Should Enforcing the Constitution and Protecting the Nation Be An Embarrassment?
Oklahoma’s SB91, described as “Identity and citizenship - requiring
proof of citizenship for candidates,” authored by Senators Brinkley, is
now making its way through the Oklahoma legislature. See information on
the bill here, http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=sb91.
The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 34 yes to 10 no (4 votes were
excluded). On April 6, 2011, it passed the House Rules Committee by a
vote of 11 yes to 0 no.
“Here in Oklahoma, where Mr. Obama won just over a third of the vote in
2008 — one of his worst state losses — Senate Bill 91 passed last month
with overwhelming and even bipartisan support. People in both parties
said they were confident that the House would do the same by the
deadline next week (the bill would have to return to the Senate for a
procedural vote). Lawmakers said they assumed that Gov. Mary Fallin, a
Republican, would sign it.
A spokesman said Ms. Fallin would not comment until the bill was on her desk and she had a chance to review it.
Legislators backing credentials bills in other states are closely watching what happens here.
‘If one state passes, and the Obama administration basically ignores the
requirement and does not qualify for the ballot in that state, that
would send a very strong signal that we have a situation in the United
States where someone who is not eligible is occupying the White House,’
said Mark Hatfield, a Republican state representative in Georgia whose
own ballot bill failed to get through. If Oklahoma does not go forward,
and an override of Ms. Brewer’s veto in Arizona does not materialize,
Mr. Hatfield said, ‘then other states, including Georgia, have a duty to
step up.’
Opponents of the birther bills say they are unnecessary and are designed
to score political points more than safeguard democracy, certainly in
Mr. Obama’s case.
Still, Democrats in Oklahoma were divided. For example, the minority
floor leader in the House, Chuck Hoskin, said he would probably vote
yes. Asked in an interview whether he was concerned about embarrassing
the leader of his own party, Mr. Hoskin said he thought Mr. Obama’s
failure to win over Oklahomans in 2008 was the real embarrassment.
But down the hall, an assistant Democratic floor leader in the House, Al
McAffrey, said the bill was the embarrassment. ‘But this is Oklahoma —
we embarrass ourselves all the time,’ he said. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/22/us/politics/22birthers.html?_r=2&hp.
What a sad state of affairs in America. Someone should ask these
politicians when it became embarrassing for lawmakers to preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution, which is the oath of office that
they all take. When did it become embarrassing to assure the integrity
of the electoral process? When did it become embarrassing to restore the
faith of the American people in knowing who their President is?
Was our media and Congress also too embarrassed to press Obama that he
release to the public his documents showing who and what he is and to
otherwise properly vet him during the 2008 presidential campaign? Were
the courts too embarrassed to accept any one case in which Obama would
have to produce discovery and conclusively show that he is a “natural
born Citizen?” Did Arizona Governor Jan Brewer tell us that she was too
embarrassed to sign the Arizona legislation that would have required
presidential candidates to prove their citizenship when she said it was
“a bridge too far?” Were our leaders also so embarrassed that they allowed a highly decorated military officer, LTC Terry Lakin, to be court-martialed
and go to federal prison for exercising his sense of duty to protect
the Constitution? And are our leaders now just too embarrassed to admit
that they were simply too embarrassed to properly exercise their duties
to the nation and to the American people and adequately deal with Obama?
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 22, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/