Topic category:
Other/General
Another Obama Opponent Headed for
Jail?
As did most of us, I first heard of Theresa Cao when she
made her now famous (some say infamous) statement in the House of
Representatives’ chamber on 6 January 2011 during a formal reading of the US
Constitution. As Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) read the Constitutional requirements
for a United States president, Theresa called out from the gallery “except
Obama, except Obama, help us, Jesus! My name is Theresa.” Unlike what had
occurred previously with the Marxist-Leninist Left-wing group Code Pink and
Cindy Sheehan merely being escorted out of the chamber when they severely
disrupted sessions in the House of Representatives, Theresa Cao was arrested
(for her one sentence statement--and no, she wasn’t “chanting” as one of the
leftist news services has written. In other words, leftists can protest in
Congressional chamber all they want but, one conservative (and Christian?)
person who dares to question the illegal president will be arrested.
Note: This IS one of the signs of a dictatorship, folks.
And please bear in mind that decorated Medical Doctor and [now] former LTC Terry
Lakin was placed into and still remains in prison for questioning Obama’s
eligibility and, therefore, the legality of his commands.
Theresa has already been forced to appear in court for
her transgression (aka “Free Speech”) of questioning Obama’s eligibility and
has, apparently, been told to accept a plea-bargain punishment…or else. She has
already had her first appearance in court, has been charged with [disruption of
Congress] “unlawful conduct” (free speech is no longer allowed under the
increasingly lawless Obama regime) and her next appearance is scheduled for 15
March 2011. Note: Maj. General Paul E. Vallely (Ret) recently called Theresa “a
brave woman. A true patriot.”
We are urging Americans to appear on the sidewalk,
Tuesday 15 March, in front of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Criminal Division, 500 Indiana Ave. N.W. in Washington, D.C. by at least
8:30-9:00 a.m. to support Theresa, enter the courtroom and to bear witness to
what occurs. This a fight for us all and Theresa implores us to be there.
Through a series of events, Theresa contacted me and the
following is a brief interview of this courageous lady.
The Interview
Sher: Theresa, it’s been good getting to know you over
the past few days. What you are now fighting is a government regime that appears
to become more dictatorial every day. Although multiple US Constitutional issues
are in motion, this seems to predominantly be an issue of First Amendment Free
Speech rights. I understand that after your first court appearance your
court-appointed attorney April Downs told you to take a plea deal. Can you tell
the readers how Ms. Downs presented it to you?
Theresa: On February 8, 2011, when Judge Marisa Demeo,
appointed April L. Downs as my court appointed Public Defender, she suggested I
pursue a "Stet" Docket. I, at that time, indicated to her that I would like to
pursue my case based on my Constitutional rights. It turns out that a "Stet"
Docket and the "FTO" (AKA First Time Offender) were new Plea Deals from the
Prosecutor's Office--offered on March 7, 2011 at my 10:30am appointment with
Attorney Downs.
In essence, Attorney Downs stated in both instances,
that these Plea Deals would not implicate my case as "Guilty" but would be
considered "Not Guilty"; but it would include 40 hours of community service, and
6-9-12 months of probation, with my promise of “Good Behavior.” Last but, not
least I would NOT be able to speak about my Constitutional rights; specifically,
the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth Amendment rights, aka. the Bill of Rights.
Attorney Downs, wanted me to believe that the "FTO" was
different from the "Stet" Docket. I had to connect the dots, so to speak, after
the fact; after my appointment with her on March 7, 2011. Thus there is a
question of fraud and collusion with the Prosecutor and the Judge, to threaten
to "Shut [me] Up" and thereby not pursue my Constitutional rights--the Supreme
Law of the Land--and not just in theory, but as the basis of our Republic form
of Government.
This specific example of corruption and fraud, being one
of a few other examples that implicates Attorney Downs, is an integral part of
the corrupted judicial system. I shall offer other examples of Attorney Down's
collusion with the anti-Constitutional system, below.
Sher: Considering the fact that Marxist Code Pink and
Cindy Sheehan have disrupted the US House of Representatives on multiple
occasions--with only escorts out of the building--how shocked were you that you
seemed to be targeted and singled out for arrest?
Theresa: Here are the other examples of Attorney Down's
collusion with the anti-Constitutional system. I asked Attorney Down's
specifically to research what has taken place with Code Pink at our initial
meeting on February 8, 2011, giving her over one month to find out information
for me. But, she did not do her job. Her response to my following up with her on
this detail was "ho humming" and beating around the bush--until she said
something to the effect that she didn't recall that question. Then she later
remembered that I did ask her and responded asking how can she find out any
information, if there were no arrests made?! She did not do her job…period. So,
to date, I still have to do some research on this specific issue.
I will be pursuing this matter of "Arrest", in both my
"Motion to Dismiss" as well as preparing for my Court Trial--should that be the
direction of my Criminal Misdemeanor case.
Sher: You said you plan to go to trial but, that the
judicial system is warning you to take their plea deal--which strongly appears
to be a direct infringement upon your free speech. How do you plan to proceed?
Theresa: Plan One: I plan to file a "Motion to Dismiss"
based on my Constitutional rights, on Monday, March 14, 2011, the day before my
court hearing date scheduled for the following day, March 15, 2011.
The reason for this late date for filing the "Motion to
Dismiss" was due to the fact that Attorney April L. Downs, the Public Defender
assigned to me by Obama's court appointed Judge Marisa Demeo, stated that I
could not file the stated Motion, prior to my court hearing.
One of two of my advisers/sources, Margy and Jack Flynn,
from the website americancitizensoftheconstitution.com, although not attorneys
per se, but who are students of the Constitution of the United States, have
advised me that I can file for the Motion prior to the court date. It should be
noted that my advisors did bring to my attention [to the fact] that I could file
the Motion prior to my court hearing, which was prior to my meeting with
Attorney Downs earlier this week on March 7, 2011. The Flynn's have been key
instruments in assisting me with learning about my inherent, God-given
Constitutional rights.
My other sources/advisers, come from the website
avoiceforchildren.com; Pamela & Will Gaston, who penned the book "Sui Juris:
The Truth in Record, A Process For the People to Access the Court", is an
essential resource, for all American Citizens who are currently involved in the
corrupted U.S. Court system, to stand upon their unalienable, God-given,
Constitutional rights.
Pamela & Will Gaston have paid a very high price
(which Pamela paid with her life, while serving prison time), paving the way, to
teach us, how to defend ourselves, without the corrupted attorneys, who
supposedly are on our side; the entire judicial system is pursuing enacting
Shariah law in place of the Constitution of the U.S., which is current news as
of two weeks ago. And since December 2008, the Treasury Dept. of the U.S. has
taught Shariah Law 101 and installed Shariah Laws into our Constitutional
system.
Please tell your family and friends, and all American
Citizens everywhere of these two noted above sources of mine, by which we can
win, case by case, against this prevailing wicked and corrupt system. We must be
brave and courageous! We can no longer be subservient to the New World Order
system! We must stand and defend our own cases, without so-called attorneys, if
they will not defend the Supreme Law of the Land!
"We the People" must actively defend our Constitutional
rights and not back down to the corrupted system that utilizes the
"Attorneys-Judge-Bar Association‘s" corrupted, anti-Constitutional system to
"terrorize" defendants into taking a "Plea Deal;" so that we do not pursue our
cases based on the Supreme Law of the Land--the Constitution of the United
States. "Plea Deals", forces the American people, to admit "Guilt", thus succumb
to the pretentious, anti-Constitutional rights; when in fact the judicial system
has infringed upon our unalienable, God-given Constitutional rights.
Plan Two: Dismiss Attorney April L. Downs, from
my case because she has not done her homework for my case, has misled me
concerning my options (given by the Prosecutors office) and is still indicating
that I should take the FTO [First Time Offender] offer. Other details, also,
lead me to believe that she does not want to defend me based on my
Constitutional rights; even though she says I still have the final choice by
Tuesday, March 15, 2011, to decide the direction of the case.
I may request that Judge Marisa Demeo assign me another
court-appointed Public Defender due to the negligence of Attorney April L.
Downs. I am not definite on this matter; I may just want to have a trial
scheduled.
Plan Three: If Judge Marisa Demeo refuses to
abide by the Constitution of the U.S. and the Bill of Rights, by not dismissing
my Criminal Misdemeanor Charge/Case, then I will ask for a Trial by Jury based
on Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Amendment.
Sher: Thanks so much, Theresa, and I’m hoping that as
many people as possible show up at the courthouse to support you this tomorrow.
Again, the address is Superior Court of the District of
Columbia Criminal Division, 500 Indiana Ave. N.W. in Washington, D.C. and we
recommend showing up Tuesday 15 March no later than 8:30-9:00 a.m.
Code Pink Heckling in House of Representatives:
1. http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=6370
2. http://www.dohiyimir.org/2009/03/stunted-growth.html
3. http://warisacrime.org/node/13294
Cindy Sheehan Heckles in House of Representatives:
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cindy-sheehan-kicked-out-of-state-of-the-union-address
Sher Zieve
Send email feedback to Sher Zieve
Biography - Sher Zieve
Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator.
Zieve's op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple internet journals and
sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The
Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications,
and on multiple university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national
radio shows.
Read other
commentaries by Sher Zieve.
Copyright © 2011 by Sher Zieve
All
Rights Reserved.
|
I cannot take any credit for the following observations
although I share each and every one wholeheartedly. (Yes. I know. It’s preaching
to the choir. Just pass it on. Please.)
Note: This article will open in PDF format. 
March 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM
http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/74/74.US.496.html
On the 10th of February, 1855, Congress passed an act,1 entitled ”An act to secure the right of citizenship to children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits thereof,’ the second section of which provides, ‘that any woman, who might lawfully be naturalized under the existing laws, married, or who shall be married to a citizen of the United States, shall be deemed and taken to be a citizen.” (Repealed in 1922)
http://books.google.com/books?id=f2IUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA378&lpg=PA378&dq=act+of+congress+January+10+1855&source=bl&ots=x6ZFQ-Hrzr&sig=UogycAZu2oWalCm-ji9jcN8WTbc&hl=en&ei=zodxTfGFHIW6sQPw8Ki7Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&sqi=2&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=act%20of%20congress%20january%2010%201855&f=false
Congressional Globe
page 378
Public XXII
March 4, 2011 at 10:02 PM
I forgot to add the 1855 act benefited Marie Elg’s mother, so at birth Marie was NBC.
March 4, 2011 at 10:09 PM
Of course we all know that Perkins v. Elg also deals with this very subject.
There is so much historical evidence that points to Obama’s ineligibility that it can only be hidden by a complicit media, and a disinterested citizenry.
There is nothing that the Obama apologists can say to refute this analysis, although we know that they stop at nothing, and the hypnotized never lie.
March 4, 2011 at 11:12 PM
Leo,
There is plenty of discussion on dual-citizenship in Elg in the Fourth point.
March 4, 2011 at 11:36 PM
I am sure you have seen this article from 1915
Problems of Dual Nationality in Time of War; Expert Replies to Colonel Roosevelt’s Criticism of State Department Letter Which Was Characterized, as “Dangerously Close to Treason to the U.S.”
By Richard W. Flournoy, Jr. ();
September 12, 1915,
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F60611FD3E5F17738DDDAB0994D1405B858DF1D3
ed. The link doesn't work for me. I dont recall the article. Please relink as it looks good from title. Thanks. -Leo
March 5, 2011 at 12:07 AM
Leo, if you hit it any harder, that ball would go into orbit.
Brilliant work!
March 5, 2011 at 3:26 AM
Maybe the reason why Obama refuses to release his school records is that he flunked the class on the Constitution but managed to graduate anyway.
March 5, 2011 at 4:58 AM
Of course we all know that the dicta of Perkins v. Elg also deals with this very subject.
There is so much historical evidence that points to Obama’s ineligibility that it can only be hidden by a complicit media, and a disinterested citizenry.
There is nothing that the Obama apologists can say to refute this analysis, although we know that they stop at nothing, and the hypnotized never lie.
March 5, 2011 at 9:43 AM
BTW, I happy you re-opened your blog.
Just giving everyone a chance to review what others have discovered as well. http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/
Born with Dual Citizenship means NOT NBC. That has been established here.
Being born on British Soil of a British father, and late registered (not accepted by the state) creates an entirely new concept of fraud. The question then becomes how did Obama get on the ballot in states that have laws to prevent it? Who is responsible to enforce said laws, and now that the people of the United States have suffered, whom can this be brought to for grievances? It seems that we the people no longer have rights under the Constitution, as SCOTUS doesn’t give the people standing. Many parties can claim harm by Obama’s policies, including the illegal ones (not enforcing or selectively enforcing laws) and preventing oil exploration and energy independence, or the Chrysler dealers for that matter. It seems as though SCOTUS is saying that it will no longer review what is Constitutional, and therefore has no point for continued existence!
What a terrible price the DNC inflicted upon the people of the United States for the election of one POTUS.