Mi?rcoles, 29 de diciembre de 2010

??http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/27/the-top-10-violations-of-the-constitution-by-obama-and-the-111th-congress/

The Top 10 Violations of the Constitution by Obama and the 111th Congress

By Paul Skousen, DailyCaller.com

?

At the close of the 111th Congress, America is deeply in the bog of Thomas Jefferson?s prophetic warning: ?The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.? Unfortunately, the broken chains of the Constitution have failed to contain the federal government.

By way of review, let?s take a stroll through the junkyard of constitutional violations that have been painted fresh by President Obama and the 111th Congress. Here?s my top-ten list, highly abbreviated for length.

#10. ? 9/11 Responders Relief Fund: We love and honor those who put themselves in harm?s way for our security. However, giving the 9/11 first responders money after the fact violates the Constitution. Article 1.8 gives Congress the right to expend funds for all the purposes itemized, provided it is done for the general welfare, NOT for individuals or preferred groups. The states may reward heroes if they so choose.

#9. ? Checks and Balances Failure: The Chairmanship of the UN Security Council: Where was Congress when President Obama became the chairman of the powerful UN Security Council in 2009? The normal monthly rotation for that chair goes to the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. because Article 1.9 of the Constitution forbids the president (and all other office-holders) from accepting any present, foreign office or title from a foreign country or a foreign potentate unless it is specifically authorized by Congress. The Founders wanted to prevent deal-making, corruption, and foreign influence from affecting America?s internal affairs.

#8. ? Net Neutrality: The government is trying to stop Internet providers from blocking or slowing some web traffic and prevent providers from showing favoritism. The FCC thinks it should be able to regulate the Internet like it regulates utility companies. This violates the property rights of Internet providers and interferes in the market?s free choice of which services receive funding. Article 1.8 makes it clear that the FCC is not constitutionally authorized to pass laws, especially those disguised as regulations.

#7. ? Czars: The moniker for appointees who report to no one but the president has taken on a new and eerie resemblance to the dusty Russian tsars of old. Article 2.2 grants the president leeway to appoint managers, but those managers may not have any regulatory, legislative or law-making powers ? such powers are reserved to the legislative branch. Today?s ?czars? have the power of cabinet members without having to go through a

#6. ? Cap and Trade: The Clean Energy and Security Act mandates greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, 42 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, and 84 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. By 2020, this tax will extract an estimated $160 billion from the economy, or an average $1,870 per family. Once again, had the chains of Article 1.8 not been broken, America would be spared such tomfoolery. Cap and trade masked in any disguise whatsoever cannot be justified as a general welfare activity.

#5. ? Cash for Clunkers: The government offered $4,500 rebates to people turning in their clunkers for more fuel-efficient vehicles. When the first program quickly ran out of the $4 billion allotted to it, another $2 billion was added. Follow-up analysis showed the program did nothing to stimulate the economy and put many people into additional debt by encouraging them to purchase cars that they otherwise would not have bought during these hard economic times. The government has zero authority to selectively give individuals tax money for purchases of vehicles, according to Articles 1.2 and 1.8 ? and common sense.

#4. ? TARP Funding: The original 2008 act authorized $700 billion to bail out banks and other institutions. The government has no business rescuing private financial institutions from bad judgment and risky ventures. Article 1.8 excludes permission for Congress to grant financial aid or loans to private companies. Any use of Treasury funds must go toward the general welfare, not to specific groups.

#3. ? Illegal Immigration: Arizona is being invaded. When that state passed SB 1070 to stem the flow of violent illegals into its sovereign territory, a derelict federal government turned around and sued. At issue was the Feds? failure to control the border, so Arizona took it upon itself to do just that ? to uphold existing federal immigration laws. It didn?t add new laws; it simply gave local authorities the power to enforce federal responsibilities. The federal government claims the right to manage immigration, but when it refuses to carry out that obligation, thereby jeopardizing the security of border states, it is derelict in its duties. Arizona should haul the federal government before the Supreme Court for malfeasance. Article 4.4 clearly states that the U.S. shall protect states from invasion ? more than 400,000 illegal aliens (est.) in Arizona is, by definition, an invasion.

#2. ? Economic Stimulus Bill: The $814 billion stimulus is the most backward-thinking proposition to come along since human sacrifice. Dumping borrowed money into an over-fed, bloated and out-of-control ogre doesn?t solve anything, it simply temporarily props up with blocks of melting ice cream a failed and failing government of extravagance. Not only does it illegally take money out of the economy that could be used to provide jobs, but it?s using borrowed money ? with interest due.

And the worst violation of the Constitution over the past two years is ?

#1. ? Health Care Reform: Health care reform was the last lever needed to lift the lid off the pot of American gold and empty it out for socialism. It required all Americans to have health insurance whether they wanted it or not. Earlier this month, Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson said that the government has no power ?to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market.?

The string of constitutional violations supporting the judge?s rejection is long and shocking:

For purposes of regulation, Congress invoked Article 1.8 and claimed insurance may be controlled because it falls under Congress? power to regulate interstate commerce. But insurance is not interstate commerce ? you can?t buy insurance across state lines.

Language in the bill says the health care law may NOT be changed or amended by anyone once signed into law. This violates the role of Congress. Article 1.1 makes it clear that only Congress is authorized to make law, meaning it has every right to alter, amend and change the health care law. To restrict Congress is to change its constitutional duty. The 111th Congress must think it can change the Constitution without amending it ? a violation of Article 5, which outlines the amendment process.

The health care bill also violates the 10th Amendment because it coerces states into complying with a new national program that reaches far into state jurisdiction.

So, what do you do when you?re navigating through a blizzard of political white-out where visibility is reduced to zero, the road is slick and slippery, and disaster is strewn about in all directions? You come to a complete stop ? and put on the chains.

Paul B. Skousen is a former analyst for the CIA, an intelligence officer in the Reagan White House, and staffer for Senator Orrin Hatch. He has interviewed on Fox News and was featured by Paul Harvey?s The Rest of the Story about smuggling Oliver North?s shredded secrets from the White House. He is a journalist and published author, and the son of W. Cleon Skousen, author of The Five Thousand Year Leap. He is a national Constitution Coach and senior editor with PowerThink Publishing, LLC. Website: www.powerthink.com. Email: [email protected].


?

?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:22
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar


WND Exclusive
BORN IN THE USA?

'We no longer have

republic subservient

to Constitution'

Officer: Lakin case is end

of 'rule of law'


Posted: December 29, 2010
10:01 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
??2010?WorldNetDaily

?


Dr. Terrence Lakin

A retired military officer who pursued all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court a legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy of the Oval Office says the conviction and sentencing of an active duty officer who raised similar questions signals the end of the "rule of law" in the United States.

Cmdr. Charles Kerchner's legal case, handled by attorney Mario Apuzzo, alleged that Congress failed its constitutional duty to examine the legitimacy of a successful candidate during the Electoral College vetting process on Capitol Hill. The Supremes ultimately decided not to hear arguments, leaving standing a lower court's dismissal.

Sign a petition to state elections officials demanding they remove the constitutional cloud over the presidency by requiring documentation of candidates' eligibility.

Now he's attended, and is analyzing, the military's court-martial of now-former Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who refused to deploy to Afghanistan ? again ? because the military refused to answer his questions and Obama refused to document his eligibility to give orders to the military.

His comments came in an interview with Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email.

The judge in Lakin's case, Denise Lind, ordered that Lakin could not raise the issue of Obama's eligibility, could not seek through the discovery process evidence that would support him, could not bring in evidence to the trial and could not bring in the witnesses he sought.

The conviction, then, was set up before the panel of officers deliberated the question.

And that means, Kerchner warned, "we no longer have a rule of law and a constitutional republic subservient to the fundamental law of the land, the U.S. Constitution."

He explained how Lakin, before publicly challenging Obama's eligibility to serve in office under the Constitution's demand that the president be a "natural born citizen" ? a status that remains to this day undocumented, had gone through every available channel seeking answers.

"Terry had been questioning Obama's eligibility for over two years, and not only did he go to his elected representatives; he used a formal path available to soldiers, filling out a form or writing a letter, to request a congressional inquiry," Kerchner told The Post & Email.

"If a soldier is having some issue with the military chain of command or for any reason feels that he has been unjustly treated, there is the Article 138 where you can directly ask your senior chain of command about it. He also filed another form or letter to request a congressional inquiry; he requested more than once that an investigation be done about Obama's eligibility because as an officer, he had sworn an oath to the U.S. Constitution. He had great doubts that Obama was eligible, and he wanted them to investigate, and they didn't even answer him," Kerchner explained.

"The Congress did nothing. Terry, as a soldier, had a further right to one, and he didn't even get an answer. For example, if you allege that your commanding officer is mistreating you, Congress investigates those allegations. Terry asked for a congressional inquiry because no one in his chain of command was answering his questions, and they didn't answer him. He felt he was being unjustly treated and ignored by his chain of command in their not addressing or answering his questions about the eligibility of Obama to be the commander-in-chief and president," he said in the lengthy interview with Rondeau.

The circumstances are then, he said, that, "Not even statutory laws are being obeyed; not even regulations regarding congressional inquiries from soldiers are being obeyed. It's strictly to defend one man, a phony, a fraud, the usurper-in-chief, Obama. Our whole system of government, our whole culture has been corrupted and turned upside-down and completely rotted from the inside out to protect this man. All of our laws are being subverted and ignored because they know the answer: he's not eligible."

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the challenges question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Several of the cases have involved emergency appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court in which justices have declined even to hear arguments. Among the other cases turned down without a hearing at the high court have been petitions by Philip Berg, Cort Wrotnowski, Leo Donofrio and Orly Taitz.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.

Obama wrote in his own book that he was born a dual citizen of the U.S. and Great Britain due to the fact his father was a subject of the British crown when Obama was born.

Lakin announced nearly a year ago that he would not deploy as per Obama's orders until his eligibility to issue such orders was verified. Lakin was stripped of his duties, then court-martialed and now is imprisoned in Ft. Leavenworth for six months.

Lakin supporters have established a fund to support Lakin's legal defense and provide for the needs of his wife and children while he is incarcerated.

Financial contributions should be sent to the Terry Lakin Action Fund, the only fund authorized by Lakin's family. Donate online at Terrylakinactionfund.com using any major credit card, or mail checks made payable to the Terry Lakin Action Fund, PO Box 1116, Bel Air, MD 21014.

Cards and letters, but no packages, can be sent to Lakin at the following address, and should not mention rank: Terrence Lakin #89996, 830 Sabalu Road, Fort Leavenworth, Kan. 66027.

No hospital has admitted Obama was born there, and while state officials in Hawaii say they have confirmed his birth documentation, they refuse to reveal what it states. The type of document posted online by Obama is available to those not born in the state.

Kerchner also said the defense counsel for Lakin should have raised the issue of the so-called Nuremberg defense. That refers to the trials after World War II where Nazi officers explained they simply were following orders, and many ended up convicted for their atrocities.

"I would have brought up the Nuremberg defense and cited the officer(s) tried at Nuremberg who told that court it was not his duty to question orders from the supreme commander, meaning Adolf Hitler, and that your duty is to obey orders, and that man was hanged for that: for blindly accepting all orders from the supreme commander," Kerchner said.

It is up to officers to evaluate orders and follow those that are legal and disobey others, he said.

"And what is a lawful order? That is the officer?s decision to make and ask his superiors and a congressional inquiry to find out if he has a doubt, and he did that, and they ignored him. The Constitution is not a piece of parchment paper down there on display in Washington. It is the fundamental law of the land. The lawfulness of all orders issued by officers and the people above them shall be judged by that law, because his officer's oath is to do just that, to support and defend the Constitution," he said.

For now, hope must rest with Republicans in the new Congress, he said.

"The only thing left is to go back to the political process which failed us the first time and hope that the new Congress, with a Republican-controlled House finally listens to the people and holds a congressional investigation with full subpoena power. We need to force them to do that. They can now justify it by saying, 'The prior Congress made a mistake, but we're not going to do it,'" he said.

He warned that if that does not happen, other repercussions will follow.

"If they don't, the only thing left is John F. Kennedy's words and the Declaration of Independence: 'Those who make peaceful resolution (to paraphrase; he used the word 'revolution') impossible make violent resolution inevitable.' This is not going to stand with the people forever. It's going to boil over at some point, and what they thought they were preventing ? violence in the inner cities if he were properly vetted and revealed he was not eligible ? will result in and cause far, far, far worse by what they have done by corrupting every institution and system of our government to protect an ineligible man, a phony, the usurper-in-chief, Mr. Zero."

He pointed out that if Obama's eligibility is not fully documented, "not only should Lakin have his conviction expunged; he should be given the Medal of Freedom."

"The truth always wins. If the truth always comes out and Obama is proven to be a fraud, which we know he is, then justice mandates that Lt. Col. Lakin be vindicated, pardoned, and his kangaroo court conviction record expunged from history and a new history written that he did the right thing in the face of adversity," he said.

See the full Post & Email interview.

Meanwhile, Hawaii's new governor, Neil Abercrombie, is promising he wants to find a way to release Obama's documentation to put the story to rest, which appears to be not going away anytime soon.

According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.

This particular case has had a long proceeding; it began as a challenge to the legality of the military orders under Obama, whose eligibility to hold the office of president never has been documented to date. While that officer, Capt. Connie Rhodes, ultimately followed her orders, the attorney was fined $20,000 in the case, and it continued its path through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and now is pending in Washington.

?


Whether it will fall by the wayside as have other cases on the same issue that have been submitted to the court remains to be seen. But even if this case falls, it doesn't appear the issue itself will fade.

Consider:

Read the full report on Obama's eligibility yourself.





Publicado por Corazon7 @ 22:45
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=244797


BORN IN THE USA?

Hawaii guv suddenly 'mum'

on Obama birth 'certificate'

After blizzard of attacks on 'birthers,'

Abercrombie now avoids interviews


Posted: December 28, 2010
10:52 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
??2010?WorldNetDaily

?


Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, on left

Although Hawaii's newly elected Democrat governor, Neil Abercrombie, has recently given a flurry of high-profile media interviews condemning "birthers" who question Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, suddenly he is declining to answer a few hard questions.

Abercrombie, 72, a former member of the U.S. House, may be trying to quell the surge of doubt among Americans ? polls show nearly six in 10 doubt Obama's own eligibility story ? by promising he will try to release additional records on Obama from his state's Department of Health vault.

He has, in just recent days, expressed his disdain toward "birthers" in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, on CNN, as well as the local Star Advertiser and Hawaii News Now.

His startling remarks appear to be in response to the recent polling results as well as the rapidly growing list of high-profile personalities and leaders publicly raising questions about Obama's eligibility.



Even as stalwart an Obama supporter as MSNBC host Chris Matthews is now urging that Obama release his long-form hospital-generated birth certificate to assist Abercrombie's campaign against "birthers."

?

?

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

"I am not a birther. I am an enemy of the birthers," Matthews said. But, he added, "Why doesn't the president just say, 'Send me a copy right now?' Why doesn't Gibbs and Axelrod say, 'Let's just get this crappy story dead?' Why not do it? ... If it exists, why not put it out?"

Matthews was joined by Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune and David Corn of Mother Jones, both of whom agreed with Matthews' call for Obama to publicly release the document, which to this point has remained tightly under wraps.

But Abercrombie won't talk with WND, which has reported more on the controversy than any other news source in the world.

See the movieObama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidentialeligibility mystery!

"It [the Obama birth certificate controversy] is an insult to his [Obama's] mother and to his father; they were my friends, and I have an emotional interest in that," Abercrombie told the New York Times in a telephone interview Thursday. "It's an emotional insult. It is disrespectful to the president; it is disrespectful to the office."

But this week, in e-mails from his press secretary, Abercrombie refused to be interviewed by WND.

"The governor did an interview over a week ago in which this topic [Obama's eligibility to be president under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution] was raised," Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie's press secretary, said in an e-mail to WND.

"He [Abercrombie] has been on vacation since Saturday and is unavailable. Hope this helps you understand. You are in no way being singled out as your e-mail suggests," she said.

But despite the denials, Dela Cruz did not respond when WND followed up with a request for an interview with Abercrombie at the governor's convenience after he returns from vacation.

It was just last week that Abercrombie himself injected new urgency into the ongoing controversy over Obama's birth certificate when the Star Advertiser reported the governor has been talking with the state attorney general's office and the director of the state Health Department to see how he can bypass Hawaii's privacy laws and release more information about whatever Obama records exist there.

Interestingly, the new governor's links to the controversy go way back.

Abercrombie claims to have seen baby Obama in Hawaii

Although he has acknowledged he was not present at the still-unidentified hospital in Honolulu to witness Obama's birth, Abercrombie long has claimed he socialized with Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham Obama when Barack Obama Jr. was yet a baby.

"Maybe I'm the only one in the country that could look you right in the eye and tell you, 'I was there when the baby was born,'" Abercrombie told the Chicago Tribune in an attempt to provide personal testimony to buttress the argument Obama was born in Hawaii as he has long claimed.

Abercrombie was a graduate teaching assistant in sociology at the University of Hawaii when Barack Obama Sr. arrived in 1959 from Kenya to enroll as the first African-born student in the university's history.

The problem with Abercrombie?s testimony is that Barack Obama Sr. and his wife, Ann Dunham, did not live together as man and wife with their baby son as Abercrombie claims to have witnessed.

WND has published transcripts from the University of Washington in Seattle that prove Ann Dunham was enrolled in extension classes there, across the Pacific, within three weeks of the baby's birth.

WND further has documented Ann Dunham's Seattle address in authoritative Seattle street directories from the period and interviewed Barack Obama Jr.'s babysitter in Seattle to further document the presence of Ann Dunham and her baby in Seattle, not Hawaii as Abercrombie has claimed.

WND also has reported that the address used in the two Hawaii newspapers in 1961 announcing the baby's birth was 6085 Kalanianaole Highway in Honolulu, an address maintained by Ann Dunham's parents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham.

In August 1961, when Barack Obama Jr. was born, Barack Obama Sr. maintained a separate address on 11th Avenue, in Hawaii.

There is no documentary evidence that Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham ever lived at the same address together as man and wife.

Moreover, university transcripts from the University of Washington and the University of Hawaii demonstrate that Ann Dunham remained in Seattle, fully enrolled in university courses, until she returned to Hawaii in 1962 to re-enroll in the University of Hawaii after Barack Obama Sr. had left Hawaii to attend graduate school at Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Nobody invited to wedding of Obama's parents?

In actuality, it isn't clear Obama's parents were married, since official records never have been produced showing a legal ceremony took place. No wedding certificate or photograph of a ceremony for Dunham and Obama Sr. has ever been found or published.

In his book, "Barack and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage," former Time magazine contributing editor Christopher Anderson elaborates: "There were certainly no witnesses (to the alleged civil marriage ceremony on Maui in 1961 between Obama's parents) ? no family members were present, and none of their friends at the university had the slightest inkling that they were even engaged."

Anderson further quoted Abercrombie, a self-admitted friend of Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, as saying that "nobody" was invited to the wedding ceremony.

Obama himself, on page 22 of his autobiography "Dreams from My Father," wrote of his parents' wedding: "In fact, how and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I've never quite had the courage to explore. There's no record of a real wedding, a cake, a ring, a giving away of the bride. No families were in attendance; it's not even clear that people back in Kansas were fully informed. Just a small civil ceremony, a justice of the peace. The whole thing seems so fragile in retrospect, so haphazard."

Bachelor father?

Contrary to Abercrombie's assertion that he spent social time with Barack Obama Sr., his wife, Ann Dunham, and their child, Barack Obama Jr., the documentary evidence strongly suggests that while Ann Dunham was in Seattle attending the University of Washington, Barack Obama Sr. lived the life of a bachelor in Honolulu.

WND has published a photo of Barack Obama Sr. at a University of Hawaii student party that he attended without his wife, Ann Dunham; the photo clearly shows his left hand absent a wedding ring.


Barack Obama Sr. at party with University of Hawaii students in the early 1960s

WND also reported on a letter Barack Obama Sr. wrote from Hawaii to his political benefactor in Kenya, Tom Mboya, in May 1962, discussing his wife, but he does so without mentioning Ann Dunham, his Hawaiian bride and the mother of the president, Barack Obama Jr.

Toward the end of the 1962 letter, Obama wrote, "You know my wife is in Nairobi there and I would really appreciate any help you may give her."

Clearly Barack Obama Sr. is referring to his first wife, Kezia Aoko, whom he had married in 1954 when he was eighteen years old while she was pregnant with their first child.

He instructs Mboya that his wife Kezia was then staying with her brother, Wilson Odiawo, in Nairobi.

Two Hawaii newspapers published feature articles in June 1962, the month Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii to attend classes at Harvard, that profiled Barack Obama Sr. in considerable detail, but make no reference to his wife in Hawaii, Ann Dunham, or his then 10-month-old infant son, Barack Obama Jr.

Abercrombie, the only witness?

Strangely, Abercrombie is the only witness on the public record claiming a recollection of Barack Obama Sr., Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Jr. living together and interacting with him socially as a family in Hawaii.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Abercrombie told the Chicago Tribune he remembered Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham as participating in "long coffeehouse sessions" while Barack Obama Sr. was attending the University of Hawaii.

The Chicago Tribune story further reported that on a trip to Africa years later Abercrombie caught up with Barack Obama Sr.

"He [Barack Obama Sr.] was drinking too much; his frustration was apparent," Abercrombie told the newspaper.

"To Abercrombie?s surprise, Obama never asked about his ex-wife or his son," Tribune national correspondent Tim Jones wrote.

Just last year, Abercrombie played a role in another Obama birth controversy when he read a letter at a Kapi'olani Medical Center centennial dinner in Honolulu that supposedly was authored by President Obama, claiming Kapi'olani as his birth hospital.

As WND reported, the letter read by Abercrombie and initially displayed on the Kapi'olani website turned out to be a computer-created likeness of a letter using HTML code, the building blocks of Internet websites, not an actual paper letter.


The Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu originally posted on its website this HTML-created version of a letter supposedly written by Barack Obama in which he states he was born at the facility. Kapi'olani has since removed this image, and the White House has remained silent on its content.

When pressed on the matter, Kapi'olani officials eventually sent WND a photograph of a paper letter purportedly written by Obama, though the White House has still not confirmed its authenticity or content. Hospital officials told WND they "know" the letter must be from Obama because it was brought to them by then-Congressman Abercrombie.


A photograph taken by the Kapi'olani Medical Center for WND shows a letter allegedly written by President Obama on embossed White House stationery in which he declares the Honolulu hospital to be "the place of my birth," The hospital, after publicizing the letter then refusing to confirm it even existed, is now vouching for its authenticity, but not its content. The White House has yet to verify any aspect of the letter.

Also in 2009, WND documented that Obama and his supporters first claimed he was born at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, before the story changed to Kapi'olani and Internet articles claiming Queens as Obama's birth hospital were cleansed to substitute Kapi'olani instead of Queens as the birth hospital reference.

'Friends' linked to Democrat Socialists of America

During his gubernatorial campaign, Abercrombie blasted WND for publishing a report that Abercrombie was listed as a member of the U.S.-based Marxist-oriented Democratic Socialists of America.

Trevor Loudon of the New Zeal blog, a researcher on communism, uncovered the November-December 1990 issue of the Democratic Socialists of America's official magazine, "The Democratic Left," that listed Abercrombie as a member of the party.

The magazine stated the group's political action committee endorsed two congressional candidates, "DSAer Democrat Neil Abercrombie seeking to regain the House seat representing Honolulu and Vermont independent candidate Bernie Sanders."

Louden also documented that Obama attended socialist conferences in New York in the early 1980s at the Cooper Union, the usual venue for the annual DSA-organized Socialist Scholars Conferences.

Stanley Kurtz, in his book, "Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism," noted on page 63 that Barack Obama's name appears on a large list of names and addresses in a folder labeled "Socialist Scholars Conference," in the records of the Democratic Socialists of America.

From analyses of these lists, Kurtz concluded that Obama pre-registered for the Second Annual Socialist Scholars Conference held on April 19-21, 1984, at the Boro of Manhattan Community College, CUNY, in New York.

WND has reported on multiple legal challenges to Obama over his status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether Obama actually was born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Further, others question his citizenship by virtue of his attendance in Indonesian schools during his childhood and question on what passport did he travel to Pakistan three decades ago.

Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers and his appointment of lawyers to suppress all requests for his documentation.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:42
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 28 de diciembre de 2010

http://www.breitbart.tv/chris-matthews-asks-obama-to-release-birth-certificate/

Chris Matthews, the anchor of MSNBC's "Hardball" program, is now calling for Barack Obama to release his original, long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to put to rest any doubts about the president's constitutional eligibility to hold office.

On last night's edition of his show, Matthews stated: "I am not a birther. I am an enemy of the birthers." But he continued with the questions, "Why doesn't the president just say, 'Send me a copy right now?' Why doesn't Gibbs and Axelrod say, 'Let's just get this crappy story dead?' Why not do it? ... If it exists, why not put it out?"

Matthews was joined by Clarance Page of the Chicago Tribune and David Corn of Mother Jones, who both agreed with the call for Obama to publicly release the document, which to this point has remained under wraps.

?

Chris Matthews, the anchor of MSNBC's "Hardball" program, is now calling for Barack Obama to release his original, long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to put to rest any doubts about the president's constitutional eligibility to hold office.

On last night's edition of his show, Matthews stated: "I am not a birther. I am an enemy of the birthers." But he continued with the questions, "Why doesn't the president just say, 'Send me a copy right now?' Why doesn't Gibbs and Axelrod say, 'Let's just get this crappy story dead?' Why not do it? ... If it exists, why not put it out?"

Matthews was joined by Clarance Page of the Chicago Tribune and David Corn of Mother Jones, who both agreed with the call for Obama to publicly release the document, which to this point has remained under wraps.

?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:25
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Visitor to Lt. Col. Lakin Turned Away

?HE?S STILL BEING PROCESSED??AFTER TEN DAYS?

by Bob Pinkstaff

?

Ft. Leavenworth houses federal civilian prisoners and military prisoners and was built in the early 1900s

(Dec. 27, 2010) ? Yesterday (Sunday), I drove to Ft. Leavenworth with the intention of visiting with Lt. Colonel Lakin at the ?U.S. Disciplinary Barracks.?? There are two disciplinary barracks on the base, both located approx two miles inside the main gate,?with approximately one mile separation between the two. Weekend visiting hours are 0800 to 1100 & 1300 to 1600.

The explanation I got from a soldier stationed there was that the first barracks is for prisoners with five or more years? time to do. The second barracks (one mile away) is for prisoners with less than five years time to do. This soldier was good enough to lead me to the detention barracks and area; I?m not sure I could?ve found my way by verbal directions from the main gate.

Lt. Colonel Lakin is an inmate in the second barracks (less than five years? time to do). I showed my military ID card?to the MP at the desk and told him I was there to visit with Lt. Colonel Terrence Lakin.?I was asked, ?who I was there to see? (two different times), and each time I repeated ?Lt. Colonel Lakin.? The MP called someone and told them that I was there to visit with ?Terrence?; no last name, just ?Terrance.? I was asked if I was a family member. I said?no,?that I was a ?Patriot? and that he doesn?t know me personally. By this time I was beginning to get really upset with their attitude and their addressing of patriot and hero Lt. Colonel Lakin as ?Terrence?!

About 15 minutes later a MSgt MP came?to the desk asking again, ?who I was there to see.? Once again I repeated ?Lt. Colonel Lakin,? always using his rank in all responses/conversation with them. The conversation with the unconcerned MSgt MP was ?

MSgt MP: You can?t see him (no reason).

Me: Why not?

MSgt MP: He?s still being processed.

Me: I?ve driven over 450 miles (R/T) and would like to visit with him.

MSgt MP: Same answer, no; he?s still being processed.

Me: There are thousands of very concerned American citizens interested in patriot Lt. Colonel Lakin?s welfare, me included!

MSgt MP: He?s still being processed and you must be on an the approved ?visitors? list? by ?Terrence.?

Me: How do I get on?his approved ?visitors? list??

MSGT MP: He has to add your name.

Me: Would you tell him I was here to visit and would like to have him add my name to the list?

MSgt MP: No!

Me: I made a few choice comments regarding?the traitorous USURPER obama being free to roam while patriot and hero Lt. Colonel Lakin is locked up! I then left the building.

QUESTIONS:

How long has Lt. Colonel Lakin been incarcerated at Ft. Leavenworth (still processing)?

Why so long to process?

Has/is Maj. General Karl Horst considering comments/facts before issuing a final ruling on Lt. Colonel Lakin?

On my way back to the main gate, just past the first detention barracks, I was?stopped for questioning by security. The MSgt MP called security after I left, telling them that he, MSgt MP, told me to leave and I wouldn?t do it. I made it very clear why I was on the base?and that the MSgt MP never did ask me to leave. I was also able to express our concerns?regarding patriot and hero Lt. Colonel Lakin?s imprisonment while the traitorous USURPER obama roams free etc. He listened to my short soap box speech and sent me on my way back to Wichita, KS.

That?s how the visit with Lt Colonel Lakin turned out, NO VISIT. It?s my opinion that Lt Colonel Lakin?s ?visitor list? will be very short and that the detention barracks is treating him as an obama?political prisoner.

Has Obama told the staff at Ft. Leavenworth to deny visitors to Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin? If so, why? Is that a federal civil rights violation?

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:21
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

CDR Charles Kerchner Speaks out about the Court-Martial of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin

???HIS OWN DEFENSE ATTORNEY BROKE HIM?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Dec. 28, 2010) ? Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (USNR, Retired) was an eyewitness at the trial of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin which took place at Ft. Meade, MD on December 14-16.? Lakin was charged with disobeying orders and missing movement after he announced last March that he could no longer follow orders because of his doubts about, and the lack of evidence of, Obama?s constitutional eligibility to act as commander-in-chief of the U.S. military.

According to the U.S. Constitution, all military authority resides with the Commander-in-Chief, who is also the President.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution states that the president (and thus the commander-in-chief) must be a ?natural born Citizen.?? Other sections of the Constitution relating to congressmen and senators state the requirement as simply ?Citizen,? therefore implying a higher standard in the ?natural born Citizen? requirement.

In 1787, John Jay, who became the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, wrote in a letter to General George Washington, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention:

Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.

In 2006, an attorney from a law firm with ties to Obama discussed the idea of a ?takeover? of the U.S. government by a foreigner and possibly a Muslim, and strongly advocated abolishing the ?natural born Citizen? requirement, calling it ?outdated and undemocratic.?? Others have called the requirement ?pernicious? and labeled the Founding Fathers? ?fear of undue foreign influence soon proved itself baseless.?

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear oral arguments in numerous cases brought before it on the question of Obama?s eligibility, and Associate Justice Clarence Thomas stated in a congressional hearing earlier this year that the Supreme Court is ?evading the issue.?

As Commander Kerchner relates, Lakin, who is a medical doctor and served as flight surgeon to General George F. Casey?s unit, made extensive efforts before his announcement in March to determine whether or not Obama held office legally and constitutionally.? None of his inquiries were addressed.? Now Terry resides in Ft. Leavenworth prison for the next six months, unless a de facto officer in the chain of command reviews the sentence and amends it.? It appears that Maj. Gen. Karl Horst, who was the original point of contact for those concerned about Lakin?s sentence, has been promoted since Obama took office on January 20, 2009.? Horst had delegated calls and emails to Lt. Col. Robert Manning, who then directed all inquiries to go to Lakin?s former Army defense counsel, Maj. Matthew Kemkes.

Since the 2008 election,? questions of possible wire fraud, social security number fraud, voter fraud, illegal campaign contributions and failure to qualify as a ?natural born Citizen? of the United States have all been raised by citizens but have either been ignored, answered with a form letter, or dismissed without a hearing from various courts.

Obama himself has stated that he was born a dual citizen of the U.S. and Great Britain due to a British citizen father. He has never shown the public any conclusive certified true and correct paper documentary proof of his alleged U.S. citizenship to any controlling legal authority such as Congress or a court of law, but evidence was presented early on in the presidential campaign that Obama might have become a citizen of Indonesia as a child.? Various accounts of his life differ as to when he was taken to Indonesia and when he might have returned to Hawaii, if he had ever lived there previously.? There are numerous statements by public officials and news outlets in Kenya stating that he was born in Kenya.

No hospital in Hawaii will confirm that Obama was born there, although the Hawaii Department of Health has stated that they ?have Sen. Obama?s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.?? However, they will not state what kind of birth registration record it was and no name of the doctor, medical attendant, or midwife who assisted with the alleged birth in Hawaii has ever been provided. No witnesses to the birth have ever been named.

Later, the Director of Health stated that she could confirm that Obama was a ?natural-born American citizen,? although she refused to expound on how she claimed that knowledge or the legal definition she utilized to make the determination.? The complete absence of any corroborating independently verifiable evidence that Obama was physically born in Hawaii and not just falsely registered as being born there by his maternal grandmother using a simple mail-in form available at the time gives Americans numerous reasons to be concerned about Obama?s true legal identity.

Commander Kerchner and Attorney William Baer did a radio interview following the court-martial on December 19 which can be heard here.

MRS. RONDEAU: Thank you for taking the time to speak with The Post & Email regarding the proceedings last week against Lt. Col. Lakin.? To begin, how many people would you say were in the room?

CDR KERCHNER: On the first day, Tuesday morning, I took the time to count the chairs, and there were 60 seats in the courtroom.? It was not a big courtroom.? The room was full; all the seats were taken, and the court bailiffs ? they were soldiers in camos ? announced that they were going to allow ?standing room only.?? So at the start of the trial, it was declared ?standing room only? admissions to the courtroom.? They also had a closed-circuit camera in there which was feeding into another room.? I never got to go over there to see how many people were there, so I don?t know if there any people there or if the room was full.? But on the first day, every seat in the main courtroom was full with the constitutionalists, news people, and there were a few bailiffs seated here and there and standing along the walls.? I guess they were there because the word was out that we could be ?potentially dangerous;? the constitutionalists were pre-labeled as potentially violent.? So they had a contingent of these people in camo in the room all the time, and at some point I noticed there were always three of them sitting behind me.? Also Rev. Manning and the two members of his congregation who accompanied him to the court martial always had a couple of these bailiffs or constables wearing their camo military uniforms sitting to the left and right of them.? It appeared there were keeping an extra close eye on certain attendees because of the false information spread around amongst the bailiffs prior to the court martial that we constitutionalists were potentially violent. And nothing could be further from the truth with that kind of statement. We came and gathered peacefully to show our support for Lt. Col. Lakin and the Constitution and nothing more.

The second day, pretty much all the seats were filled, with a few more of the uniformed bailiffs than on the prior day that I noticed.

On the third day, Lt. Col. Lakin?s counsel, Neal Puckett, left before the court-martial was over.? That surprised me and in my opinion showed a lack of 100% dedication to LTC Lakin?s court martial.? He actually made a statement that he had to go to another trial somewhere, catch a plane or whatever.? And of course, he had to get the permission of Lt. Col. Lakin to leave early.? The court asked Terry also, but Terry was broken in spirit by that time, because Neal Puckett, his defense counsel, did more to destroy the self-esteem and morale of Terry Lakin on the stand than any member of the prosecution.? I think that Neal ambushed him.? If you read the statement released on Puckett?s website, he says he ?surprised? Terry with his method of defense.

MRS. RONDEAU: Immediately afterward, I had read that Puckett sounded more like a prosecutor than a defense attorney at the trial.

CDR KERCHNER: Absolutely. I had driven down from Pennsylvania with a Vietnam combat veteran friend who had wanted to be there, too.? When we arrived at Ft. Meade, I went to the base to see if there was going to be lodging available on the base for me because it would have been considerably less cost, as a retired military officer, than staying outside in commercial lodging.? So we were driving around the base, not knowing exactly where the check-in building is, and after some time had elapsed, we found the right building.? We asked a fellow in the parking lot, and he said, ?This is where you have to go in and check in there and see if they have a room.? I was just in, and they don?t have any, but if you want to check yourself that is where you do it.?? So he showed us where to go; we went in there, and he stood there while we inquired.? He was a Lt. Col., and I pulled my ID card out and said, ?I?m CDR Kerchner; I had called down and asked to reserve a room, and you said I couldn?t do that, but if I got here around 16:00 (which is 4:00 in the afternoon for the civilians), if they had a last-minute cancellation on a room, they would provide it.? They said, ?No, we don?t have any openings.?? So I said, ?OK,? and I thanked the Lt. Col. who was there.? It turned out he was on Terry Lakin?s panel the next day; he was one of the jurors, so to speak.

Anyway, I turned around and was leaving, and I heard, ?Commander Kerchner,? and it was Terry Lakin.? He was checking out at that facility while I was attempting to check in.? If I had arrived a minute or five minutes before or a minute or five minutes later, I would never have met the man.? Can you just imagine that?driving a couple hundred miles, and the timing to come down and be at his trial?just two people in motion in the universe, and we just crossed paths in that building at that instant in time.? Anyway, he said, ?Commander Kerchner,? and I said, after looking at who was calling me, ?Terry!? It was quite a surprise to meet him that way. We were chit-chatting for a few seconds there, and he said, ?I?m pleased to meet you,? and I said, ?I?m honored to meet you.? I?m here to support you.?

As we were talking there, he said, ?Why don?t we go out to my car because the fellow over here might be on the panel.?? He kind-of detected that.? He went out to the car and he put on the heat, and we were talking, and he was upbeat then.? He wasn?t defeated.? And then at some point, he said, ?Why don?t you fellows come out to my house tonight?? and I said, ?Are you sure?? This is the night before the trial.? Don?t you prefer to be with your family or consulting with your counsel?? and he said, ??No, I don?t have any scheduled meetings and my family would enjoy meeting you.? I?d be happy to have you out.? It?s such a great honor to finally meet you,? and I was saying the same thing to him.? I told him, ?You?re the one who should be honored.? You?re risking everything.?

So we agreed, and he gave us the address and phone number in case we got lost on the way and we could call him.? We had a GPS system, so we went out there and met his family.? He has a nice home in the suburbs, nothing pretentious; just an ordinary middle American home, about 35 miles from Ft. Meade.? He has a beautiful wife and three lovely children, a Christian home, very nice kids who were very well-behaved.? They got pizza for us, and we had a little wine and pizza and talked.? He was not a beaten man.? He knew he was going to be punished, but he was not demoralized.

We left at about 8:45 that evening.? The next day, the trial started.? I just thought it was God?s hand at work there to put us two together, the two most recently prominent figures in the Obama eligibility saga, he as a defendant, and I as a plaintiff.? I thought it was really remarkable that this happened. When we talked, we both had a kindred soul and understanding that we were answering the call to do this.? We didn?t do it for any other reason but to stand up for our oaths to the Constitution, and we answered a higher call.? Both of us felt that way.? We were like two kindred souls there; we understood each other; we could look at each other face-to-face, and we knew we both were standing for the truth and for the Constitution, so help us, God. We both believe in God and that what we are doing is right.

The point is that Terry was not at all defeated or demoralized when I met him.? He knew he was going to be punished, but he wasn?t a broken man over it.? He believed he was standing tall for the Constitution.

The next day, at the court, he came in with his new lawyer, Neal Puckett.? In retrospect, I don?t believe that Neal even told Terry how he was going to approach defending him.? I don?t know how much time Lt. Col. Lakin actually had to meet with his lawyer and discuss strategy.? Based on what I saw happen, my opinion is:? very little.? I believe he knew that they were going to plead guilty to the charges of disobeying orders to report to Ft. Campbell and disobeying orders to report to his Commanding Officer for counseling.? Regarding those, Terry admits that he misunderstood the advice about not reporting for counseling.

MRS. RONDEAU: When you say ?advice,? was that from his first attorney?

CDR KERCHNER: Yes.? Listening to the testimony and statements of Terry?s lawyer, it seemed as if his first civilian attorney, Paul Jensen, had said something to the effect of refusing to obey all orders was consistent, after Terry decided not to follow the order to deploy for the 30,000-man surge, which came directly from Obama.? Foreign deployments must be signed off by the President.? So Terry was looking at this as a direct order from the illegal President, and he was disobeying that. But when Terry apparently asked Paul Jensen whether or not he should obey the order to go to counseling, Paul Jensen said something to the effect of ?Well, I can?t tell you not to go, but it would be consistent with your refusal to obey the first set of orders regarding overseas deployment.?? So Terry misunderstood that, and perhaps Paul Jensen doesn?t understand military law, but what he did was to set up numerous violations from each time he disobeyed an order.? The government piled all of those on to make additional charges to add on more potential jail time.

In retrospect, Terry understood that he made a mistake in that regard.? He should have obeyed all orders except the one that came down from Obama ordering him to be deployed overseas in combat.? Terry had been to Afghanistan and Bosnia before in a war situation, so it wasn?t a case of lack of courage to be deployed and go to combat.? He?s been there many times before.? It was strictly because he didn?t believe that Obama is eligible to issue any orders to any soldier to do anything, especially to deploy overseas in combat, because he?s a usurper.

So that was the whole first morning:? pleading out, and making sure he knew his rights to plead guilty to disobeying these orders.? Then in the afternoon, they had voir dire about the second charge of ?missing movement,? which was missing the movement of a particular commercial airline flight to take him to Ft. Campbell, KY to join the unit, the 101st Airborne, which was being deployed in the near future to Afghanistan.? Terry had been told to go to Ft. Campbell to do pre-deployment training with the unit for several weeks or months.? So by missing that plane he did not miss the movement of the military unit which was ?moving? as a unit several weeks or months later to Afghanistan. He just disobeyed orders to go to Ft Campbell, KY.

There were ten officers, and both sides? lawyers were questioning them to make sure that they didn?t have preconceived bias one way or the other.? They were all senior to Lt. Col. Lakin. Most of them were full colonels, and I think one was a Lt. Col. who would have had an earlier date of rank, which would mean that he was commissioned to the same rank earlier than Lt. Col. Lakin, so he would be senior.

They eventually decided to dismiss two of the ten and were left with eight, and they proceeded with the government?s case.? By the end of the day, the government made Terry look like the worst officer who ever served in the military; you would expect that from them.

MRS. RONDEAU: Did the eligibility question come up at all on that first day?

CDR KERCHNER: Yes, I believe it was on the first day.? One of the witnesses for the government, when asked if she knew why the Lt. Colonel was doing this, said ?Yes, because he questioned the eligibility of the president,? and of course, the government attorneys, who were all young captains, cut that line of testimony off by her and said, in effect, ?Whoa?we don?t want to go there.?

MRS. RONDEAU: So the reason for Lakin doing what he did couldn?t even be mentioned?

CDR KERCHNER: That?s correct.? It couldn?t be mentioned in the trial phase, but during the sentencing phase on the third day, it was mentioned, not by the defense but by the prosecution.? The prosecution played the video where Lt. Col. Lakin was in Paul Jensen?s office and explained why he did it.? They played the whole thing, but they used it in a way that was detrimental to Terry Lakin to make Terry Lakin look bad and that he planned it all and was a pawn of the ?birther? movement.

MRS. RONDEAU: It was planned to the extent that he had gone through about a year and a half of asking all of his elected representatives to verify that Obama was eligible.

CDR KERCHNER: It was even more than that.? I learned a lot there.? Terry had been questioning Obama?s eligibility for over two years, and not only did he go to his elected representatives; he used a formal path available to soldiers, filling out a form or writing a letter, to request a congressional inquiry.? If a soldier is having some issue with the military chain of command or for any reason feels that he has been unjustly treated, there is the Article 138 where you can directly ask your senior chain of command about it.? He also filed another form or letter to request a congressional inquiry; he requested more than once that an investigation be done about Obama?s eligibility because as an officer, he had sworn an oath to the U.S. Constitution.? He had great doubts that Obama was eligible, and he wanted them to investigate, and they didn?t even answer him.

It was the same story for me when I wrote to Congress to request inquiries, although under statutory law, I don?t have the right to one in the same sense that an active duty soldier does.? However, we both had constitutional rights to ask Congress to investigate the questions and fully vet Obama?s eligibility. The Congress did nothing.? Terry, as a soldier, had a further right to one, and he didn?t even get an answer.? For example, if you allege that your commanding officer is mistreating you, Congress? investigates those allegations.? Terry asked for a congressional inquiry because no one in his chain of command was answering his questions, and they didn?t answer him.? He felt he was being unjustly treated and ignored by his chain of command in their not addressing or answering his questions about the eligibility of Obama to be the Commander-in-Chief and President.? He brought that up in the sentencing phase of the trial.

It was the same story, absolutely no answers being provided to the questions being asked. His was within the military; mine was in civilian life.? They totally ignored us.? The Congress ignored hundreds of thousands of petitions and letters from people like me in civilian life and also from this soldier. Terry wrote personal letters to his elected representatives and a congressional inquiry request that were sent to the proper committee to request a formal congressional inquiry, and they were totally ignored.? They didn?t even answer him.

MRS. RONDEAU: What do you think this means, Commander, when the courts, the Congress, state legislators, the military and the media have closed off every avenue that ?we the people? thought we had for redress of grievances?

CDR KERCHNER: It means we no longer have a rule of law and a constitutional republic subservient to the fundamental law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.? Not even statutory laws are being obeyed; not even regulations regarding congressional inquiries from soldiers are being obeyed.? It?s strictly to defend one man, a phony, a fraud, the usurper-in-chief, Obama.? Our whole system of government, our whole culture has been corrupted and turned upside-down and completely rotted from the inside out to protect this man.? All of our laws are being subverted and ignored because they know the answer:? he?s not eligible.? They know it. The media anointed him, covered for him,? plowed the way for him, and ridiculed anybody who stood up to ask questions about his eligibility during the election process.? They painted themselves in the corner by his getting the nomination.? When the electoral college questions came up, they continued again; in the joint session, again and again, to protect him, to plow the road ahead and cover for him and ridicule and put down anybody who questioned it.? I believe the Republican Party was complicit in this because they put up John McCain, who also had questionable natural born Citizenship, and they wanted to keep the lid on that.? John McCain should be ashamed of himself for his silence during the campaign on this matter and his continued silence on this matter.? It was a perfect storm for creating a constitutional crisis, and I believe that Obama and his backers played that perfect storm perfectly, with the media backing it 110%.

We know about the Journolist group of 400 mainstream media journalists in a secret forum, planning and plotting how to write favorable stories for Obama, their anointed one, to be the first black president in history, and coordinated attacks on anybody who stood up to Obama asking questions about his constitutional eligibility for the office he sought, labeling them as racist and other vicious names.

Going back to the Monday night when I met Lakin?s family, he is in a mixed-racial marriage. So for CNN to call him a racist was abominable.? It was terrible.

?

Terry Lakin and his wife, Pili

MRS. RONDEAU: I hadn?t known that at the time, but when I saw his wife?s photo on the new foundation?s website, I saw that she is Asian.

CDR KERCHNER: She?s Thai.? She came over here after the Vietnam War.? I don?t know under what program, but they did allow a lot of people who worked for the U.S. government during the war to come over to the United States for their own safety.? I don?t know if that was the exact reason for her.? She?s a very beautiful woman, and lovely children.

In the military, there are warriors, and we?re all trained, to a certain extent, to be warriors, but Terry Lakin is a doctor.? He?s a healer, a nurturing man.? There?s not a racist bone in his body.? I don?t even think he?s ever thought a racial thought.? I?m more of the Alpha Male Warrior type.? He?s a nurturer, a very quiet, calm man.? Race has nothing to do with this issue. It is a legal and constitutional question......

READ MORE


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:44
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Lunes, 27 de diciembre de 2010

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Video: Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie offended by Obama citizenship questions; Then use your commie power and free the Obama records!

Video interview of Gov. Abercommie from Hawaii News Now embedded below. Via Hawaii News Now; - Abercrombie offended by Obama citizenship questions - By Brooks Baehr -

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) ? Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie said Friday the "dark side" is responsible for accusations Barack Obama is not or should not be president because he was not born in the United States. As governor Abercrombie is optimistic he will be able to quiet at least some of the questions surrounding Obama's birth place.

"This has to do with the people in Hawaii who love him, people who loved his mom and dad. This has to do with the respect of the office that the president is entitled to," Abercrombie said after attending the Sheraton Hawaii Bowl at Aloha Stadium.

The controversy first gained national attention during Obama's presidential campaign in 2008. While his mother was from Kansas, his father was from Kenya. And doubters claimed he was born in either Kenya or Indonesia where he lived for a while as a child.

Obama's 2008 presidential campaign responded by releasing a certification of live birth and posting it online. But critics persisted. They want to see his original long-form birth certificate - - something that by law is not public record.

Chiyome Fukino, who at the time was Director of the Hawaii state Department of Health issued a statement saying she had "... personally seen and verified that the Hawaii state Department of Health has Senator Obama's original birth certificate on record..."

Even that did not quiet some who challenge Obama's legal citizenship.

So now Governor Abercrombie wants to do something to dispute claims the president's parents somehow lied about their son's birth place.

"It's an insult to his mother and father. How would anybody like to have their mother and father in that kind of a situation? I was friends with his mom and dad. The president of the United States is entitled to the respect of his office," Abercrombie said.

Exactly how Abercrombie will be able to produce additional evidence is still unclear. ...continued here; http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=13739513



Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie: discrediting anti-Obama 'birthers' is a top priority; Bring it on you Commie Scumbag, Got Citizen Parents!? -At Source.

Flashback; Confirmed: Neil Abercrombie IS a Socialist! DSA'er Abercrommie Running for Governor of Hawaii to Help Protect Obama's Ineligibility!? -Details here.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].

Check out the 4 different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly or Anderson Pooper;


1) Daily Kos COLB; http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg


2) Fight the Smears COLB; http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg


3) Factcheck.org COLB with seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg


4) Factcheck.org COLB without seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg


All should view the research compiled at this site; http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/

Flashback from the Right Side of Life; Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.

The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama?s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy ? so he?s a political operative ? while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature ? I?m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots ? just what you?d expect ? Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph ? suitable work for a Ph. D.

Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it ? and so do Henig and Miller.

FactCheck does say their, ?representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ?birth certificate,? and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.? In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.

And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE and HERE.

And this oldie; Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online ? neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.

FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source. And much more HERE.

Forgery is nothing new to the Obama campaign, via Debbie Schlussel; Obama?s Selective Service Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this(last) year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It?s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama?s official Selective Service registration for the draft. The full investigative report is HERE.

And via Give us Liberty; EXPLOSIVE...more proof that AKA OBAMA is a fraud and very likely not even an American citizen!... - Obama conspiracy ? It?s no longer just a theory - A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed. This is a must read HERE.

Bonus; CONFIRMED: Factcheck.org Published Bogus Fact Regarding Obama?s British/Kenyan Citizenship. We can report that it has been conclusively established ? the Factcheck.org report contains false information. Factcheck.org ? Inaccuracy #1: Obama?s Kenyan Citizenship did not expire on Aug 4, 1982. Factcheck.org was absolutely wrong when they reported Obama?s Kenyan citizenship expired on Aug 4, 1982.

Factcheck.org ? Inaccuracy #2: While Obama?s status as a British citizen may have been short lived, Factcheck.org failed to state that his status as a British subject was not short lived. Research has discovered multiple legal mechanisms which have the potential to establish that Obama is now a full citizen of Kenya as well as the United Kingdom, the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations and the Republic of Indonesia. Source.

Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President. Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].







Official Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth vs Obama's Certification of Live Birth
A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Bor...
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-10-04 pg 5

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:29
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com

Governor Abercrombie interview on Hawaii News Now, KHNL, KGMB, Abercrombie lies for Obama, Obama birth certificate, Orwellian word?smithing

Governor Abercrombie interview on Hawaii News Now, KHNL, KGMB, Abercrombie lies for Obama, Obama birth certificate, Orwellian word smithing

?Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records???Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

?And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
?if all records told the same tale?then the lie passed into
history and became truth. ?Who controls the past,? ran the
Party slogan, ?controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.??George Orwell, ?1984″

?If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it??Joseph Goebbels

Yesterday, December 26, 2010, the Citizen Wells blog reported on the interview of newly elected Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie by Hawaii News Now, KGMB, KHNL. Abercrombie, who admits to being friends with Obama and Obama?s parents, continues his Orwellian choice of words and outright lies to protect Obama. Hawaii News Now included a June 2008 article from Citizen Wells in their video. I thanked them in the article and subsequent email.

?Abercrombie states:

?This has to do with the people in Hawaii who love him,
who loved his mom and dad.
This has to do with the respect of the office of the president is entitled to.?

No Governor Abercrombie. This has to do with respecting the US Constitution, office of the presidency and the American people!?

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/12/26/neil-abercrombie-lies-for-obama-hawaii-news-now-interview-kgmb-khnl-citizen-wells-reference-call-me/

More on Abercrombie lies and deception from Citizen Wells December 24, 2010.

?Let?s examine the first piece of Orwellian spin by Abercrombie (with the help of the LA Times).

?Neil Abercrombie knew Barack Obama?s parents when the future president was born here in 1961″

My response:

People in Kenya knew Obama?s parents, so he must have been born there, applying that logic.

Second.

?Maybe I?m the only one in the country that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ?I was here when that baby was born.? ?

My Response:

I was here when that baby was born. Does that mean Obama was born in NC?

Duh!

Third.

?That June, the Obama campaign released a certificate of live birth, an official document from the Hawaii Health Department certifying the facts of a person?s birth, as proof of his birthplace.?

My response:

First of all, the COLB posted on the internet is a certification not certificate. The one posted on the internet was never validated as having been issued by the state of Hawaii. And even if it had been, a HI COLB does not prove birth in Hawaii. It is as Lou Dobbs stated, a document that refers to another document.

Fourth.

?Investigations by two prominent fact-checking organizations, PolitiFact and FactCheck.org, concluded that the certificate was authentic.?

My response:

Would you trust securing the office of the presidency and upholding the US Constitution to these two FactCheck.org employees?

Fifth.

?FactCheck also turned up a 1961 birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser marking the birth of a son to ?Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama of Kalanianaole Hwy.??

My response:

Once again, we have more proof that a birth occurred, but not where.?

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/12/24/neil-abercrombie-big-brother-spokesman-orwellian-speak-hawaii-corruption-much-like-illinois-corruption-obama-tied-to-both-states/



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:24
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Jueves, 23 de diciembre de 2010

GOP Continues to play Supplicant to Marxist Obama?Our Nation under Siege

?
??1Share 0diggsdigg ?

STOP THE DISMANTLING OF AMERICA!

by Sher Zieve, ?2010

In 1848, Karl Marx published "The Communist Manifesto," which decried capitalism and the wealthy class

(Dec. 23, 2010) ? Using only the quietest and most humble voices to disagree with the Dictator-in-Chief, Republican leaders continued to bow and scrape to the usurped and, therefore, illegal authority claimed by Barack Hussein Obama to function as POTUS.? In other words, as The Obama bows to foreign leaders?therefore placing the USA in a subservient position to them?the GOP establishment RINOs (aka Marxist/Democrat plants) continue to bow to The Obama.

Besides the obvious refusals?from both the US Marxist Party and RINOs?to acknowledge the truth of what We-the-People told them in November, The Obama continues to spin ?the vote meant we?re supposed to work together to get my agenda done?.? No, Mr. Obama.? That?s not what we said.

However, rather than acknowledge what We-the-People literally shouted to Congress with our 2010 midterm election votes, the old corrupt establishment Republicans in Name Only (predominantly but not entirely in the Senate) offered only the mildest pretense of fighting the Marxist/Leninist tyrants now occupying the once people?s White House.? Instead, RINOs joined with the Marxist Party to vote in the heavily-detrimental-to-the-USA START (which effectively gives the defense of the USA to the whims of Russia), the repeal of DADT and the Marxist ?voice-only vote? to take over OUR country?s food supply (including its distribution) of the United States?effectively giving the Marxists (should they so choose) the power to starve-out any segment of the society it wishes.? Don?t think it can happen?? It already has in both Soviet Russia and Mao?s China?where millions and millions of people were?by design?murdered.? Note:? Both of these countries were ruled by Marxist/Leninists when these atrocities occurred.

In November 2010, We-the-People shouted to the proverbial rooftops that we wanted Obama and his anti-American agenda to be stopped?period.? We did NOT vote for the GOP to begin even more fervent compromises with the pretender to the US presidency.

We voted for gridlock over the continued dismantling of the United States of America; not more destruction to OUR country.? And as we did so, the factual evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural-born or otherwise US citizen continued to mount?and mount?while the RINO ?faithful? continue to beg for alms from the Usurper and Dictator-in-Chief.

Note:? Attorney Stephen Pidgeon has a logical, if not brilliant, dissertation on both Obama?s ineligibility to hold any elected position in the USA, let alone that of POTUS and cites multiple US codes (two include 18 U.S.C. 1017 and 1028) already on the books that deal with this type of fraud and the punishment to be rendered.? Such punishment may include 15 years in prison.? In other words, contrary to popular opinion, there actually ARE remedies to the continuing swindle and hoax that strongly appears to have been perpetrated upon the US public by both Obama and the leaders of the Marxist-Democrat Party.

Despite the November 2010 elections, we and our country are still under siege from the corrupt Political Ruling Class that is bound and determined to extend and increase our new position of We-the-Slaves; so that it?not us?can remain in power.

Folks, when the new conservative House of Representatives enter that body and take the reins in January, we must remember to constantly praise them when they do We-the-People?s and pro-American work and chastise them immediately if they do not.? It?s better to have little-to-NO government activity for a couple of years, rather than having the corrupt, insane and patently evil rulers continue to turn our country into their own personal feudal caste system?with them at the top and us at the bottom.? If we are to survive?at all?we must immediately (there?s no time left) stop the demolition of our country, stop the Usurper and Dictator Obama and vote Obama & Co, the rest of his Marxist Party and the rest of the RINOs we can out of power in 2012.

But, have no illusions.? If Obama isn?t stopped straight away, we won?t last as a country for two more years.

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:11
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 22 de diciembre de 2010

?Dear Major General Karl Horst,

As a former Army officer (Captain, U.S. Army-Aviation; 1957-1965), I find that, even at the age of 75, I still feel strongly about upholding my oath to the Constitution. I have often stated that if recalled to active duty (anything is possible under this rogue administration) and asked to fly Helicopter One, I would have to refuse until the putative Commander in Chief shows proof that he can issue anything other than unlawful orders.

Being so upset about the unlawful and unconstitutional (Kangaroo) Courts-Martialing of an honorable and decorated flight surgeon, LTC Terry Lakin, I felt compelled to write the following article concerning the gross injustices that are being done in the name of our Constitution, but are instead diametrically opposed to the oaths to uphold and defend it.

I would ask that you read it, Sir, and perhaps consider some of the comments and facts therein, before issuing your final ruling on the events that took place at Ft. Meade, MD on December 14-16, 2010 - so that it does not go down as another day that will live in infamy in the history of our Constitutional Republic.

Respectfully submitted;

Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
Carlsbad, CA

How can this man continue to hide all of his records and expect to stay in office?

(Dec. 21, 2010) ? The argument that LTC Lakin asked the wrong question when he refused to deploy to Afghanistan ? a direct order for the surge from the office of the Commander-in-Chief ? sounds plausible, but is false and misleading. LTC Lakin did not ?ask a question?. He only demanded proof that the putative (i.e., accepted as true on inconclusive grounds) Commander-in-Chief (CIC) could issue anything other than unlawful orders, a sworn duty of all U.S. Military officers.

Lakin did suggest some means by which Obama could prove otherwise:

    ? by releasing all his unlawfully hidden records such as passports, school records, law records, Selective Service registration records (an additional requirement to be in the Executive Branch), and a long-form birth certificate proving ?natural born? citizenship as required by the Constitution.

LTC Lakin should have been found Not Guilty by reason of ?NON-INSANITY?, for it would be insanity to follow the orders of a CIC who has not yet proven that he can give anything but unlawful orders!

Until Obama does ? which We The People know that he cannot ? then anyone who follows any orders from this Usurper-in-Chief (thank you, Maureen Dowd of The New York Times) is, in fact, complicit in aiding and abetting Obama?s acts of Treason. This would include JAG Judge Col. Denise R. Lind and her superiors up through Major General Carla G. Hawley-Bowland, Major General Karl R. Horst, and the Army Chief of Staff, General George W. Casey, Jr.

It would also include LTC Lakin?s Congressman, Rep. John Duncan (R), his two U.S. Senators, as well as the entire 111th Congress, plus SCOTUS ? all of whom aided and abetted in the seating of a known-to-be-ineligible Usurper in the Office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

Let us not forget that the ultimate conspirator was none other than the previous Natural-Born President and Commander-in-Chief, George W. Bush, who, in a final act of absolute Treason, knowingly turned over the reins of our Constitutional Republic to a non-Natural-Born ?citizen? ? in violation of his oath to, and the Article II terms of, the Constitution of the United States.

Just as the charges of Treason by LTCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III ? now a political prisoner in a dungeon in Madisonville, TN, on trumped-up, false charges by a fatally-flawed Grand Jury and a (Kangaroo) Court Trial ? just as these charges and demands go unanswered and are still in play today, so the demands of LTC Terry Lakin go unanswered to this day.

What is the more serious charge?

1. Missing a movement, by refusing to comply with unlawful orders, or;

2. Aiding and abetting in the act of Treason ? by the (Kangaroo) Courts-Martialing of an honorable and obedient Military Officer, while such Court failed to review a single bit of documented and offered evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Obama is nothing more than a Usurper to the Office of the Presidency.

The answer is obvious!

What Can Be Done About This?

Since the entire Congress, the JCS, the SCOTUS, the DOJ, and Law Enforcement are all complicit in this ultimate act of treason, and

Since We The People cannot indict them all at once, we suggest the following:

I. Begin forming local 5th Amendment Citizens? Grand Juries (Carl Swensson of www.RiseUpForAmerica.com and Bob Campbell of www.AmericanGrandJury.org have paved the way here), and start indicting the traitors ? one by one.

(e.g., a Citizens Grand Jury nearby Ft. Meade, MD or in nearby VA should begin with JAG Judge Col. Denise R. Lind. The charges could be: convening an illegal Courts-Martial; falsely convicting an honorable military officer; denying a defendant his right to self-defense/calling witnesses; judicial misconduct; aiding and abetting in acts of Treason, etc.).

II. When these ?easy-to-conclude? indictments go unanswered by the now-complicit Judiciary and Law Enforcement, the People should then form 9th and 10th Amendment Citizens Court Trials (Dr. James David Manning of ATLAH.org has paved the way with the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL ? see www.CRS-Reports.org for the verdicts and transcripts) and issue actionable Guilty Verdicts and Sentencing.

III. Finally, when the Citizens Court Trial verdicts and sentences are ignored by the corrupt law enforcement and the judiciary, use the already formed Citizens? Militias to carry out the arrests and sentencing. (States that already have Citizens Militias are: AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, ID, IN, KY, ME, MI, MN, NH, NJ, JC, OH, OR, PA, TX, UT, VA, & WA).

There is still time to begin correcting this matter before it goes too far:

A. Major General Karl R. Horst can vacate the verdict and sentencing of LTC Lakin (he is being formally served with the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL transcripts on December 20, 2010), and call for a retrial for the exoneration for LTC Lakin ? while demanding proof that Obama can issue anything other than unlawful orders;

B. The 111th Congress can go into a joint session before year-end 2010, and hear the evidence and remove the Usurper and his cabal of thugs in handcuffs immediately;

C. Finally, since all who are presently in the Constitutional line of succession for the Office of President and CIC are complicit in this Treason, the Joint Chiefs of Staff should assume control (as in Honduras) until new elections of a Constitutionally qualified President and Commander-in-Chief can be held on April 5, 2011.

It should be noted that the incoming Republican majority cannot be expected to do anything about this on their own, since they know that Obama is destroying the Democrat Party while strengthening their own Party ? and that keeping him in the White House, although unqualified and ineligible, increases their chances for complete control in 2012, and;

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have already shown their hand ? that they would rather send an oath-upholding decorated and honorable officer to Leavenworth (where he is incarcerated now*), rather than uphold their oath to the Constitution ? because they assume that if they expose the Usurper, the existing military forces will leave their posts until a lawful CIC can be installed, and ?There MAY BE Blood? (assumed).

On the other hand, We The People** can no longer be expected to passively give up our rights and our Constitution, and that to preserve our unalienable rights it is more likely that ?There WILL BE Blood? (assured).

That?s how our emerging nation got things done over 200 years ago ? with Citizens Grand Juries and Citizens Court Trials, and with oath-honoring sheriffs and lawmen. If it was good enough for our founding fathers then, it should certainly be good enough for us now.

And we?ve got a well-seasoned ?contract? to work with ? the U.S. Constitution. It worked then. There is no reason to trash it and start over. It will work for us now ? if we will only speak up and use it.

?With the privilege and honor of knowing of, swearing to, and living under our Constitution, comes the responsibility and duty of defending, maintaining and adhering to it.?

As Dr. Laura has oft been heard to say, ?Now go do the right thing.?

*Send cards and letters (no food, supplies, or books) to:

Terrence Lakin #89996 (NOTE: no rank is allowed)
830 Sabalu Road
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027

**Recent polls show that over 150 million Americans (over 60%) now have doubts as to whether the putative Commander-in-Chief can issue anything other than unlawful orders.

? Prepared and Written by Neil Turner


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:05
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Margaret Hemenway to Military Officers: Stop Using the Nuremberg Defense

? ??11Share 0diggsdigg ?
?

?IT WAS AN ABOMINATION?

Are our military officers "just following orders," whether or not the person giving them is legitimate?

December 21, 2010

From: Margaret Hemenway
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]?; [email protected]?
Cc: [email protected]?
Subject: FW: Military families & LTC Lakin

MG Horst & MG Hawley-Bowland:? My family is among the multi-generational military families that have fought for this country since the Indian Wars- my son is named for General Troup Miller, a cavalry officer- my Dad volunteered in World War II, and served?in?General Curtis LeMay?s command with the Army Air Corps; my husband served 16 yrs in Army reserves (light infantry) until President Clinton downsized his unit.? My ancestor, John C. Calhoun,?served as?Secretary of War.? My father-in-law, who filed an eligibility lawsuit, also served in World War II, graduated from the US Naval Academy,?was a Rhodes Scholar and a foreign service officer in Russia and Germany- at the age of 83,?he was threatened with ruinous financial sanctions by Obama?s eligibility lawyer, Robert Bauer- who since was appointed White House Counsel.? This is not a partisan issue- my father-in-law is a registered Democrat- who filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Democrat, former Deputy AG in the State of Pennsylvania, a Hillary Clinton supporter.? The original ?birthers? of course were the major newspapers who hounded Senator McCain until he felt compelled to produce an original birth certificate even though there was no question of his ?natural born? status, born to two US citizens.? Senator Obama, on the other hand, if born in Kenya, as prominent Kenyans claim, was not entitled under immigration statutes in force in 1961, to US citizenship- he would fail the ?natural born? test.

LTC Lakin?s trial?was not only a miscarriage of justice- it was an abomination.? A great irony at trial was the portraits of General George?Washington and Thomas Jefferson (raised by LTC Lakin during his unsworn testimony) behind the heads of the sentencing panel- the brilliant and brave men?who designed the U.S. Constitution? including the unique requirement for the Presidency- that?a President be ?natural born.?? We entrust those trained with lethal weapons to protect?OUR government- not just to fight wars, as young prosecutor Captain O?Beirne (who replaced rogue prosecutor LTC Brodsky) misunderstands.? If Obama is not Constitutionally eligible, he cannot be Commander-in-Chief.? The fact that he has hidden all evidence necessary to prove his ?natural born? status, logically leads one to conclude that the evidence is concealed because he?cannot pass?the ?natural born? test.? The Army failed LTC Lakin when it could not answer his simple question about the legality of his orders- his Congressional delegation failed him when it could not answer this question.? Does it become evident that when our leaders fail us, ordinary citizens- or ordinary soldiers- might feel compelled to raise their voices- or to fall on their swords as in the case of LTC Lakin?

Alfred Jodl, Chief of the Operations Staff of?the High Command of the German Armed Forces, at Nuremberg, claimed it was not the task of a soldier to act as judge over his supreme commander??but he was found guilty on all four counts- sentenced to death by hanging.? LTC Lakin?has been sentenced to Leavenworth?for doing what Jodl?and others should have done- which was to question the legality of his orders, per his training as an officer.? It is more than disturbing to see officers today?rationalize, spin and obfuscate- concocting legal evasions (e.g. de facto officer doctrine)- to avoid this central problem of the Commander-in-Chief?s eligibility.? It is?appalling to see officers now?employing the discredited Nuremberg defense.? (http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/NurembergIndictments.html#Jodl Jodl?s defense was that he was an obedient soldier, signing orders only as a command from Hitler.? This was not a defense allowed under Article Eight of the Charter, however, and no other mitigation evidence could be offered.)

I am forwarding this message below- conveyed verbally to LTC Manning, as typical of many military mothers.? Consider the morale of the troops in the injustice perpetrated upon LTC Lakin.? Consider that LT Choi wasn?t labeled ?a spectacle? as CAPT O?Beirne labeled LTC Lakin- when Choi was chaining himself to the White House fence in protest of Don?t Ask, Don?t Tell- even as the politically correct Army tried to salvage?Choi?s military career.??There are many of us who are outraged by the pervasiveness political correctness in the upper echelons of the Army today? it is eroding a great military institution that the nation?relied upon to?protect our freedoms.? We only ask that you uphold your sworn?oaths to the Constitution.

Margaret Calhoun Hemenway

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:49
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Miki Booth: The Constitution Matters to Me

? ?Share 0digg ?
?

BUT NOT TO OBAMA, WHO HAS OBSCURED EVERYTHING ABOUT HIMSELF

December 22, 2010

Why won't this man release his records? Why is he being propped up by the U.S. military? Pensions, benefits, pay, control?

Dear Editor:

The following letter was sent to Maj. Gen. Matthew Kemkes, the designee to receive all communications regarding Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who was sentenced last week to six months at Ft. Leavenworth Prison without the opportunity to present a?defense?or?obtain discovery?relating to Barack Hussein Obama?s eligibility to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. military.

Dear Maj. Matthew Kemkes,

I wish I had died before this travesty befell this honorable and patriotic officer, Terrence Lakin, and never had to witness this. There are millions of us who believe Barack Hussein Obama was never eligible to serve as Commander in Chief of our country?s military. Terry Lakin spoke for us as we want proof that Obama has met qualifications to be in the White House and orders originating from him are legitimate.

Terry is a hero and one day he will be recognized as the bravest American of our time. He was right to ask for proof that his orders were legal. Obama hides behind millions of dollars of legal protection. 6 out of 10 Americans now believe Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president. Why don?t you ask and have answers to the question, ?what is he hiding?? No one will investigate. No one cares. Well, the Constitution matters to me. The truth matters to me.

I challenge you to take on one, just one, piece of suspicious information no one will answer. Why is Obama?s social security number issued out of Connecticut when he never lived or worked there? His SS# 042-68-4425 is linked to his selective service record.

https://www.sss.gov/RegVer/wfVerification.aspx?Enter Last name, SS# and DOB 08/4/1961. Do this soon, they are already talking about changing the way SS numbers are issued. Another act to cloud the issue.

Why are all his records sealed? Not just court sealed but executive order sealed and CIA sealed. What is he hiding? And why do you protect him when he could have just showed Terry his long-form birth certificate from Kapiolani if he has one? No, he wants Terry incarcerated and his secrets safe.

Maybe I?m just wasting my time once again. Anyone that questions Obama gets silenced. Terry is the latest proof of that.?The buck is being passed again, Maj. Kemke. We?re now directed to address this issue to you.

I?m sure Judge Lind wants Terry to stay in the darkest confines of Ft. Leavenworth and hopes this issue will just go away. If you haven?t followed Terry?s case, know this, Lind denied discovery for Terry saying she would not allow her courtroom to be used to embarrass Obama. Oh, really? What does she know? Again, I ask does anyone care? Do you?

Sincerely,

Miki Booth

????????

Editor?s Note:?Ms. Booth?s husband and son were both born in Hawaii, and their original birth certificates can be seen?here.? Obama has never?produced?such a document, and Hawaii has routinelyissued??Certifications of Live Birth? to people not born there but who have a relative who can prove one year of residency.? It is widely known and was reported before Obama entered the Oval Office that no hospital in Hawaii has?claimed?that it is Obama?s birthplace.

? 2010,?The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:40
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 21 de diciembre de 2010

?

When did Kenya became?Hawaii?

When did Kenya become Hawaii?

Barack Hussein Obama claims to have been born on the island of Oahu in Hawaii on Aug 4th, 1961. This claim is backed up by one and only one document [in three versions], and not one these has been proven to be a valid and authentic document. Just because it was initially excepted, does not mean it is real or factual.

More to the point, until Barack Hussein Obama was campaigning for the Presidency his place of birth was not an issue. The Constitutional requirements for the Presidency are clearly laid out in in the United states Constitution Art. 2 sec. 5.? as it has been established here that a Nautial Born Citizen is a person born to Citizen parent(s) at the mimimal standards, but also born in country. Link?SR 511 confirms this.

So if being born in the United states is all that is required for eligibility for the Presidency, Barack Hussein Obama should have no issue releasing a long form Birth Certificate issued from the State of Hawaii. Correct?? A long form Birth certificate contains all the recorded vital stactics at the moment of birth, the doctor, the witnesses, the wieght, siblings, parents, their occupations and other stactics.

So the question is ?When did Kenya become Hawaii??? Because until the campaign newspaer articled that referred to Barack Hussein Obama all reported ?Kenyan-Born?.

[click on the images below for a larger pop-up]

The first is a report that when Obama was running for Illinois State Senator he was ?Kenyan-Born?. The report is from the AP or Associated Press. So even before Barack Hussein Obama was campaigning as a Presidential candidate the news media was reporting Obama as ?Kenyan-Born?.

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/auburn-ca.jpg

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/100408npr.jpg

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/allafrica1.jpg

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/newspage-report.png

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/nigerian-observer.png

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/sunday-standard.jpg

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/tanzania.jpg

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/obama_bbc_senatewin_kenya_home.jpg

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/barackbama08usafrica.gif

http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/modernghana.jpg

  1. The Kenyan Government on their official record states that Obama was born in Kenya and is not even a US Citizen.? Link?and more statements by the Kenyan Government
  2. Barack Hussein Obama?s own wife Michelle has stated more then once that Kenya is his ?Home Country?
  3. So when did Kenya become Hawaii?



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:56
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

LTC Terry Lakin Prosecution‏

? ??Share 0diggsdigg ?

YOUR ALLEGIANCE IS TO YOUR COUNTRY, NOT TO A POLITICIAN

December 21, 2010

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin shaking the hand of Faux Defense Secretary Robert Gates while he was on active duty as a medical doctor

Dear Editor:

The following letter was sent to the addressees indicated below in regard to Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin.

From:? Victoria Windsor
Sent:Tue 12/21/10 2:35 AM
To: Major General Karl R. Horst ([email protected])
Cc: LTC Robert Manning ([email protected])

Major General Karl R. Horst
Convening authority for Court-martial

Dear Major General Horst,

I have followed the court-martial of LTC Terry Lakin and conclude that the issues are more Politically Motivated than Military Oriented. It is within your power and authority to review the procedure of Judge Lind?s ruling and the panel?s sentencing recommendation. Further, authority to suspend or shorten the Lt. Colonel?s sentence.

It is my belief that LTC Lakin?s exemplary career and his impressive resume of service to his profession as a medical doctor and service to his country, can not and must not go ignored. I would expect that any military officer that swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States has a duty to defend and protect the Constitution and the United States of America and not the oval office. I have spoken with LtC Lakin and I am convinced that his allegiance to our country is true and profound.

I prefer to deal in de jure facts and do not accept de facto jurisprudence. The fact is, Mr. Obama has hired attorneys to protect his identity and history. Full disclosure is a requirement of law and profound within the Constitution. I have never heard of anyone that vetted the candidate and frankly I have no idea who this man really is nor his qualifications. If you have proof to the contrary, please step forward and show us the proof. What is most significant, is that it goes without saying, he has transformed my country into a nation that I do not recognize anymore and I do not like the fact that my entire family has fought for this nation since coming to America in 1691 in order that I and my grandchildren live in freedom and liberty to have it destroyed.

Therefore, I appeal to your sense of values and integrity that you were raised in a small town such as Wenatchee, Washington of which is more intrinsic than a current career. Please suspend LTC Terry Lakin?s sentence and incarceration at Fort Levenworth, and allow him to retire honorably with his earned pension. I trust that you do the honorable thing when exercising your authority in this case, knowing that the decision you make will represent and reflect upon the American People as a Nation. We the People stand with Terry Lakin as an honorable man that has shown throughout his career an outstanding service to our country.? It serves no benefit to the military nor this nation to strip this man of his dignity nor to devalue his services as a life saving physician, that he earned. Anything short of this request indicates that you honor an office, rather than this nation and its people. As an officer and gentleman your allegiance is to your country as a natural born citizen and not to a temporary elected official.

Cordially,

Victoria Windsor

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:12
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

?

Defending LTC Lakin (and LTCDR Fitzpatrick)/Defending Honor/Defending the Constitution!

by Neil Turner

?

How can this man continue to hide all of his records and expect to stay in office?

(Dec. 21, 2010) ? The argument that LTC Lakin asked the wrong question when he refused to deploy to Afghanistan ? a direct order for the surge from the office of the Commander-in-Chief ? sounds plausible, but is false and misleading. LTC Lakin did not ?ask a question?.? He only demanded proof that the putative (i.e., accepted as true on inconclusive grounds) Commander-in-Chief (CIC) could issue anything other than unlawful orders, a sworn duty of all U.S. Military officers.

Lakin did suggest some means by which Obama could prove otherwise ? by releasing all his unlawfully hidden records such as passports, school records, law records, Selective Service registration records (an additional requirement to be in the Executive Branch), and a long-form birth certificate.

LTC Lakin should have been found Not Guilty by reason of ?NON-INSANITY?, for it would be insanity to follow the orders of a CIC who has not yet proven that he can give anything but unlawful orders!

Until Obama does ? which We The People know that he cannot ? then anyone who follows any orders from this Usurper-in-Chief (thank you, Maureen Dowd of The New York Times) is, in fact, complicit in aiding and abetting Obama?s acts of Treason.? This would include JAG Judge Col. Denise R. Lind and her superiors up through Major General Carla G. Hawley-Bowland, Major General Karl R. Horst, and the Army Chief of Staff, General George W. Casey, Jr.

It would also include LTC Lakin?s Congressman, Rep. John Duncan (R), his two U.S. Senators, as well as the entire 111th Congress, plus SCOTUS ? all of whom aided and abetted in the seating of a known-to-be-ineligible Usurper in the Office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

Let us not forget that the ultimate conspirator was none other than the previous Natural-Born President and Commander-in-Chief, George W. Bush, who, in a final act of absolute Treason, knowingly turned over the reins of our Constitutional Republic to a non-Natural-Born ?citizen? ? in violation of his oath to, and the Article II terms of, the Constitution of the United States.

Just as the charges of Treason by LTCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III ? now a political prisoner in a dungeon in Madisonville, TN, on trumped-up, false charges by a fatally-flawed Grand Jury and a (Kangaroo) Court Trial ? just as these charges and demands go unanswered and are still in play today, so the demands of LTC Terry Lakin go unanswered to this day.

What is the more serious charge?

  1. Missing a movement, in order to not be in compliance with unlawful orders, or;
  2. Aiding and abetting in the act of Treason ? of (Kangaroo) Courts-Martialing an honorable and obedient-to-his-oath Military Officer, while failing to offer one shred of evidence that the putative CIC can issue anything other than unlawful orders.

The answer is obvious!

What Can Be Done About This?

Since the entire Congress, the JCS, the SCOTUS, the DOJ, and Law Enforcement are all complicit in this ultimate act of treason, and

Since We The People cannot indict them all at once, we suggest the following:

I.??????? Begin forming local 5th Amendment Citizens? Grand Juries (Carl Swensson of www.RiseUpForAmerica.com and Bob Campbell of www.AmericanGrandJury.org have paved the way here), and start indicting the traitors ? one by one.
(e.g.,? a Citizens Grand Jury nearby Ft. Meade, MD or in nearby VA should begin with JAG Judge Col. Denise R. Lind.? The charges could be: convening an illegal Courts-Martial; falsely convicting an honorable military officer; denying a defendant his right to self-defense/calling witnesses; judicial misconduct; aiding and abetting in acts of Treason, etc.).

II.??????? When these ?easy-to-conclude? indictments go unanswered by the now-complicit Judiciary and Law Enforcement, the People should then form 9th and 10th Amendment Citizens Court Trials (Dr. James David Manning of ATLAH.org has paved the way with the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL ? see www.CRS-Reports.org for the verdicts and transcripts) and issue actionable Guilty Verdicts and Sentencing.

III.??????? Finally, when the Citizens Court Trial verdicts and sentences are ignored by the corrupt law enforcement and the judiciary, use the already formed Citizens? Militias to carry out the arrests and sentencing. (States that already have Citizens Militias are: AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, ID, IN, KY, ME, MI, MN, NH, NJ, JC, OH, OR, PA, TX, UT, VA, & WA).

There is still time to begin correcting this matter before it goes too far:

A.??? Maj. Gen. Karl R. Horst can vacate the verdict and sentencing of LTC Lakin (he is being formally served with the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL transcripts on December 20, 2010), and call for a retrial for the exoneration for LTC Lakin ? while demanding proof that Obama can issue anything other than unlawful orders;

B.??? The 111th Congress can go into a joint session before year-end 2010, and hear the evidence and remove the Usurper and his cabal of thugs in handcuffs immediately;

C.??? Finally, since all who are presently in the Constitutional line of succession for the Office of President and CIC are complicit in this Treason, the Joint Chiefs of Staff should assume control (as in Honduras) until new elections of a Constitutionally qualified President and Commander-in-Chief can be held on April 5, 2011.

It should be noted that the incoming Republican majority cannot be expected to do anything about this on their own, since they know that Obama is destroying the Democrat Party while strengthening their own Party ? and that keeping him in the White House, although unqualified and ineligible, increases their chances for complete control in 2012, and;

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have already shown their hand ? that they would rather send an oath-upholding decorated and honorable officer to Leavenworth (where he is incarcerated now*), rather than uphold their oath to the Constitution ? because they assume that if they expose the Usurper, the existing military forces will leave their posts until a lawful CIC can be installed, and ?There MAY BE Blood? (assumed).

On the other hand, We The People** can no longer be expected to passively give up our rights and our Constitution, and that to preserve our unalienable rights it is more likely that ?There WILL BE Blood? (assured).

That?s how our emerging nation got things done over 200 years ago ? with Citizens Grand Juries and Citizens Court Trials, and with oath-honoring sheriffs and lawmen.? If it was good enough for our founding fathers then, it should certainly be good enough for us now.

And we?ve got a well-seasoned ?contract? to work with ? the U.S. Constitution.? It worked then. There is no reason to trash it and start over. It will work for us now ? if we will only speak up and use it.

?With the privilege and honor of knowing of, swearing to, and living under our Constitution, comes the responsibility and duty of defending, maintaining and adhering to it.?

As Dr. Laura has oft been heard to say, ?Now go do the right thing.?

*Send cards and letters (no food, supplies, or books) to:

Terrence Lakin #89996?? (NOTE:? no rank is allowed)
830 Sabalu Road
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027

**Recent polls show that over 150 million Americans (over 60%) now have doubts as to whether the putative Commander-in-Chief can issue anything other than unlawful orders.

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:55
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Lunes, 20 de diciembre de 2010

Letter of support for Lt Col. Terry?Lakin

Barack Hussein Obama now has his political prisoner, and thanks to the United States military and the Uniform Code of Military Justice, an 18 year Army veteran with a simple question is penalized beyond words.

?The oath that an Officer in the United States takes upon commissioning is as follows;

?I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.? (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

Faith and allegiance to the United States Constitution to protect and defend it against all enemies foreign and domestic an oath that you took without reservation and freely obligated yourself, and your sacred honor to uphold. That means that on one is above that law that you swore to uphold and defend.

Now, another officer will pay the price for upholding his affirmation and sacred honor questioning the eligibility of a possible foreign born immigrant and usurper to the Office of the Presidency. Namely that Barack Hussein Obama has not established himself as qualified to hold the office that despite being elected, the same Constitution that Lt Col. Terry Lakin swore to uphold and defend is the same that states that the President elect has to qualify?

Amendment 20 ? Presidential, Congressional Terms. Ratified 1/23/1933.

3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or?if the President elect shall have failed to qualify?

The fact remain that Barack Obama with a foreign father and unknown place of birth, is questionable at best and a Usurper at the worst.

At no time has the United States Constitution and the Constitutional requirements for the Office of the Presidency been altered or amended to allow for anyone other then a ?Natural Born Citizen? of the United States to be eligible for the Presidency and Commander in Chief on the United States military forces.? That would require a Constitutional amendment, and that has never happened.

Why is it that a member of the United States military deploying to a war zone, has to produce a valid Birth Certificate and the current resident in the White House as Commander in Chief does not? Not only has he failed to produce a valid document, but all the other personal records and documents are also forbidden. Why?

Does your scared honor, duty, and obligation in bearing true faith and allegiance in the United States Constitution allow you to openly disregard another Officers attempt to fulfill his obligation and bypass the establish set of rules in a military court and deprive another of a honorable defense? and reduce that court to a kangaroo circus?

As a former serviceman to this nation, I am appalled at the military has decided to turn on its own and allow an officer to become a political prisoner because the evidence would be an embarrassment to anyone regardless of whom that person might be.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 20:11
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

The Lakin legacy & the left-right hypocrisy

Comment on this article at Canada Free Press

?By Doug Hagmann

19 December 2010: Now here?s an interesting lesson into the act of civil disobedience. Bomb the Pentagon, lead a domestic terrorist group that was responsible for 30 bombings, destruction of property and deaths, and suggest that you cannot rule out committing additional bombings, you become a folk hero of the radical left, a close confidant of a sitting president, and hold a position as a professor in higher academia.

Alternatively, give your country nearly 18 years of unblemished military service as a high ranking military officer until you request proof that the orders you are given are, in fact, made by someone with the ultimate authority to do so, you are stripped of your military rank, your liberties, your income, your pension, your freedom and are sentenced to Leavenworth.

Welcome to the new paradigm of civil disobedience, Chicago style, and where self-proclaimed conservative warriors are more AWOL than Lt. Col. Lakin on the issue of Obama?s Constitutional eligibility to hold office.

The Washington Examiner published a powerful article by columnist Diana West today about Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, the army surgeon who attempted to verify the Constitutional legitimacy of the deployment orders he received. For his efforts, however questionable in both tactic and venue, this highly decorated military leader was sentenced to serve time in Leavenworth. As Ms. West so eloquently concluded, the guilty verdict against Lt. Col. Lakin settles nothing, except, perhaps, that such challenges within the ranks will not be tolerated.

The most basic question of whether Barack Hussein Obama is Constitutionally eligible to hold office and issue orders to the most powerful military in the world remains unaddressed and unanswered. Accordingly, it remains a national security issue of the highest magnitude.

As I wrote last week, Lt. Col. Lakin chose a particular path to compel, once and for all, Barack Hussein Obama to provide authenticated proof that he is qualified to issue orders to the U.S.? military as the Commander in Chief. It was arguably not the best path to choose in a system that was rigged from the start, but at least this man had the grit to put everything on the line for the sake of the U.S. Constitution and ultimately, every American citizen.

Now, Lt. Col Lakin will be paying the price for his actions. One positive although surely unintended consequence of the Lakin case, however, is that it has clearly exposes the wretched hypocrisy of the progressives and their corporate media mouthpieces as well as the duplicity and dissimulation of many so-called conservatives. So that Lt. Col. Lakin?s efforts are not entirely in vain, I believe closer examination into this aspect of the case is necessary.

Ms. West wrote that Lakin?s actions ultimately fell ?into the category of civil disobedience, breaking the law to uphold higher principle.? If history has taught us anything, it has shown that acts of civil disobedience and breaking the law to uphold a higher principle are the very tactics that are enthusiastically embraced and praised by the progressives. The activists themselves are held in high esteem, and their activities are often rewarded by academic positions at universities or positions in the Obama administration. ?Former Weathermen terrorist William Ayers is a perfect example of this progressive principle of legitimizing and even deifying an activist and his cause.

For the advancement of a higher principle, Ayers proudly proclaims that the Weathermen were responsible for 30 bombings aimed at destroying the security and defense infrastructure of the U.S. and that he personally participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972. During their period of ?civil disobedience,? the actions of the Weathermen resulted in both death and destruction in the U.S., all for a ?higher principle.?

Today, Ayers is hailed as a hero to many on the political left and quite the chum of Obama, despite the desperate denials of leftist, self-proclaimed arbiters of truth like Media Matters, FactCheck.org, and the brain-sharing freak show of Keith Olberman, Rachael Maddow and Chris Matthews. When not fundraising for Obama or shilling for Hugo Chavez, Ayers serves as a professor of education at the University of Illinois. Perhaps more disturbing is that Ayers has not ruled out the possibility of conducting future bombings, as he muses in his 2001 memoir Fugitive Days. But such is to be expected from the morally bankrupt lunatic left.

More troubling than the far left?s position on the Obama eligibility issue, however, is that of the conservative right. It is here, in my opinion, where the most dangerous duplicity exists and is allowed to metastasize. By design or default, this dissimulation is co-opting a strong and growing conservative base. These self-proclaimed, constitutional loving conservatives are more AWOL in legitimately reporting on the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama than Lt. Col. Lakin was for his last deployment.

There is something very wrong when those who have the eyes and ears of a vast national audience and the power to educate, inform and even influence millions of Americans choose to remain silent on perhaps the most important, or at least the most fundamental of all Constitutional issues.

There is something wrong when simply raising the topic of Obama?s Constitutional eligibility qualifies reasonable and well researched conservatives the designation of ?pinheads.?

There is something wrong when constitutional scholars are ignored or mocked by conservative pundits, or by talk show hosts who ?are insulted by the pejorative ?term ?tea-baggers? yet accept and even advance the equally disparaging label of ?birthers.?

There is something wrong when presidential candidate McCain is made, by congressional mandate, to prove his eligibility as a candidate while Obama is not held to the same standard.

This is something wrong when a 32 year-old baseball player states that he believes Obama is hiding something regarding his birth certificate (i.e. his eligibility) and gets more press than a highly decorated military veteran who expresses the same concerns under the threat of court martial.

The corporate-fed conservative forces will be at their microphones and in front of the cameras, assured that their jobs are safe as long as they dare not step over the forbidden topic of Obama?s eligibility and pedigree. They will continue to enjoy their compassionate conservatism as long as they don?t ask for the release of Obama?s long form birth certificate, his passport records, kindergarten records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records and thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, and a list of other documents that would provide proof of Constitutional eligibility and valuable insight into the current occupant of the house of the American people.

While the political favorites of the Tea Party, the conservative pundits who lecture relentlessly on the virtues of Republicans and conservatism, and the conservative bloggers whose article appear in lockstep with the old guard lead the masses down the acceptable path of truth and liberty, Lt. Col. Lakin has been unceremoniously denied both.

Sadly, so has every American. Sadder still, most don?t even realize it, and most of those with the moral obligation and opportunity to make a difference are contemptibly silent.

Comment on this article at Canada Free Press


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:33
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Defend the Constitution

? ??15Share 0diggsdigg ?
?

OBAMA MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY

by Victor Smith

Does this document mean anything to those who are sworn to uphold it?

(Dec. 19, 2010) ? The Constitution theme is universal for all political parties, liberals, conservatives, moderates, and all religious groups.

As Members of Congress, you are sworn by oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, sworn without ANY mental reservation or purpose of EVASION. The incontrovertible act of failure to comply with ONE basic requirement of that Constitution by all branches so created, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, destroys the whole document.

Violation of the Constitution, Article II, Section 1, must cease.

The current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue boasts his father is Kenyan and he was a British citizen at birth. You need go no further to determine he is not born of U.S. Citizens (definition of natural born Citizen as he acknowledged in early 2008 while a Senator considering qualifications of another candidate). He cannot ever be constitutionally qualified for the office of President.

The DNC Chairwoman confirmed this in 2008 by certifying candidates to various states and omitting a declaration of Constitutional qualification to all states except Hawaii, which requires ?constitutionally-qualified? wording.

The Judicial Branch is unwilling to defend the Constitution against domestic enemies.

Under the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Congress is charged with providing for the common defence. Since Article II, Section 1 directly bars the installation as President of a person who has ever owed allegiance to another nation, it is the duty of Congress to insure that only a natural born Citizen be installed as President.? Article II, Section 4 REQUIRES removal of Obama for high crimes and misdemeanors, which crimes reasonably include usurpation of office without qualifying in accordance with the Constitution.

Impeachment will not work because that initially accepts the accused is qualified to hold office, ignoring the fact that he is not.

From Your Constituent:

Date:

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:09
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
S?bado, 18 de diciembre de 2010

The Army Treats a Murderer like a Prince but Vilifies Lakin

? ??3Share 0digg ?
?

?INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY? UNLESS YOU?RE QUESTIONING THE USURPER?S ELIGIBILITY

by Miki Booth

?

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin was denied a defense in a Gestapo-like rigged court-martial similar to that reported by Walter Fitzpatrick wherein the defendant is convicted before the hearing even begins

(Dec. 18, 2010) ? We all know the hell that the Army put LTC Terrence Lakin, Army Flight Surgeon, through. Makes one wonder what?s going on with another Army officer, Psychiatrist Nidal Hasan. Surely he?s getting special attention. After all, he served on Obama?s task force to recommend policy and procedures for Obama?s presidency regarding homeland security. The summation of recommendations were implemented to tilt heavily in favor of Muslims and treating anything Islam with political correctness. It stands to reason a different set of rules will apply to Hasan and in fact were considered the instant he began killing people on a military base.

Last we checked Hasan has unlimited access to family and friends and more legal advice than he can shake a stick at. Every cohort who knows how to game the system is lined up at Hasan?s feet. Will he ever face justice? Will Eric Holder ever weigh in on the prosecution of a Muslim who murdered 13 people? Doubtful. He only believes in prosecuting white America. Besides, it?s up to the Army, right?

Nidal Hasan is a Muslim terrorist and the U.S. Army knew he was out of control when he made anti-American statements over and over and they chose to ignore it because of political correctness. Conversely, they persecuted and prosecuted LTC Lakin for questioning Obama?s eligibility to be Commander-in-Chief. ?Lakin was denied discovery.? Military Judge Col. Denise Lind ruled she would not allow her courtroom to be used to embarrass Obama. After three days of court martial trial at Ft. Meade, MD, and a guilty verdict for disobeying orders, the jury deliberated Lakin?s punishment. If upheld, he will spend six months in Leavenworth Prison, forfeit his pay and be dismissed from the service.

Will Lakin have unlimited access to his family in Leavenworth as Hasan has? Upon conviction, Lakin?s military pay is cut off. But Hasan continues to receive pay until when, or if, he?s convicted of murder and that can be strung out forever. In the meantime, Hasan enjoys the art of using the Constitution against America and We the People, something we?ve taught Islam how to do very well.

????????

Editor?s Note:?Why does the military leadership traitorously continue to cover for Obama?? Is it that they don?t want to give up?their?pensions, pay, benefits and prestige?? What do they think they will have once Obama has completely destroyed the U.S. government, which is the source of their income?? Once there is no more money to pay them and they are left with nothing, as Lt. Col. Lakin is, perhaps they will wish they had spoken out against a foreign national who seized the U.S. presidency by dissembling and deceit.

There is still a treason?complaint?against Obama that has never been unanswered.? How do Col. Denise Lind and her cohorts respond to that?? If Obama can be accused of treason, so can they, for pretending that Obama is legitimate when they know he isn?t.

? 2010,?The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:24
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
?
Dream Act Amnesty Defeated Again Today!
Posted on Saturday, December 18 @ 12:30:10 EST
Topic:
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC Americans for Legal Immigration PACFriends of ALIPAC,?

We have won another round against Reid, Pelosi, and Obama's Dream Act Amnesty!?

The Cloture Vote on HR 5281, which passed the House by a narrow margin, has failed with 55 votes for Cloture and 41 against leaving the bill supporters 5 votes short of what they needed.?

We want thank each and every one of you that has supported ALIPAC, or NumbersUSA, or the many other great organization leading the charge against this nationally destructive Amnesty.?

Your calls, donations, and emails have made the difference and you did it without significant mass media support from the major networks including Drudge Report which took a dive and kept silent on this issue again.?

We appreciate all of the sacrifices people have made and those working today instead of spending much deserved time with their friends and family members.?

While Dream Amnesty Cloture has failed we are not out of the woods just yet until the final bell rings and Congress adjourns for the session. In fact, we will not be truly safe until January 6, when the new historic Congress you helped to elect is sworn in.?

We must remain diligent and ready to respond at a moments notice through Christmas and New Years as evil Harry Reid and his traitors could try anything at any moment.?

But today, for this brief moment, our hard work has paid off.?

Three cheers for our victory over Dream Amnesty!?

Praise be to God for allowing us to still have a country today.?

Sincerely,?


William Gheen and The ALIPAC Team?
www.alipac.us?


PS: Merry Christmas to our many friends and supporters! ?Your comments and feedback about this victory are welcome to be broadcast and preserved for posterity at this link....

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:42
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Socialists Manipulate Illegals for Political Gain

Cross-posted from the New Zeal blog

Veteran Democratic Socialists of America member, communist front activist and United Farmworkers leader Dolores Huerta joined protestors at? the San Antonio offices of? Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, December 6.

At least 16 activists were on the 27th day of an hunger strike in support of passage of the so-called DREAM Act.

Seen by many as a back door method of achieving amnesty for millions of illegal aliens,? the DREAM Act, would offer young people brought illegally to the U.S. by undocumented parents, a path to citizenship if they go to college or enlist in the military for two years.

Huerta?s support is not surprising as America?s largest Marxist organization the D.S.A. has long been campaigning for amnesty in various guises.

Huerta?s fellow D.S.A. honorary chair? and SEIU vice president Eliseo Medina is the most influential pro-amnesty activist in the country.

Medina let the cat out of the bag on the real reason for D.S.A.?s push for illegal alien amnesty during a speech At the America?s Future Now! conference in Washington, DC on June 2, 2009.

Medina revealed that? legalizing 12 million illegal aliens would create at? at least 8 million new Democratic voters to create ?a governing coalition for the long term, not just for an election cycle??


That?s what this is about. Huerta, Medina and their D.S.A. comrades are using Latinos to give their Democrat allies almost? permanent power.

How cynical is that?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:52
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

?
?

WND Exclusive
BORN IN THE USA?

Supremes facing eligibility

challenge to Obama, again

Taitz's case distributed

for conference among

justices on Jan. 7


Posted: December 18, 2010
12:35 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
??2010?WorldNetDaily
?

?

It just doesn't appear to be going away.

The idea that Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy to Oval Office, and do chores such as appointing Supreme Court justices, needs to be explored and documented is headed back to the highest court in the land.

According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.

This particular case has had a long proceeding; it began as a challenge to the legality of the military orders under Obama, whose eligibility to hold the office of president never has been documented to date. While that officer, Capt. Connie Rhodes, ultimately followed her orders, the attorney was fined $20,000 in the case, and it continued its path through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and now is pending in Washington.

?


Whether it will fall by the wayside as have other cases on the same issue that have been submitted to the court remains to be seen. But even if this case falls, it doesn't appear the issue itself will fade.

Read the full report on Obama's eligibility yourself.

Consider:

Retired Cmdr. Charles Kerchner, whose legal challenge to Obama's eligibility recently was turned back by the Supreme Court on a vote that included two members of the bench appointed by Obama and therefore holding an apparent conflict of interest, said the problems will just get bigger the longer the issue remains unresolved.

"The Obama eligibility matter should have been fully and thoroughly addressed and openly investigated by the investigative reporters in the major media and political parties early in the spring of 2008 during the primaries to get all of Obama's documents released to the public as part of the vetting process. It wasn't done," he said.

"Congress should have addressed when asked by 100s of thousands of constituent letters and petitions sent to them and when constitutionally it was required to [do] so under the 20th Amendment. It didn't," he continued. "Everyone in our system of government chose ignoring the problem and appeasement over confrontation and punted the ball to someone else.

?


Orly Tait

"Now it is far worse. The Supreme Court has chosen appeasement and inaction over action and dealing with the issue and questions openly in a court of law under the rules of evidence and law," he said.

That decision not to address the uncertainty of Obama's background now, "will only delay the inevitable and fester and grow and in the end be a far worse situation to deal with when the real nature of the tyrant reeals himself in a much bolder way and attempts to take away all our protections to our unalienable rights and liberty," he said.

Taitz, who was among those who brought concerns to the Supreme Court at the time of the election on an emergency basis ? all of which were refused by the Supremes, told WND that she's convinced ultimately the Supreme Court will review Obama.

"I don't believe they can continue avoiding this issue," she said. "They have to show integrity, have to show that the Constitution of the United States matters."

She said also the case has been getting "ripe," or coalescing into a specific dispute. There now are disagreements among court rulings, she said. She cited a California court ruling that there could be a door for the courts to determine the issue but only after Congress has acted, even though another judge ruled the matter should have been brought to the courts before the election.

Further, one judge has ruled that the military should resolve the question over Obama's eligibility to be commander in chief while the result from the recent Lakin court martial was that Judge Denise Lind refused even to allow his defense arguments, evidence and witnesses in her courtroom, essentially withholding related due process and discovery procedures.

Taitz said one of the largest issues that remains a roadblock to the case being resolved is that Obama's two appointees to the Supreme Court apparently are participating in cases in which they have an interest.

"In my opinion they [Elena Kagan and Sonya Sotomayor, both appointed to the bench by Obama] should recuse themselves," she said. "However until now they have refused to recuse themselves in such cases."

Taitz said the conflict is clear: they were appointed by a president who may not have had the authority to appoint them, therefore their own positions would be in jeopardy.

Kerchner brought forward the same concerns.

"The two justices appointed by Obama who in my opinion had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to to the court) in the outcome of this petition and case did not recuse themselves even though they should have!" he wrote.

"Their recusal was called for in our petition on page 36 with the relevant U.S. Code cited. The two justices and the court ignored that. ? I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS was that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayor and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against certiorari, and to require 4 votes instead of 3."

Taitz v. MacDonald, the case now pending before the Supremes, originally was brought on behalf of Rhodes, an Army flight surgeon questioning the validity of deployment orders issued under Obama's signature. The case argues that Obama has not proven that he is a "natural-born citizen" of the United States, which Article 2 of the Constitution requires any president to be.

A "natural born citizen" was considered at the time the Constitution was adopted as an individual whose parents are both American citizens. Obama's father was a British subject when Obama was born in 1961.

But Taitz vs. MacDonald goes beyond Obama's legitimacy to raise the possibility of Social Security fraud.

"Legitimacy is a theoretical question," Taitz told WND earlier. "This case also presents evidence of criminal actions by Obama, showing he needs to be both removed from office and prosecuted."

Taitz said the case provides evidence generated by professional investigators showing that the Social Security number currently used by Obama is fraudulent.

"It cannot have been legally obtained," said Taitz.

Her brief asserts that Obama's Social Security number was first issued to a Connecticut resident born in 1890.

"This is evidence of fraud," Taitz said.

More legal documents related to Taitz v. MacDonald can be found on Taitz' website.

According to Taitz, the likelihood that the Supreme Court will rule on the merits of Taitz v. MacDonald is increased because she personally has legal standing to bring the case. Taitz was fined $20,000 by Judge Clay D. Land in connection with the case, and she's appealing the fine, which she contends violated her civil rights.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Several of the cases have involved emergency appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court in which justices have declined even to hear arguments. Among the cases turned down without a hearing at the high court have been petitions by Philip Berg, Cort Wrotnowski, Leo Donofrio and Taitz.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.

One other prominent case in which a judge threatened sanctions against an attorney involved attorney John Hemenway. He brought a challenge on behalf of retired military officer Gregory S. Hollister.

The Hollister case ultimately was dismissed by Judge James Robertson, who notably ruled during the 2008 election campaign that the federal legal dispute had been "twittered" and, therefore, resolved.

Robertson sarcastically wrote: "The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his commander in chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven ? to the colonel's satisfaction ? that Mr. Obama is a native-born American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be president.

"The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court," Robertson wrote.

Then the judge suggested sanctions against Hemenway for bringing the case. Hemenway responded that the process then would provide him with a right to a discovery hearing to see documentation regarding the judge's statements ? not supported by any evidence introduced into the case ? that Obama was properly "vetted."

Hemenway warned at the time, "If the court persists in pressing Rule 11 procedures against Hemenway, then Hemenway should be allowed all of the discovery pertinent to the procedures as court precedents have permitted in the past.

"The court has referred to a number of facts outside of the record of this particular case and, therefore, the undersigned is particularly entitled to a hearing to get the truth of those matters into the record. This may require the court to authorize some discovery," Hemenway said.

The court ultimately backed off its threat of sanctions.

This case also remains in the court system heading for the Supreme Court.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:37
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Steve's note: My friend Porter Stansberry is one of the smartest guys I know. And right now, his ideas are generating huge interest ? and a lot of controversy ? all over the country. So I invited him to explain his ideas to DailyWealth readers in a special series this week. Read on for the latest installment...
http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.phpShare

How America Became a Communist Nation

By Porter Stansberry with Braden Copeland
Thursday, December 16, 2010

As I showed you yesterday, the Greeks may be the most notorious of the world's profligate nations... but they are not the real problem.
?
The real problem is much larger and more complex.
?
The root of the problem the world is facing right now isn't really governments... or banks. The real problem is simply a very bad idea ? the idea that the State ought to sit in the center of society. Let me explain...
?
The last 100 years (since 1914) saw not only the end of the classic gold standard, but also the fantastic ascendancy of the nation-state.
?
These two trends are inherently and dangerously related.
?
Until World War I, the central government of the United States, for example, played a small role in the lives of its citizens. Its powers were strictly limited, as were its revenues. It was specifically barred from taxing citizens directly. It was a humble government that interacted with the individual states in the union, but didn't interact much with individual citizens.
?
The first signs of change came after the Civil War. "Progressive" ideas began to emerge. Most of these ideas came from Germany, from philosophers like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The core of these ideas was that the State itself was superior to its citizens. Therefore, the argument went, society ought to be organized to better accomplish the goals of the State.
?
Today, most Americans have no idea that the foundations of our modern State are based ? nearly verbatim ? on the demands of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto.
?
In 1848, Marx threatened to organize a worker's revolution unless European governments:
?
1. Abolished property rights and applied all rents towards public purposes.
?
[Modern corollary: Don't pay your property taxes, lose your house. So who really owns your house?]
?
2. Levied a heavy, progressive income tax to equalize wages.
?
[Modern corollary: Combined federal and state marginal income and payroll taxes approach (or surpass) 50% in many U.S. states.]
?
3. Abolished all rights of inheritance.
?
[Modern corollary: The estate tax.]
?
4. Confiscated the property of all emigrants.
?
[Modern corollary: The 2008 "Hero's Act," which forces people leaving the U.S. to pay the equivalent of their estate taxes on the global assets before they turn in their passports.]
?
5. Centralized access to credit in the hands of the State by means of a national bank and an exclusive monopoly.
?
[Modern corollary: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which make more than 90% of all of the mortgages in the U.S. and have dominated the market for mortgages for decades.]
?
6. Centralized the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
?
[Modern corollary: AT&T was a legal monopoly for decades. Amtrak is a ward of the states. The government owns all the roads. And the State controls all air traffic.]
?
7. Provided free education for all children in public schools.
?
[Note the emphasis on public schools. Paying for education isn't enough. What counts is indoctrinating the kids in glorifying the State.]
?
8. Produced a common agricultural policy to maximize the productivity of the land.
?
[Modern corollary: Massive ethanol and agricultural subsidies.]
?
Most people in democracies like these ideas for one simple reason: They hold the allure of getting something for nothing. They are the siren song of living at the expense of your neighbor.
?
These ideas became extremely popular over the last 100 years, all around the world. As a result, as democracy spread, so did these ideas. Politicians of each party and persuasion throughout the Western world quickly adopted them as their own (and never mentioned Marx).
?
As these ideas took hold, one big problem developed... How do you pay for them?
?
Progressive politicians believed they had the answer. They just took Marx's big innovation: A progressive income tax. Let the rich pay!
?
It's a popular idea ? but it never works because decisions to add more benefits don't take into account the expense of paying for them. It doesn't take long for the budget to get out of control. Or said another way, everyone can't live at the expensive of his neighbor. His neighbor can't afford it... and he moves.
?
More serious, the flaw in communism is obvious. Communism doesn't account for the fact that people expect to control the fruits of their labor. People don't like their assets being stolen and their wages being heavily taxed by a government that regulates their businesses and sends their children off to war. Incrementally, people stop working. Wealthy people flee... or hide their incomes.
?
Tax revenues fail to meet projections. Deficits grow. Deficit spending soars. And debts mount.
?
That's where paper money comes in. Paper money isn't only good for financing a war. It's also perfect for closing the gap between what an economy ought to produce and its paltry real production when it has been beaten into submission by communist ideas. I like to explain it this way...
?
The central truth of economics is scarcity. There can never be enough of anything to satisfy everyone. The central truth of politics is patronage: promising to give everything to everyone. Paper money is the bridge between economics and politics.
?
The unpaid debts of an entire generation of people in Western countries are coming due. The so-called "baby boomers" grew up in a world dominated by Marxism and Keynesian economics. These are bad ideas. They are destined to collapse.
?
And the collapse is here.
?
Tomorrow, I'll show you how to protect yourself.
?
Regards,
?
Porter Stansberry

P.S. What most Americans don't realize is this crisis is already well underway. I'm sure you don't believe me, but please let me show you just a tiny fraction of the evidence that surrounds us. Take a look at these simple facts in the presentation I've posted here. I know you will be surprised. Then, you can make up your mind for yourself.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:34
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Viernes, 17 de diciembre de 2010
??

Is This Our America Anymore?

?

By Patrick J. Buchanan

?Buried in the Oct. 30 Washington Post was a bland headline: "Report Points to Faster Recovery in Jobs for Immigrants." The story, however, contained social dynamite that explains the rage of Americans who are smeared as nativists and xenophobes for demanding a timeout on immigration.


?
In the April-May-June quarter, foreign-born workers in the U.S. gained 656,000 jobs. And native-born Americans lost 1.2 million.

?
From July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, foreign-born Hispanics gained 98,000 construction jobs. Native-born Hispanics lost 133,000. Black and white U.S. construction workers lost 511,000 jobs.

?
According to the Center for Immigration Studies, from Jan. 1, 2000, to Jan. 1, 2010, 13.1 million immigrants, legal and illegal, entered the United States, a decade in which America lost 1 million jobs.

?
From 2008 and 2009, the figures are startling. In 24 months, 2.4 million immigrants, legal and illegal, arrived, as U.S. citizens were losing 8.6 million jobs.

?
Query: Why are we importing a million-plus workers a year when 17 million Americans can't find work? Whose country is this?

Why do we not declare a moratorium on all immigration, until our unemployment rate falls to 6 or 5 percent? Charity begins at home. Ought we not take care of our own jobless first before we invite in strangers to take their jobs?

?
According to the Pew Hispanic Center, each year between 300,000 and 400,000 "anchor babies" are born to illegal aliens. These newborns are entitled to citizenship, free health care and education, welfare and food stamps

?
Their parents -- almost all are poor or working class -- rarely pay any state or federal income tax.
How long can we keep granting citizenship and full social welfare benefits to the children of people who break our laws and break into our country or overstay their visas??

?
How long can we keep bringing in workers to take jobs when our unemployment rate hovers around 10 percent?

?
Again, according to the Pew Center, the number of anchor babies here now is about 4 million. Add to that 3 million to 4 million born each decade, and it will not be long before Colorado, Nevada, Arizona and Texas resemble California, which is on the brink of default.

?
If no action is taken, the Republican Party will soon be unable, even in wave elections, to win the presidency, as it won nothing and indeed lost state legislative seats in California in 2010.

?
The border will disappear, and America will be a geographical expression, not a country anymore.

?
Legal scholar William Quirk describes a new phenomenon in the invasion of America: "maternity tourism." Pregnant Asian women pay $15,000 to agents to ensure they are in the United States when their child is born so that they can return home secure in the knowledge he or she will be a U.S. citizen with the right to a U.S.-taxpayer subsidized education in college.

?
Though the nation has awakened to the threat to social cohesion and national solvency, Harry Reid is still attempting to ram through a lame-duck Senate an amnesty for illegal aliens up to age 30 who claim they were brought here before they were 16, have a high school diploma or GED and state that they intend to go to college within six years.

?
An estimated 2.1 million illegal aliens would be amnestied, put on a path to citizenship, and be eligible for student loans and more.

?
According to Alabama's Jeff Sessions, ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee: "Aliens granted amnesty by the DREAM Act will have the legal right to petition for entry of their family members, including their adult brothers and sisters and the parents who illegally brought or sent them to the United States, once they become naturalized U.S. citizens. In less than a decade, this reality could easily double or triple the 2.1 million green cards that will be immediately distributed as a result of the DREAM Act."

?
Lawbreaking would be rewarded. Chain migration would continue. A permanent powerful magnet would be provided to all foreigners to sneak into the United States and be sure to bring the kids.

?
As Rep. Dana Rohrabacher argues, one effect of the DREAM Act will be to move illegals applying to college ahead of many Americans, as 80 percent of illegals are Hispanics and eligible for affirmative action.

?
U.S. soldiers coming home from Afghanistan will "sit in back," as Obama puts it, when competing against amnestied illegals.

?
Several days ago, UCLA's Kent Wong addressed a pro-amnesty rally in Los Angeles' MacArthur Park. Wong turned the race card face up.

?
When Reid's bill passes, said Wong, "the young people of the DREAM Act movement will go on to accomplish and do great things. ... You will go on to become lawyers, teachers, doctors and members of the U.S. Congress to replace those old white men ... ."

?
If the DREAM Act passes, Wong is right about whose time has come and gone. May the tea party take names at the call of the roll.

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 16:00
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Jueves, 16 de diciembre de 2010


WND Exclusive
BORN IN THE USA?

Lakin sentenced: Dismissal,

?6 months

Appeal automatic in situations

officer given 'punitive' separation


Posted: December 16, 2010
8:26 pm Eastern

By Brian Fitzpatrick
??2010?WorldNetDaily

?


Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin

FT. MEADE, Md. ? A sentence of dismissal and forfeiture of benefits as well as six months in confinement was announced this afternoon at the court martial for Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, the Army doctor who challenged his military orders on the basis that Barack Obama has not documented his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirements.

The sentence announced in the courtroom of Judge Denise Lind still has to be approved by the local commanding officer, and then is on appeal automatically.

That's what Army procedure specifies in a case involving the "punitive" dismissal of an officer.

Lakin had faced as many as 42 months in prison, forfeiture of pay and retirement benefits and dismissal from the service after being convicted of four felonies. Lakin pleaded guilty to two counts of disobeying orders to report to his commanding officer and one count of failing to report to his new unit. The court-martial panel found him guilty of the most serious charge, missing the movement of an airplane that was to take him to his new post.

Yesterday, Lakin had apologized for forcing the Army to court-martial him over his attempt to compel Obama to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as commander-in-chief.

"I am extremely sorry for everything that has come of this," Lakin said in unsworn testimony during the sentencing phase of his trial. "As a military member, I was wrong."

"I didn't want it to end this way," said the 17-year veteran flight surgeon. "I want to continue to serve the military" by applying his extensive medical expertise to wounded soldiers on the battlefield.

The apology came even though Lind had specifically ruled Lakin would not have access to discovery of evidence because any revelations might be "embarrassing" to the president, would not be able to present his defense, would not be allowed to present his evidence, would not be allowed to call his witnesses ? and essentially would be allowed to argue only whether he follow specific orders or not.

Lakin sought for months to find out whether Obama is a natural-born citizen, the constitutional requirement for an American to serve as president.? Both military and civilian authorities were unwilling to answer the question.

In April, Lakin refused to obey orders to report to the 101st Airborne Division shortly before the unit was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan. Lakin was concerned that the unit's orders to join Obama's surge might be illegal because of Obama's uncertain eligibility to be president. He said he preferred to resolve the eligibility question before being sent into a combat theater, to avoid disrupting a unit on the front lines.

Deprived by trial Lind of any opportunity to defend himself by introducing evidence or expert testimony, Lakin was reduced to pleading guilty on three charges of disobeying orders and mounting only a narrow, technical defense on the "missing movement" charge. Lakin's attorney, Neal Puckett, tried in vain to persuade the court-martial panel to convict Lakin of a lesser charge.

The judge's handling of the case enraged observers.

"His attorney was reduced to a circus clown because [Lind] wouldn't allow a meaningful defense," said California attorney Orly Taitz, who has brought repeated cases challenging Obama's eligibility before U. S. courts. "It's a joke, just a farce."

"The issue is very simple," said New Jersey attorney William Baer. "What is the definition of 'natural-born citizen' and does Obama meet it? Nobody will let the question be asked."

"The military wouldn't let him have discovery, so he said 'go ahead and put me in prison,'" said retired Navy Commander Charles F. Kerchner of Emmaus, Penn., the plaintiff in a case that recently went before the U.S. Supreme Court. "He's a political prisoner."

Kerchner and retired Army Capt. Pamela Barnett of Sacramento, who was a plaintiff in a case handled by Taitz, both said they attended the court martial to support Lakin. Kerchner and Barnett pointed out that they, like Lakin, have been denied justice by U.S. courts that refused to hear the merits of their cases against Obama.

"They took away every constitutional right Lakin has," said Barnett. "The U.S. Supreme Court and the House of Representatives should address this stripping of an officer's civil rights. A terrorist has more rights than Terry Lakin."

During his statement, Lakin explained that he chose to disobey orders because of concerns that all military orders could be illegal when their authority is derived ultimately from a commander-in-chief whose legal eligibility to occupy the Oval Office remains unproven.

Now, however, Lakin says he agrees with the Army that orders given to him by his superior officers were valid in spite of Obama's legal status.

Lakin backers traveled from all over the country to attend the court martial. At least three times they were cautioned by Lind to remain silent after erupting into applause for Lakin.

"I am angry about this," said observer Dr. Catherine Vandemoer, a well-known blogger on eligibility issues who traveled from North Dakota to support Lakin. "The system has failed," said Vandemoer, who writes the DrKatesView blog. "They crushed him, and the questions about Obama's eligibility have still not been answered."

Lakin's defense has not yet announced whether they will appeal the verdict, but court observers contend that the verdicts should be appealed even though Lakin technically forfeited his right to appeal three of the convictions by pleading guilty.

"Lind denied Lakin discovery. She excluded all evidence about Obama's eligibility because revealing the documents might prove 'embarrassing' to Obama," said Vandemoer. "These would seem to be appealable items."

"They should file a complaint for judicial misconduct," said Taitz.

"He was placed under duress by Judge Lind," added Barnett. "Lind should have recused herself. She's biased, denying evidence against Obama because it might be 'embarrassing.'"

Lakin's commanding general, Maj. Gen. Karl Horst, has the authority to grant clemency to the surgeon.

If he loses his first appeal, Lakin can appeal again to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. If CAAF hears his appeal but denies it, Lakin could, in theory, appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.? The Supreme Court rarely grants hearings to appeals from the military justice system.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:21
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Dream Act Amnesty Equals The Destruction of America
Posted on Thursday, December 16 @ 13:06:06 EST
Topic:
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC Americans for Legal Immigration PACDream Act Amnesty Equals The Destruction of America

Will allow Obama to declare amnesty for all illegal aliens.

December 16, 2010

by
William Gheen

President of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
www.alipac.us

The phones are ringing off the hooks in the US Senate as the Dream Act Amnesty bill that recently passed the House by a narrow margin hangs within one or two votes of passing the US Senate.

The phones are ringing with calls from illegal aliens and their supporters, who are backed by million dollar public relations groups, paid phone banks, massive media buys, and teams of professional lobbyists, who are trying to persuade US Senators to vote Yes on cloture to pass the Dream Amnesty.

Congress approval ratings have dived to historic lows in polls taken just on top of the Dream Amnesty vote, which is opposed by 59% of Americans and supported by only 22%. Despised Senator Harry Reid, who miraculously won his election with the help of illegal alien union workers in Las Vegas, is vowing to stay in session beyond Christmas to get his Dream Amnesty passed to further thwart the will of voters, who threw so many politicians out of DC this year.

On the other side, Americans who are aware of what kind of national destruction and hardship passage of the Dream Act Amnesty will cause are mounting a desperate defense. The calls are neck in neck and one of the reasons is that the broader swaths of Americans are not rising to oppose the bill.

The current dormancy of mom and pop America must change rapidly to have any hope of defeating the Dream Act Amnesty for the seventh time in as many years.

CLICK HERE TO MAKE CALLS TO THE SENATE WITH ALIPAC TO STOP DREAM ACT AMNESTY !

This dangerous sleep is being fueled by two major factors.
One, the pro-Amnesty and open borders lobby is exerting its influence to stop major conservative political communications and news channels from relaying the facts about the Dream Act Amnesty sham. Two, the sales pitch being sent out about innocent little children benefiting from Dream Amnesty is very powerful, when taken on its face value. The truth is that most of these warm fuzzy claims about Dream Amnesty are lies.

Americans who value borders and future immigration enforcement are being encouraged to f
lood the US Senate with calls against the Dream Amnesty. You need to call and write all of the media outlets that are not covering this story or are feeding you the propaganda.

Americans must realize the following facts and take action immediately.

First of all, the
Dream Act Amnesty will turn millions of current illegal aliens into legalized workers, students, and voters. This means that millions of innocent American citizens will be displaced and replaced. Please picture yourself or your children and grandchildren not getting a job, not getting into the college of their choice or college at all, and your votes being counteracted by millions of illegal alien voters.

In a world of limited resources, millions of American jobs, college seats, and votes will be transferred to people who broke into America to take these things without permission.

Dream Act Amnesty would also qualify most illegal aliens for in-state tuition subsidies and affirmative action programs, which would force US taxpayer to replace their own children in the limited seats in our colleges at taxpayer expense!

Second, the Dream Act Amnesty is not for children and will not be limited to just a few million illegal aliens. The supporters of the Dream Act Amnesty have made it clear that passage of this friendly sounding legislation is just a lever to gain the full Amnesty for 12-20 million illegal aliens in America today! In fact, once they legalize the Dream Act Amnesty recipients, politically stopping full Amnesty will become almost impossible. Once the full Comprehensive Amnesty becomes law, there will be no reasonable expectation of future enforcement of America's existing immigration and border laws.

America as you have known it will be gone forever along with our borders.

With over 80% of Americans demanding that our existing border and immigration laws be enforced, and even with the full backing of both the US Constitution and existing federal laws, our borders remain open and unsecured. Illegal aliens roam freely in America as unrestrained workers, students, and voters already. All Congress is really doing is giving a rubber stamp legitimacy to the massive crimes already committed against America and Americans.

If we
Americans of every race, party, and walk of life representing over 80% who want our borders protected cannot have our way in our own nation, then all hope will be lost once millions of illegal aliens are made citizens, voters, workers, and students who will be deployed against us.

Third, even before the mass Comprehensive Amnesty kicks in, it is probable that many more millions of illegal aliens will be given citizenship under Dream Act Amnesty, rather than the current 1-2 million being promoted by bill sponsors.

Not only can millions of illegal aliens making false unverifiable claims be instantly immune to deportation, but any illegal immigrants caught by Homeland Security can claim they qualify for Dream Amnesty, if it is passed based on 'Prima facie' evidence. Simply put, any apprehended illegal can claim they are under 30, brought here as kids, and planning on attending college so deportation will be waived, and if nobody rebuts their claims, since Homeland Security plans to keep applicants confidential, good luck checking on their work and so much for open government!

The Dream Act Amnesty bill that just passed Congress has no funding or details on how the provisions of the bill will be enforced, and even if funding and mechanisms for enforcement were added, there is no reasonable expectation that the Obama administration will enforce those laws. Only those eager to grasp for desperate hopes like the floating wreckage around our sinking national ship would succumb to such folly. Please if there one existing immigration or border law that has been adequately enforced over the last ten years?

Why would a Department of Homeland Security that skipped the process of comparing millions of legal immigrant applicants against the terrorism watch databases bother with checking the claims of Dream Act Amnesty supporters?

Americans have been betrayed in the highest levels of our own government, which is now helping illegal aliens and the terrorists among them to enter and remain in our midst!

The promoters of the Dream Act Amnesty including numerous elected officials, pundits, and members of the biased media claim, "The Dream Act is for undocumented residents, who have been in America for more than five years, are under the age of 30, and were brought here under the age of 16 by their parents can enter college or the military."

These are not assurances, these are claims and in many cases they will be false!

There is no magic machine that tells us when and where someone was born, at what age they crossed the borders illegally, that they are of good moral character, or how long they have been in America.

Even if funding and enforcement mechanisms were actually added to the deficient Dream Act Amnesty, how would authorities verify the dates of birth and border crossing of a 50 year old illegal alien from the back country of Brazil or Nicaragua?

There's not even a requirement that Dream Act Amnesty recipients have a clean criminal record. Nor are they required to even finish college or their military service! It just requires the claim they will go to college or join the military.

All that will be happening here is that millions of illegal aliens will sign their names or make their mark on a piece of government paper claiming they are under 30, claiming they have been in the US over 5 years, claiming they are of good moral character, and claiming they were brought here as children.

Now this part may come as a shocker to many of you, but a lot of illegal aliens are going to lie to get what they want and will make false claims that will never be verified.

And why not? The existing hijacked American government has shown illegal aliens that they can engage in an extensive pattern of criminal acts to the detriment of American citizens and get away with it. Our nation currently has no immigration or border enforcement credibility.

Obama's
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and Customs and Border Patrol Commissioner Alan Bersin actively promote Amnesty for illegal aliens, while thousands of Americans and new border patrol agents like Brian Terry are killed.

Giving illegal aliens any form of Amnesty such as Dream and Comprehensive will be like letting bank robbers keep part of the money, if they are ever caught. Such a policy would lead to more bank robberies as
Dream Amnesty will lead to more illegal immigration.


The worst of these problems in the Dream Act Amnesty bill HR 5281, which is up for consideration in the Senate, is the 'waiver' on page 5 line 21 Sec. 6 (a)(2) that allows the Secretary of Homeland Security, the American patriot antagonist Janet Napolitano, to waive all of the enforcement requirements arbitrarily for any illegal aliens she wants.? Thus, the Dream Act Amnesty bill that is close to passing gives Homeland Security the option of granting mass Amnesty to all illegal aliens in America through executive decree!?

"(2) WAIVER.?With respect to any benefit under this section and sections...the Secretary of Homeland Security may waive the... ground of inadmissibility ...and the ground of deportability... for humanitarian purposes or family unity or when it is otherwise in the public interest."

This provision will grant the Obama administration the power to declare full amnesty for the 12 to 20 million adult illegal immigrants in America!

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE DREAM ACT AMNESTY BILL WITH THIS PROVISION

Different groups estimate that there are over 1 Billion people on the earth, mostly in 3rd world gang rule poverty areas, who would like to take part of the United States for themselves if allowed. After years of hearing of our unenforced borders and immigration laws, they are now hearing Congress will wave a wand and make them citizens once they break in.

With millions of established illegal alien voters, students, and workers keeping Americans on deep retreat within our own borders, the next batch of ten million illegal aliens will arrive soon, if Dream Act Amnesty passes.

Those elite special interest groups and personalities, who are responsible for this invasion and betrayal of the public trust want to destroy America and replace Americans who paid the bills, built the nation, and fought the wars to preserve our way of life with a new army of more manageable people.

The
Dream Act Amnesty is a political teddy bear with a hand grenade in it. It is a spoon full of sugar and lies in order to make the poison go down.

Americans and lawmakers who believe the lie on its surface appearance will soon see the smiles on faces fade as the hook line and sinker are swallowed.

America you must awaken to the truth and you must knock that cup of poison out of the hands of Lady Liberty before we are all cast into the darkness of national destruction and a future for us all of retreat within our own nation.

Take action to fight back against the Dream Act Amnesty at www.ALIPAC.us

DISCUSS THIS NATIONALLY RELEASED ARTICLE WITH OUR ONLINE ACTIVISTS AT...
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1155157.html#1155157

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:08
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??





Lakin serves the Constitution,
?
?Mr. President

Posted: December 16, 2010
2:22 pm Eastern

??2010?

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin didn't rush onto a battleground this week; he walked into a military courtroom. He didn't fire a weapon; he pleaded guilty to disobeying orders related to deployment, and not guilty to the more serious charge of "missing movement." But Lakin put his life ? in the sense of his distinguished 17-year career as an Army surgeon, his income, his pension and his personal freedom ? on the line due to his sworn duty to the U.S. Constitution.

All members of the U.S. military take the following oath:

"I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

To Lakin, "true faith and allegiance" were more than words; they were a call to action. And so, because the current president of the United States has never released the paperwork necessary to establish his legitimacy as a "natural-born citizen," Lt. Col. Lakin took action. Over the course of a year, he sought assurances of the president's eligibility from both the military and his congressional delegation. Receiving none, Lakin questioned his 2010 redeployment orders, believing that as a senior officer ordered back into a war zone ? and, not incidentally, ordered to bring along copies of his own birth certificate ? he had every right to ask his commander in chief to prove his bona fides. Hoping to force the issue into the open, if necessary in a military court, the Bronze Star recipient stopped following his redeployment order.

The definitive documentary on the red-hot eligibility story: "The Question of Eligibility: Is Barack Obama's presidency constitutionally legitimate?"

Here's the rub as I understand it: The military justice system isn't empowered to consider whether a president, duly elected and certified by the Electoral College, inaugurated and sworn in by the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, is anything other than what the civilian leadership says he is. What this means is that Lakin's beau geste may originate within the military order but it falls into the category of civil disobedience ? breaking the law to uphold higher principle. It is a higher principle no one else is upholding. Indeed, Lakin's disobedience highlights the existence of a vacuum of "true faith and allegiance" in the land. A gross abdication of civilian responsibility to ensure the lawful transfer of presidential powers took place long before Lakin received orders to return to Afghanistan.

? ?

By sacrificing the service career he loves, Lakin serves the Constitution he loves more. He also does the rest of us a great favor. Through this peaceful action, Lakin has directed our attention to the moral corruption of our most trusted public servants who, rather than expose themselves to political inconvenience, permitted the secrecy of Barack Obama to fester in the first place.

As a presidential candidate born in the Panama Canal Zone, Sen. John McCain was himself challenged during the 2008 presidential campaign to prove his bona fides. He, of course, complied ? who wouldn't? As candidate, as GOP party leader, as scion of a military family, as U.S. senator, McCain failed at this crucial point simply, logically, correctly, to invite his opponent, Sen. Obama, to do exactly the same.

Like a house of cards that was never built, the rest of the Senate, the House of Representatives, the White House, the judiciary, the nation's political parties, the Electoral College and, of course, the Obama-enthralled media all followed suit. And the rest is history.

Or would be, if it weren't for heroic Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin.

This week's court martial verdict, guilty on all counts, settles nothing. On the contrary, it leaves the question in boldface: What could possibly be preventing the president from showing the American people his original, 1961 birth certificate? What remains to be seen is whether there exists any authority, any leader in this whole country with the courage of a Lakin to ask.





Diana West is the author of "The Death of the Grown-up: How America's Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization," and blogs at dianawest.net.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:34
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??
States pursuing constitutional eligibility: Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Texas. Let's work for 50 of 50! Click here to read the story.

COUNTDOWN to Court-Martial (Fort Meade, MD, Dec 14-15)

? Action Week Summary & Challenge: Read Now

Key Trial Articles & Updates:

CLICK HERE FOR FULL INFORMATION ABOUT FORT MEADE AND ATTENDING THE COURT MARTIAL
SUPPORT TERRY'S COMMUNICATIONS EFFORTS.
Download APF's New Blunders Report (click here):
A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?s Birth and Constitutional Eligibility

THE COURT MARTIAL CONTINUES ON THURS DEC 16 AT 0830. Attorneys will be making closing statements. The jury will be instructed. Then jury delibrations will begin for sentencing.?

Terry Needs Your Help

This week, the American Patriot Foundation heard from a retired Navy SEAL, shocked by the stunning decision by a civilian court in which a terrorist suspect/detainee was convicted on only ONE count of 249 criminal charges: "Let me see if I understand this, Col. Lakin can get a more severe punishment that Ahmed Ghailani?"

frontpage201004222Unlike Ghailani, LTC Lakin is being tried in a military court-- for defying military orders in order to seek the truth about whether Obama is legally, Constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief. LTC Lakin's sworn oath as a military officer requires him to uphold the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

No one in his chains of command or in his Congressional delegation could tell him-- after more than a year of seeking assurance that his orders were lawful-- if Obama met the requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution of a "natural born citizen" and was entitled to command the U.S. Armed Forces. LTC Lakin's military orders to deploy to Afghanistan under Obama's announced surge, included a requirement that he present copies of his birth certificate (to which he dutifully complied).

We continue to be amazed at an administration that balks at producing such a simple, elementary document-- one that every US citizen possesses and is asked to show many times during his or her lifetime.

Thanks again to everyone who generously volunteered their time for Terry Lakin Action Week-- we are making headway- and want to encourage everyone to keep up the phone calls, letters and emails to elected officials on behalf of LTC Lakin. Your outreach is making a difference. Please keep spreading the word to others!

The House Government Reform and Oversight Committee (majority/minority contacts listed below) is the major investigatory body in the House of Representatives. We recommend lodging a protest at the denial of traditional due process rights to LTC Lakin, a criminal defendant. Since LTC Lakin is being denied access to evidence-- to documents-- which could prove his innocence- we urge Terry's supporters to make contact with the Committee Members and staff and urge the Committee to use its subpoena powers to force open the sealed records necessary to determine whether Barack Obama is a "natural born" citizen and therefore constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President.

At the very least, the administration has wasted a huge amount of the nation?s time. At worst, Obama is in fact not eligible to be President. Would that be uncomfortable? Would it be inconvenient? Would it be problematic? Of course. But this nation has survived many traumatic events in its past and would survive this. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land- and it must be upheld.

http://oversight.house.gov
(202) 225-5051

http://republicans.oversight.house.gov
(202) 225-5074

Similarly, in the Senate- the chief oversight committee is Homeland Security and Government Affairs:
http://hsgac.senate.gov/public
(202) 224-2627

?

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:43
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

British Citizenship: the True Disqualifier for Obama

? ??3Share 0diggsdigg ?

WHY DID NEITHER OF LAKIN?S LEGAL TEAMS USE THE OBVIOUS TO PROVE OBAMA?S INELIGIBILITY TO SERVE?

by Lester Kincaid

Why did Obama readily admit that his father had British citizenship before the election? Many say that Obama has lied "about everything." Is this one of those things? Is his father actually someone else?

(Dec. 15, 2010) ? Mrs. Rondeau?s view of a corrupted military is certainly correct. Dr. Lakin?s actions were always suspect, though it isn?t clear who, if anyone, was guiding him. Dr. Lakin was backed by a shadowy 501(c)3 with little record of direct activism. Dr. Lakin, voicing concern about the natural born Citizen clause, referred to statute ? citizenship law ? rather than the dozens of statements confirming the natural law definition of a natural born Citizen, ?born on the soil of citizen parents.? Birth certificates are irrelevant when a child is born of a non-citizen parent. It was all about allegiance. When the Constitution was written, the citizenship of the father became that of the wife. A child?s allegiance can be influenced by either parent. The large majority of U.S. citizens were natural born after about 1800. Obama never hid his father?s citizenship ? British ? or his own at birth ? British.

For Dr. Lakin to apparently put his future at risk but not understand the Constitution raised doubts about his motives. The Marxists running our government have raised the level of cynicism about our government, perhaps by design. For the JAG to not have allowed discovery sounds challengeable, but with the major issue being avoided by the Supreme Court, that is, the definition of natural born Citizen, justice is now about politics. The Constitution has become Obama?s ?artifact.? It will remain to be seen whether the refusal to recuse themselves constitutes ?Good Behavior? on the part of the new justices. They can be removed by the Senate, and I hope most of us will not forget the Kerchner certiorari review.

CDR Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo proved that corruption now dominates the Supreme Court. The two Obama appointees, who would have lost their jobs if the Kerchner case had been reviewed, refused to recuse themselves. It is common-law and common sense that a fiduciary interest in a decision by a judge requires recusal. Three justices are clearly originalists (I suspect that Roberts, who knew Obama was illigitimate, and had the responsibility to ask the question, was the defector), and could have granted certiorari if only seven justices were part of the review.

We will probably never know Dr. Lakin?s motives, but the publicity he generated, supporting the misdirection around a birth certificate, could have been subterfuge. Obama was born a British subject. Would our framers have been so stupid as to allow a born British subject to command our military? They explicitly forbade it. Even if Obama had been born of a natural born father and a non-citizen mother, he would still not be naturally born, i.e., require no legal qualifiation. A subtle partition, explained by Mario Apuzzo, and stated to much confusion by Earl Cheit, the retired Dean of Hastings, U.C. Berkeley?s law school: Citizens are either naturally born or naturalized.

Obama?s cadre has permeated our government. His documents have been concealed, just as Chester Arthur hid his birth certificate to keep the suspicion focused on his birth, and not his father?s British citizenship, when he was born.

Dr. Lakin?s lawyers? claims required that Obama release his records. As disgusting as it is that our judicial branch allows the concealment of the background of our most important public official, that is currently the situation. But Obama?s father?s and his own citizenship at birth are not concealed and are in violation of the Constitution. For Dr. Lakin to challenge the executive on jus soli ? born on the soil ? without proof, when the jus sanguinis requirement ? citizen parents ? was already admitted, was a guarantee of failure. As ?jtx? pointed out, when SCOTUS refused to hear Kerchner, the fix was in. Our only path is through the legislature, Tea Parties, and a few honest legislators. Every legislator in Congress when Obama was elected except Nathan Deal, who did request proof of eligibility and was answered with ethics charges, is complicit. Don?t expect any of them to speak up. They only want the issue to go away.

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


?

9 Responses for ?British Citizenship: the True Disqualifier for Obama?

  1. Justitia says:

    May I second CH?s comments and analysis? It is quite obvious to those who love the Constitution that ?politics? may NOT trump Constitutional Order and Law.

    Lakin may have ?Lost? at one level, but his ?loss? has actually brought a strange triumph to eligibility seekers.

    As CH has so correctly maintained, the press is NOW all over this and it is a topic squarely in the arena of public debate. It had been marginalized by the press and pundits until now, and the fact that LTC LAKIN?s trial did not resolve it, ironically STILL exacerbates the issue for Obama.

    If anything it is a major nibble at Obama?s Achilles Heel.

    Mirroring so many of Obama?s lies, perhaps his REAL FATHER is NOT Barack Sr.
    Nonetheless, the British Subject and then later, Kenyan citizen, accepted paternity for Barry Jr.

    It may not be universally recognized or yet acknowledged, but this ASSAULT on the CONSTITUTION means the eventual end of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY which will split into various factions and cease to be a national force in American Politics.

    They have been unveiled and national awareness just needs to catch up. It will?.very swiftly.

  2. iluvamerica says:

    Why would the Republicans be complicit in this cover-up? Congress has worked on bills to remove Natural Born Citizen requirement many times over the years.

    The biggest reason may be JINDAL!! Republicans and Gov. Jindal need to know, we will NOT vote for Jindal or any other candidate for President or VP, who is not a Natural Born Citizen. Fox News has been touting Gov. Jindal and Rubio for the top of the ticket. We need to make sure the Republican party knows in advance, It?s NOT going to happen.

    How many republican House and Senate members need to be replaced in 2012??? Every member who does not step up and protect our Constitution!! The Supreme court says this is the responsibility of the House and Senate. If you are not going to do your job in DC?STEP DOWN or we will do it for you. God Bless America

  3. TheGoodRevDr says:

    Why did Alito and Thomas not write dissents to Apuzzo?s case? They had an opportunity to make history by calling Obama a fraud and failed to do so.

  4. RacerJim says:

    ?When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.? ? Thomas Jefferson

    Obama has succeeded in fundamentally transforming the United States of America from the former into the latter.

  5. Kevin J. Lankford says:

    This is as simple as it can get. The facts are in their face,but they choose to ignore
    the truth, the Constitution, and the People.

    It could not be more clear,this is a challenge to the People. Accept this Fraud or Else!

  6. AuntieMadder says:

    ?But Obama?s father?s and his own citizenship at birth are not concealed and are in violation of the Constitution.?

    Please, tell us how you know who his father is.

    ?For Dr. Lakin to challenge the executive on jus soli ? born on the soil ? without proof, when the jus sanguinis requirement ? citizen parents ? was already admitted, was a guarantee of failure.?

    No. It was proof that, when it comes to this man and his ineligibility to hold the office of the POTUS, there is no recourse and there will be no justice, not in the justice system or the military courts, not by arguing that his alleged father was a Brit when he was born nor by arguing that he?s not proven where he was born or to whom.

  7. The Big Boo says:

    Excellent summary and conclusions. By ?implicit? I take it you mean Traitor. All those who have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, and are in public office, are now in fact Traitors to the Constitution if not actively seeking redress and remedy of the usurpation of the Office of President. This of course includes all the commissioned officers of the Military as well as the Congress (Deal perhaps excepted).

    Action now seems to fall upon the shoulders of state legislatures and Secretaries of State. Entanglement here by requiring FULL Disclosure and proof of Eligibility as per the Constitution, will put an end to this venal and corrupt scheme.

  8. Last I checked, in order to conclusively prove who one?s birth parents are, a long-form or hospital generated birth certificate must be viewed/verified, by some sort of legal authority?

    Most of us know that Obama would be ineligible if his parents are who he claims them to be, but, many still don?t know that fact?

    What if his birth parents are not who he claims them to be?
    ???????
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: I highly suspect that to be the case. His ?mother? spent almost no time with him as he was growing up; she ?returned? to school supposedly just weeks after having a baby in 1961 (the University of WA verified that it was September, not August, but that still would have been barely six weeks), and he bears a striking resemblance to Stanley Armour Dunham. Perhaps Barack Obama Sr. was a surrogate parent who was easy to put down as the father on a fake COLB because he?s dead. However, if that proves to be the case, and the truth will undoubtedly come out some day, it would prove that he?s a complete fraud. Who wants that kind of person in the White House?

  9. ch says:

    You need to see a birth certificate to build the next step about place of birth of parents. Dr. Lakin knows Obama is hiding the truth about who he is. It is running in national newspapers. My own Oregon paper which has avoided any truth, from some odd reason ran this article. They may be all playing games at the top to have the new Republican Congress handle it. I think the defense of Obama plays the game that it is a ?political question? with ?political motives.? They play this lie so often, like the Alinsky tactic, if you lie often enough, people will start to believe it. The crime has definitel happened in the political arena, but it is not a political question and motives are not political. It is a constitutional question and a legal question. Somebody has got to learn to learn judo law, and flip these Alinsky guys to the carpet! If the Obama Alinsky crowd can play this out long enough, they will have made it to the end run, and Obama?s term will be over, and all their illegal laws will be in place and their illegal Supreme Court judges sitting safely chained to their seats. It is pretty obviously this is a game being playing one way publicly and another very different way privately. God bless America?.He knows what is going on, and has warned about ?plotting.? It will come to no good for those who undermine Truth.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:25
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??

Is Barack Obama In Bed ? so to speak ? With Julian Assange?

? ??27Share 0diggsdigg

ASSANGE HAS RELEASED U.S. CLASSIFIED AND UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION, BUT WHAT IS HIS SOURCE?

by Joan Swirsky, ?2010

?

Julian Assange is editor-in-chief of Wikileaks, a website organized to expose secret governmental activities worldwide

(Dec. 15, 2010) ? The fanatical hard Left ? those communists, socialists, and radicals currently in power ? view anything that is bad for our country ? massive Intelligence leaks, disastrous oil spills, escalating unemployment, chaos on our borders, military setbacks, et al ? as a thundering success. To them, anything that undermines the United States brings them closer to their Grand Plan of toppling Big Bad America and transforming it into the kind of totalitarian Banana Republic they never tire of glamorizing.

That?s why it is clear to me that the potential damage from the Australian-born Julian Assange?s release of 250,000 classified State Department and Pentagon cables on November 28 ? and an equal number last July ? is part not only of this Australian?s wish to harm our country but also the American Left?s premeditated and malevolent plan to destroy America. And let us not forget that Assange?s assault began in April 2010 with nearly 80,000 documents ?dumped? for public consumption, as well as another 400,000 that the Marxist Assange released in October 2010 ? all of which he claims are just the tip of the iceberg.

The Accountability Factor

Clearly Assange is delighted that his leaks have gained international attention. And so delighted are the Russians with his anti-American raison d??tre that they suggested he be rewarded with a Nobel Prize!

It is obvious that ?president? Obama is pleased as well. Hence the complete lack of reaction or sanction not only from Attorney General Eric Holder, who seems never to have met a thug he didn?t like, but especially from Mr. Obama himself, who to this day cannot bring himself to speak out against Assange.

?

In an article entitled The lunatic who thinks he?s Barack Obama, Spengler writes: ?Napoleon was a Lunatic who thought he was Napoleon, and the joke applies to the 44th United States president with a vengeance. What doesn?t the president know, and when didn?t he know it? American foreign policy turned delusional when Barack Obama took office, and the latest batch of leaks suggests that the main source of the delusion is sitting in the Oval Office.?

As for Holder, writer Quin Hillyer elaborates at length in this must-read article on the AG, stating that ?the Obama Department of Justice is dangerously politicized, radically leftist, racialist, lawless, and at times corrupt. The good news is that it?s also often incompetent.?

As author and journalist Austin Bay has written: ?WikiLeaks harms the US. But the president?s refusal to acknowledge the threats we face is a bigger danger.? Bay calls Obama?s response ?weak, wrong-headed and erratic.

??His secretary of state does not comprehend that America is the subject of the attack, his department of defense is not interested in defending us, and the president himself seems utterly indifferent to the whole affair. All of this underscores the real problem. It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration, which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too often unwilling to act to thwart them.?

Bay?s comments echo those made by Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, who commented to Reuters that it is ?not WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange [who is] legally liable, but rather the questionable ?adequacy? of U.S. security.

Well, far be it for the man who has spent his entire tenure at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to be at all displeased that the WikiLeaks revelations cast our country in the worst possible light. For the past 24 months, after all, he has been:

  • Apologizing for America.
  • Denying her exceptionalism.
  • Undermining our military, as reporter Arnie Rosner describes here in detail.
  • Suing Arizona for simply upholding federal immigration law.
  • Kowtowing to and cozily fist-bumping our country?s enemies.
  • Being as incapable of saluting Congressional Medal of Honor recipient Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta at a recent White House ceremony as he has been at saluting the American flag on numerous occasions, just two examples here and? here .
  • And enacting, as Ben Lieberman chillingly describes, job-killing measures in industries that are the lifeblood of our country, but that he and his fellow environmental radicals revile: oil exploration, factory manufacturing, mining, and fishing.

But all this is not surprising, as a new book by Stanley Kurtz ? Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism ? demonstrates.

Like a rotten fish, the reaction to the whole WikiLeaks thing stinks ? as they say ? from the head, meaning not only Obama but also his Capo di Tutti Capi, George Soros, whose major role in the political lives of both Hillary and Obama and their historically toxic anti-American agendas has been brilliantly, rivetingly, and illuminatingly spelled out in exquisite detail in The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party by David Horowitz and Richard Poe.

The Hillary Factor

Of course our Secretary of State pretended to be outraged when in truth she and other Leftists in our government are secretly thrilled that America is made to look weak and feckless, with an incredibly incompetent Intelligence system and an indiscriminately murderous Military. Her statement of ?outrage? was delivered so robotically that she may as well have been telling a waiter that her tuna-melt was cold.

I?m sure that when both our allies and enemies learned that the treacherous Ms. Hillary was involved in ? gasp ? treachery, asking for U.N. personnel?s telephone numbers, e-mails, credit card data and frequent-flier numbers, spewing insults at foreign dignitaries, etc., not a single eyebrow was raised in surprise.

As journalist Tyler Durden has written: ?When we first heard of the latest Wikileaks ?cablegate? fiasco, we speculated that Hillary Clinton may be forced to resign for what is rapidly becoming the biggest crisis for US foreign policy since the Bay of Pigs. Let?s recall that Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment under somewhat comparable circumstances.?

Rich, is it not, that Hillary sat on Nixon?s impeachment panel, but now this acolyte of anti-American radicals Saul Alinsky and George Soros is being accused of the same rank corruption!?

Liberal writer David Corn seems to think that Hillary?s departure will be just a shade less ignominious than Nixon?s. ?Diplomacy is about face,? he writes in the Arizona Sentinel, ?and the only way for other nations to save face will be to give them Clinton?s scalp. There is no way that the new WikiLeaks leaks don?t leave Hillary Clinton holding the smoking gun. The time for her departure may come next week or next month, but sooner or later, the weakened and humiliated secretary of state will have to pay.?

Ironic too that the Nixon-era expos?s that Woodward and Bernstein were lionized for by the Left, as well as the release of the Pentagon Papers and the Ellsberg Papers, are the same kind of expos?s Assange is being vilified for. Leftists still thrill at bad news for America, only not when they?re in power! Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Who Benefits?

Just who exactly benefits when Hillary is thrown under the bus? Certainly Obama benefits by having a potential rival in 2012 tainted irreparably. What amazing timing that these particular leaks came so closely after the midterms, when the 2012 presidential race de facto began.

Personally, I don?t believe Obama will run again, as I spelled out in my last article, ?Obama Won?t Run?His Work Is Done.? But the leaks will keep Hill and Bill, the perpetual thorns in Obama?s side (especially after Bubba stole the show in the White House last week), scrambling to re-burnish her tarnished broomstick image.

But according to Dr. Jack Wheeler, a longtime Washington insider, all the burnishing in the world won?t help. Everyone ?should shout Hallelujah for the enormous act of public service Assange has performed,? Wheeler writes.??He has single-handedly obliterated ? as in nuked ? Hillary Clinton?s chances for the White House. `The greatest foreign policy disaster in US history` has happened on Hillary?s watch.? Any chief executive would have to fire her, and Zero [Wheeler?s name for Obama] needs a scapegoat in any regard.?Her political career is over ? finita la musica, the Clinton?s music is finished.? Thanks, Julian.?

When you think about the magnitude of Assange?s assault on America, you know two things immediately:

  1. Private Bradley Manning, the man accused of disseminating the leaks while pretending to listen to Lady Gaga, was certainly a minor cog (or perhaps scapegoat) in a much huger scenario. Manning?s rank had been reduced and he was considered a potential candidate for discharge for unsatisfactory performance, but strangely retained his clearance. Was that decision made by the same ?authority? who knew about but failed to report the terrorist links and jihadist rants of U.S. Army major and psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan, the Palestinian Muslim fanatic who on November 5, 2009, murdered 13 people in cold blood at Fort Hood in Texas?
  2. The suspicions that the torrent of WikiLeaks was orchestrated by the Obama government, with the generous help of a craven left-wing media, are increasingly credible. How else to explain their absolute lack of intervention? When the feds want to stop something or kill someone anywhere in the world ? except for Osama bin Laden ? poof! But in this case, nothing!

Again, who benefits?

  • Certainly Obama would benefit by using the leaks as a pretext to abandon our missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving the 50-million people in those countries who tasted democracy for the first time ? through the ballot as well as the press ? to the predatory machinations of the more feudal hordes who operated with both savagery and impunity before our military campaigns introduced them to the 21st century. Clearly he hates (and is not very proficient in) foreign policy and would love those billions to help support his socialist domestic agenda.
  • Again, Obama would benefit by using Assange?s abuse of the Internet to actualize his own and his henchmen?s oft-stated desire to censor if not downright control Internet content, especially when it comes to voices that dispute his űber-Leftist policies. Eric Blair has spelled this out in ?WikiLeaks Being Used to Justify `Patriot Act` Legislation for Internet.?
  • And yet again Obama would benefit by delivering to his overseers and puppet masters worldwide publicity for the view they all share: America is bad!

The Co-Conspirators

No wonder that the personal flunkies of this regime, who share their anti-American views ? most egregiously The New York Times ? couldn?t wait to publish leaks potentially damaging to the United States.

As Pamela Geller of AtlasShrugs.com points out, Obama ?ignored the whole WikiLeaks issue [but] he could only accomplish this with the tacit support and silence of the media. Once again the criminal media is providing aid and comfort to our enemies. It had to strike you as ironic that the New York Times would not publish the 13,000 Climategate emails because they were `private emails` but they had no problem with the treason of WikiLeaks..?

And as the Gawker website states: Holder said that a ?criminal investigation into Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is more than just `saber-rattling? and Justice Department officials are claiming he violated the Espionage Act. If that?s true, isn?t the New York Times guilty as well? If Holder really believes that the Espionage Act is a constitutional law that ought to be enforced ? as opposed to a mere pretext for making Assange?s life as miserable as possible ? then he?d better be prepared to go after the New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and El Pais, all of which published the classified cables after being granted early access and were part of a clear conspiracy with Wikileaks to break the Espionage Act. So if it was a crime when Assange obtained the database, why wasn?t it a crime when the Times did??

Apparently, the The U.S. Air Force is asking the same question, which is why this branch of our military has blocked the website of The New York Times on its computers, because the paper published bits of secret diplomatic cables leaked by secret-sharing site Wikileaks.

Here is a mere smattering of leaks the Times gleefully published:

  • Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. I wrote about this here in 2005, Geller has documented this fact exhaustively, and Jim Kouri, columnist for The Examiner and Chiefs of Police executive, said that the Wikileaks classified documents ?reveal that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.? No other conclusion but that the Leftist media knew this but withheld it in their shameful obsession to discredit Pres. Bush.
  • A detailed list of sites throughout the world that U.S. officials say could be vulnerable to terrorist attack.
  • Cables indicating that the U.S. leaked documents designed to pit Middle East governments against each other.
  • Sec. of State Clinton?s charges that Saudi Arabia is the Number One financier of terrorist activity ?worldwide.?
  • WikiLeaks Exposes White House?s Conscious Support of Islamists, written by Seth Mandel.
  • Saudi Arabia?s King Abdullah, the King of Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, Egypt?s President Hosni Mubarak, et al, all placed the threat of a nuclear Iran far ahead of the concern they had, if any, with the Israel-Palestinian issue, practically begging Obama to take military action, to no avail. Former Israeli minister and journalist on Irapundit, Yoram Ettinger writes: ??the [WikiLeaks] documents refute Obama?s fundamental assumptions?that the Palestinian issue is a root cause of Middle East turbulence and anti-Western terrorism; that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are allies of the US; that there is no Islamic terrorism since Islam promotes peace and not terrorism; that there is no Jihadist terrorism since Jihad is a process which purifies the soul; that there is no global terrorism?? Morton A. Klein, the national president of the Zionist Organization of America, says that the Obama Administration ?has been cynically using the Iranian nuclear issue as a tool for extracting concessions from Israel, knowing all the while that such concessions bear no relation whatsoever to regional support for confronting Iran.?These cables increase the validity of many analysts and journalists views who state that President Obama may be the most hostile president to Israel, ever.?
  • Tehran has used the Iranian Red Crescent (member of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) to smuggle weapons and Iranian Revolutionary Guards? forces into Lebanon during the 2006 Hezbollah-Israel war, and into Iraq, to fight against U.S. soldiers.
  • North Korea is supplying Iran with advanced ballistic missile systems that could accurately hit Tel Aviv or Moscow, and is also playing a significant role in the proliferation of nuclear equipment and ballistic delivery systems in the Middle East.
  • Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is ?an exceptionally dangerous? Islamist, whose anti-Israel rhetoric derives from a personal, visceral hatred of Israel.
  • According to Joshuapundit, citing Doug Ross: ?Wikileaks Proved Obama Lied Repeatedly About Middle East Policy.? The blog reports that Obama ?has a sentimental sympathy for Islam, which explains his coddling of Iran and Pakistan and his animus towards Israel? If you feel like you may have seen this movie before, you have?in the appeasement of Hitler by Britain prior to WWII. Wikileaks, if nothing else, revealed exactly how incompetent and dangerous Barack Obama really is.?
  • In this video by Dick Morris, Clinton?s former advisor explains why Obama?s disgraceful abandonment of Israel could lead to a ?second Holocaust.?

Jim Kouri, mentioned above, ?reports that this week ?a new threat emerged in the world of cybersecurity: `hacktivists` have openly launched retaliatory attacks on businesses, organizations and even governments, shutting down their websites for hours or days, in protest over actions taken against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.?

Given the clear advantage Obama stands to yield from Assange?s leaks, could these attacks also have been coordinated from the White House?

The More Things Change?

Columnist Daniel Greenfield explains that ?the Wikileaks mess is a reminder that the enmity of the International Left did not die when the Soviet Union did. It sends the stark message that we have political enemies who are using the internet to organize their attacks in new and dangerous ways. From Soros to Assange to Chavez, the International Left is a highly active and dangerous foe, and it is working to aid Islamic terrorists?because speaking the truth out loud would be `unhelpful` and embarrassing to the Muslim regimes whom they fear and whose favor they court.?

So true, and I also agree with Vasko Kohlmayer who has called WikiLeaks ?Obama?s Katrina? [and] Hillary Clinton ?the Michael Brown in this affair.? He goes on to write:

?Our government officials tell us that Assange?s act somehow poses a threat to our national security by undermining America?s foreign policy. One may as well ask: What foreign policy? The cables show something many have always known ? that most so-called leaders and politicians are liars, schemers, crooks, egomaniacs, and incompetents.

?Ask yourself this: Who is the greater threat to America? Is it an Australian programmer or Barack Obama? Assange is merely a website operator. He has no backing or powers to inflict harm on this country. Obama, on the other hand, has been using the powers of his office to systematically destroy the American economy, the dollar, our standard of living, and our standing in the world. He has been stoking racial tensions. He has been taking private property of American citizens and giving it to his friends. He and his people have been destroying the values and fabric of American society faster than you can say `bam.? In reality, it is this regime that is a menace to America.

?But above all, let us not get fooled this time around. The ruling elites will try to play on our patriotic feelings in order to save their skins. Contrary to what you will hear from this administration and its acolytes, WikiLeaks? disclosures are not a threat to America. But they are an immense threat to the current regime, because they represent a colossal indictment of its incompetence and doltishness.? Amen, Mr. Kohlmayer.

As I stated in my last article, the Left has two bedrock so-called principles, the first being: If it?s bad for America, it?s good! Clearly these leaks are bad for America, which is why I?m firmly convinced that the regime in Washington, D.C. is behind them, or at least complicit, and that indeed Barack Obama is in bed ? so to speak ? with Julian Assange.

I remember in the mid-seventies hating the Supreme Court decision to allow Nazis to march through the streets of Skokie, Illinois. But I had to agree with the Court that the right of free speech (and assembly) was more important than my personal feelings. And I agree with Fox Business Network?s Judge Andrew Napolitano that Assange has the same right to free speech, objectionable as it may be.

The problem with the WikiLeaks is not that they will threaten our national security. The problem is that our national security is threatened by a far worse menace, specifically by the man I consider a usurper in the White House and his rogue regime.

Writers like me hate to repeat themselves, but I have to end this article the same way I ended another fairly recent article. It is with the three words most deeply in my heart: God Save America!

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:19
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

A military jury has convicted an Army doctor who disobeyed orders to deploy to Afghanistan because he questions President Obama?s eligibility for office.

The jury on Wednesday found Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin of Greeley, Colo., guilty of missing a flight that would have gotten him to Fort Campbell, Ky., for his eventual deployment. He was convicted of a charge of missing movement by design.

His attorney had argued that he should be convicted of a lesser charge.

Lakin had already pleaded guilty to another charge against him. All told, he now faces up to three and a half years in prison.


Comment by American Grand Jury:

This will backfire on the FRAUD in office. All troops who fight for our Nation should take notice. You have a Usurper who is acting as your Commander-in-Thief who will take down one of your own decorated war hero?s (who is Flight Surgeon no less) rather than stand up like a man and accept an honest challenge.. How many lives has Dr. Lakin saved in battle while doing his duty to defend our Country? How many lives has Obama taken or put in harm?s way while acting as an illegal alien.

The Usurper is NOT an American. He will do his best in the long run to get you killed if you continue to follow his orders.

Generals, Admirals and High-Ranking Officers ? Much of this is YOUR fault. You allowed it to happen. Your pensions, golf course memberships and luxury homes are more important to you than the integrity of the Military. Putting Lakin in jail will have the opposite effect of strengthening the chain-of-command. It will weaken it in the long run. No man or woman will look at leadership in the Armed Forces again as the same. Your past and present leadership will always be in question now. Who do you really fight for, the Constitution or people like Obama that mock, ridicule and, in essence, burn it?


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:59
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??

WEBCommentary Contributor
Author:? Sher Zieve
Bio:
Sher Zieve
Date:? December 16, 2010

Print article - Printer friendly version

Email article link to friend(s) - Email a link to this article to friends

Topic category:? Other/General

Democrats: Put down your Scheming Propositions and leave the Capitol Building

The new omnibus spending bill now being proposed as the last ?shove it down their unthankful throats and choke ?em to death? thrown together and not read by the Marxist/Leninist Democrat leaders, is designed to destroy the rest of life as we had known it in the USA. That is the life before the totalitarians with their ?you work for us punks!? attitudes took over and began decimating everything that was honorable about OUR country. It is time for them to leave the US Capitol building--forever.

This latest blight designed to end the last vestiges of the USA includes (but is most definitely not limited to) earmarks and unregulated pork spending, the DREAM Act (amnesty) the faux ?Food Safety Bill? (which resuscitates the previously removed Orwellian language giving the ObamaGov total control over the country?s food supply including severe limitations on individuals growing food themselves and the distribution and purchase of vitamin supplements), funding for ObamaCare (the Left wants to ensure their enslavement of We-the-People is not thwarted by Conservatives coming into Congress) and language ensuring the Democrats will retain rule and sway over the money and the people despite the Republicans taking power of the House of Representatives in January 2011. In other words, this new $1+ TRILLIONS bill proposed by the Marxist/Leninist Party says ?We told you elections mean nothing to us! We will remain in control whether you so-called ?people? like it or not!?

This proposal must not be passed, in any way shape or form. It must be stopped and shelved--period. A continuing resolution can be passed giving the government money to continue to operate until next month when the new folks take over from the old decaying communists (formerly known as Democrats and RINOs). Note: There are still more of these parasites left in Congress--and of course the Executive branch--and they must be handled in upcoming elections. And, speaking of RINOS, We-the-People know the ?emergency passing of the continued tax rates, more unemployment insurance and more earmarks? was not an emergency and could have waited until the new Congress was seated. We also know who demanded it and compromised before conservatives could be sworn in.

And for you leaders in the Marxist/Leninist/Dem Party, we saw how you and your usurper in the Executive branch (if he?s there legally--have him prove it) destroyed businesses and millions and millions of jobs, in order to quickly bring about the US Welfare State--so that ALL become dependent upon the ?good will? of their unwanted and unwelcome rulers. We watched while you refused to listen to us when we shouted ?NO ObamaCare and no Cap & Tax!? But, you ignored us, shoved ObamaCare down our throats and the Dictator-in-Chief said ?there?s more than one way to skin a cat? referencing the people?s demands against Cap & Trade and placed it (via ?Executive Order?) in the hands of his now totally-controlled EPA. This is called tyranny and we now are living under a Dictatorship--despite what you may have heard to the contrary.

Every day, more and more of our now almost non-existent wealth is being stolen from the majority of Americans and placed into the pockets of the ruling elite minority. Every day, multiple freedoms and liberties (now including the ObamaGov?s control of our bodies with ObamaCare, TSA probing and groping and ?net neutrality? soon to bring the total control of our speech) are being removed at a frightening pace. Can the country and our now almost former Republic withstand this onslaught? We already know the answer.

The following is a reiteration of some profound statements made by one of our central founders, Thomas Jefferson:

1. ?A government afraid of its citizens is a Democracy. Citizens afraid of government is tyranny!?

2. ?Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have. The course of history shows us that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

3. ?I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

4. ?The end of democracy and the defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of lending institutions and moneyed incorporations.?

As is usually the case, Jefferson?s observations were and are still correct. We are, also, also quickly becoming a police state. The TSA--which provides groping of only non-Muslim US citizens--gives us a clear picture of the future abuses to come. The ObamaMedia, of course, refuses to report on it or the other atrocities--including but, not limited to the real reasons for the courts martial of LTC Lakin (for daring to ask The exalted Obama to prove he is a natural born citizen). How soon will it be before others are imprisoned or completely censored for asking the same question about the Usurper and Dictator-in-Chief Obama? Not long, I suspect.

When We-the-People voted against the Marxist/Leninist ruling class, it and its members came out gnashing their teeth and fighting against us. They are now shouting at us ?We?ll enslave you anyway and you can?t stop us!?

The new American Revolution looms closer every day. People can only take tyranny for so long before screaming NO MORE and acting upon it. Do you now hear the people sing Congress and Obama? Do you?

Is the food safety bill bad for small farmers?:

http://www.newscow.net/story.php?StoryID=4641

Senate Omnibus Bill Includes Food Safety, Other Health Measures:

http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2010/12/15/senate-omnibus-bill-includes-food-safety-

other-health-measures.aspx

Spending Bill Tests GOP Resolve:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704098304576022014099914434.html

US officer faces prison in 'birther' court martial:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iFXaB7HbetbpQE3-ftuB4KiFMbKA?

docId=CNG.937a29e74a6fa43f33a85ed42e22fb84.c11

Do you Hear the People Sing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmaTNf4YhEs

Sher Zieve

Send email feedback to Sher Zieve


Biography - Sher Zieve

Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve's op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.


Read other commentaries by Sher Zieve.

Copyright ? 2010 by Sher Zieve
All Rights Reserved.

[ Back ]

?


? 2004-2010 by WEBCommentary(tm), All Rights Reserved


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:38
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 15 de diciembre de 2010
??
??

Military jury finds 'birther' officer guilty

MugshotArmy Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin of Greeley, Colo., leaves a military court with his brother, Greg Lakin, during a break in his court-martial at Fort Meade, Md., on Tuesday, Dec. 14, 2010. Lakin questions whether President Obama was born in the United States. (AP Photo)
Md. (AP) ? A military jury on Wednesday afternoon found an Army doctor who disobeyed orders to deploy to Afghanistan because he questions President Obama's eligibility for office guilty of missing a flight that would have gotten him to his eventual deployment.

The jury returned the verdict against Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin of Greeley, Colo., on the charge of "missing movement" by design. It carries a possible two-year sentence.

Lakin previously pleaded guilty to another charge against him. All told, he now faces a possible 42 months in prison. A military jury will sentence him after a sentencing phase.

?

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:03
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
?
American Thinker
December 15, 2010
By Richard Kantro
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/12/crucible_of_a_hero.html

When Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, MD walks out of the chamber where he has faced a court-martial this week, he will emerge -- regardless of the verdict -- a towering American hero.

Nothing like the stupendous display which he has mounted -- of principled, sustained self-sacrifice and fearless defiance -- has been seen in decades on the American political stage. Together with the peril of actual battlefield engagement, it ranks alongside the greatest courageous stances even of the American Revolution itself. Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale: those kinds of stances.

This case is of shatteringly great significance, and if you don't know about it, well, you can thank the cowards, commies, and crooks at your favorite mainstream media Bureau of Disinformation, National Desk. Lt. Col. Lakin has been abandoned by the establishment press, dastards and lackeys almost to a one. In a just post-Obama world, there is hope that, one day, there will come the destruction of a thousand shameful careers in what was once journalism -- via abdication by the press of its vital role as Fourth Estate; desertion of its watch as the protector of American liberty; and its own knife-wielding, unforced, alacritous auto-castration.

For historical background and the underpinnings, foundations and history of this case, see Lt. Col. Lakin himself and Thomas Lifson, both in April, 2010; see also, www.safeguardourconstitution.com.

Briefly summarized, the issue is this: Earlier this year, Dr. Lakin refused an order -- an agonizing and drastic step for a loyal military man -- to deploy for a second time to Afghanistan, where, in addition to Bosnia, he has already served in dangerous combat areas. Indeed, he announced his refusal to obey any orders from his commanding officers, men he admires and respects, and the contravention of whose directives has caused him significant personal anguish. The reason is the overwhelming doubts and suspicions -- national doubts and suspicions, not just personal ones -- about the egregious likelihood of Barack Hussein Obama's ineligibility to serve as commander-in-chief.

The genesis of these doubts: the failure and probable inability of said Barack Hussein Obama -- he of the reclusive records, wagging forefinger, and sibilant esses -- to release for public delectation a valid Hawaii birth certificate. Despite a lengthy series of gaslighting blandishments on the part of a cadre of partisan sycophants in government and media that such documentation had been shown and that it was time to move on, it is an inarguable fact that no such birth certificate has ever seen the public light of day. The wan attempts to substitute for such signal evidence of citizenship -- a simple document, which millions of Americans routinely must produce -- the so called "certification of live birth", issued in 1961 by the State of Hawaii, is a smokescreen, and a wispy one.

This is all the more outrageous in view of the fact that John McCain, scion of a family of naval officers -- if he were any more American he'd be a bald eagle -- was made the subject of consideration by the august US Senate, which felt it had to take up and pass upon the satisfactoriness of his own natal bona fides.

Yet no reciprocal imprimatur was made of His Oneness -- not by the marshmallow press; not by the Senate; not by the voters; not by the various boards of election; not by any statutes -- which don't exist to begin with -- to enforce natural-bornness; and certainly not by the inscrutably reticent Mr. McCain himself, who threw that fight as surely as any over-the-hill boxer who knows his legs aren't what they used to be and who needs cafeteria money and a hotel room for the week.

In fact, there is more than a certified, long-form birth certificate -- a lot more -- about Barack "Barry Soetoro" Hussein Obama that no one outside of the hermetic world of sworn-to-silence hospital personnel, state vital records workers, and college bursar-level functionaries has ever seen. A partial list would include, in addition, Neolani kindergarten records; the Obama-Dunham marriage license; the Obama-Dunham divorce records; the Soetoro-Dunham marriage license; Soetoro adoption records; the Punahou School application and records; Noelami Elementary School records; the Soetoro-Dunham divorce; consistent selective service registration info; SAT scores; LSAT scores; Occidental College records; financial aid records; passports; Columbia University records; putative Columbia thesis on "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament"; Harvard University records; Harvard Law Review records; any writings as President of the Harvard Law Review beyond one tough anti-fetus fragment; Illinois bar records; certificates of baptism or adoption; medical records; Illinois State Senate records, from 1997-2004, Illinois State Senate schedule; law practice client list while at Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard; University of Chicago scholarly articles; and more. Oh, but we do have a document from the Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, a Catholic institution, which shows him enrolled as Barry Soetoro: as a Muslim and an Indonesian.

I stated at the outset is that Lakin's stature is assured despite the verdict. Here's why. The charges are (i) that he missed his deployment flight; and (ii) conduct unbecoming an officer. He has, in the early stages of his trial, been denied discovery, and the presentation of witnesses, evidence, or argument in defense of his position. That position necessarily goes to the heart of whether Obama should hold the White House keys. Conviction on the charges seems inescapable. The military court is not likely to risk uncovering an inconvenient truth about the acting President, if there be one. Were Lakin to be exonerated -- which seems all but impossible -- then the tribunal would be staring in the face the propriety of all things Obama, a task far too sensitive for it. And the question of his provenance would fairly beg itself into being before Court could adjourn. And on the other hand, if Lakin is convicted, well, society will be no closer to probing the mystery of the guarded origins and persona of the Commander-in-Thief. Which will make doubly urgent Lakin's reach for the grail of truth, and for others to take up his cause.

Among all the comfortable, set-for-life politicos, officials, appointees, careerists, officeholders, aides-de-camp, campaigners, supporters, friends and hangers-on in and during the Obama era, there has not been a single high-level, principled resignation. No stand in protest of what, if Obama's position is the usurpation it could be, the most devious high crime ever perpetrated by and against American government. Lakin's honorable course is a rebuke to today's so-called leaders, who, cowering in suspense, would not all taken together approach the equal of this man.

Terry Lakin is putting at risk his own life; his own fortune; and his own sacred honor. He has invited his own court-martial, scorn, possible conviction, and disapprobation; loss of rank, position, and pension; loss of the future; danger to family and impoverishment; and possible hard jail time at Leavenworth. All this for the exalted goal of fealty to a Constitution his every step of the way towards protecting which is blocked by the government that administered the oath he took, and which oath he must contravene, only to be able to honor it in the extreme. The greatness of battlefield valor notwithstanding, this is bravery of another order.

This is the kind of courage -- after the crawling, burrowing, light-averse invertebrates of the political landscape have long since slithered away and vanished -- that gets statues of a man built in public squares. This kind of courage gets folk songs and laureate poems written for a man, and they will be written for him. This kind of courage guarantees -- even a hundred years from now -- that parents will still be proud to give their little boys names like Terrence Lakin Jones.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:59
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Standing with Lt. Col. Terry?Lakin

?2010 drkate

Usurper v USA

Ironic, isn?t it, when we as Americans have standing to be punished, but not enough standing to ask about our own National Security and its jeopardy under the Obama regime. So is the case of Lt. Col Terry Lakin, whose only ?crime? is that he asked that his orders be verified as legal.

In a packed military court room at the Ft. Meade complex in Maryland, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin steadfastly faced? Court Martial trial proceedings with family, friends and Patriots standing with him.? Undeterred by the weight of the charges, LTC Lakin and his attorney, Neal Puckett, deftly executed a strategy that left the government prosecutors red-eared and shaken by the magnitude of their own mistakes and inability to articulate a valid claim.

Recall that Judge Denise Lind, presiding over the Court Martial, denied LTC Lakin an opportunity for discovery and told him literally to ?get another defense?.?? This decision is in my view reversible error as the Judge offered no legal reason why Obama?s records could not be retrieved except that they would be ?embarassing?.? Based on what knowledge, and what law, Col. Lind?

And to that challenge, LTC Lakin and Attorney Puckett certainly rose to the occasion.

?Piling On

The military?s charges against LTC Lakin are two fold:

  • That LTC Lakin ?missed movement? by not reporting to Ft. Campbell for deployment to Afghanistan
  • That LTC Lakin disobeyed a number of orders.? This charge contained at least four ?elements? which appear to this author to be ?piling on? charges that carry long sentences.

Because Judge Lind denied LTC Lakin?s right to discovery and evidence, the only possible outcome for LTC Lakin on the second charge?disobeying orders?was to plead guilty.? Essentially he would lose this argument because he was denied the right to discovery, with each charge carrying a two year prison term.

Judge Lind carefully went through each of the second group charges, painstakingly asking each time whether LTC Lakin understood the ramifications of disobeying these orders.? Lakin described the anguish involved in his decision, yet accepted responsibility for his final course of action.? On balance, this discussion between the Judge and LTC Lakin revealed Lakin?s extensive efforts to alert his Chain of Command as to his concerns, and the failure of the Chain of Command to address them.? This is the reason he invited his own Court Martial?it may be one of the only ways to reveal Obama?s problems on proving his eligibility for office.

The second charge had its components ?collapsed?, and when sentenced, LTC Lakin could face a maximum of 18 months in prison.? NO SENTENCING DECISION HAS BEEN MADE.

Missing Movement

?Missing movement? is a military term of art describing the movement of troops aboard a military aircraft, a ship, or other event where unit of soldiers moves into the war theater.

To this charge, LTC Lakin pleaded ?not guilty?, and asked for a jury to hear the case.? A jury was assembled consisting of initially ten senior officers; through questioning, two were excluded.

For this charge, Lakin is accused of missing a commercial airline flight from Baltimore to Ft. Campell.? As attorney Neal Puckett pointed out, however, Lakin could have traveled to Ft Campell in any manner he chose.? Prosecution witness after witness divulged to Attorney Puckett that no one gave Lakin a direct order to take a commercial airline flight to his next duty position, as his orders allowed him to travel in any manner to Ft. Campell.

Additional injury to the government?s case was to come, as it was revealed in cross examination that the actual deployment of troops was going to occur three-four months after Lakin was called to Ft. Campbell.? Thus, LTC Lakin did not ?miss movement?

Painstakingly asking each of the six prosecution witnesses as to the schedule, timing, deployment, and general practice of deploying troops to a war theater, Attorney Puckett demolished the ?missing movement? charge.

The Government Introduces Obama?s Ineligibility

Recall that the government would rather bury LTC Lakin on a bunch of piled on charges than address the issue of Obama?s ineligibility.? In what can be termed as a little ?divine intervention? the fifth government witness actually stated the reason why LTC Lakin refused his orders?Obama?s eligibility.? You should have seen the prosecution shut that lady down right away!? ?next??? :lol:


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:21
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??

Is the U.S. now ruled by Military Dictatorship?

?
???Share 0diggsdigg ?
?

WHAT AUTHORITY DO THE ARMY COMMANDERS TRULY HAVE OVER TERRY LAKIN?

by Sharon Rondeau

Is this book, published in 1949, a "novel" or "the truth?"

(Dec. 15, 2010) ? In a move reminiscent of George Orwell?s 1984, Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin has pleaded guilty to ?four specifications of refusing to obey lawful orders? during a hearing held today at Ft. Meade, MD.

On March 30, 2010, Lakin had announced his refusal to obey orders on the grounds that Obama might not be a ?natural born Citizen? as required by the U.S. Constitution to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the military.? However, in an apparent contradiction, Lakin or his surrogates have referred to Obama as the ?President.?

In its original press release, the Safeguard Our Constitution website supporting Lakin had announced that ?Mr. Obama?s continuing refusal to release his original 1961 birth certificate has brought Lt. Col. Lakin to the point where he feels his orders are unlawful, and thus MUST be disobeyed.?? The foundation prominently asked, and is still asking, for donations to support Lt. Col. Lakin?s cause.

An earlier statement on the website reads:

At the very least, the administration has wasted a huge amount of the nation?s time. At worst, Obama is in fact not eligible to be President. Would that be uncomfortable? Would it be inconvenient? Would it be problematic? Of course. But this nation has survived many traumatic events in its past and would survive this. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land- and it must be upheld.

Every single avenue of redress:? the courts, the legislative branch, and the executive branch ? and by extension, the U.S. military ? have been closed to We the People.? What does that mean for the U.S. Constitution?

If Obama, who appears at the top of the military chain of command along with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, is not eligible to occupy the position of commander-in-chief, then how is it that Lakin today ?stood before Judge Lind and over and over told her that he was wrong to have disobeyed his orders, which were lawful??

Does two plus two make five?? Are there any ?hard facts? anymore, or are facts constantly being altered to protect Big Brother?

Does ?The Truth Matters? now mean that War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength?

?Smith!? screamed the shrewish voice from the telescreen. ?6079 Smith W.! Yes, you! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You?re not trying. Lower, please! That?s better, comrade. Now stand at ease, the whole squad, and watch me.?

A sudden hot sweat had broken out all over Winston?s body. His face remained completely inscrutable. Never show dismay! Never show resentment! A single flicker of the eyes could give you away. He stood watching while the instructress raised her arms above her head and?one could not say gracefully, but with remarkable neatness and efficiency?bent over and tucked the first joint of her fingers under her toes.

?There, comrades! That?s how I want to see you doing it. Watch me again. I?m thirty-nine and I?ve had four children. Now look.? She bent over again. ?You see my knees aren?t bent. You can all do it if you want to,? she added as she straightened herself up. ?Anyone under forty-five is perfectly capable of touching his toes. We don?t all have the privilege of fighting in the front line, but at least we can all keep fit. Remember our boys on the Malabar front! And the sailors in the Floating Fortresses! Just think what they have to put up with. Now try again. That?s better, comrade, that?s much better,? she added encouragingly as Winston, with a violent lunge, succeeded in touching his toes with knees unbent, for the first time in several years.

Is history being rewritten in front of our eyes?

What kind of threat did Col. Denise Lind pose to Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin?? If Obama is a fraud, which the military must know, why did Lakin plead guilty?? Of what is he guilty if Obama is a fraud?? How could he be guilty?

Was there any authority to hold a court-martial without a legitimate commander-in-chief?? Why did Attorney Neal Puckett apparently fail to bring that up at the hearing?? If there was no authority, why did it even commence?

What changed between March 30, 2010 and December 14, 2010?? How much does anyone ?need? attorneys like these?? Are they all about advising their clients to take plea deals rather than uncovering the truth?? What do they know of the U.S. Constitution and its provisions for a legitimate commander-in-chief?? Was Puckett?s defense of Lakin based on constitutional principles or something else, like money?

Almost unconsciously he traced with his finger in the dust on the table:

2 + 2 = 5

?They can?t get inside you,? she had said. But they could get inside you. ?What happens to you here is for ever,? O?Brien had said. That was a true word. There were things, your own acts, from which you could never recover. Something was killed in your breast: burnt out, cauterized out.

At what point did Lakin decide that he was guilty for asking a question about the alleged commander-in-chief?s qualifications?? What about ?The ?superior officer? must be one authorized to give the order; else indeed his command would not be a lawful one??

And why is Lakin now reduced to ?pleading for mercy??

He accepted everything. The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford were guilty of the crimes they were charged with. He had never seen the photograph that disproved their guilt. It had never existed, he had invented it. He remembered remembering contrary things, but those were false memories, products of selfdeception. How easy it all was! Only surrender, and everything else followed. It was like swimming against a current that swept you backwards however hard you struggled, and then suddenly deciding to turn round and go with the current instead of opposing it. Nothing had changed except your own attitude: the predestined thing happened in any case. He hardly knew why he had ever rebelled. Everything was easy, except??!

Have ?collusion, conspiracy and cover-up? perpetrated by military officers been maintained as the truth, particularly today?

Was the verdict already decided in Lakin?s case?

The President has the authority to maintain the Uniform Code of Military Justice over the U.S. military, including the process of courts-martial.? Even civilians working with the Armed Forces are subject to the UCMJ.

But what if there is no lawful president to command the Armed Forces?

Now that we have no Constitution, is this what is coming?

There were times when his nerve so forsook him that he began shouting for mercy even before the beating began, when the mere sight of a fist drawn back for a blow was enough to make him pour forth a confession of real and imaginary crimes.

Or is it happening already?

Are we mindless, spineless, useless idiots who have been brainwashed into being afraid of our government and letting it run roughshod over us? Or do we stand up to tyranny and physical abuse, even while falsely imprisoned?

Is the Constitution nothing but a cast-off relic which our entire government has decided is obsolete so that it can control our every movement?

He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.

THE END

? 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:48
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Martes, 14 de diciembre de 2010

FORT MEADE, Md. ? An Army doctor who disobeyed orders to deploy to Afghanistan because he questioned President Barack Obama?s eligibility for office pleaded guilty Tuesday to one of two charges against him.

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin of Greeley, Colo., pleaded guilty in a military court to a charge that included disobeying orders to meet with a superior and to report to Fort Campbell in Kentucky. Lakin, a 17-year veteran, faces up to 18 months in prison and dismissal from the Army when he is sentenced on that charge.

He pleaded not guilty to a second charge of missing a flight meant to take him to Fort Campbell, and the court-martial proceeding continued on that count. His defense attorney is arguing Lakin wasn?t specifically ordered to be on that particular flight.

A military jury will decide Lakin?s eventual sentence, but Lakin won?t be able to raise the topic he wanted to as part of his original defense: whether Obama was born in the U.S. and therefore can serve as commander in chief. In September, a military judge ruled that whether Obama is qualified under the U.S. Constitution to hold office is not legally relevant in Lakin?s case.

In videos posted on YouTube, Lakin aligned himself with so-called ?birthers? who question whether Obama is a natural-born citizen as the Constitution requires for presidents. Lakin, a flight surgeon, says in the videos that any reasonable person looking at available evidence would have questions about Obama?s eligibility to be president and that he had ?no choice? but to disobey orders. He said he would ?gladly deploy? if Obama?s original birth certificate were released and proved authentic.

Officials in Hawaii say they have seen and verified Obama?s original 1961 birth certificate, which is on record with that state. But birthers have not been satisfied with that assurance or the ?Certification of Live Birth? Obama has released. The certification is a digital document that is a record of a person?s birth in the state, but the certificate does not list the name of the hospital where Obama?s mother gave birth or the physician who delivered him.

On Tuesday, members of the military jury that was asked to hear the case were questioned about whether they had heard of the birther movement and what feelings they had about individuals who identify with it. Several said they had heard the term, and all but one said they had at least heard of the case of a military doctor refusing to deploy because of his questions about the president?s eligibility for office.

Lakin had been ordered to deploy for what would have been a second tour of duty in Afghanistan.

His parents and two brothers were in court Tuesday, as were supporters who audibly scoffed when one potential juror said he believed evidence that Obama was eligible to be president.

During the morning portion of the trial, Lakin said he had gone to a chapel and done some soul-searching about whether to disobey orders.

?I believe there is a valid question that needs to be asked and answered,? he said, referring to Obama?s eligibility to be president.

Source: Fox News


Comment by American Grand Jury:

I cannot walk in LTC Lakin?s shoes. He has a wife and a family to consider. Pleading guilty was probably the best he could do under the circumstances. He has a very good lawyer advising him who is ex-military.

That being said, it is beyond disgusting that a Military Kangaroo Court will sit there and beat a decorated Military Doctor into submission simply to protect a criminal.

Barack Hussein Obama, known as Barry Soetero is absolutely the biggest fraud and traitor we have ever known in the history of America. Obama has willfully violated the Constitution and the trust of the people. What is so evil is that this man does it with great joy and profit. Obama truly hates America ? without question, all his actions and motivations are that of a foreign illegal alien.

The charges against Obama are overwhelming. Obama has never proven a ?real? birth in the State of Hawaii. No such certified birth document has ever been released to the public or divulged in a any court of law, or competent jurisdiction. In fact, the piece of paper depicted as an image of Obama?s so called Hawaiian birth wasn?t even posted by Obama. It was posted by some 3rd party website that has been proven over and over again to be less than reputable. We have conclusive forensic evidence in our American Grand Jury files proving the image in question to be nothing more than a photo-shopped digital file, never being that of an original Certification of Live Birth from the State of Hawaii.

Even if the document were real, a ?Certification of Live Birth? lacks complete credibility. Such document doesn?t prove Obama to be Constitutionally eligible to be president ? it doesn?t even prove he was born in Hawaii ? Obama has never produced any certified document from a Doctor or Hospital proving any real claim to US Citizenship or birth in the State of Hawaii. Everything is speculation on the part of the Media and the public that blindly believe Obama without proof. Until Obama actually proves ?natural born? citizenship, his presidency is a fraud. It is basically that simple.

Those of you that blindly follow Obama have no right to sit in judgment against people like Lt. Col. Terry Lakin. He is an honorable man, God-fearing and a dedicated servant to our Country. When you deny Terry Lakin his Constitutional right to question Obama?s claim to citizenship and the presidency you do so because of greed, mis-justice and hate. Lakin has every right to question Obama. You have no right to stop him. Taking one man?s rights away and giving them to another violates every common sense law known to man. It violates God?s will. Even if you don?t believe in God you cannot in good conscience stand as a human being and believe that men should always prosper at the expense of others. That is immoral and wrong. If you take joy in prospering at the expense of others then you are no better than the Obamas? of the world.

------------------------------

http://1click.indiatimes.com/photo/0e513tQ93Y8Ri?q=Maryland


Lieutenant Colonel Terrance Lakin (L) and his brother Greg Lakin step out of the magistrate court during a break for lunch in his court martial December 14, 2010 at Fort Meade in Maryland. Lakin had refused to deploy to Afghanistan until US President Barack Obama produced a birth certificate to prove that he was born in the US. He is charged with violating one specification of Article 87, UCMJ, missing movement; and four specifications of Article 92, UCMJ, failure to obey an lawful order and dereliction of duty.

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 22:07
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
?
?
?

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Court-Martial Live Coverage Update

?
This is the long-form birth certificate that Obama is concealing containing information that's not on the short-form Certificate-of-Live-Birth
=========
Dear Listeners,

We are attending the Lt. Col. Terry Lakin trial at the Fort Meade army base. We regret we are unable to file a report today because we are not allowed to bring cameras and recording devices into the courtroom. Lt. Col. Terry Lakin did plead guilty to a minor charge regarding disobeying a direct chain of command order. We met with Dr. Orly Taitz, famed Birther attorney, Maureen Dowd of the NY Times, and a reporter from World Net Daily. A full report of today?s proceedings will be filed tomorrow promptly on the Manning Report at 3pm EST at
atlah.org. After which, each days proceedings will be filed the day of the event.


In His Royal Service,
A Natural Born Citizen,

Dr. James David Manning
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 21:00
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??
?


WND
BORN IN THE USA?

Lakin pleads

guilty to 1 count

Army doctor who

questioned eligibility

of Obama accused

of missing assignments


Posted: December 14, 2010
1:18 pm Eastern

By Brian Fitzpatrick
??2010?WorldNetDaily

?


Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin

WASHINGTON ? An Army physician who was facing multiple counts for allegedly failing to follow orders because he questioned whether Barack Obama legitimately occupies the Oval Office today pleaded guilty to one count.

The case involves Greeley, Colo., native Lt. Col. Terry Lakin.

Lakin pleaded guilty to not meeting with a superior when ordered to do so and not showing up at Fort Campbell in Kentucky as assigned.

The possible penalties range to 18 months in prison and dismissal from the Army, officials have said.

But Lakin has maintained his plea of not guilty to a second charge ? involving a flight he allegedly was assigned to take but missed.

?

His defense attorney, Neal Puckett, earlier confirmed he would work to limit the punishment for Lakin, following the judge's determination that Lakin's reasons, and all of the evidence, testimony and facts related to his actions, played no part in the case.

Lakin disobeyed orders to deploy to Afghanistan to try to force Obama to produce his birth certificate and other documents that might establish whether he is a "natural born citizen," the constitutional requirement for any president.

In an interview selected as Video of the Day by the Western Center for Journalism, Puckett said his goal during the court martial will be to "minimize the punishment" the Army will mete out to Lakin for disobeying orders.

Puckett called on Lakin's supporters to start thinking about what will happen to the decorated flight surgeon after the court martial.

"If he loses his career in the Army, and if by losing his career in the Army his career as a doctor is put into jeopardy, he still has to support his family financially," Puckett said.

"If he is viewed as a hero by some for taking a stand, and he has to suffer because of that, people need to think, 'Because he did that for me, what can I do for him?'"

After requesting assignment to a combat unit so he could serve in Afghanistan, Lakin was required in his orders to produce his birth certificate. According to Puckett, Lakin's conscience was troubled when he realized Obama, the man responsible for sending American servicemen to Afghanistan, has never produced his own birth certificate.

Lakin deliberately disobeyed orders to deploy to Afghanistan again because of doubts that Obama is eligible to occupy the Oval Office.

"He's stuck in a situation where he has disobeyed military orders, those orders issued from military authority, and the army is not allowing him to look beyond that," said Puckett. "That's why he's going to court martial. ... Our job will be to minimize that punishment and allow him to move forward in a way that is not damaging to his family."

Puckett characterized Lakin's disobedience as "courageous" and an act of "civil disobedience."

"He acknowledges responsibility for his decisions he made and he's made them courageously. He's sort of engaging in classic civil disobedience. He's saying 'I am acting in accordance with my conscience. My conscience will not let me do this unless I find out certain information.' He knew from the very beginning this could cause him personal harm, That's true courage. It's moral courage, it's physical courage. You have to admire him for that.

"The goal we would all like to have is to be acquitted of charges, but sometimes the evidence or the facts or the circs don't allow for that," said Puckett. "The next level of defense for someone who cannot be acquitted under the evidence is to achieve the best possible outcome under the circumstances.

"The prosecution is really out to get him," Puckett added. "They really trumped up the charges higher than they needed to be."



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:46
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

http://www.alipac.us/article5932.html

?

VIDEO: Dream Amnesty Supporters Racist Comments Against Whites

Friends of ALIPAC,

This video just came into us! We need all of you to take swift action. Please follow these simple steps.

1. Click on the video link below to watch the racist comments of Dream Act Amnesty supporters against white Americans and white members of Congress.

2. Share this video via email, Facebook and Twitter posts, and by adding it to your Favorites, voting it thumbs up, and making supportive comments. ALIPAC will take steps to distribute this but we need you to follow our instructions and carry this video far and wide fast!

CLICK LINK TO WATCH AND SHARE
Dream Amnesty Supporters Racist Comments Against White Americans
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFCCHbLMqME

?

?

?

?

PLEASE FLOOD ALL US SENATE OFFICES WITH THIS VIDEO OF RACIST COMMENTS BY DREAM ACT AMNESTY SUPPORTERS.

Senate office contact info at...
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-63874.html



PS: ALIPAC is a group of Americans of all races, parties, and walks of life, and we oppose both illegal immigration and racism against any group of Americans be they white, black, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American.

DISCUSS THIS VIDEO AND THESE RACIST COMMENTS HERE AT ALIPAC AT THIS LINK...
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1153777.html#1153777

?

For National Release

December 14, 2010

CONTACT: Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
(866) 703-0864 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(866) 703-0864??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting
[email protected]

Americans for Legal Immigration PAC is calling on UCLA and Dream Act Amnesty supporting groups to renounce the racist comments that UCLA instructor Kent Wong made on video stating Dream Amnesty would allow illegal aliens to replace white Americans.

The video of Director Kent Wong's racist comments have been placed online by ALIPAC at this link.

VIDEO: Racist Comments From Dream Amnesty Supporters Replace Whites
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFCCHbLMqME

Kent Wong states to Dream Amnesty supporters who cheer loudly when the racist comment is made, "You will go on to become lawyers, teachers, doctors and members of the US Congress to replace those old white men".

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:36
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

?


?


INVASION USA

Privileges for illegals

at stake in Senate vote

Door open for Reid to bring up

'Dream Act' proposal


Posted: December 14, 2010
1:00 am Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
??2010?WorldNetDaily

?

WASHINGTON - DECEMBER 9: Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) rides the Capitol Subway while heading to vote on Capitol Hill December 9, 2010 in Washington, DC. The US House and Senate are trying to finish legislative business before the holiday break and end of the 111th Congress. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

Supporters of the DREAM Act continue to believe the House's approval of the bill by a 216-198 vote sets the stage for its passage by the Senate before the lame duck Congress adjourns at the end of the month.

After considerable maneuvering in the Senate last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is now free to bring up in the Senate the version of the DREAM Act passed last Wednesday in the House.

Reid and Sen. Dick Durbin, R- Ill., the Senate Democratic Party whip, said in a joint statement Thursday that they will work with House leaders to assure passage of the DREAM Act before the end of the current lame duck session of Congress.

"Only a massive reaction from the American people can stop the DREAM Act from passing the Senate before Christmas," William Gheen, head of Americans for Legal Immigration, told WND.


"Most Americans are not aware that the DREAM Act is close to passing at any moment," he said. "We are asking our activists to start climbing over the walls to rally talk radio and warn hosts that the hour is late, the situation is dire and only a massive reaction from the American public can stop Dream Amnesty from passing before Christmas."

Activists supporting the DREAM Act are also making calls for a public outcry to influence Congress before the end of December.

A torch rally pilgrimage that began 72 days ago in Mexico City at Mexico City's Basilica Guadalupe culminated Sunday at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City, with a group estimated at 5,000 greeting runners that had crossed 3,000 miles through nine Mexican states and 12 U.S. states to express their support for the DREAM Act.

The bill offers permanent legal status to illegal immigrants up to age 35 who arrived in the United States before age 16, provided they complete two years of college or two years of U.S. military service.

Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, estimates more than 1 million illegal immigrants will eventually enroll in community colleges or state universities as a result of the DREAM Act.

Camarota anticipates that with the low income of most illegal immigrants, about 80 percent of the illegal immigrants attending institutions of higher learning under the DREAM Act would gravitate to community colleges and state universities.

"Given limited space and limited funding at community colleges and state universities, illegal immigrants will crowd out U.S. citizens and legal immigrants in the United States," Camarota told WND.

Under the DREAM Act, illegal immigrants attending community colleges or public universities would receive in-state tuition.

Camarota estimates that on average, each illegal immigrant who attends a public institution will receive a tuition subsidy from taxpayers of nearly $6,000 for each year he or she attends, for a total cost of $6.2 billion a year, not including other forms of financial assistance they may also receive.

The DREAM Act does not provide funding to states or counties to cover the in-state tuition subsidies the bill mandates.

The bill also does not provide any enforcement mechanism to screen out fraud committed by applicants who may not meet its requirements, including the requirement that the applicant first came to the U.S. illegally before age 16.

Without an enforcement mechanism, Gheen estimates that the number of illegal immigrants applying for citizenship under the DREAM Act could turn out to total 2 to 3 million, not just the 1 million illegal immigrants truly in the U.S. before age 16.

"Whether the DREAM Act passes the Senate is entirely dependent upon whether or not the bill's supporters can find the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster," Camarota said, noting that Reid could not rely on all Senate Democrats to hold party line and vote for the legislation.

Numbers USA agrees, noting that Congress was flooded last week with phone calls opposing passage of the DREAM Act.

Numbers USA has targeted the following 10 senators as undecided votes on the DREAM Act:

  • Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska
    DC: (202) 224-6665 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-6665??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (907) 271-3735 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(907) 271-3735??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Mary Landrieu, D-Louis.
    DC: (202) 224-5824 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-5824??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (225) 389-0395 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(225) 389-0395??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Susan Collins, R-Maine
    DC: (202) 224-2523 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-2523??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (207) 622-8414 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(207) 622-8414??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Olympia Snowe, R-Maine
    DC: (202) 224-5344 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-5344??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (207) 622-8292 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(207) 622-8292??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.
    DC: (202) 224-4822 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-4822??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (313) 961-4330 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(313) 961-4330??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Claire McCaskill, D-Miss.
    DC: (202) 224-6154 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-6154??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (314) 367-1364 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(314) 367-1364??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Max Baucus, D-Mont.
    DC: (202) 224-2651 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-2651??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (406) 657-6790 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(406) 657-6790??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Byron Dorgan, D-N.D.
    DC: (202) 224-2551 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-2551??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (701) 250-4618 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(701) 250-4618??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Kent Conrad, D-N.D.
    DC: (202) 224-2043 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-2043??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (701) 258-4648 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(701) 258-4648??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

  • Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.
    DC: (202) 224-3954 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(202) 224-3954??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting Local: (304) 264-4626 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting??????????????(304) 264-4626??????end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:20
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Lunes, 13 de diciembre de 2010

U.S. Air Force General McInerney Affidavit: Supports Constitutionalist Colonel Terrence Lakin ~ Obama?Eligibility.

Leave a Comment Posted by Volubrjotr on December 12, 2010

Air Force General McInerney

Air Force General Thomas McInerney has officially joined the legions of Constitutionalists, after writing an affidavit in support of Army Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin who?refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he does not believe President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Lakin?faces a court martial for his refusal.

The affidavit from McInerney acknowledges concerns about Obama?s Constitutional eligibility, and demands that he release his birth records or that the court authorize discovery.

In addition, a hearing is set at Fort Meade, Md. over a defense request for deposition of Hawaiian officials and written discovery of President Barack Obama?s school and college records.

McInerney, a Fox News contributor and member of the Iran Policy Committee,?served in Vietnam, overseas in NATO and as commander of 11th Air Force in Alaska.

Lakin is a physician who has served in the army for 18 years who announced in a video posted on?YouTube in March that he would refuse to obey orders until he received proof of Obama?s eligibility.

General McInerney?s Affidavit:

The President of the United States, as the Commander in Chief, is the source of all military authority. The Constitution requires the President to be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to hold office. If he is ineligible under the Constitution to serve in that office that creates a break in the chain of command of such magnitude that its significance can scarcely be imagined.As a practical example from my background I recall commanding forces that were equipped with nuclear weapons. In my command capacity I was responsible that personnel with access to these weapons had an unwavering and absolute confidence in the unified chain of command, because such confidence was absolutely essential? vital? in the event the use of those weapons was authorized. I cannot overstate how imperative it is to train such personnel to have confidence in the unified chain of command. Today, because of the widespread and legitimate concerns that the President is constitutionally ineligible to hold office, I fear what would happen should such a crisis occur today.

In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. That training mandates that he determine in his own conscience that an order is legal before obeying it?Indeed, he has publicly stated that he ?invites? his own court martial, and were I the Convening Authority, I would have acceded to his wishes in that regard. But thus stepping up the bar, LTC Lakin is demonstrating the courage of his convictions and his bravery. That said, it is equally essential that he be allowed access to the evidence that will prove whether he made the correct decision.

For the foregoing reasons, it is my opinion that LTC Lakin?s request for discovery relating to the President?s birth records in Hawaii is absolutely essential to determining not merely his guilt or innocence but to reassuring all military personnel once and for all for this President whether his service as Commander in Chief is Constitutionally proper. He is the one single person in the Chain of Command that the Constitution demands proof of natural born citizenship. This determination is fundamental to our Republic, where civilian control over the military is the rule. According to our Constitution, the Commander in Chief must now, in the face of serious? and widely held? concerns that he is ineligible, either voluntarily establish his eligibility by authorizing release of his birth records or this court must authorize their discovery. The invasion of his privacy in these records is utterly trivial compared to the issues at stake here. Our military MUST have confidence their Commander in Chief lawfully holds this office and absent which confidence grievous consequences may ensue..

TPM


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:15
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Monday, December 13, 2010

Countdown to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's Court-Martial: The Chain of Command; The Military Makes it Clear: A No Brainer.

?


The Chain of Command: The Military Makes it Clear - No Brainer -

So what's so complicated about this? Almost every base and military organization has a chain of command board like this.

See who is at the top?

Terry's argument exactly. Is Mr. Obama eligible to hold this office? Seeing his birth certificate would help clarify the issue. Don't you think so?

American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin's Case http://www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com

If you want to gather to support Terry during the trial see this page for details: http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/gathering.html

For Last Minute News on the Hearing See our Summary Page Later Tonight. http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/tlawsummary.html

The Chain of Command: The Military Makes it Clear: It's a No Brainer! http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/news/chainofcommand.html

Margaret Hemenway - www.safeguardourconstitution.com -

For more information on the trial or to donate to the LTC Lakin?s defense visit: www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com

CPT Pamela Barnett(Barnett v Obama), CDR Charles Kerchner(Kerchner v Obama) join in solidarity to support LTC Terry Lakin at trial. Continued at Source.

A public statement regarding Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's upcoming court-martial from Commander Charles Kerchner. Statement at Source.

General Thomas McInerney on Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Court-Martial; There Will Be Congressional Investigations if Lakin Goes to Ft. Leavenworth. Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Attorney Neal Puckett on All Fired Up: Obama's Eligibility; IF it is a political question, why aren't politicians pursuing it. Interview at Source.

Attorney Neal Puckett: Call the Army Leadership to Task on LTC Lakin's Plight for Answers on Obama's Eligibility; It's a Constitutional Issue. - Interview at Source.

LTC Lakin's Lawyer: Conviction certain; We have to proceed without the documents, evidence and witnesses that have been denied to the defense. Source.

LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.

Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.

Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.

LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.

An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song at Source.

Action Alert, Calling All Patriots: Countdown to the Court Martial; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TERRY LAKIN ACTION ALERT.(Don't let up!) More details at Source.

LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?s Birth and Constitutional Eligibility. Source.

Previous reports on LTC Lakin can be searched here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].


LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?...
Irrefutable Proof that Obama is Not Eligible to be President of the United States, the Facts Don't Lie!
Obama Is a Usurper - Illegal President - 20100802 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

1 comments:

Anonymoussaid...

Attending Court Martial: December 14-15, 2010
Where to Gather

Note that SOC is not organizing the gathering. Please use your own social networks to mobilize supporters.

If you'd like to gather during the hearing in support of Terry Lakin please read below.


1. It is going to be very cold (32deg/23mph winds). So be careful.

2. This location is off the base. You cannot gather on base property.

3. The recommended location is the intersection south of the visitors entrance.

4. There is an abandoned fast food restaurant on the north east corner.

5. Make your own signs (see some recommended phrases below).

6. Do not under any circumstance block or hinder traffic.

7. No permit is required and you are free to gather as long as you do not interfere with businesses or vehicles.

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/gathering.html


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:27
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Monday, December 13, 2010

Countdown to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's Court-Martial: The Chain of Command; The Military Makes it Clear: A No Brainer.

?


The Chain of Command: The Military Makes it Clear - No Brainer -

So what's so complicated about this? Almost every base and military organization has a chain of command board like this.

See who is at the top?

Terry's argument exactly. Is Mr. Obama eligible to hold this office? Seeing his birth certificate would help clarify the issue. Don't you think so?

American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin's Case http://www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com

If you want to gather to support Terry during the trial see this page for details: http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/gathering.html

For Last Minute News on the Hearing See our Summary Page Later Tonight. http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/tlawsummary.html

The Chain of Command: The Military Makes it Clear: It's a No Brainer! http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/news/chainofcommand.html

Margaret Hemenway - www.safeguardourconstitution.com -

For more information on the trial or to donate to the LTC Lakin?s defense visit: www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com

CPT Pamela Barnett(Barnett v Obama), CDR Charles Kerchner(Kerchner v Obama) join in solidarity to support LTC Terry Lakin at trial. Continued at Source.

A public statement regarding Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's upcoming court-martial from Commander Charles Kerchner. Statement at Source.

General Thomas McInerney on Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Court-Martial; There Will Be Congressional Investigations if Lakin Goes to Ft. Leavenworth. Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Attorney Neal Puckett on All Fired Up: Obama's Eligibility; IF it is a political question, why aren't politicians pursuing it. Interview at Source.

Attorney Neal Puckett: Call the Army Leadership to Task on LTC Lakin's Plight for Answers on Obama's Eligibility; It's a Constitutional Issue. - Interview at Source.

LTC Lakin's Lawyer: Conviction certain; We have to proceed without the documents, evidence and witnesses that have been denied to the defense. Source.

LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.

Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.

Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.

LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.

An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song at Source.

Action Alert, Calling All Patriots: Countdown to the Court Martial; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TERRY LAKIN ACTION ALERT.(Don't let up!) More details at Source.

LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?s Birth and Constitutional Eligibility. Source.

Previous reports on LTC Lakin can be searched here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].


LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?...
Irrefutable Proof that Obama is Not Eligible to be President of the United States, the Facts Don't Lie!
Obama Is a Usurper - Illegal President - 20100802 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

1 comments:

Anonymoussaid...

Attending Court Martial: December 14-15, 2010
Where to Gather

Note that SOC is not organizing the gathering. Please use your own social networks to mobilize supporters.

If you'd like to gather during the hearing in support of Terry Lakin please read below.


1. It is going to be very cold (32deg/23mph winds). So be careful.

2. This location is off the base. You cannot gather on base property.

3. The recommended location is the intersection south of the visitors entrance.

4. There is an abandoned fast food restaurant on the north east corner.

5. Make your own signs (see some recommended phrases below).

6. Do not under any circumstance block or hinder traffic.

7. No permit is required and you are free to gather as long as you do not interfere with businesses or vehicles.

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/gathering.html


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:23
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Domingo, 12 de diciembre de 2010

Sunday, December 12, 2010


Interview with Atty. Stephen Pidgeon: Irrelevant where Obama was born; the statement of probable cause for high treason against Obama.

?


Interview with attorney Stephen Pidgeon. The case for probable cause of high treason against Barack Obama. Atty Pidgeon explains how there is already enough probable cause to warrant investigations and indictment against Obama for high treason under the Logan Act. Atty. Pidgeon also explains Obama's constitutional eligibility in full detail. Parts 1-3 embedded below. Enjoy!

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].






A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Bor...
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-29 pg 5

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:23
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
S?bado, 11 de diciembre de 2010
http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=nxaz7rdab&et=1104059794468&s=3866&e=001v2P7CUSUgosge_blZVNdhTPZXyui2vy8JmCLN9Svt0WKYLVxv4Un401Inlaa90bE7v4ATBJd_Y7dNiZs7nR8fnARurAUpcJ_22UWeHRXlP8VHbUbCLevLC7GBWsMx7QkA8IKwOLRWUs=
American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin's Case

CDR Charles Kerchner to Attend Lakin Court Martial

?

The American Patriot Foundation is pleased to announce that CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired), the Lead Plaintiff in the Kerchner et al v Obama case, will be attending the court-martial of LTC Terry Lakin beginning on December 14.

?

Click below for the full press release.

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/press-release/kerchertoattend.html

?

?

VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR THE LATEST ON THE COUNTDOWN TO TERRY'S COURT MARTIAL.

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/tlawsummary.html

?

Check back on Sunday afternoon for specific information about where to gather during the court martial.

?

?

//?Margaret Hemenway
// www.safeguardourconstitution.com

?
WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW

http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1103333458669

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:59
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Obama?s?Apartheid

?2010 drkate

Most are familiar with the term ?apartheid? and its broad aim of division through separation.?? It is derived from the Afrikaans word for ?apartness? and is:

  1. An official policy of racial segregation formerly practiced in the Republic of South Africa, involving political, legal, and economic discrimination against nonwhites.
  2. A policy or practice of separating or segregating groups.
  3. The condition of being separated from others; segregation.

Usurper v USA

A profound separation and ?apartness? characterizes Obama?s attitude toward America, as would a foreigner?s casual acquaintance.? His efforts have been to divide and separate us all by class, race, politics, age, and most profoundly, as Americans or anti-Americans.? He obviously favors the anti-Americans?those ?world citizens?, progressives, communists.

The hatred and violence with which the usurper Obama has institutionalized his attack on every facet of American life betrays a deep agenda, a fundamentally systematic effort to create an apartheid of sorts, perhaps more closely reflected in this definition:

Apartheid. System originating in South Africa, designed to prevent blacks from invading their own country. Democratically applied by the New Order to the poor of the world, irrespective of? colour.

I find it curious that the desire is to ?prevent blacks?or the poor of the world? from invading their own country?, when it is we the people who occupy our own land.? So Obama?s apartheid in America is to prevent us from living on, occupying, and deriving the fruits of the land.? Suddenly the legislative agenda takes on new meaning?a fundamental separation of Americans from our land, our water, our selves, and our history.? Indeed, a ?political, legal, and economic discrimination against Americans.? The racially-based Holder justice department is just a cover for the ruination of all Americans by Obama, irrespective of colour.

?

The agenda of cap and trade, nationalization of the health care, banking, and auto industries; the regulation of home based gardens, farmers markets, and bake sales?all of this is designed to separate us from our own lives, to prevent us from fully occupying our own country.

Obama and the Dead Duck Congress: Seeds of Treason

The apartheid-like approach of Obama to prevent Americans from using our own resources is the strategy of communism?the seed of treason as we know it in these United States. Of course, the New World Order, and its secret societies will use almost any ideology?the more brutal the better?to accomplish their aim.

In order to accomplish these goals, Obama had to not only usurp the White House, he had to usurp the Congress.? When Obama ?strikes a deal? with anyone in Congress, he takes power that he is not entitled to.? One usurpation deserves another, as the Congress completely ignores the Constitutional significance of Obama?s actions.

These are the days of high crimes and misdemeanors. What an enormity when the entire Congress, the Cabinet, the White House, and the military are committing high crimes and misdemeanors every single day they are in office.

None of the pomp and circumstance, the crisp military uniforms with decorations, the highly polished shoes, the limos and helos?none of this can cover the stench of Obama?s usurpation.

If Congress won?t wake up and smell the coffee, maybe a truck load of dead fish will work.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:34
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Write to every media outlet, demand that they cover eligibility. LTC Lakin?s trial is Dec 14-15, my case will be heard in conference by the Supreme Court on January 7

Posted on | December 10, 2010 | No Comments

WHY do you not cover the courts martial of Col. Lakin coming up?
InboxX
?Reply |Gordon Smith to Editors
show details 5:13 PM (25 minutes ago)
?
Dear Human Events,
?
I am a 20-year service disabled vet, and a very good friend of Lt. Col. Lakin (I know you know who he is) who is about to be court-martialed on Dec. 14th.
?
I will be very brief to give this email a better chance of being read?.but more importantly?.being acted upon.
?
I received an email invite today to join a Conservative talk-a-thon to discuss conservative ?most important issues of the day?.
?
So??since you said ?my opinion counts??..then I will speak for the MILLIONS and MILLIONS (60% of Americans, at last count) of Americans who believe there is something wrong with why our President, immediately upon taking office, sealed all his personal records?and still to this day, refuses to show his LONG FORM birth certificate. PLEASE forget the item he published on his website?..that?s NOT his long form birth certificate. You can argue all day about what it is?but it?s not IT.
?
I will not go into the usual birther rant?I know that gets old and annoying, and you?ll immediately delete this email?..but I will leave you with a simple question?attached is a long form birth certificate from a woman who had twins the day before Obama said HE was born at Kapiolani Hospital in Hawaii..trust me, it?s legit. So why is it some sort of right-wing/conspiracy/nut-job request to ask Mr. Obama to show his form which should look exactly like that.
?
He won?t.
?
Why?
?
That?s it??.now for something as innocent and innocuous as this $20 piece of paper which would shut up 60% of us ?birther? Americas and show us to have not just an egg?but a bloody Denver Omelette on our face??he still won?t do it?.but worse?.WE ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE ASKING FOR IT?..you, the mainstream media?.ALL the medias except (God bless) WorldNetDaily?..talk about it either not at all?or as a whispered hush.
?
I didn?t spent 20 years fighting for my country?..and being spit on at the San Francisco airport more than once protecting the Constitution?to have some executive sit in that hallowed office and when we ask him his credentials to do that???.he laughs at us.
?
So?..you want a topic of discussion for your talk-a thon? Ask your subscribers why we?re about to imprison an Army Flight Surgeon with the Bronze Star because he asked his Commander-in-Chief? to show him and America his $20 piece of paper.
?
I?d like to listen in on THAT topic.
?
Thank you for reading this email.
?
A committed birther,
?
Gordon Smith
Medford, Oregon
[email protected]


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:21
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Letters To Leaders

?
All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Gov't Operations:
?
Subject:
Congress will review Lakin case

To:
Rep. Fred Upton

December 11, 2010

Dear Sir, I am very troubled by Obama's lack of documentation, or what is called historical foot prints.

I have a big problem when my kids have to show there long form birth certificate just to play in school and community sports. Or when they go through drivers education and for a host of other things. However this man who is now our sitting president of these United States of America has never shown his long form birth certificate now any other records concerning his life history.

In this vein there is a mockery of a military court marshal now under way in this country concerning Lt. Col. Lakin and his duty as an officer to question orders up to refusing them if he believes them to be illegal.

The following is taken fron on of the many news stories on wnd.com covering this travisty.

"It's important that he gets a fair trial, which means discovery. Since the Army will not allow that I believe in the final analysis that this will be overturned, but he may have to go to the slammer in Ft. Leavenworth."

Lakin had hoped through the discovery process to force Obama to produce documentary evidence demonstrating his birth and citizenship status so that Obama's authority to give orders as commander-in-chief would be demonstrated or dis-proven.

Court martial judge Col. Denise Lind, however, simply declared the orders received by Lakin were valid. Lind refused to allow Lakin to address the underlying eligibility issues and limited the scope of the trial to whether Lakin had knowingly disobeyed orders.

McInerney held up his own treatment by the trial judge to illustrate the unfairness of the proceedings thus far. Lind has refused to allow McInerney or any other expert witness requested by the defense to testify at Lakin's court martial. She has also refused to permit Lakin to present any evidence or arguments in his own defense that might justify his decision to disobey orders.

"The judge in this particular case said I do not know enough about the Army to be able to understand the Army's position on the Uniform Code of Military Justice," said McInerney, who added he once commanded an army division in Alaska as part of a joint Army-Air Force command.

"I am intimately familiar with the Uniform Code of Military Justice," said McInerney. "But you get a judge ... who says that I as a three-star general who had general court martial authority do not know enough about the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Dr. Terry Lakin is not going to get a fair trial in this particular proceeding."

McInerney was asked by the defense to testify about when a soldier is trained to disobey orders he believes are illegal.

I served this country for three years as an airborne ranger and I took an oath to defend our Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. I was also taught to question orders and even dis-obey if I felt them to be illegal.

It is my sincere hope that this congress will restore some faith to there bosses, we citizens, by doing there sworn duty to see that our Constitution is upheld in this matter and that Lt. Col. Lakin gets a legal trial and not the kind they gave Jesus Christ.

Watervliet , MI


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:13
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

?

Friday, December 10, 2010


A public statement regarding Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin's upcoming court-martial from Commander Charles Kerchner...

A public statement from Commander Charles Kerchner regarding Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's upcoming court-martial. For Immediate Release - December 10, 2010 -

Comment from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret):

I will be attending the scheduled Court Martial of LTC Terry Lakin on Tuesday, 14 Dec 2010 at Ft. Meade MD, to show my support for this brave man who is courageously standing up and risking all to live up to his oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, the prime directive to guide the actions and decisions of every commissioned military officer and patriot. The oath for military officers is not to support and defend the President or any man, but to support and defend the Constitution the fundamental law put in place by the founders and framers to protect our unalienable rights against all enemies foreign and domestic. The Congress failed to do their duty. The main stream media has failed to do its duty. The legal system and federal courts including the U.S. Supreme Court have failed to do their duty. We are supposed to be a nations of laws, not men. And no man in our system is to be above the law, not even a President. These people and the institutions have been acting to protect one man, Obama, from being required to provide conclusive primary source, certified true and correct copies of the contemporaneous documents of his birth records and other records such as college admission records and travel and passport records to answer some simple questions about his early life and true legal identity. A digital image on the internet of an alleged secondary source and summary document in the age of PhotoShop is proof of nothing. No one in the major media with independent expert document examiners has been even allowed to see the alleged piece of paper that image was allegedly made from. These people and institutions are acting to protect a man, one man, Obama, who has held himself out to be above the law. They have not been acting to protect the U.S. Constitution which they should be defending. LTC Terry Lakin is doing his duty and standing up for his oath to the Constitution. I will be there on Tuesday at Ft. Meade MD to support him in his fight.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

______________________

General Thomas McInerney on Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Court-Martial; There Will Be Congressional Investigations if Lakin Goes to Ft. Leavenworth. Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Attorney Neal Puckett on All Fired Up: Obama's Eligibility; IF it is a political question, why aren't politicians pursuing it. Interview at Source.

Attorney Neal Puckett: Call the Army Leadership to Task on LTC Lakin's Plight for Answers on Obama's Eligibility; It's a Constitutional Issue. - Interview at Source.

LTC Lakin's Lawyer: Conviction certain; We have to proceed without the documents, evidence and witnesses that have been denied to the defense. Source.

LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.

Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.

Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.

LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.

An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song at Source.

Action Alert, Calling All Patriots: Countdown to the Court Martial; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TERRY LAKIN ACTION ALERT.(Don't let up!) More details at Source.

LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?s Birth and Constitutional Eligibility. Source.

Previous reports on LTC Lakin can be searched here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].


Irrefutable Proof that Obama is Not Eligible to be President of the United States, the Facts Don't Lie!
Obama's Lack of Constitutional Eligibility-The 3 Enablers-20091130 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly-pg 9
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-29 pg 5


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:40
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar


BORN IN THE USA?

McInerny: Congress

will review Lakin case

3-star general: Physician

'is not going to get a fair trial'


Posted: December 10, 2010
9:45 pm Eastern

By Brian Fitzpatrick
??2010?WorldNetDaily

?

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney predicts the incoming Republican-controlled House of Representatives will launch an investigation if Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin is convicted in next week's court martial.

?

?

Lakin is on trial for refusing to obey orders to deploy to Afghanistan. He challenged the orders because he questions President Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as commander-in-chief of the armed forces. His court martial is scheduled to begin Dec. 14.

"It looks like he's not being treated fairly," said McInerney in an interview Friday on Denver talk radio station KHOW.

"It's important that he gets a fair trial, which means discovery. Since the Army will not allow that I believe in the final analysis that this will be overturned, but he may have to go to the slammer in Ft. Leavenworth."

?See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!

Lakin had hoped through the discovery process to force Obama to produce documentary evidence demonstrating his birth and citizenship status so that Obama's authority to give orders as commander-in-chief would be demonstrated or disproven.

Note: A legal-defense fund has been set up for LTC Terry Lakin. Click for information.

As reported earlier by WND, court martial judge Col. Denise Lind, however, simply declared the orders received by Lakin were valid. Lind refused to allow Lakin to address the underlying eligibility issues and limited the scope of the trial to whether Lakin had knowingly disobeyed orders.

McInerney called on Congress to "do its job" and determine whether Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve as president.

"[Lakin] really had a very important point. He is not a birther, he is a constitutionalist," said McInerney. "Now it shouldn't be the job of a lieutenant colonel and flight surgeon in the U.S. Army to be the constitutionalist. It's the job of the Congress and the executive agency to do that. But we've had 44 presidents of the United States and only one, the current president, has not shown a valid birth certificate."

McInerney suggested Lakin is certain to be convicted if the court martial proceeds.


Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin

?

"The outcome is evident to me that this is a slam dunk," said McInerney. "They're not going to let him really talk about it. They're avoiding the issue.

"The way they conduct themselves is going to be extremely important for the follow-on investigation for the House of Representatives," added McInerney, who said the House Armed Services Committee could hold hearings to determine whether the military handled the case properly.

"The smartest thing the Army could do is not to have [the trial]," said McInerney, who suggested the court should let the case go "low profile."

"I don't think they're going to do that. They're going to make the mistake of trying him, and then you're going to have a court of record that will condemn them for the way they conducted it."

Get a FREE, comprehensive report answering the question: Does Barack Obama meet the requirements of the U.S. Constitution to occupy the hallowed Oval Office?

McInerney held up his own treatment by the trial judge to illustrate the unfairness of the proceedings thus far. Lind has refused to allow McInerney or any other expert witness requested by the defense to testify at Lakin's court martial. She has also refused to permit Lakin to present any evidence or arguments in his own defense that might justify his decision to disobey orders.

"The judge in this particular case said I do not know enough about the Army to be able to understand the Army's position on the Uniform Code of Military Justice," said McInerney, who added he once commanded an army division in Alaska as part of a joint Army-Air Force command.

"I am intimately familiar with the Uniform Code of Military Justice," said McInerney. "But you get a judge ... who says that I as a three-star general who had general court martial authority do not know enough about the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Dr. Terry Lakin is not going to get a fair trial in this particular proceeding."

McInerney was asked by the defense to testify about when a soldier is trained to disobey orders he believes are illegal.


?

?

Sponsored Link: The Most Important Day in America in 50 Years... It?s Coming in 2011.This day will change everything about our nation and your day-to-day life.Watch the eye-opening video presentation here...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:20
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Notice to Congress: This is your crisis of the making!

? ??6Share 0digg ?
?

IF NOT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, WHAT IS OUR MILITARY SUPPORTING?

by Arnie Rosner

Why is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff allowing a usurper to the office of President to stand?

(Dec. 11, 2010) ? It is hard to believe that the courageous men and women of our military are simply standing by idle when this longstanding series of direct attacks against them is carried out by members of the 111th Congress and the illicit Obama regime, attacks orchestrated in various forms of legislation and election abuses.? Even more disturbing is the apparent lack of support among the senior officers.

  • DON?T ASK, DON?T TELL
  • Col. Terry Lakin
  • Deprived of voting rights
  • Unjust persecution of military personnel on duty
  • Deprived of protection under the Geneva Convention

Conspicuous by his absence in defending his troops?at least in my opinion, Admiral Mullen, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. ?They all seem to have turned their backs on those?for whom they are responsible. ?While not knowing this for certain, I get the sense the troops are very disappointed in the recent turn of events. ?And who could blame them?.

Is it not bad enough that all of you, members of the 111th Congress, have permitted an?illegal alien?to invade the White House, subvert the government and now proceed to ruthlessly attack our valiant troops.

  • Is it not bad enough that the same regime has seen fit to attack the?Pendleton 8?
  • Is it not bad enough that the same group of people has seen fit to attack our?Navy Seals?
  • Is it not bad enough that the same cadre has seen fit to attack the?Leavenworth 10?
  • Is it not bad enough that the same criminals?demean?our American heroes?
  • Is it no bad enough that those in the field of battle do not have the legal protection afforded them by the Geneva Convention because none of you, in Congress, or any members within the military chain of command know for certain that the usurper is legally eligible to act as the commander-in-chief?

As members of Congress, each of you must answer the following questions:

  • Why does this regime continue to launch deplorable attacks on these honorable military personnel?
  • Are they the ones still perceived as loyal to the Constitution?
  • Are they the only ones who might be seen to protect the rights of the people?
  • Are they the only ones who might maintain the rule of law?
  • Is there any real justice left in America?

Do you suppose Obama is deliberately seeking to demoralize those who might just stand between his accomplishing his dictatorial plans and those who might offer credible resistance, resistance by the same people who brought about the slap in his face in November of 2010? ?Let me ask you to hold that thought while I address another issue of grave concern.

All of you in the 111th Congress have brought great disgrace upon the American system of government. ?All of you had the opportunity to stop the illegal coup that has been accomplished by the communist elements within your Congress and led by Obama, Reid and Pelosi. ?And all of you failed in your responsibility and your duty to honor your sacred oath to protect the Constitution and the rights of the American people.

Speaking just for myself, I will tell you I will never forgive you for this outrageous and disloyal act of treason. ?The entire 111th Congress is complicit in this heinous crime against the American people.

Many of us told you of this problem and more than once! ?And you all still chose to ignore our demands for investigation. ?Others?in government also ignored our demands for investigation. ?Not one man or woman in government rose to the challenge. ? Well, save one?a military officer?one American hero who had the strength of character to do the right thing.? Only one of a handful of men in America, I might add, who demonstrated the moral strength and the courage of not just one lion but the courage of a pride of lions, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin.

Just as millions of other Americans, Col. Lakin had also recognized the failure of the 111th Congress to perform their basic responsibilities to protect the Constitution and the rights of the American people. ?However, Col. Lakin, being of sterner stuff?the right stuff, to be precise, after careful deliberation, decided to do the right thing.

Col. Lakin made the courageous decision to deliberately place his entire being in harm?s way on behalf of a grateful nation. Having served on multiple occasions in active combat, this was not the first time he had done so. And for similar reasons as well?once more, for no other reason than his love of country. Col. Lakin has put himself on the line, and many of us as fellow Americans intend to stand by him shoulder to shoulder.??After all, it is the right thing to do!

I also expect many of his comrades in arms to do the same thing. ?Comrades who, up to this minute, have patently displayed remarkable restraint! ?Members of America?s finest all waiting to see just how the organization they too serve will deal with this matter.

Already the incredibly stupid ruling by the judge placing the possible ?embarrassment? of the lying, cheating and dishonorable scoundrel you in Congress has permitted to masquerade as president colored the tense atmosphere with a cloud of disbelief and mistrust. An impression for which the judge is solely responsible and created by the ridiculous statements already a matter of public record.

At this point, I would like to offer my congratulations to the members of our armed forces. ?Congratulations on maintaining discipline and patience at a time when I can only imagine the tremendous sense of frustration and disappointment regarding the behavior of a system of government that hardly seems worthwhile defending.

And what is worse, those in charge seize the opportunity to use the freedom and power provided them, courtesy of the U.S. military, to destroy the very freedom our brave men and women have provided! ?Somehow that is just too much for me to bear! ?You are all to be commended! You are much better people than I could ever be.

The oath of office administered to a military officer is to protect and defend the Constitution (the document and for what it stands) as opposed to a person or an entity.? On that basis, it is a good thing I am not in the military?for if I was in a position of command, given the gross abuse of power by this regime and the complete and utter disregard of the Constitution and the rule of law, the justification to invoke my responsibilities as prescribed by my oath of office would be very clear.

So, depending on the fairness of the justice reflected by the outcome in the upcoming hearing, I might be inclined to feel obligated to defend the Constitution, storm the hearing and arrest the judge and the other senior officers involved in what up to this point I can only describe as a travesty of American justice. ?I am confident many others, including some in uniform, feel the same way.

I see two points of view when looking at the way the matter of Col. Lakin is being handled. ?First, this matter must be resolved just from the perspective of doing things the right way because it is the right thing to do.? Secondly, if our government is so corrupt that they can treat Col. Lakin as a political prisoner and treat him in this manner, it can do the same to any of us!

Has the time come to lock and load?

? 2010,?The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:52
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Viernes, 10 de diciembre de 2010

?

Thursday, December 9, 2010


LTC Lakin court-martial dishonors military; current military hierarchs seem ruthlessly determined to intimidate anyone who seeks reassurance...

Via WND; - Lakin court-martial dishonors military - by Alan Keyes

Next Tuesday, Dec. 14, begins the court-martial of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, the officer being prosecuted for his efforts to assure that orders currently issuing from the U.S. military chain of command flow from a constitutionally qualified, and therefore lawful, commander in chief.

There was a time when responsible military authorities fully understood that soldiers had the right to reasonable assurance that their orders came from a valid source. During the Battle of the Bulge, for example, English-speaking German soldiers dressed in American uniforms had infiltrated American forces. Their activities gave rise to disquieting rumors and confusion in the ranks. In response, "Checkpoints were set up all over the Allied rear, greatly slowing the movement of soldiers and equipment. Military policemen drilled servicemen on things which every American was expected to know, such as the identity of Mickey Mouse's girlfriend, baseball scores, or the capital of a U.S. state ? though some could not remember or did not know."

Today, American troops are every day risking and laying down their lives in battle just as they did in World War II. But rather than acting effectively to protect the integrity of the chain of command, current military hierarchs seem ruthlessly determined to intimidate anyone who seeks reassurance against the now widespread question concerning the constitutional identity of the person who presently occupies the office of commander in chief. Lt. Col. Lakin is saying, simply, "I don't know that Barack Obama is the person the Constitution says he must be. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Therefore, I cannot know that in obeying his orders I am defending the Constitution, as I am sworn to do."

Some officers during World War II were asked to name Mickey Mouse's girlfriend. Barack Obama is being asked to let U.S. servicemen and women (and indeed all Americans) see that he is what he claims (and the Constitution requires him) to be, a natural born citizen of the United States. But unlike those serving during WWII, military officers today face a question that threatens more than military operations. It involves a fundamental doubt as to the continued operation and integrity of the Constitution they are sworn to defend. It goes to the heart of the cause that morally justifies the use of force in its defense. It threatens morale in the most literal and fundamental sense of the term.

"War is hell," Gen. Sherman said. When its long hours of tedium and routine hardships erupt into still longer moments of unimaginable horror, a soldier in the midst of a firefight would be forgiven for wondering by what awful transgression he ended up among the damned. Then he might think of the deadly things he has been asked to do and, losing heart, be tempted to confirm his damnation.

Every combatant thus labors under a moral burden that is uniquely his own. However, a people that truly respect and honor those who endure the burden for their sake will labor to make sure that nothing they have done, or that is done in their name, increases its weight. A people of good conscience, such as the American people are supposed to be, will be especially concerned that the cause and conduct of the war satisfy, insofar as humanly possible, the requirements of right and justice.

I say that this is what the American people are supposed to be because limited government, such as that established by the Constitution of the United States, means first of all government defined, structured and limited (in its use of power) by respect for the requirements of right and justice; and because the common commitment of Americans to the Constitution is the core of our identity and unity as a people.

The use of military and police forces is the most explicit manifestation of government power. Because it involves potentially violent instruments, its every use raises questions of justice and morality. Every individual involved in such use labors under the inescapable burden of conscience such questions involve. As I pointed out in a previous column, this is explicitly acknowledged and recognized in the regulations that govern the conduct of U.S. military forces. Lawful orders exclude those that violate the fundamental moral laws that allow us to distinguish just military and police actions from violent iniquity. "The moral principles the Allies relied upon for their prosecution of German military officers at Nuremberg after World War II make clear that individual officers are not relieved of the conscientious responsibility for the moral consequences of their actions. Military discipline, therefore, requires obedience to lawful orders, not those that abuse the formalities of the chain of command, and violate the basic principles of justice that substantiate the lawfulness of the authority it represents." ...Continued at WND here; http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=237841

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Attorney Neal Puckett on All Fired Up: Obama's Eligibility; IF it is a political question why aren't politicians pursuing it. Interview at Source.

Attorney Neal Puckett: Call the Army Leadership to Task on LTC Lakin's Plight for Answers on Obama's Eligibility; It's a Constitutional Issue. Interview at Source.

LTC Lakin's Lawyer: Conviction certain; We have to proceed without the documents, evidence and witnesses that have been denied to the defense. Source.

LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.

Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.

Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.

LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.

An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song at Source.

Action Alert, Calling All Patriots: Countdown to the Court Martial; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TERRY LAKIN ACTION ALERT.(Don't let up!) More details at Source.

Previous reports on LTC Lakin can be searched here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].


LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?...
Obama Is a Usurper - Illegal President - 20100802 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:30
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Republicans: We Did Not Rehire you to continue business as usual

?



?

DO THE REPUBLICANS HAVE THE RESOLVE TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE?

by Sher Zieve, ?2010

?

Is the Grand Old Party one which will return the country to constitutional governance? Will they rein in out-of-control spending, enforce the borders, and repeal or nullify unconstitutional legislation, or is their "compromise" a sign of just more of the same to come?

(Dec. 9, 2010) ? The US Republican Party?s first order of business since the 2010 midterm elections was to compromise with the Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama. Acting as if they hadn?t won a resounding victory in the House of Representatives, Republican leaders met with the usurper and agreed that if he would ?allow? them to continue with the Bush tax cuts, they would give him even MORE money to fritter away at taxpayers? expense?beginning with another 13 months of unemployment insurance.?Note: It is now clear that the Washington D.C. Ivory Tower gang of dwellers view unemployment insurance as ?ensuring the unemployed will remain that way.?

To those who cannot seem to learn lessons easily, in November We-the-People sent you the following unmistakable and highly comprehensible messages. Please immediately refresh your memories with the following:

1. We do NOT want the passage of the DREAM Act, ANY OTHER form of Amnesty for illegals or ?path to Amnesty? for illegals. We have told you this over and over again but, still you persist with the pretense of not understanding us

2. We do NOT want ObamaCare in any way, shape or form. We do not want it tweaked; we want it REPEALED. What about that do you not understand?

3. We do NOT want censorship of OUR Internet. This is not a government entity?it belongs to the people. But, Obama & Co is now bent upon taking it over, in order to censor those opinions it doesn?t like

4. We do NOT want any government entity telling us what we can and cannot eat and barring us from growing our own food unless the government supervises. We dodged a bullet with SB 510 but suspect that Congress and the usurper are already working to ?re-add? the previously removed Orwellian regulations

5. WE DEMAND OUR BORDERS BE SECURED. Every day, more violence occurs from drug cartel members who are setting up shop in the USA. Every day more and more illegals are crossing into OUR country and sucking its resources dry. We worked for our lives, in order to provide for ourselves and our loved ones. We did NOT work for anyone and everyone who wants to cross our borders illegally and steal what we have

6. We do not want any more faux ?stimulus packages? as it?s obvious the only ones ?stimulated? are the crony groups and their friends in Washington D.C. STOP THE STEALING

7. Stop the sexual groping (yes?it is) and forced submission of the TSA searches. These agents are NOT searching Muslims and particularly anyone dressed in either a burqa or a hijab. Have you forgotten that Muslims caused the terrorist attacks in the first place? Or is your memory selective so that we will all soon become as sheep to their slaughter?

I have only presented you with seven items, as I want you to be able to fully absorb these before moving on to the next ones. By the way, if you have forgotten what Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, allow me to refresh your memory: ?We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.?

I wish to particularly draw your attention to ?That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.? We-the-People still believe that. As long as our US Constitution is followed, we can work within the current government framework. But, you and your colleagues have not followed the Constitution for, at least, decades. It is time for you to renew your pledge and constitutional duties. If you further refuse to listen to us, We-the-People?s patience will have finally been totally and irrevocably exhausted. Can you not already hear the rumblings of a real rebellion?

? 2010,?The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:37
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 08 de diciembre de 2010


WND Exclusive
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL

E pluribus buffoonum

Congress slams Obama

Lawmakers say president's

omitting of God undercuts

American history


Posted: December 07, 2010
6:30 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
? 2010 WorldNetDaily

?

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks to the media about the tax cut compromise during a news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington on December 7, 2010.  UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg Photo via Newscom

Members of the Congressional Prayer Caucus have written to President Obama asking him to correct a speech he gave in Indonesia incorrectly replacing the nation's motto of "In God We Trust" with "E pluribus unum."

The letter also cites a series of situations in which Obama has failed to include the reference to the "Creator" when quoting the Declaration of Independence.

WND has reported on numerous situations where the president quotations have left out references to God or the Creator.

Classic book on USA's Christian heritage: New edition of 100-year-old treasure reveals nation's true religious history

In the newest development, U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes of Virginia and 42 bipartisan members of the Congressional Prayer Caucus have dispatched a letter over Obama's statement to a Jakarta audience that "E Pluribus unum" is the national motto.

Actually, it's "In God We Trust."



?

"For the president of the United States to incorrectly state something as foundational as our national motto in another country is unacceptable," said Forbes. "The president is the primary representative of our nation to the world, and whether mistake or intention, his actions cast aside an integral part of American society."

He said, "President Reagan once warned that 'If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.'"

It was during Obama's expedition to the Far East when he went to Jakarta on Nov. 10.

Speaking at the University of Indonesia, Obama said:

I believe that the history of both America and Indonesia should give us hope. It is a story written into our national mottos. In the United States, our motto is E pluribus unum ? out of many, one. Bhinneka Tunggal Ika ? unity in diversity. We are two nations, which have traveled different paths. Yet our nations show that hundreds of millions who hold different beliefs can be united in freedom under one flag. And we are now building on that shared humanity ? through young people who will study in each other's schools; through the entrepreneurs forging ties that can lead to greater prosperity; and through our embrace of fundamental democratic values and human aspirations.

The letter explains that "In God We Trust" has been foundational throughout the history of the United States, from presidential proclamations to engravings in both House and Senate chambers. In 1956, Congress passed and President Eisenhower signed into law establishing "In God We Trust" as the official national motto of the United States.


White House text of Obama stating national motto is "E pluribus unum"

"'E pluribus unum' is not our national motto," the letter, dated yesterday, said. "As members of the Congressional Prayer Cuacus, a bipartisan group of members of the United States House of Representatives, we are dedicated to preserving America's religious heritage and protecting our religious liberty."

Signing the document were Reps. J. Randy Forbes of Virginia, Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, Paul Broun of Georgia, Steve King of Iowa, John Shadegg of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Donald Manzullo of Illinois, John Boozman of Arkansas, Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania, David Reichert of Washington, Gregg Harper of Mississippi, Jason Chaffetz of Utah, Robert Aderholt of Alabama, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Glenn Thompson of Pennsylvania, Steve Austria of Ohio, Jeff Miller of Florida, Mike Pence of Indiana, Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington, Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Joe Wilson of South Carolina, Doug Lamborn of Colorado, John Kline of Minnesota, Phil Roe of Tennessee, Peter Roskam of Illinois, John Carter of Texas, K. Michael Conaway of Texas, W. Todd Akin of Missouri, Zach Wamp of Tennessee, Randy Neugebauer of Texas, Todd Tiahrt of Kansas, Robert Wittman of Virginia, Vernon Ehlers of Michigan, Tom Price of Georgia, Spencer Bachus of Alabama, Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland, Mike Rogers of Alabama, Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan, Trent Franks of Arizona, Phil Gingrey of Georgia and Michele Bachmann of Minnesota,

The letter also noted that on Oct. 18 during a fundraiser Obama omitted the "Creator" from a reference to the Declaration of Independence.

"Once may be a mistake. But twice is a pattern. These omissions and inaccuracies are a part of a larger pattern we are seeing with the president where he is inaccurately reflecting America and undercutting important parts of our nation's history," said Forbes. "Trust in God is embedded in the fabric of society and history in the United States.

"If we allow these threads to be pulled, we will begin to unravel the very freedoms that birthed America," he said.

It was martial arts champion, actor and WND columnist Chuck Norris who noted Obama actually has omitted "Creator" seven times in just the past few months:

His research lists the following:

  • On Oct. 21, 2010, at a rally for Sen. Murray in Seattle, Wash.:

    "None of us would be here if it weren't for that extraordinary leap of faith that had been taken. Thirteen colonies deciding to start a revolution based on an idea that had never been tried before ? a government of and by and for the people. A government based on the simple proposition that all men are created equal. That we're endowed with certain inalienable rights."

  • On Oct. 18, 2010, at a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dinner in Rockville, Md.:

    "It has to do with this idea that was started by 13 colonies that decided to throw off the yoke of an empire, and said, 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.'"

  • On Oct. 17, 2010 at a reception for Gov. Ted Strickland in Chagrin Fall, Ohio.:

    "The idea of America has never been easy. The notion of 13 colonies coming together and overthrowing the greatest empire in the world, and then drafting a document that says, we find these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights ? that's hard."

  • On Sept. 22, 2010, at a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dinner in New York, N.Y.:

    "And what was sustaining us was that sense that ? that North Star, that sense that, you know what, if we stay true to our values, if we believe that all people are created equal and everybody is endowed with certain inalienable rights and we're going to make those words live, and we're going to give everybody opportunity, everybody a ladder into the middle class,?"

  • On Sept. 15, 2010, at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute's 33rd annual awards gala in Washington, D.C.:

    "But over the centuries, what eventually bound us together ? what made us all Americans ? was not a matter of blood, it wasn't a matter of birth. It was faith and fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

  • On Sept. 11, 2010, at the Pentagon Memorial in Arlington, Va.:

    "For our cause is just. Our spirit is strong. Our resolve is unwavering. Like generations before us, let us come together today and all days to affirm certain inalienable rights, to affirm life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

  • On Sept. 10, 2010, at the president's press conference at the White House:

    "With respect to the mosque in New York, I think I've been pretty clear on my position here, and that is, is that this country stands for the proposition that all men and women are created equal; that they have certain inalienable rights ? one of those inalienable rights is to practice their religion freely."

When WND's correspondent at the White House, Les Kinsolving, raised the question about the omissions, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said, "I haven't seen the comments, Lester, but I can assure you the president believes in the Declaration of Independence."

In a second commentary on the subject, Chuck Norris continued, "The truth is, if you want an accurate religious history of America, you're no longer going to get it from our president, our progressive society or secular schools, at least not without unbiased trained teachers or the induction of a religious curriculum that hasn't tampered and twisted history."

At the time the declaration was adopted, however, the concept of all being created "equal" was a rare idea.

The Declaration states: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."


Original wording from Declaration of Independence

One of the incidents is on tape, with the reference appearring shortly past the 22-minute mark:

?

Other speeches, with the reference missing, followed.

Other references to America's Christian heritage have been excised at the home of the Liberty Bell, the Supreme Court and even the Washington Monument.

Chaplain Todd DuBord, who works with Chuck Norris' multiple organizations, has documented the ongoing trend at his National Treasures website.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:38
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 01 de diciembre de 2010

BY LINDA BENTLEY | DECEMBER 1, 2010

LTC Terry Lakin may be last line of defense to Constitution

SCOTUS denies Kerchner petition for writ of certiorari

Bookmark and Share

ltc terry lakinPHOENIX ? The American Patriot Foundation has called on citizens to support LTC Terrence ?Terry? Lakin during the countdown to his court martial.

As of this edition, there are only 12 days before Lakin goes to trial.

A group has organized a ?Support Terry Lakin Day? series of rallies on Monday, Dec. 6, beginning at 10:30 a.m. in front of Sen. John McCain?s Office, 5353 N. 16th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85016.

The next rally will begin at 12 noon in front of Sen. Jon Kyl?s office, 2200 E. Camelback, Phoenix, Arizona 85016, with the final rally at 2 p.m. in front of Rep. Trent Frank?s office, 7121 W. Bell Road, Glendale, AZ 85308.

Jeff Lichter, who is organizing the rallies, said they will consist of standing outside each official?s office with signs urging their support of Lakin while some participants will enter the offices to speak with staff about Lakin?s situation.

Lakin, a highly decorated Army doctor with over 18 years of service, was told to bring his birth certificate when ordered to deploy to Afghanistan. Lakin was perfectly willing to provide a copy of his birth certificate if President Obama would release a copy of his.

As an officer, Lakin took an oath to ?support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.?

Unlike the enlisted soldier?s oath, which includes a clause to ?obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me ?? there is no such provision in the oath for commissioned officers.

Additionally, Lakin is bound by his oath and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to obey lawful orders and to disobey any order that violates the Constitution.

If Obama is a usurper to the presidency, which his own published memoires indicate he is by his admission to being born a British subject, then he cannot be a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution.

Some question whether he was actually born in Hawaii as he claims, as no hospital has claimed being his birthplace and both Obama and his sister Maya have provided conflicting information as to which hospital in Honolulu was allegedly the place of his birth.

Other information Obama has been unable to keep hidden is the fact that his Selective Service System registration was falsely created, after the fact in 2008, and his use of a Connecticut-issued Social Security number, which is associated with another individual who was born in 1890.

Men who do not register with the Selective Service by the time they reach 26 years of age, are forever precluded from holding a job in the executive branch of the federal government.
There is plenty of documentation available tipping in favor of those who question Obama?s legitimacy.

However, the Constitution was delivered another blow on Monday when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) denied the petition for a writ of certiorari in Charles Kerchner, et al. v. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Although other cases will come before the SCOTUS to request citizens be granted standing to defend Article II Section I of the United States and settle the definition of natural born citizen, Lakin has placed his military career on the line to defend the Constitution against an enemy who is either foreign or domestic.

Visit
www.safeguardourconstitution.com for more information about Lakin?s case and/or to make a donation in support of his defense.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:43
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

?

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

New Details on LTC Lakin: Ignored Letters From Lakin Family to Obama & Hawaii; No Witnesses, Documents, Explanation at Court-Martial...

Via the Greeley Gazette; - Lakin not allowed witnesses, documents, explanation at court-martial Dec. 14! - By Jack Minor

Letters obtained by The Gazette reveal the extent to which a decorated Army officer and his brother struggled to resolve concerns over the President?s eligibility prior to the officer being court-martialed.

The Lakins are long-time Greeley residents. Three Lakin brothers; Dr. Greg Lakin, Capt. Gary Lakin USCG and Lt. Col. Terrance Lakin graduated from University High School in 1977, 1980 and 1983 respectively. The brothers' parents still live in Greeley and have a long history of supporting humanitarian causes in the area.

Lt. Col. Lakin is currently scheduled to be court-martialed Dec. 14 for disobeying orders to deploy after exhausting numerous attempts to resolve issues regarding the President?s eligibility to be Commander-in-Chief. The specific issue involved is the Constitutional requirement that the President be a natural born citizen.

Dr. Greg Lakin has previously been a member of the Greeley Police Department and was a prosecutor in Hawaii. Greg, who was interviewed on the Peter Boyles radio show on Nov. 9, said Lakin, ?mulled over this for a long period of time? before he made his decision to refuse to deploy to Afghanistan. He strongly disputed the contention that his brother was a coward for deploying, noting Terry had already served in both Bosnia and Afghanistan.

Military Judge, Denise Lind, has ruled that Lakin will not be able to present any witnesses or documents for his defense and will not be able to explain his reason for disobeying orders at the court-martial. Lind has ruled the issue of the President?s eligibility is irrelevant saying the orders came from the Pentagon and not the President. Dr. Lakin disputed this contention saying the President took credit for Lakin?s deployment during a speech at West Point where he gave a speech for the surge in Afghanistan. ?He was part of that surge so it would be an order that comes directly from Obama himself? and ?if he doesn?t have standing then no one does.?

In an interview with the Gazette, Dr. Lakin shared copies of letters he and his brother sent to the President and Hawaiian Governor Linda Lingle asking for a resolution of this issue. Greg said the letters were written with a very humble spirit in an attempt to seek information verifying Barack Obama?s birthplace.

Greg drew a contrast between his brother and the President saying his brother is upholding the constitution, ?while the other has probably violated it.? He went on to say the President ?promotes transparency in government unless it applies to him. On the other hand, Terry is convinced that justice will prevail.?

Lt. Col. Lakin sent a letter to the President prior to being charged saying, as part of the deployment orders, he was required to submit his long form birth certificate and he was ?glad to obey this order, and will provide a certified copy of my original birth certificate with common, standard identifiers, including the name of an attending physician and a hospital.? He said he ?attempted through my chain of command for many months to get answers to the relentless questions surrounding your eligibility, but was informed that I lack standing. I also sought answers, unsuccessfully, through my Congressional delegation.? He went on to explain the reason for his request had nothing to do with personal differences. ?Please assure the American people that you are indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief and thereby may lawfully direct service members into harm's way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but want to do so with the knowledge and peace of mind that this important provision of our Constitution is respected and obeyed.?

Dr. Lakin, in his first letter to the president prior to his brother?s arraignment, implored Obama to put the matter to rest stressing his brother tried to resolve the matter through proper channels but was rebuffed. ?Approximately 20 months ago while continuing to serve in the Army he attempted to seek clarification regarding your birth certificate through proper military channels. Lt. Col. Lakin filed his requests through the normal chain of command (as the military advised) but continued to meet with frustration as the Army was unable to provide any clarification with regard to your place of birth. He believes this raises a Constitutional issue, a Constitution which he has sworn to uphold.? He stresses that his brother would gladly deploy in an instant once his questions have been answered, saying Terry ?remains ready and willing to continue to serve his country in areas of conflict - as he has done in Afghanistan and Bosnia. I believe that upon meeting with my idealistic and principled brother you would find him professional, compassionate and worth helping.? Dr. Lakin even suggested a way to defuse the situation saying that ?a meeting with him or our family, whether you chose to do this in private or public setting, would likely defuse this matter.?

He also sent a letter to Hawaiian Governor Linda Lingle who he met several times while he was a prosecuting attorney in Maui County. He told her that ?a short meeting or phone with him or family (whether done privately or publicly - your choice), would completely defuse this matter.? The suggestion is significant as Lingle has said she personally told her health director to examine the birth certificate saying ?I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the President was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.?

Dr. Lakin sent another letter to the President after the initial court-martial date was set. In the letter Greg told the president he was a supporter who was pleased to see him elected in 2008. He reiterated that Terry made this decision only after other options had been exhausted. ?It is a shame that no one above him in the military ranks and no one in Congress, who represents him, could address his concerns so that he could have avoided the prospect of such an enormous penalty for staying faithful to the oath he swore as an officer.? He went on to say that Col. Lakin was far from alone in his concerns saying, ?Many others in uniform share this concern and have conveyed their support to my brother.?

Showing he understands the divisiveness the issue has caused, he told the President, ?We should use all means necessary to avoid an escalated controversy this fall when his court-martial is scheduled. There is much strife and tension in this nation now and this would not be healthy or productive.? Emphasizing the desire to find a resolution of the eligibility issue once and for all so the matter could be put to rest, Lakin said, ?My family stands ready to provide any further information you might need and to offer our assistance to try to broker any compromise or negotiation that might be acceptable to all parties. We are deeply distressed over this situation, and do not believe that Terry deserves to be imprisoned simply for seeking assurances that he is following legal orders.?

Greg stated that he has not received any response to his letters and is concerned the Army will simply take the easy way out by avoiding the issue and simply lock up his brother. He said based on his experience as a prosecutor in situations like this where there is no case law, ?Judges go in with a pre-determined idea how they are going to decide it and take case law and policy statements to say whatever they want. There is no magic law that supports either position.?

Greg said if his brother is not allowed to present evidence on his behalf and is convicted he would be forced to leave his practice to advocate for his brother saying, ?My reluctant but determined response would be to forego my busy medical practice treating drug addicts and elderly patients to organize a public outcry for America?s new military political prisoner.?

As the issue drags on,... continued here; http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=6890

LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.

Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.

Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.

LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.

An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song embedded below and at Source.

Action Alert, Calling All Patriots: Countdown to the Court Martial; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TERRY LAKIN ACTION ALERT, NOVEMBER, 2010.(Don't let up!) More details at Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama?...
Citizen v natural born Citizen-It's Don't Ask Don't Tell-20100809 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:24
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar