for Reconsideration Unredacted Exhibits 1-5 - Obama's Social Security Number

Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Latest Piece on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants. MORE HERE

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. MORE HERE

Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration

We Have a Criminal and Forger in the White House! 20110627 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 5

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:35
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Lunes, 05 de septiembre de 2011

Monday, September 5, 2011

Video: Tea Partier Confronts Congressman Lungren About Obama's Eligibility

Rep. Dan Lungren Town Hall Meeting: Tea Partier Confronts Rep. Lungren About Obama's Eligibility - 8/24/2011 --- VIDEO HEREFrom our source: I attended a town hall from Rep. Dan Lungren on August 24, 2011....

NPR Scrubs Powell's Statement About Birther Summit Challenge: Powell Continues Cover-up


Sunday, September 4, 2011

Calgary Sun: The great Obama cover-up; the Media Party doesn’t want us to know

The great Obama cover-up We know every detail about other presidents and their families, why not this one? By Ezra Levant @ The Calgary Sun Onyango Obama, U.S. President Barack Obama’s uncle, was charged...

Dr. Jerome Corsi on WABC Radio: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate and Tax Fraud

Dr. Jerome Corsi on WABC Radio: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate and Real Estate Tax Fraud --- 9/4/2011 --- VIDEO HEREMara Zebest Adobe Analysis: Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate Report; Final DraftWe...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:19
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar