Jueves, 18 de junio de 2009
 http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/?s=Schneller+v.+Cortes

Schneller v Cortes: SCOTUS Dismissed and Denied

Monday June 22, 2009

08-9797 SCHNELLER, JAMES D. V. CORTES, SEC. OF PA, ET AL.

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed.  See Rule 39.8. As the petitioners have repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioners unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) are paid and the petitions are submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1.  See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents.  See id., at 4, and cases cited therein

June 22, 2009 Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause | Uncategorized | | No Comments




-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 3, the case was “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2009,” whereby the Supreme Court Justices will consider whether or not to grant the case cert.
 
 
~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Apr 6 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2009)
May 16 2009 Waiver of right of respondents Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al. to respond filed.
Jun 3 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2009.
Jun 10 2009 Supplemental brief of petitioner James D. Schneller filed. (Distributed)
 
 
 
PETITION TO SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES ASKS NEW LOOK AT OBAMA CITIZENSHIP
::
   AIP Projects -> Obama Watch

PETITION TO SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES ASKS NEW LOOK AT OBAMA CITIZENSHIP, IN LIGHT OF FRAUD,  UN-AMERICANISM, AND COLLABORATION BY CONGRESS THAT PREVENTED INVESTIGATION


Wednesday, April 22,  12:20 AM (EST)
Contact: Jim Schneller  |  610-688-9471 |  
[email protected]



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


WASHINGTON, DC -   Pennsylvanian James D. Schneller has filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking reversal of the denial by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court of Mr. Schneller's petitions for writ of mandamus and for injunction, for an order the Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro Cortes to  demand proof from Barack Obama of his eligibility for office, in particular his standing as a natural born citizen under the United States Constitution.  The second petition sought an injunction directly to Mr. Obama, and a stay of the certification of the vote, by Secretary Cortes, including any certification to Pennsylvania's Governor, and postponing of the scheduled meeting of the electors, pending disposition of the request for writ of mandamus.

        Petitioner Schneller claims that since the candidate had not shown his eligibility under the Constitution, it follows that certification of the ballot was improper and fraudulent,  that the canvas and certification of the vote was meaningless,  that the Pennsylvania electors should not have had their votes certified, nor had their votes tallied in the traditional meeting before the Governor,  nor should the certified electoral ballots have been lodged with the President of the U.S. Senate, nor the joint session of Congress.

        Schneller says:  " We have witnessed a treasonous coup by the Democratic Party and the Congress.     The Supreme Court has had time to consider Mr. Obama's acts and how his post election activities relate to his subterfuge.  How long do we have to pretend that this man is our President ?   What may have been novel, or overwhelming, in the realm of political equity, has disappeared, and the gentleman is to most voters an interloper and un-American.   The Supreme Court has an urgent duty to stand with the Constitution and with the People !  "

        Unlike in prior Supreme Court cases entitled Berg, Donofrio, and Wrotnowski, Schneller claims abundant standing to sue, for reasons including his personal experiences in the campaign, and his standing as a member of subclasses of citizens deeply affected by the defendant's improper candidacy, including the religious, and the pro-life.   No prior case has resulted in an opinion.

        Petitioner Schneller's state suit raised the fact that Senator Obama had placed a doctored "certificate of live birth" on the internet, and had sworn falsely or in bad faith in his candidate affidavits in thirty or more states.  Moreso, suits against ACORN had been filed in numerous states.   Hollow and biased judgments in these, as well as the administration's continual overtures to ACORN since the election, are a warning signal to all who object to open corruption and use of public funds as private favor.

       The petition for writ of certiorari also claims that the Pennsylvania Department of State failed to prosecute numerous violations of the Commonwealth's election law by Mr. Obama, and argues that the election law's omission of a requirement for presidential candidates to file sworn affidavits is unfair, unequal, and unconstitutional.   This omission was inexplicably amended into the statute in 2006.

       "The entire country is aware of Obama's subterfuge, yet no official has demanded proof of this gentleman's eligibility under what is a most simple and basic requirement for the Presidency.    A bare statement by the Hawaii Health Director that they have a valid birth certificate is fatally insufficient.  Hawaiian officials have dug the ditch deeper, through various obstructive actions taken by them, and a boycott against Hawaii is in place."

       The petitioner says in regard to Congress:  " Even if Pennsylvania's certified electoral vote had been delayed past the time of the Joint Session, this could have had the positive effect of fomenting a recess and a resolution, so that the eligibility issue could be properly addressed .    Since the Pennsylvania vote arrived in time, I then filed in the Supreme Court for an injunction or writ of mandamus ordering Congress to not count the Pennsylvania vote until resolution of the Schneller v. Cortes case, and ordering Mr. Obama to produce proofs of citizenship.  I faxed copies of this to every Senator and Member of Congress prior to the Joint Session, just as I had faxed a copy of the petitions for injunction and mandamus, to every Pennsylvania elector and official, prior to the meeting of the electoral college.   What more did any of these leaders need to initiate investigation ? "
Posted 2009-04-22 11:10 AM (#12318) By: EternalVigilance

Tags: OBAMA CITIZENSHIP

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:52
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Comentarios