Lunes, 24 de octubre de 2011

 

Will Those Who Took an Oath Save Our Republic?

“MILLIONS OF PARTICIPANTS CAN CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY”

by JB Williams, ©2011

Does it matter to the U.S. military that a constitutionally-unqualified man, and British citizen at that, is sitting in the White House?

(Oct. 24, 2011) — As conditions in America worsened over the last few years, in particular the time frame since an illegal and unconstitutional man from nowhere with a blank resume seized the White House and started installing unvetted and unelected Czars at the helm of the people’s government, I heard the same single question asked over and over again with increasing regularity and desperation – “Where’s our military and law enforcement? Isn’t anyone who took an oath to protect and defend against all enemies, going to do something?”

Amid an endless stream of conspiracy theories, a real conspiracy was underway and well-founded concerns for the true state of our union led many to one question surfacing repeatedly with increasing anxiety – “why are our soldiers allegedly fighting for freedom and liberty abroad while we are being stripped of our freedom and liberty at home? Why isn’t anyone doing anything to stop it?”

It’s quite clear that our nation is speeding towards the cliff. Even after the Tea Party success in the 2010 mid-term elections, the rush towards the cliff is only accelerating. Totally shut out from the legal system with no political solution in sight, what started out as an obvious question was fast becoming a national plea for men and women who had taken an oath, to stand up for the American people and live by that oath.

The Oath for Enlisted Service Members

“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

What if the orders of an illegal President are at odds with the orders of officers appointed over the enlisted?

The Oath for Officers of the US Military

“I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

Note that unlike the enlisted oath, the language requiring one to follow the orders of the President is missing from the officers’ oath. An officer has a sworn duty to the Constitution of the United States with no stated loyalty to the President of the United States, just in case we ever have a President who is himself, a domestic enemy.

When the orders of a President are at odds with the orders of the Commanding Officer, the enlisted must decide which orders to follow, which orders are legal and constitutional. While every officer is sworn to protect and defend the Constitution alone, each enlisted is faced with a dilemma – following the orders of the President, or the orders of their Commanding Officers.

Such would be the case if a domestic enemy in the White House was to ever order American troops to guns on American citizens, which is only legal in a true “state of emergency.” Of course, a domestic enemy operating from the White House, has the power to create a “state of emergency” and many are speculating these days that this is exactly what Obama and his Czars are doing.

The Oath of Congress

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

The Oath of Justices and Judges

“I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States.  So help me God.”

Once again we see that Congress, Justices and Judges do not swear any oath of loyalty to a sitting president and there is a reason for this. This is due to the three branches having separate and equal powers under the Constitution.

The Oath of Every Federal Employee

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” – 5 U.S.C. §3331

Note that every federal employee also takes a civil servants oath, not to whoever might be president at any given time, but solely to the United States Constitution. Like Military officers, there is no conflict of loyalty in their oath. They have but one obligation, and that obligation is to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, even if that enemy resides in the people’s White House.

Notice something else in common with every oath — they all end with “So help me God.”

Every member of Law Enforcement also takes a similar oath to protect and defend with no allegiance to whoever might occupy the office of president at any given time.

Violating Their Oath

Our Federal Government currently has more than 21 million employees (aka civil servants). All of them have taken one or more of the above oaths. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case.

Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime.

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.

Where are our soldiers on the matter?

A veterans groups called The Veteran Defenders of America has now answered that question. In a documented Call-to-Action titled a – A Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic – former Military and Law Enforcement Officers have come together to demand that all oath-takers immediately execute their oaths in preservation of the Constitutional Republic.

At present, every member of the Military, Law Enforcement, Justice, Congress and federal employment is in direct violation of their oaths. As they stand idly by allowing an anti-American transformation of our constitutional form of government, they do so in direct violation of the oaths they have each taken. This is not just an act which justifies their immediate removal from office — it is in fact a federal crime punishable by extreme measures.

As a result, an undisclosed number of veterans across the country have joined forces to demand that every individual who has ever taken an oath to the Constitution immediately and without reservation, begin to adhere to that oath.

They have put out an open Call-to-Action for every oath-taker and every true American patriot to join them in Washington D.C. on Veterans Day, November 11, 2011 at the Washington Monument to demonstrate the will of the people and the resolve to protect and defend our Constitution and the free Republic for which it stands.

Those who refuse to live by their oath will confirm their intent to continue violating their oaths.

As you would expect – forces in the country and in particular on the Internet have worked around the clock to keep word of the veterans’ declaration from reaching critical mass. Only a few online publications have mentioned the event and no main stream media outlet or personality has uttered a word in support of these veterans. They do this at their own peril, as John F. Kennedy stated so well years ago – “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

The veterans have set a course to peacefully restore the Constitutional Republic, going so far as to release a Code of Conduct for participants in the 11.11.11 event at the Washington Monument.

America can be protected and defended, and restored to a Constitutional Republic peacefully, but only if all oath-takers immediately begin to act on their oaths. That is a really big if…

To date, there are no signs that anyone in Washington D.C. intends to keep the oaths they have taken to the Constitution and the people of the United States. Instead, they seem quite disinterested in protecting the Constitution and are instead, directly engaged in subverting every principle and value stated in all of our founding documents.

The current call by veterans to alter that course may be the last peaceful means available to the people of the United States. After November 11, 2011 – if all oath-takers refuse to act upon those oaths, in the interest of the Constitution and the American people, there will be no peaceful solutions left to consider.

What if oath-takers refuse to keep their oaths?

The American people are key to the questions with no answers…

Thousands of participants on November 11th will have little or no real impact. But millions of participants can indeed change the course of history and they can do it peacefully if they do it soon, say, November 11th.

But once again, that’s another big if… Now that the soldiers have drawn a line in the sand and taken a firm stand, how many so-called patriots are ready to stand with them?

We will get the answer to that question on November 11, 2011. May God bless their efforts and have mercy on a people unwilling to stand with them.

Meanwhile, the veterans have established a citizen lobby opportunity where citizens can send information on their Declaration directly to elected officials at no charge. A sample copy of the message is available here and everyone can send it to your elected officials here.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:19
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Viernes, 21 de octubre de 2011
 

[UPDATE: 5:03 PM Oct. 20, 2011 -  Dianna  Cotter's report "JustiaGate" appears at Examiner.com]

New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election.  My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases.  But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite “Minor v. Happersett” as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.

Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state “Full Text of Case”, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court.

At this point, we do not know who committed these acts of sabotage.  Since neither Obama nor McCain meet the Supreme Court’s definition of a “natural-born citizen” in Minor v. Happersett, the deception might have been undertaken on behalf of either one.

Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor’s relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the “Full Text of Case”.  This is the very definition of “Orwellian” fascism.  It’s propaganda.  And there is no place for it in the United States.  The sacrifices for truth and justice which created and have sustained this nation are wantonly debased by the subversive deception emanating from Justia.com servers.

We do not know at this point if Justia personnel were behind this or if their site was hacked.  That being said, Justia’s reaction to my last report mirrored the deception of the sabotage.  Instead of addressing the proof, Justia quietly and with stealth un-scrubbed the evidence without acknowledging or addressing the issue at all.  And they placed  “.txt robots” on their URL’s for the two previously identified cases so the Wayback Machine could no longer provide historical snapshots of those cases as published at Justia.

TWO LAYERS OF SABOTAGE

In all 25 instances of tampering, the case name “Minor v. Happersett” was removed from Justia’s publication of each SCOTUS opinion which cited to it.  Anyone searching for cases citing Minor at Justia or Google were led into a maze of confusion.  In some instances, not only was the case name scrubbed, the numerical citation was also removed along with whole sentences of text.

But the deception goes deeper still.  There are three official citations for Minor. v. Happersett: 88 U.S. 162, 21 Wall. 162, and 22 L. Ed. 627.  Researchers will either search for the case by name, or by any of these three citations.  Since it is common for legal researchers to query both the name of the case and/or the official numerical citation, these opinions were tampered for both.

In Kansas v. Colorado, Kepner v. U.S., Schick v. U.S.,  and South Carolina v. U.S., the citation left behind after scrubbing was “88 U.S. 422″.  In Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, the citation left behind was 88 U.S. 448.  Minor officially begins at 88 U.S. 162 and finishes at 88 U.S. 178.  So 88 U.S. 422, and 448 are completely bogus.  (See collage of screenshots.)  The other 20 cases cite to actual pages in Minor, but not to the official citations.  While Justia linked from the bogus citations back to the first page of Minor, anyone searching for US Supreme Court cases citing Minor by querying the official citations would have been thwarted.

This further establishes that the sabotage undertaken at Justia was surgically precise.  The reality that both candidates eligibility was questionable according to Minor v. Happersett appears to have been known and handled by somebody’s legal team.  However, Justia CEO Tim Stanley was associated with “Obama For America 2008″.  (Dianna Cotter’s article will take a closer look at Tim Stanley.)

RECAP OF PREVIOUS REPORT

On July 1, 2011 I published a report: “Justia.com Caught red Handed Hiding references To Minor v. Happersett In Published US Supreme Court Opinions“.  The article featured screenshots and links to the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine which chronicled tampering with two US Supreme Court opinions, Boyd v. Nebraska and Pope v. Williams.  Both cases cite to Minor v. Happersett, the only US Supreme Court decision to directly construe the natural-born citizen clause in relation to a citizenship issue.  The Court’s unanimous opinion in Minor defines those born in the US to citizen parents as natural-born citizens:

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens.  Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”  (Emphasis added.)

McCain clearly does not meet the definition since he was born in Panama.  And since Obama’s father was never a US citizen, the current POTUS doesn’t meet the Supreme Court’s definition of a natural-born citizen either.  Minor v. Happersett has, therefore, been the subject of an intense disinformation campaign.  Falsehoods about the case have been widely spread.  The two most flagrant are:

1) that Minor was only a voting rights case – not a citizenship case – and therefore the Court’s discussion of federal citizenship was dictum and not precedent

2) that Minor was overruled by the 19th Amendment

Both criticisms are false.   Unfortunately, many of the Supreme Court cases which cite to Minor as precedent on citizenship were scrubbed by Justia along with other cases that continued citing Minor as good law on voting rights issues well after the adoption of the 19th Amendment.  As you will see from the holding in a Supreme Court opinion from 1980, the contention that Minor was overruled by the 19th Amendment is false.

PATTERN OF JUSTIA SUBTERFUGE

The tampering exhibits a very noticeable pattern.  Below, I will include screenshots as well as links to the Wayback Machine which illustrate this pattern clearly.

In most of the cases scrubbed at Justia, the Wayback Machine evidence shows that the very first snapshots taken of Justia URL’s for these cases was in 2006, with a couple of snapshots taken in early 2007.  In all of the cases, the first snapshots exhibit that Justia originally published the cases correctly as they appear in the official US Supreme Court reporters.  However, by November 2008, all 25 opinions had been sabotaged.

Some cases scrubbed the words “Minor v. Happersett” every time they appeared, and some left it in one time, but removed it in other places.  References to The Slaughterhouse Cases, Scott v. Sandford, and Osborn v. Bank of United States (citizenship cases which prove troublesome for Obama’s eligibility) were also scrubbed along with full sentences from majority opinions (as was done in Pope v. Williams), and dissents (as was done in U.S. v. Wong Km Ark).  The scrubbing was surgically precise as to the issue of POTUS eligibility.  The Wayback Machine snapshots prove that the tampering stayed in effect through the final snapshots taken in 2010.

RECAP OF MY INITIAL REPORT REGARDING “BOYD v. NEBRASKA” and “POPE v. WILLIAMS.“

After I published the first report on July 1, 2011, the Boyd and Pope cases were un-scrubbed at Justia so that Minor v. Happersett was reinstated to each opinion, and the citations were corrected.  The other 23 cases, known only to the sabateur(s), were also un-scrubbed.  Perhaps they thought nobody would ever discover the depth of the operation, because they failed to place blocking robots on the other 23 cases.  This allowed us to look back into history and see the tampering unfold for each case on the Wayback timeline.

The initial report documented that Justia.com had removed the case name, “Minor v. Happersett” from its published opinions of Boyd and Pope.  The report also documented that, in the Pope opinion at Justia, full sentences discussing Minor v. Happersett were removed thereby changing – not only the citations in the case – but also the Court’s stated opinion.

Within an hour after I published that report, Justia.com had re-instated the opinions to include the missing references to Minor and the missing text without commenting or noting the revisions.  Justia then further covered the trail of deceit by placing robots on their URL’s for Boyd v. Nebraska, and Pope v. Williams, so that access to the Wayback Machine’s snapshots is no longer possible for those cases.  (Should they now scrub the robots, here are screenshots for Justia’s Boyd and Pope opinions which show the robot blocking.)

Justia’s stated mission is as follows:

“Justia’s Mission

To advance the availability of legal resources for the benefit of society.”

Justia CEO and founder, Tim Stanley, is known as a leading light advocating for freedom of legal information on the web.  Stanley was also the founder of Findlaw, which he sold to West Publishing for $37 million.  So, what’s good for the goose should be good for the gander, and therefore Stanley is the last person who should be using robots to hide previous versions of Supreme Court cases (which are in the public domain anyway).

I haven’t spoken to Tim Stanley or anyone else at Justia.  I did not think it prudent, seeing as how Justia tried to cover their tracks after my last report, to contact them prior to releasing the rest of the evidence I gathered from the Wayback Machine.  I needed to publish before they could place robots on the URL’s for the other 23 tampered opinions.

OTHER BLOGGERS ARE COMING TO THE STORY.

Other bloggers following the developments discussed herein will be contacting Justia.com in the days ahead as this story develops.  I held back on publishing this follow-up so I could enlist the help of these other bloggers and journalists who have already viewed the evidence.  Dianna Cotter, who has published articles for Accuracy In Media and Examiner.com, has documented everything, and she has worked closely with me in the days leading up to this report.  She will publish a follow-up later today at Examiner.com.

Furthermore, whoever was responsible for placing the robots on Boyd and Pope at Justia should know that Dianna Cotter and I have forwarded and discussed the information published below with writers at The Washington Times, Accuracy In Media, Free Republic and many other publications.

I have also forwarded evidence of the tampering (screenshots, Wayback Machine URLs and downloaded HTML for each Wayback snapshot) to Cindy Simpson (who published an article yesterday at American Thinker which discusses  Minor v. Happersett).  I have also shared the evidence with attorney Mario Apuzzo who is writing an analysis of Justia’s sabotage of Wong Kim Ark, a case which was subjected to multiple instances of tampering by Justia.  (I will update my report with links to the reports of Dianna Cotter and Mario Apuzzo when they are published later today.)

I reached out to people I trusted before publishing so that all of the evidence could be documented by multiple sources, media publications and attorneys.  The evidence has been viewed and documented by so many sources now that any attempt by Justia to block it, the way that it blocked the evidence of my first report, will be futile.  This tampering happened at Justia.com.  That is a fact.  The questions which need to be answered now are who ordered it and who carried out the subversive plot.

Additionally, the US Supreme Court’s Public Information Office was forwarded the evidence.  I have personally spoken with one staffer and one official there.  Dianna Cotter has also been in contact with the SCOTUS PIO.

TAMPERING WITH OFFICIAL WRITINGS IS A CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1018.

§1018. Official certificates or writings

Whoever, being a public officer or other person authorized by any law of the United States to make or give a certificate or other writing, knowingly makes and delivers as true such a certificate or writing, containing any statement which he knows to be false, in a case where the punishment thereof is not elsewhere expressly provided by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

The statute covers a “person” authorized by any law of the US to make or give official writings.  Justia.com is authorized – according to the federal Public Domain laws – to re-publish US Supreme Court opinions.  In every case that was tampered, the words “Full Text of Case” appear on each scrubbed opinion.  Since the cases were intentionally sabotaged by the removal of text, the affirmation at the top of each page which indicated that one is reading the “Full Text of Case” is knowingly false.  It’s the inclusion of this intentionally false statement which makes this a crime under the statute.

Each of the 25 instances of tampering carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison.  There are 25 possible counts, so the saboteur(s) could potentially face serious prison time.  And there may be other relevant criminal violations as well.

FALLOUT UPON THE REST OF THE ELECTRONIC LEGAL PUBLISHING COMMUNITY

Not only were those who consulted Justia for these cases defrauded, this behavior has also cast doubt upon the entire enterprise of electronic legal publishing.  The other bloggers I have shared the evidence with are rounding up interviews with heavyweights in the legal publishing field, including West (who has previously sued Justia CEO Tim Stanley).

Furthermore, the American Association of Law Libraries (AALLNET) have been notified and are discussing the issue with Dianna Cotter.

I imagine the American Bar Association will not be pleased and that Tim Stanley, if he is behind this, could be disbarred in California and the federal courts.

LURIA v. US

Let’s begin with Luria v. US, 231 U.S. 9 (1913).  This was the first case I found after Boyd and Pope which exhibited definite tampering.  The quote which drew my attention is this:

“Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other. Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 88 U. S. 165; Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. S. 94, 112 U. S. 101; Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 22 U. S. 827.”

Here we have a direct citation to Minor v. Happersett as precedent by the Supreme Court… 15 years after Wong Kim Ark was decided.  Furthermore, voting is not mentioned anywhere in the opinion.  This is another important case which bears witness to Minor as authority on federal citizenship.  Last week, when I checked the current page for Luria at Justia, it contained the reference to Minor.

I then went to the Wayback Machine and plugged in the Justia URL for Luria.  It returned a calendar with nine snapshots of Luria ranging from Nov. 4, 2006 through April 13, 2010.  Mimicking the pattern for all 25 cases, the Nov. 4, 2006 snapshot is not tampered with.  All of the snapshots prior to the one for July 6, 2008 are also not scrubbed.  But the snapshot for July 6, 2008 has been tampered with.

“Minor v. Happersett” was removed along with the reference to “Osborn v. Bank of United States”, another important opinion in the lineage leading through Minor to Luria.

Compare the tampered July 6, 2008 version of the Justia snapshot for Luria with the Nov. 2006 version quoted above:

“Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other. Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency. 88 U. S. 165; Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. S. 94, 112 U. S. 101; 22 U. S. 827.”

Minor and Osborn are missing.  Furthermore, the remaining numerical citation does not indicate any of the three official citations for Minor, nor does the point stated in the quote appear at 88 U.S. 165.

The tampering persists in all Wayback Machine snapshots following July 6, 2008 through the final snapshot taken by the Wayback Machine on April 13, 2010.

To make the progression of the tampering with Luria v. U.S. easier to follow, I have prepared a collage of the relevant screenshots from 2006 to the present.  Additionally, here are full screenshots for each date discussed above as to the Luria tampering:

screenshot of LURIA v. U.S. on  Nov 4, 2006 – Minor and Osborn are there

screenshot of LURIA v. U.S.  on July 6, 2008 – Minor and Osborn are missing

screenshot of LURIA v. U.S. on April 13, 2010 – Minor and Osborn are still missing

LURIA as published at Justia today (October 19, 2011) – Minor and Osborn are back

................MORE

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:15
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
ditorials The Transition from Jus Soli — Obama NOT a Natural Born Citizen

The Transition from Jus Soli — Obama NOT a Natural Born Citizen »

WHAT WAS THE FOUNDERS’ DEFINITION OF “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?” by paraleaglenm, ©2011, blogging at paraleaglenm (Oct. 20, 2011) — The Transition from Jus Soli For over a century, the American colonies were limited to children born...

October 20 2011 / No comment / Read More »
Researcher Seeking Letters Sent to Congress Re:  Obama’s Eligibility

Researcher Seeking Letters Sent to Congress Re: Obama’s Eligibility »

BY CERTIFIED MAIL by Sharon Rondeau (Oct. 20, 2011) — A citizen researcher is compiling data on how many letters regarding the question of Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president have been sent to...

October 20 2011 / No comment / Read More »
Veterans and Patriots Call for Action in D.C., 11.11.11

Veterans and Patriots Call for Action in D.C., 11.11.11 »

“WE HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE” by JB Williams, ©2011 (Oct. 20, 2011) — On October 5, 2011, the following national call was released to the public – “An undisclosed number of American Veterans and former service...

October 20 2011 / No comment / Read More »

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:42
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 19 de octubre de 2011

The Im/Un/In-Abilities of Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel

CONGRESS KNOWS ABOUT HIS DECEIT YET ALLOWS HIM TO REMAIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE

by Neil Turner

Are the Democrats who propelled Obama through the primaries and to the presidency satisifed with the "hope and change" he promised?

(Oct. 19, 2011) — The IM/UN/IN-ABILITIES of Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel:

  1. INELIGIBILITY – he is unable to meet the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 ELIGIBILITY requirements of the Office of President;
  2. UN-E-VERIFIABILITY – he is unable to pass our Government’s own E-verify program with the SS # he has provided to the Nation;
  3. INABILITY – to speak intelligently without his teleprompters and the words of others placed in front of him;
  4. INSTABILITY – of mind (one has to be out of their mind to think they can commit blatant treason and usurp the Presidency – as a foreign-born Sharia promoting Muslim, and non-natural born non-US Citizen – and get away with it for 2 terms, never mind one);
  5. UN-INTELLIGIBILITY – whenever he speaks without his teleprompters, he is absolutely un-intelligible (uuuuhh; uuuuhh; uuuuhh);
  6. INCREDIBILITY – he has lied so much (it is a ‘high crime’ to lie whenever one speaks under oath of office) that he has no ‘credibility’ – worldwide – whatsoever;
  7. IMPLAUSIBILITY – his responses to any questions about his past and his origins are so implausible as to call for a willful suspension of disbelief – by a nation of complicit Zobama-bies;
  8. UNBELIEVABILITY – it is unbelievable that a ‘Christian’ (and an admitted adult ‘apostate’ of Islam) would bow to Muslim Kings, would cancel the National day of prayer, would host dinners at the White House for Muslims only, would have Muslims (whose political movement goals are the replacement of our Supreme Law with Sharia law) and other domestic terrorists on his staff, and that there would not be a fatwa of death on his head (for his ‘apostasy&rsquoGui?o by the Muslim world.

Considering the foregoing, it seems inconceivable that, but for the Conspiracy of Congress, the Supreme Court, the Judiciary, and the complicity of the Media – that this phony, this fraud, this foreign-born, Sharia promoting, usurping Muslim traitor – still sits in our White House spewing his anti-American hate and destruction.

“The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who continue to acknowledge a virtual Ghost as their lawful President & Commander in Chief.”

It is UNBELIEVABLE that we can have all these ‘presidential’ debates about how each of them can save this Nation – without addressing the INELIGIBLITY of the usurper, or even the UN-E-VERIFIABILITY of the Social Security number of the person whom they acknowledge – without question – as the leader of the ‘Free World’.

That is why the www.PatriotsUnion.org and the www.VeteranDefenders.org are converging on Washington, D.C. on 11.11.11 with their NATIONAL CALL FOR A UNITED ACTION and their DECLARATION TO RESTORE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

If you can’t make it to D.C. for this massive show of support for the restoration of our Constitution, then you can at least sign up with your financial and/or moral support.

Remember:

“With the privilege and honor of knowing of, swearing to, and living under our Constitution,
comes the responsibility and duty of defending, maintaining and adhering to it.”

In Liberty.

Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution

www.PatriotsUnion.org
www.VeteranDefenders.org

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:44
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 18 de octubre de 2011

Monday, October 17, 2011

Dr. Ron Polland: How I Made Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate

Forged creation matches Obama's birth certificate Computer generated file duplicates document released by White House Jerome CorsiThis is the first in a two-part series examining how researcher Ron...

Judge Lamberth Kills Taitz v Astrue and Taitz v Ruemmler Killing November Hearing in Hawaii

Judge Lamberth Kills Both Taitz v Astrue and Taitz v Ruemmler Killing The November Court Hearing in Hawaii Taitz v Astrue - Memorandum and Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration - Obama's Social Security...


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:55
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
S?bado, 15 de octubre de 2011

Dear Congressmen: Does the Constitution Matter?

“A FULLY TYPED FORGERY”

October 15, 2011

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a certified copy of Obama's original Hawaii birth certificate. There is no embossed seal and the word "THE" is misspelled as "TXE" in the registrar's stamp.

Dear Editor:

This is a letter that I am sending to my two Senators (Rubio and nelson) and Representative (West). I don’t expect any responses.

I realize that you, and Congress, have no interest in addressing the matters of Obama’s ineligibility, fraudulent use of a SSN and allowing two forged birth documents to be posted on line. Nevertheless, I will just share the following which is so typical of the treatment received by attornies trying to get a court to hear the plethora of evidence supporting these claims. (Actually, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments back on May 2, 2011, but has yet to render a decision. What do you suppose is taking them so long?)

Remember back in January 2011 when Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie said he would settle the dispute over Obama’s birth certificate by doing the research himself? Well, he tried and all he could come up with was, “something written down in the archives” and concluded that “there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii.” Surely the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) knew that he was making this search so why didn’t they just tell him that they have it but can’t release it because of privacy? Then there was Tim Adams, the senior Hawaii elections worker who has sworn by affidavit that, according to his supervisors (and Gov. Abercrombie) there is no Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama. And we musn’t forget former HDOH Director, Chiyome Fukino, who said that she had seen Obama’s birth certificate and that it is “half written and half typed.” Then came the big day on Apr. 27, 2011 when Obama showed the world his birth document – A FULLY TYPED FORGERY.

I should also include the Hawaiian birth certificates of the Nordyke twins, Gretchen and Susan, born on Aug. 5, 1961, and whose certificate numbers (10637, 10638) were lower than  Obama’s certficate number (10641), yet he was born one day before them on Aug. 4, 1961. How does Obama get a higher number being born a day earlier?

In the District Court of Hawaii, on Oct. 12, 2011, attorney Orly Taitz sued to have Obama’s “vault sealed” birth certificate produced for comparison with the one he showed the world last April. She was also prepared to produce evidence showing that “expert after expert” examined Obama’s birth certificate and that every one of them concluded it is a forgery. The attorney arguing for Obama, Jill Nagamine, told the court that the new Director of HDOH, Loretta Fuddy, has “verified” that Obama’s BC is on record. That was the substance of her argument. So the American people only need to trust Director Fuddy and take her word that Obama’s fully typed and forged birth certificate does exist in the HDOH records. And what was Judge Nishimura’s ruling? “Case dismissed!”

Is Congress to stand idly by again and allow Obama to run for re-election without bringing up his ineligibility and criminal acts? Does the Constitution matter?

Orly Taitz has two more cases pending (Taitz v Astrue – CV-11-00402/Taitz v. Ruemmler 1:11-cv-01​421). I see no reason to expect justice from these either.

Sincerely,

J. Black

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 20:36
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Viernes, 14 de octubre de 2011

CDR Kerchner's Blog

October 13, 2011

Forger-in-Chief Obama Strikes Again: AP Story – Ex-Indiana Guv: That’s Not My Signature on Obama Ballot Petition | @ BirtherReport.com

,

Click on Image for the Evidence

Forger-in-Chief Obama Strikes Again: AP Story – Ex-Indiana Guv: That’s Not My Signature on Obama Ballot Petition | @ BirtherReport.com

Read the full story here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/10/forger-in-chief-strikes-again-ex.html

See evidence Obama is using an SSN not legally issued to him: Obama Social Security Number (SSN) Fraudulent

See evidence Obama forged his birth certificate posted on White House servers 27 Apr 2011: Obama Birth Certificate & Other Docs Forged – Expert Reports

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas

Audio Revealed: U.S. Congress Rep. Posey Spokesman: Media Ridicule Stopping Us From Addressing Obama’s Identity Fraud | by Al Hendershot | @ BirtherReport.com

 

What has happened to our Constitution and the Rule of Law? Why is all of Congress a bunch of Cowards and Appeasers?

Audio Revealed: U.S. Congress Rep. Posey Spokesman: Media Ridicule Stopping Us From Addressing Obama’s Identity Fraud | by Al Hendershot | @ BirtherReport.com

Listen to the audio recording link below revealing why … the entire U.S. Congress refuses to enforce the Rule of Law and the U.S. Constitution in regards to prosecuting Obama for his criminal fraud activities before and after he entered the White House. They are afraid to even call for an investigation because someone in the major media might ridicule them.  The poor babies in the entire U.S. Congress are being hog tied by Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals rule #5, fear of ridicule.  Can you believe that?  Suspend the Rule of Law in our nation and the U.S. Constitution because you are afraid you might be criticized in the press for launching an investigation into the SSN fraud, real estate transaction and tax fraud, forging a birth certificate, and identity theft fraud by Obama before and during his entry into the Oval Office. What has our ‘nation of laws and not men’ turned into? We have vain cry babies for leaders in the Congress. Shame on them. What despicable examples of leaders they are! Listen for yourself and find out about the cowards and appeasers of criminals and bullies our elected officials have turned into.  Does Obama have dirt on all of them?  Is there not an honest and brave man or woman left in Congress? Listen for yourself here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/10/rep-posey-spokesman-media-ridicule.html and http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/spokesperson-for-congressman-bill-posey-r-fl-admits-they-fear-media-ridicule-about-obama-eligibility/

See evidence Obama is using an SSN not legally issued to him: Obama Social Security Number (SSN) Fraudulent

See evidence Obama committed real estate transaction and tax fraud with the property he allegedly owns and lives in when in Chicago IL:  http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/09/foia-release-al-hendershot-video-promo.html and http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/10/audio-revealed-cook-county-deeds-office.html

See evidence Obama forged his birth certificate posted on White House servers 27 Apr 2011: Obama Birth Certificate & Other Docs Forged – Expert Reports

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas

Audio Revealed: Cook County Deeds Office Confirms Tax fraud In Obama/Rezko Land Deal | by Al Hendershot | @ BirtherReport.com


 

Click for Evidence of Real Estate and Tax Fraud by Obama

Audio Revealed: Cook County Deeds Office Confirms Tax fraud In Obama/Rezko Land Deal | by Al Hendershot | @ BirtherReport.com

Listen to the audio here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/10/audio-revealed-cook-county-deeds-office.html

See evidence Obama is using an SSN not legally issued to him: Obama Social Security Number (SSN) Fraudulent

See evidence Obama forged his birth certificate posted on White House servers 27 Apr 2011: Obama Birth Certificate & Other Docs Forged – Expert Reports

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas

 

October 12, 2011

Congressional Staffers Fail to Respond to Constituent’s Request for Meeting on Obama’s Social Security Fraud | @ ThePostEmail.com


 

Click on Image for the Evidence

Congressional Staffers Fail to Respond to Constituent’s Request for Meeting on Obama’s Social Security Fraud. She is now an accessory after the fact. | @ ThePostEmail.com

Read all the details here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/12/congressional-staffers-fail-to-respond-to-constituents-request-for-meeting-on-obamas-social-security-fraud/

See the evidence Obama is using an SSN not legally issued to him: Obama Social Security Number (SSN) Fraudulent

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

 

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:39
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

This Is How I See It

 

WHAT ARE OBAMA’S SUPPORTERS DEFENDING?

by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet

Is this the flag of Obama's birth country?

(Oct. 13, 2011) — Let’s say I’m legally in contention to be the next President and someone accuses me of being born in Kenya. My response would be to inform the uninformed that my mother never had the honor of visiting Kenya. And what do you think the accuser says next? That I was born in Kenya.

Through some sort of freak accident, all the stars align to make the 2012 election honest and everyone writes in “OPOVV” for their choice of Federal Employee Number One. And then we hear rumblings of ineligibility because of the “possibility” of my having been born in Kenya, which I and all of my supporters TOTALLY IGNORE because, after all, we all know that my mother never had the honor of visiting Kenya. There’s also talk of having multiple Social Security cards and aliases, and never having served a day in the United States military, which I and all of my supporters TOTALLY IGNORE because we all know that I’ve used only one name, had the same Social Security card all of my life, and have an Honorable Discharge from the United States Military.

As a matter of fact, not one of my supporters wastes his time and energy with frivolous nonsense. There is not one website backing my claim to be qualified, eligible, legal, native and natural born. Not one website questioning where my parents were born, and not one website questioning my time in foreign countries while in the military. Not one.

My family tree is not even questioned. I’m half Norwegian from my mother, and Scottish, English and Cherokee from my father.  Both were born in the good old U.S.A; one in Montana, the other in Washington State. And, you guessed it, there’s not one website supporting my claim, because the Truth needs no support.  Get it?

So why all these websites supporting Obama? Why have even one? I don’t need even a little website supporting my claims, because the Truth is irrefutable, without question, and that’s the way it is.

And these attacks on the websites that question Obama’s eligibility: if he were telling the truth there would be no need for any of them, now would there? Showing not one but two birth certificates? What’s that all about, except when you weave a lie…

So, looking at the falsehoods stated by Obama, one only has to look at his supporters and see how they respond. If you said to one of my supporters that I never took the Oath to the Constitution or that I never tested the firing mechanisms on nuclear warheads, which required a Top Secret clearance, they would TOTALLY IGNORE you, wouldn’t they?

I’m telling you they would, and so would I. We’re going to get one shot at getting our country (meaning our Constitution) back without bloodshed. The other side will lie and cheat and steal the election as they did with Al Franken’s senatorial seat in Minnesota.  Unless we stick together as citizens who believe in equality and Civil Rights, and in the dignity of all men and women who cherish freedom and the knowledge of what it took to achieve those freedoms, we will not win back our birthright.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:10
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Presidential Candidate Will Challenge Obama’s Eligibility

 

“A MALIGNANT CANCER CALLED ‘CAREER POLITICS’”

by Sharon Rondeau

John A. Dummett and wife Karmi live in Foresthill, CA

(Oct. 13, 2011) — The Post & Email recently learned of a presidential candidate who plans to challenge the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of President of the United States.  Mr. John A. Dummett of Forest Hill, CA is running as a Republican and describes himself as “conservative to the core” and “a constitutional conservative.”  He advocates abolishing the Internal Revenue Service and repealing the Sixteenth Amendment, upon which The Post & Email has reported previously and which has been described as a “powerful criminal conspiracy.”

Mr. Dummett was a guest on an internet radio broadcast entitled “Restoring America” on several occasions.  He has also been a guest on Paul Revere Radio and Radio Liberty.  Dummett told The Post & Email that he will again be a guest on the Paul Revere Radio show hosted by Rick Johnson and will also be appearing on Dr. James David Manning’s show, The Manning Report, in the near future.

Dummett stated that his primary goal is “to restore the Constitution to its original form and intent and to return power to the States where it rightfully belongs.”  He believes that “We the People are the only entity out there that can accomplish this.”

Regarding the Obama eligibility question, Dummett said, “The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has tentatively said by dicta that a registered candidate for President of the United States would have standing in a federal court to force Obama to produce a document we all know he possibly cannot.”

Dummett told us that he had not been involved in politics until the 2008 presidential election.  For his campaign, he has developed a list of 28 principles with accompanying essays which reflect his views of the Founding Fathers’ beliefs and intents when drafting the U.S. Constitution and emphasize Dummett’s assertion that the people were intended to hold the power over elected officials.

We asked, and Mr. Dummett answered, the following questions:

Q.  Given what you’ve said about your apolitical status up until recently, what made you file as a presidential candidate, and why do you think you are qualified?

President Ronald Reagan served two terms from 1980 to 1988 (Photo courtesy of Morganzilla.com)

A. For as long as I can remember, I had always wanted to get involved in politics. When I was in the sixth grade, our class took a field trip to Sacramento, which is the state capital of California. Ronald Reagan was the governor. When we got to the Capitol building, a friend and I slipped away from the rest of the group to do a little exploring on our own. Back in the sixties, security was not like it is today. My pal and I walked into what we thought was an empty room. It wasn’t. We had actually walked into an office being used by Ronald Reagan. For around twenty minutes Ronald Reagan spoke with us and asked us questions about what we wanted to do when we grew up and other questions about how we understood what government was all about. Our teacher finally hunted us down and we did get in hot water, but we got to have a once-in-a-lifetime experience talking with Ronald Reagan one-on-one. I believe from that moment on, I considered myself a Conservative Republican inasmuch as I understood what conservatism was. As far as wanting to be a Republican in my mind at that age, republicanism equates with representative government. How much I have learned over the years.

The events that actually made me decide to run for actual office occurred during the election of 2008. Several years prior to that I was slowly coming to the conclusion that the People were no longer being represented. The candidates the Republicans and Democrats put up for us to vote for did not seem to differ much in the vision they had for America. I was completely convinced that the two major parties were part of an oligarchy. To this oligarchy it was more important to remain in power than to do what was best for the United States.

I watched the 2008 Presidential election very closely. I was extremely disappointed when I learned that John McCain was going to be the choice of the Republican Party to run for President. I pointed out earlier that representation of the People was taking a seat farther back in the bus. The candidates the parties were offering were becoming weaker as leaders and more of the type of person who could be easily controlled by the party. As far as I was concerned, John McCain was not the strongest candidate out there for the Conservatives. But like the last few Presidencies after Ronald Reagan, the pool that I considered strong patriotic candidates was progressively getting weaker. It always seemed as if I was voting for the lesser of the two evils instead of voting for the best candidate. My opinion was solidified when McCain nominated Sarah Palin. At fist I thought to myself, “Palin who?”  The first couple of speeches she gave, I thought she sounded okay, but then the gaffes started coming out and it was clear as a bell that the duo the Republican Party was promoting was an exercise in futility. I did resign myself to support McCain and Palin because there was no way on Earth that I was not going to exercise my franchise.

I then turned my attention to the Democratic nomination process. At the time the most recognizable candidate out there in my mind was Hillary Clinton. I did perceive that the Democratic nominee would be between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. One day I was watching some news coverage of Hillary Clinton at a campaign stop. A statement she made piqued my interest. What she said, and I am paraphrasing:  “Barack Obama was not eligible to be President.”  To me, words mean things as they should to everyone. What amazed me was that very few people picked up on the word which Hillary used. She used “not eligible” as opposed to “not qualified.” To me, this meant that Barack Obama did not meet the eligibility requirements to be President.

While attending San Diego State University for fun, I took several 500-level courses in Constitutional History. These courses dealt primarily with Constitutional Law, so I was familiar with Article II, Section I, Clause V in which the eligibility requirements are spelled out for President of the United States. After making sure I heard what I did and saw what Barack Obama was doing to prevent anyone from obtaining access to any record that could shine any light on his eligibility status, I came to the conclusion that the Democratic Party was considering allowing an unqualified person to seek the White House.

Why was Obama the Democrat candidate for president when there were questions about his constitutional eligibility which have never been addressed?

I started to dig into the background of Barack Obama, and the more I researched, the more I became convinced that Obama was not eligible to be President of the United States. This would not have scared me so much except that it was becoming obvious that Obama was going to be the nominee of the Democratic Party.  After Obama won, it was perfectly clear that a real-life Manchurian Candidate had been elected. The poor performance of John McCain in running against Obama led me to believe that not only did McCain have no interest in winning the Presidency, but by the actions of the Republican Party, neither did they.

After witnessing what I consider to be a bloodless coup in the election of 2008, I found myself no longer being able to sit on the sidelines and continue voting for the lesser of two evils. I understood that the government which I thought represented the People of the United States no longer existed, and if our original form of government was ever going to be restored, the restoration would never be undertaken by the oligarchy that actually rules this nation. Being elected to Congress would not do because a Congressman must serve many years to gain the power needed to cause change. If the Constitution of the United States is ever going to be restored to its original form and intent, and power returned to the States where it rightfully belongs, the Presidency must be won. The Presidency does not have to compete with 99 other Senators to get the job done. Because of this reason I know the only way our nation stands a chance of righting the wrongs perpetrated by self-interested politicians in Washington is to be elected to the White House. There I can use the Bully Pulpit and go right to the people with all the issues that threaten this nation’s sovereignty, freedom and liberty. This is where Ronald Reagan’s influence comes into play, for any time Ronald Reagan could not get Congress to see that it was not acting in the best interests of the People of the United States, he went directly to the People to plead his case. Even a Congress controlled by an oligarchy has no defense to thwart the will of 330,000,000 American patriots.

Q.  What is your current occupation?

A. My current occupation is with the State of California, Department of Fish and Game. I am a Staff Programmer Analyst. My primary job is to build business applications which allow the state of California to monitor and oversee its natural resources. The work I do ensures that no foreign nation can come within our territorial waters and consume our ocean resources as if they were vacuuming a dirty rug. The applications I build also monitor the use of our natural resources to help determine their best use and to procure ways which will ensure that those resources will be sustainable, healthy and available for future Californians and citizens of the United States of America to enjoy.

Q.  When did you first hear of the questions surrounding Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the presidency?  What actions did you take, if any, in that regard?

A. I answered this question in part in question one. What I can add here is to tell you what my intentions are in regard to exposing Barack Obama for what he is and what he is not.

In early May of this year, Orly Taitz and Gary Kreep appeared in court attempting to force the eligibility issue surrounding the election of Barack Obama. Orly is trying to connect the illegal use of a dead person’s social security number to Barack Obama. What Orly fails to realize is there are only two entities which can show harm and therefore gain standing in federal court to charge Obama with a crime. The first it the actual dead person who used to own the social security number in question. I am sure you can see that this is a dead end, pardon the pun. The other entity which could gain standing is the Social Security Administration (SSA) itself. Considering that it is the President of the United States who appoints the head of the Social Security Administration, the chances of its bringing charges against Barack Obama are even lower than a dead man doing so.

Gary Kreep is pursuing Obama in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by representing Wiley Drake and Alan Keyes. It is Mr. Kreep’s contention that Drake and Keyes have standing because they were harmed in the last election because Barack Obama was not eligible to be President in the first place. The courts threw out the case because the People had already spoken and a President was elected. What is interesting is what the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said in dicta. The court has actually rendered a tentative opinion that a currently registered Federal Elections Commission candidate for President would have standing to force Barack Obama to produce a document which we all know he can’t possibly produce.

Image claimed by Obama and the White House to be a certified copy of his original birth certificate. To date, no one has authenticated it.

The long-form birth certificate that Obama wagged in our faces on national television is a fraudulent document. I am a computer programmer with over twenty years of experience in building computer applications, and just by glancing at the document presented on national television, I could see it was an obvious fake. With the tentative dicta opinion of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals working on my side, a nationally-known “birther attorney,” who must remain anonymous for the moment, has agreed to represent me in federal court to force Barack Obama to produce any and all documents that can prove that he is even a citizen of the United States, let alone eligible to be President of the United States. Several ardent supporters of mine have come together to raise the necessary court costs that my case will incur. The site is independent of my political campaign and any donations are completely separated from my campaign donations. They will be specifically used to the penny to pay for the incidental court costs in going after Obama’s exposure as being a usurper. I am the only registered FEC Presidential candidate who is openly calling on the exposure of a usurper, and once exposed, to also call for the indictment, arrest, trial and conviction of Barack Obama whom I consider a usurper and ineligible to be President of the United States. If this is accomplished, the election of 2008 will be null and void, and every law, executive order, appointment or international treaty will also be null and void.

I have stood up and said that I will risk life and limb to restore our Constitution to its original form and intent and will return power to the States where it actually belongs. I will also restore the balance of power among the three branches of government and finally do what every elected official in this nation is supposed to do, which is to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States and to represent the People of the United States as our Founding Fathers had intended it to be.

Q. Do you think most Americans are aware that there is a question about Obama’s qualifications under Article II?

A. It is my opinion that the majority of the American people are aware that there is a Presidential eligibility problem with Barack Obama. However, the mainstream media are willing accomplices with the oligarchy that rules this nation by obfuscating what the truth is surrounding his ineligibility.  Obama and his handlers have done a great job in prevaricating the truth. Unfortunately, most Americans are interested in politics only when we are actually in the process of electing the people who are to lead this nation. The rest of the time they do not care to be bothered. Every single elected and appointed official in this country is too vested in the fraud to do the right thing by exposing Obama as a usurper and nullifying the election of 2008................MORE


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:02
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Jueves, 13 de octubre de 2011

Summary of the hearing and actually fair and balanced reporting on FOX HI –KHON 2 at 5 and 6pm evening news, FOX showed the judge totally biased and dumb

Posted on | October 12, 2011 | 7 Comments

Summary of the hearing and actually fair and balanced reporting on FOX HI –KHON 2 at 5 and 6pm evening news, FOX  showed the judge totally biased and dumb

Today at the hearing it was clear that Judge Nishimura was under marching orders to dismiss the cas,e but give it an impression of a hearing on the merits and some impartiality. She stated, that she will  hear the case on the merits. Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagaminre, whose husband, Todao Nagamine,  is reportedly Obama’s family attorney (he handled his sister’s divorce from her fist husband) argued the same old shpil, that I can’t get  any disclosure of records, because I don’t have any tangible interest. She kept going on again and again and the judge kept nodding and agreeing with her.

When my turn came, I quickly responded that this whole song and dance with the tangible interest is completely irrelevant to my case, as I am not asking for any disclosure and I don’t need to show any tangible interest.

I showed them different provisions in their state law, that showed, that as an attorney with a case, where the certified copy is at issue, I am entitled to get verification of the documents on file in lieu of the certified copy provided. At that point both the judge and the Deputy Attorney General were bewildered and were thrown out of the loop. They were completely unprepared for this argument.

Nagamine scrambled to come up with something and she came up with the stupidest excuse. She said that the state of HI verifies documents with only 2 words: yes or no, meaning that the document is yes, in records or no, not in records. And they verified and said yes regarding Obama’s records.

I asked to provide rebuttal and stated that he fact that the state even argues this point is completely despicable. I stated, that I provided affidavits and statements from expert, after expert, after expert, all of whom attested to the fact, that the document posted by Mr. Obama on line is a  forgery. So, what Ms. Nagamine is stating, is that the state official can provide a clear forgery and defraud 311 American citizens and the only thing the state of HI will do, is have the same official state, that “yes, the document is on file” and that constitutes verification, which means that anyone can issue any forgery in HI.

The whole hearing lasted for an hour. I provided them with rule after rule after rule from HI codes, showing that they are required to allow inspection of the original in lieu of the certified copy. (I ordered the transcript) and will post it, when it is ready, you will have the whole argument.

Also, FOX had their camera in the jury box and it was pointed at me.  They recorded the whole hour, but showed small clips at 5pm and a longer clip at 6pm.

Their choice of material for this evening prime time report was very telling. First, they showed me telling the judge:’ Your Honor, I provided in my complaint statements of expert, after expert, after expert stating that what Mr. Obama posted on the internet, is a forgery”

Then they show Nagamine, who argued: “Your Honor, the state verified he records already. If you were to ask the state, whether Obama was born here, they would state –yes”

They finished the clip  by saying that after an hour of argument the judge ended by saying 8 words: motion    by the state to dismiss the case is granted. This report clearly shows the public, that the judge is biased and unreasonable. She was told to weigh the evidence. She had on one hand multiple affidavits of experts, saying it is a forgery,  on the other hand she had one word “yes” from Fuddy, an official who released this forgery, and the judge is agreeing with Fuddy,

FOX is clearly showing the judge to be either corrupt or dumb. It was shown twice in prime time news in HI and millions of people saw it.

After the hearing I gave an interview for channel 8. The judge allowed only 1 camera in the courtroom, so I gave channel 8 interview after the hearing.

Afterwards I went to the  clerk’s office, ordered the transcript, later I went to the Federal court, court of Appeals and the Health department. Emergency submission to the court of Appeals will be posted within a few days. More subpoenas will  be coming.

From stress and jet lag and nerves, I did not sleep for 2 nights. I will need to get some rest,  as I have to be up at 5 am tomorrow.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:30
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Will the Obama Syndicate Ever be Held Responsible for its Crimes?

   

ALL OF THE TRAITORS MUST GO

by Sher Zieve, ©2011

David Ogden is faux Deputy Attorney General under Eric Holder

(Oct. 12, 2011) — With the exception of Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), no one from the GOP side of the aisle seems to really care about the crimes that have been and continue to be committed by Obama and his syndicate.  Instead, Congress–itself–has established its own unconstitutional “Super Congress” of twelve which essentially does away with representation of WE-the-People.  Does anyone still remember “taxation without representation” that sparked the first “Tea Party?”  In this way, Congress is either joining the Obama dictatorship or has formed its own totalitarian challenge to it.  Either way, both Obama and the US Congress have now established their own versions of anti-Republic government.  Like all petulant and/or undisciplined children, they will continue unless we–the adults–stop them.  The Obama syndicate crimes, however, are escalating at a frightening pace.

The Most Criminal Regime in US History

The Obama-led administration (aka the Obama syndicate) appears to be–by far–the most rogue and lawless (by design and original intent of the perpetrators) ever attributed to “leaders” of the United States Government.  This regime refuses to follow–let alone uphold–any US law (including Constitutional law) that it doesn’t like; specifically those that would stop its purpose of completely overthrowing and destroying the US Republic.  Note:  It is being effected–with vigor by our oppressors–as I write this.

Two huge scandals with likely provable criminal intent and application by Obama and his syndicate have been exposed.  Bear in mind there are dozens of others, which I have covered in previous columns.  Most recently, however, Holder and Obama were caught with their proverbial pants down regarding the Obama-ordered “Operation Gunwalker:  Fast and Furious” program.  The program was set up and implemented with the sole intention of blaming US citizens for gun traffic to the Mexican drug cartels and, then, placing restrictions of the US Constitution’s Second Amendment.  An unarmed population is a submissive population.  In reality and fact, however, the Obama government actually forced US gun shops to sell weapons to drug cartel members and this same ObamaGov actually and clandestinely partnered with the Sinaloa drug cartel!  In an 8 October article, Los Angeles Times reporter Richard A. Serrano wrote:  “These Fast and Furious guns were going to Sinaloans, and they are killing everyone down there,” said one knowledgeable U.S. government source, who asked for anonymity because of the ongoing investigations. “But that’s only how many we know came through Texas. Hundreds more had to get through.”

“Torres Marrufo, also known as “the Jaguar,” has been identified by U.S. authorities as the enforcer for Sinaloa cartel chieftain Joaquin “Chapo” Guzman. The Fast and Furious weapons were found at one of Torres Marrufo’s homes April 30 when Mexican police inspected the property. It was unoccupied but “showed signs of recent activity,” they said.”

Question:  Were there also kickbacks to Obama & Co by the drug cartels?  Considering what has occurred, the question is a highly legitimate one and should be asked by members of the “mainstream“ media.

One of the central problems with Fast and Furious is that it was established by Obama in 2009 and the media refused to report on that fact then–and still refuses to do so now.  For months, I have been reporting on a 24 March 2009 C-SPAN 2 video made of Deputy Attorney General David Ogden, in which he identifies Obama and Holder as the driving forces behind the “Gunwalker“ (then called “gunrunner&ldquoGui?o program and calls it “a new and aggressive plan.”  The video, until recently when it was finally mentioned on another conservative site, was ignored and still appears to be ignored by most of the US Congress.  This Obama-Holder program caused the death of, most notably, USBP Agent Brian Terry and countless Mexican citizens.  Recently subpoenas were prepared to be sent to US Attorney General Eric Holder for him to again testify before the House Judiciary Committee.  However, in a move that sounds suspiciously like the movie “Wag the Dog,” Holder chose Tuesday, 11 October to announce the thwarting of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi Arabian Ambassador (arrests were made in September) within the confines of the USA.  An attempt to divert or at least cool down the negative attention surrounding Holder’s patently criminal activities?  You decide.

Then, of course, there are the money laundering and “redistribution-of-stolen-taxpayer-money-to-the-Marxist-Democrats-and-their-friends” slush fund ventures.  Note:  Recently, even Rush Limbaugh noted this money laundering.  The way you ask?  Why…Green Energy projects!  Bogus “environmentalism” and “green projects” are merely Marxist inventions (environmentalism is mentioned as a conquest-of-the-people tool in both the Communist Manifesto and Communist Goals [for America] 1963) to steal from the middle and lower classes and “redistribute” to the ruling classes.  And, Obama is doing it.  Solyndra is a prime example of this and there are more of these fake companies on the way as Obama continues to ignore his uncovered crimes and to fund (with taxpayer money) even more ludicrous “green energy” shell companies in order to fatten his and his friends’ wallets and purses.  Suffice it to say, ALL of the Solyndra executives have claimed the Fifth Amendment and refuse to testify (or at least answer any posed questions) before Congress.  The company received over half a billion dollars in ObamaGov loans and–guess what–the California Democrat Party is listed as one of its creditors (not the US taxpayer from which the money was appropriated) and will be paid if there is any money to be found!  Note:  I suspect it has been well-hidden.  Obama’s hands are all over this one, too.

To say that the Obama syndicate is the most corrupt and criminal in US history is to minimize what it is actually doing.  Obama and his band of Marxist-Leninist marauders are doing no less than overthrowing the country–and they have been effecting it since they usurped power.  As I have been writing for years now, the Obama regime is completely lawless.   Yet, Congress has done little to nothing to stop him.  Instead, its members strongly seem to have joined him in his efforts.  Unless we rid ourselves of all of the traitors–on both sides of the aisle–and place strict Constitutionalists in office, the USA will not be revived.  And until we remember and again openly recognize who placed us here, We-the-People will continue to be even more forcibly enslaved.  It is what it is.

Isaiah 3:5  “And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.”

Jeremiah 33:3  “Call unto me, and I will answer thee, and show thee great and mighty things, which thou knowest not.”

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:26
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Video: Fox News' Hawaii KHON-2 News Report; Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuit Dismissed

Video: Fox News' Hawaii Affiliate KHON-2 News Report; Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuit Dismissed. VIDEO HERE Summary of the hearing and actually fair and balanced reporting on FOX HI –KHON 2 at 5/6pm...

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Rep. Posey Spokesman: Media Ridicule Stopping Us From Addressing Obama's Identity Fraud

Congressman Bill Posey Spokesman Admits Media Ridicule Stopping Them From Addressing Obama's Social Security Number Fraud, Failed E-Verify, Etc....Audio Revealed: Albert E. Hendershot; Well my friends,...

Audio Revealed: Cook County Deeds Office Confirms Tax fraud In Obama/Rezko Land Deal

Audio Revealed: Cook County Recorder of Deeds Office Confirms Tax fraud In Obama/Rezko Land Deal. VIDEO HEREBackground and Related Research By Albert Hendershot Can Be Found Here: Skip Tracer Al Hendershot...

Hawaii Judge Rhonda Nishimura Dismisses Taitz v. Fuddy/Hawaii DOH Lawsuit

We received several messages this afternoon by email and comments that attorney Orly Taitz's case in Hawaii 'Taitz v. Fuddy' was dismissed by Judge Rhonda Nishimura during today's hearing.This post will...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:20
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 12 de octubre de 2011

Woman denied request to see Obama's birth certificate

Reported by: Jai Cunningham
Updated: 11:12 am
A woman who has been seeking to inspect President Barack Obama's original birth certificate has run into another road block.

Circuit Court Judge Rhonda Nishimura granted the state's motion to dismiss a request by Dr. Orly Taitz to see that certificate.

The state says it has verified that the president's birth certificate is real.

Last spring the White House released that document to the public.

Taitz alleges the online release is a forgery.

She has appealed denials to federal court before, and everywhere she has turned she has been denied.

Taitz, along with other so called "birthers", believe President Obama was not born in America. President Obama's father was from Kenya, his mother is from Hawaii.

Taitz is not alone in making a claim like this other more high profile people like Donald Trump have even brought the subject up in public.

Jai Cunningham will have more on this story tonight on the KHON2 News at Five and Six.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:32
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 11 de octubre de 2011
 

The Bum's On The Ropes... But Will Obama Go Down For The Count?

Things aren’t looking too good for our antipresident: his popularity is down, the economy is in the toilet, his popularity is down, and his popularity is down.

Taking down the economy was planned, but his popularity being down is really bad for a narcissist and imitation savior.

An article in Sunday’s New York Post said members of Soetoro/Obama’s cabinet have little “face time” with him and are left out of decision making, while his “work days” end as early as 4 PM.

But is there more to it than his apparently being in over his head? I say apparently because the peril our nation is in is the direct result of the good work he has been doing for his real employer, Rothschild, in taking America down.

Michael Goodwin, author of that New York Post article says the reports about Obama “paint a picture of an isolated man trapped in a collapsing presidency.” Well, he may be isolated and his presidency is collapsing, but he has been a willing accomplice doing far more than driving the banksters’ get-away car.

And there are other things going on that mainlie media glosses over or ignores. Eric Holder’s perjury in the congressional investigation of “Fast & Furious” and word of subpoenas coming from Darrell Issa’s committee to find out “who knew what and when?” about federal gun (and drug running) has shades of Watergate and “what did the President know and when did he know it?” all over it.

Then, there is the court hearing in Hawaii, tomorrow, against Director of Health Fuddy and Registrar Onaka in Taitz v Fuddy/Onaka about the forged birth certificate which mainlie media ignores. There is also Orly Taitz pursuit of Obama regarding the stolen social security number he is using, and more.

Does Barry boy know his days are numbered, even before the 2012 election more than a year away? And does he get suicidal, thinking about things such as prison?

Yes, it looks as if this bum is on the ropes, so let’s not forget to give him a helping hand. I mean, it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

 

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:14
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
 

The Bum's On The Ropes... But Will Obama Go Down For The Count?

Things aren’t looking too good for our antipresident: his popularity is down, the economy is in the toilet, his popularity is down, and his popularity is down.

Taking down the economy was planned, but his popularity being down is really bad for a narcissist and imitation savior.

An article in Sunday’s New York Post said members of Soetoro/Obama’s cabinet have little “face time” with him and are left out of decision making, while his “work days” end as early as 4 PM.

But is there more to it than his apparently being in over his head? I say apparently because the peril our nation is in is the direct result of the good work he has been doing for his real employer, Rothschild, in taking America down.

Michael Goodwin, author of that New York Post article says the reports about Obama “paint a picture of an isolated man trapped in a collapsing presidency.” Well, he may be isolated and his presidency is collapsing, but he has been a willing accomplice doing far more than driving the banksters’ get-away car.

And there are other things going on that mainlie media glosses over or ignores. Eric Holder’s perjury in the congressional investigation of “Fast & Furious” and word of subpoenas coming from Darrell Issa’s committee to find out “who knew what and when?” about federal gun (and drug running) has shades of Watergate and “what did the President know and when did he know it?” all over it.

Then, there is the court hearing in Hawaii, tomorrow, against Director of Health Fuddy and Registrar Onaka in Taitz v Fuddy/Onaka about the forged birth certificate which mainlie media ignores. There is also Orly Taitz pursuit of Obama regarding the stolen social security number he is using, and more.

Does Barry boy know his days are numbered, even before the 2012 election more than a year away? And does he get suicidal, thinking about things such as prison?

Yes, it looks as if this bum is on the ropes, so let’s not forget to give him a helping hand. I mean, it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

 

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:07
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
S?bado, 08 de octubre de 2011

 

Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Birth Certificate: Fox News Will Be In Attendance

Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Missing Birth Certificate: Fox News Reporter Will Be In Attendance

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YMs6zPz6CeI/To9cey5IwpI/AAAAAAAADcg/E62qlBDHNDk/s1600/aFUDDY_HDOH.jpg

From attorney Orly Taitz: Update! My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am. If you are a resident of Honolulu or if you are visiting Honolulu on October 12th and you are a supporter of mine, please, come to the hearing to support me. First circuit court of HI, Judge Rhonda Nishimura, 777 Punchbowl str., Honolulu, HI, October 12th 8:30 am.

This case was filed against the registrar Alvin Onaka and Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, seeking access to the original birth certificate of Barack Obama for expert examination.

If you are a tea party member in HI, please, relate this message to the Tea Party members, Republican party members or any decent resident of HI, who wants the truth and justice to prevail. Please, relate this message to the local media.

FOX reporter will be in the courtroom during October 12th hearing in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com

All related court filings and news reports for the Taitz v Fuddy lawsuit can be found here and here.
Taitz v Fuddy - Hawaii Circuit Court - Opposition to Motion to Dismiss - 9/30/2011


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:44
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Viernes, 07 de octubre de 2011

Friday, October 7, 2011

Unreleased 'Never Vetted' Book, Natural Born Citizen Chapter Released for Free Download

Unreleased 'Never Vetted' Book, Natural Born Citizen Chapter Released for Free Download & Distribution FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE…October 6, 2011The author, CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired, has released...

Thursday, October 6, 2011

New York State Board of Elections Blocking Access To Natural Born Citizen Requirements

New York State Board of Elections Website Blocking Access To Natural Born Citizen Requirements By  Pixel Patriot 10/5/2011Previous versions of the New York State Board of Elections website that...

Jerome Corsi: Full Obama Eligibility Presentation; Sarasota Patriots Event; Sarasota Florida

Jerome Corsi, Harvard PhD, best-selling author and Investigative Reporter for World Net Daily, presents his findings about Barack Obama's eligibility for the office of the US Presidency, hosted by the...

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Corsi: Obama's Eligibility; Suspended Elections; It's Going To Be Bloody Before It's Done

Jerome Corsi: Obama's Eligibility; Fast & Furious; Suspended Elections; It's Going To Be Bloody Before It's Done - VIDEO HERE Indict Eric HolderIBDScandal: A major-league pitcher was indicted for...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:11
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
 
Editorials Is This Why Former White House Counsel Robert Bauer Resigned?

Is This Why Former White House Counsel Robert Bauer Resigned? »

“A CRIMINAL ACT” October 5, 2011       Did someone create this image on a computer to make it appear that Obama was born in Hawaii when he was not? Does his birthplace matter in regard to his...

October 6 2011 / No comment / Read More »
Omar Onyango’s Felonies Examined in “Unclegate”

Omar Onyango’s Felonies Examined in “Unclegate” »

PROOF OF IDENTITY THEFT!  OMAR USES TWO SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS! by WTPOTUS, blogging at WTPOTUS, ©2011 (Oct. 6, 2011) — Ruh row…your nephew is not going to be happy about this!  Will a call to...

October 6 2011 / No comment / Read More »
Open Letter to All Fifty Governors

Open Letter to All Fifty Governors »

“LEAD FROM THE FRONT!” by John Sutherland, ©2011 (Oct. 6, 2011) — Dear Governors all, Unless there was massive voter and/or election fraud in your state elections, each and every one of you has been...

October 6 2011 / 1 comment / Read More »

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:01
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 04 de octubre de 2011

George Lopez on Fox News: Everyone Wants To See Obama's Birth Certificate

George Lopez on Fox News' Fox & Friends: Everyone Wants To See Obama's Birth Certificate - 10/3/2011 - VIDEO HEREGeorge Lopez: If Obama Doesn't Have To Prove Where He Was Born Why Should We;Obama's...

Supreme Court Denies Another Obama Eligibility Case With No Recusal From Sotomayor or Kagan

Keyes v. Bowen: Supreme Court Denies Another Obama Eligibility Case With No Comment Or Recusal From Sotomayor Or Kagan10-1351 KEYES, ALAN, ET AL. V. BOWEN, DEBRA, ET AL.The petitions for rehearing are...

Documents From Cook County Treasurer Prove Fraud In Obama/Rezko Land Deal

Documents Received Through The Freedom Of Information Act From Cook County Treasurer’s Office Prove Fraud In Obama “Buffer Zone” Albert Hendershot @ The Obama Hustle The Northern Trust Co....

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:53
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar