Lunes, 28 de junio de 2010
??

?
?



It's time to open impeachment file

Posted: June 26, 2010
1:00 am Eastern

??2010?

Yes, yes, I know. An impeachment investigation will never be started while Nancy Pelosi is speaker of the House. The good news is that this obstacle to impeachment will likely be removed by January.

It goes without saying that the impeachment process should never be a political weapon used to pursue partisan political advantage. But neither should an impeachment investigation be obstructed for political reasons.

Impeachment is a constitutional remedy to be used for serious offenses identified in the Constitution. So, we must ask this question: Has Barack Obama crossed the line that separates political differences from the serious offenses that warrant impeachment?

The Constitution's provisions for impeachment and removal are not aimed solely at the office of president. Article II, Section 4, stipulates that "the President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

Let the world know your solution to unconstitutional tyranny in America with the magnetic bumper sticker: "IMPEACH OBAMA!"

I believe there is a growing body of evidence of impeachable offenses sufficient to warrant a formal impeachment resolution in the House, followed by a trial in the Senate.

It is instructive that the founders listed only two specific crimes justifying impeachment ? bribery and treason. The accusations of bribery against this president are now numerous and growing, and by themselves deserve an independent investigation under supervision of a bipartisan committee of the House of Representatives. In Pennsylvania and Colorado, candidates for the U.S. Senate were offered federal appointments in exchange for dropping out of their respective races. On their face, those actions are attempted bribery and warrant a thorough investigation.

There are also presidential actions that may stray into the category of high crimes and misdemeanors. Only this past week we have witnessed a United States senator tell his constituents that the president, in an Oval Office conversation, refused a direct request to enforce the Constitution's guarantee of federal protection against foreign invasion. Obama wants a legislative "deal" in exchange for acting to secure the southwest border.

Let's ponder the meaning of that news item and ask if this falls into the category of normal political "horse trading." The president of the United States, in brazen defiance of his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution, refuses to faithfully execute the laws of the United States unless he gets amnesty legislation to benefit another 15 million to 20 million illegal aliens. The principal beneficiary of that amnesty would be a foreign country, Mexico, not the United States.

Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution guarantees each state protection against foreign invasion. The governor of Arizona and three other governors have formally requested 6,000 National Guard troops to help protect against the foreign invasion now under way, an invasion supported, encouraged and assisted by the government of Mexico. President Obama says ? no, I will not fulfill that constitutional duty unless I get something in return.

Seven United States senators have written President Obama to ask him not to use his executive powers for parole and delayed departure to grant de facto amnesty to millions of illegal aliens. If he does use this power, which was clearly intended by Congress as an administrative remedy to be used in individual cases, he will be violating the spirit of the separation of powers and usurping legislative authority over immigration law.

In foreign affairs, this president has shown a cavalier disregard for the security interests of the United States. In Afghanistan, he has insisted on a fixed timetable for withdrawal of U.S. military forces ? against the strenuous objections of his military advisers. He thereby gave the enemy a timetable for their victory and the return of terrorist training bases in that country.

Obama has refused to allow anyone in his government to use the term "radical Islam" to describe the enemy who has declared war on this country. To what purpose? If you cannot identify your enemy, that can only serve to hinder the prosecution of that war and undermine the sovereignty and security of the United States.

But perhaps Obama's most serious offense against the Constitution's limitations and obligations is his war against the Constitution itself. He does not adhere to the oath he took to defend the Constitution because he does not respect the Constitution.

It may be that these actions do not yet support or prove a case for impeachment. But considering Obama's drive for expansion of his executive powers and his disregard for clear constitutional duties, it clearly is time for Congress to open an investigation.

Citizens and patriots who love the Constitution and the liberties it protects have already started their own impeachment files to chronicle Obama's high crimes and misdemeanors, beginning with the overt crime of bribery. Whether or not the crime of treason will be added to that file remains to be seen. But the question is being asked, and the answer may not be pretty.


If you would like to sound off on this issue, participate in today's WND Poll.





Publicado por Corazon7 @ 20:06
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

?

Friday, June 25, 2010

Congressman John Boehner Willing to Present Obama Resignation Petitions to House, Get Busy Sending!

?

[update(s) below] The Obama resignation letter drive that Major General Paul Vallely spoke about is now in full swing.? This project is being spearheaded by Chalice Jackson of Patriots Heart Network, whom is also partnered with Veteran Defenders, Stand Up America, 20 Turns, The Captain's AMERICA, United States Justice Foundation, The Post & Email,?The Birther Report, Act! for America, The Regulators, The Gold Coast Chronicle, and America Coast to Coast.? The goal is to send a message to Obama & Gang that we the people are serious and we demand action.

It was also reported that Congressman John Boehner's office confirmed that Rep. Boehner would present the Obama resignation petitions to the House.? *It must be noted that Rep. Boehner is not involved with the petition drive itself.? This is a grassroots movement.
?
Now, it is up to we the people to get the petition letters sent.? This is something that can be done in the comfort of your home, with ease.? PHN is looking to sign-up at least 1,000 participants by Sunday, just to get started, help make that happen... The instructions on what to do, posted below full text of the 'No Confidence We Demand Resignation Petition Letter,'... ?
[note: this project is time-sensitive, act now, you can print directly from embedded docs below]
The No Confidence We Demand Resignation Petition Letter for Obama et al.

No Confidence We Demand Resignation Petition Instructions and Worksheet

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 19:35
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
WND Exclusive
FROM JEROME CORSI'S RED ALERT

Invasion! U.S. '

sanctuary city'

succumbs to illegals

1st municipality to fire all public

employees

after being forced into bankruptcy


Posted: June 28, 2010
12:56 pm Eastern

??2010?WorldNetDaily

?

Editor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Jerome Corsi's Red Alert, the premium online newsletter published by the current No. 1 best-selling author, WND staff writer and columnist. Red Alert subscriptions are $99 a year or $9.95 per month for credit card users. Annual subscribers will receive a free autographed copy of "The Late Great USA," a book about the careful deceptions of a powerful elite who want to undermine our nation's sovereignty.

A California "sanctuary city" has fallen victim to illegal immigration ? going bankrupt and firing all of its public employees, Jerome Corsi's Red Alert reports.

The city of Maywood, Calif., hit the budget wall after it decided not only to be a sanctuary city, but to be a completely "safe haven" for illegal aliens seeking protection from deportation.

Mexican flag flies at Maywood, Calif., post office (courtesy: Terry Anderson show)

"Predictably, mainstream media newspapers, including the Financial Times in London, chose to present Maywood as a victim to the recession, rather than to tell the whole story ? that Maywood fell victim to illegal immigration," Corsi wrote.

"Crushed by the recession and falling tax revenues, the city is disbanding the police force and firing all public sector employees," Matthew Garrahan wrote in the Financial Times, never mentioning that illegal immigration was the problem.

Maywood is a small town comprising only about 1.2 square miles on the southern border of Los Angeles. More than 96 percent of its residents are Hispanic. The town's official population is listed at 29,000 but may be nearly 45,000 when illegal aliens living in Maywood are counted.

?


Maywood, Calif., in August 2006 (Photo: Flopping Aces blog)

In January 2006, Maywood's city council passed a resolution declaring that the city would not enforce any federal law such as H.R. 4557 that sought to declare illegal immigrants to be felons.

More aggressive even than sanctuary laws, this new resolution prohibited Mayfield police from being involved in any immigration enforcement actions undertaken by federal, state or county authorities.

On April 11, 2006, in writing the book titled "Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders," Jim Gilchrist and Corsi interviewed Maywood Mayor Thomas Martin by telephone.

In the shocking interview available at Red Alert, the mayor strongly suggested the city of Maywood was willing to defy any federal law demanding that the police get directly involved in enforcing immigration laws.

For the full interview with Maywood Mayor Thomas Martin, read Jerome Corsi's Red Alert, the premium, online intelligence news source by the WND staff writer, columnist and author of the New York Times No. 1 best-seller, "The Obama Nation."

Red Alert's author, whose books "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command" have topped the New York Times best-sellers list, received his Ph.D. from Harvard University in political science in 1972. For nearly 25 years, beginning in 1981, he worked with banks throughout the U.S. and around the world to develop financial services marketing companies to assist banks in establishing broker/dealers and insurance subsidiaries to provide financial planning products and services to their retail customers. In this career, Corsi developed three different third-party financial services marketing firms that reached gross sales levels of $1 billion in annuities and equal volume in mutual funds. In 1999, he began developing Internet-based financial marketing firms, also adapted to work in conjunction with banks.

In his 25-year financial services career, Corsi has been a noted financial services speaker and writer, publishing three books and numerous articles in professional financial services journals and magazines.

For full immediate access to Jerome Corsi's Red Alert, subscribe now.

Subscribe to Jerome Corsi's new weekly economic newsletter, Red Alert, for one year and, for a limited time get "The Late Great USA" free. (This offer applies only to annual subscriptions for $99.)





Publicado por Corazon7 @ 19:02
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
?

Odogma Admin Refuses to Give Congress Transcripts of Russia?US Arms Reduction Treaty (START) Negotiations; Urges Them to Ratify it Anyway

This Administration is acting like rulers, not elected officials . . .

The Obama administration is urging the Senate to ratify the US-Russia Strate gic Arms Reduction Treaty ? but it won?t release the negotiating record for ?New START? to senators who?ve asked for it.

Denying the Senate?s requests raises all sorts of suspicions about the treaty, which would reduce the US strategic nuclear arsenal by about 30 percent and cut our missile silos, bombers and submarines by nearly 20 percent.

Is there is something in the blow-by-blow transcript of the talks with the Russians that the White House doesn?t want senators to see?

Some fear the administration did some winking and nodding with the Kremlin on missile defense that won?t show up in the treaty language. Team Obama says START doesn?t limit US missile-defense plans, but the administration?s remarkable weakness so far on missile defense is cause for anxiety.

President Obama & Co. have cut budgets of many missile-defense programs and put the kibosh early in their tenure on the Bush-era missile-defense system planned for Poland and the Czech Republic, aimed at Iran?s nuclear/missile programs. (It?s widely believed they deep-sixed the Polish-Czech program as a sop to the Russians in their near-incessant efforts to ?reset? relations with the Kremlin.)

Then there?s the treaty preamble that acknowledges ?the link between strategic offensive and strategic defensive armaments.? This language, experts say, might limit American missile-defense programs. And, while the administration says the preamble isn?t part of the treaty, Moscow said on the day of the treaty signing this spring that it will withdraw from the pact if US missile defense is expanded or improved.

Thus, Washington may face the choice of defending us from North Korea and Iran or seeing New START fall apart ? not a choice we should have to make.

Others wonder if the bargaining sessions included discussions on arms control in space. The Russians (and Chinese) are seeking to diminish (actually eliminate) US superiority on the Final Frontier. This is not only a matter of satellites and counter-satellite weapons, but missile defense as well ? since space is the best place to base interceptors to defend against incoming ballistic missiles.

Interested senators also wonder why the verification procedures in New START are less stringent than the original 1991 START it supersedes. (Especially since the Russians aren?t known for their strict adherence to arms-control pacts.)

NY Post


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:07
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??

Historical Documents Prove Vattel?s Writings Were Used By Our Founders To Define ?Natural Born Citizen?

Jefferson?s Rebels Published

?A little rebellion now and then?is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government.? Thomas Jefferson, Letter to James Madison, 1787, 3rd U.S. President (1743 - 1826)

Bloggers on UndeadRevolution.Wordpress.com now state they have found documentation from the revolutionary era that proves the framers of our Constitution used Vattel?s writings to define the meaning of the term ?natural born citizen? ? a hotly debated issue. UR is a group of university historians?not your average blogger, so their research is important. They plan to publish the results of their research either in a professional journal or perhaps a book.

When the link opens, scroll down to the June 18, 2010 comment.? If you haven?t already read the column from start to finish, this would be a good time to do so.? If you search Jefferson?s Rebels, you will find numerous articles on this topic.? Use either the keywords ?vattel? and/or ?natural born citizen.?


UR folks?
Any progress on locating additional historical documents that show the ?natural born citizen? to Vattel link?

Allegedly, there exists some Adam?s family, and Lee family papers that have not been seen by the general public, that prove the framers got their definition and understanding of a natural born citizen from Vattel?s work.

When might they, or other documents, be published?

The country is devolving by the day now.

We need relief from the usurper and his cronies.

Yep. We have the definitive proof of the Vattel link to the Constitution straight from historical documentation.

?

Via Undead Revolution
These Are The Times That Try Mens Souls

The Meaning of Natural Born?Citizen

?

The time may ere long arrive when the minds of men will be prepared to make an effort to recover the Constitution, but the many cannot now be brought to make a stand for its preservation. We must wait a while.
N.Y. Historical Society?s Collections (Lee Papers), vol. III, 1873

I have the Honor to be with great respect Sir, Your Most Humble  
and Obedient Servant. - George Washington

I have the Honor to be with great respect Sir, Your Most Humble and Obedient Servant. ? George Washington


OVERVIEW

There were three types of citizens at the time of the signing of the Constitution:

1. Those who pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to the?Declaration of Independence.? On that day, July 4, 1776, millions of former British subjects became citizens of a sovereign America.

2. The children, their heirs, born of those pledged citizens, were the first natural-born citizens of the new nation.

3. A person naturalized into citizenship through an act of law requiring an oath and and renunciation to any former allegiance.

We are either a United people, or we are not. If the former, let us, in all matters of general concern act as a nation, which have national objects to promote, and a national character to support. If we are not, let us no longer act a farce by pretending to it.

George Washington, letter to James Madison, November 30, 1785
?

INTRODUCTION

The scope of this writing is to focus on the intent of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States as it pertains to the clause in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

This study explores the historical, legislative and judicial areas for factual evidence that defines the intent behind the clause. While it by no means gives the bulk of the research justice, for that would require a book, it should provide a sufficient template that destroys the theory that the definition was allegedly an ambiguous or an otherwise unanswerable question. Breaking it down into the three aforementioned parts, we are able to see a contiguous pattern that is easily digestable using the credibility of those who were living and present during those eras. It is crucial to set the stage during the American Revolution, for we find that it was the experience drawn from this event that provides the foundation from which everything else is drawn that embodies the spirit of the Constitution itself.

In GULF, C. & S. F. R. CO. v. ELLIS, 165 U.S. 150 (1897), the court advocated, as well as over 100 other courts who similarly advised, to look to this period for direction when applicable:

?? and while in all cases reference must be had to the organic law of the nation for such limits, yet the latter [The Constitution] is but the body and the letter of which the former [The Declaration of Independence] is the thought and the spirit, and it is always safe to read the letter of the Constitution in the spirit of the Declaration of Independence.?

So we start at this point in history and provide a historical review of the events that shed light on the intellect that manifests itself later into the Constitution and subsequent legislation and jurisprudence.


HISTORICAL

We pick up events after the French and Indian War1 where King George III attempted to tax the colonists in an effort to recoup his losses incurred by the war. This event also gave the king the excuse he needed to gain control over the now flourishing and prosperous States. America was no longer a band of menial pioneers who struggled through long winters and devastating plagues with little to no help from the distant Crown. It was now a fully functional, vast community of largely, self-sufficient States, rich in resources with the potential of becoming more powerful and independent by the day. The king seized the post-war opportunity to call for reining in that power and wealth for the benefit of the mother country. The colonists objected, having no representation in Parliament; a violation of the often ignored, yet existing, constitution2 between them. By 1775, the conflict from a series of levies by Parliament and resistance by the colonists had come to a head. Shocking intelligence revealed that the king was actually intending to utilize the Hessians (Germans) as mercenaries in conjunction with his own army to crush the Americans by force. The plan threatened imminent doom for America as they knew it. Despite the colonists hopes, the long-awaited resolution was not to come and an Act was passed by Parliament throwing them out of the king?s protection. Dr. David Ramsay3, notable historian, physician, one in service to the Continental Congress and president in the Senate, wrote:

Though new weight was daily thrown into the scale, in which the advantages of independence were weighed, yet it did not preponderate till about that time in 1776, when intelligence reached the colonists of the act of parliament passed in December 1775, for throwing them out of British protection, and of hiring foreign troops to assist in effecting their conquest. 4

The colonists were now faced with the prospect of seeking aid themselves or facing up to the possibility of being crushed by an onslaught that was stacked in Great Britain?s favor. Where that aid might materialize from was not evident. What was clear was that the colonial States together with England, had just gotten over participating against the French in a seven-year long conflict that spanned throughout Europe. While tensions with France weren?t as nearly as bad as that of England, it certainly wasn?t optimal or trusting. In addition, there were many other obstacles to overcome. Word of the king?s plan needed to be conveyed to the people. They needed to arrive at a decision for independence and then declare it. This was so that, in the eyes of the law of nations, their sovereignty would demand recognition. Otherwise, they would be viewed as a people engaged in a civil war that other nations would be loathe to get involved in. Dr. Ramsay further explains,

While the public mind was balancing on this eventful subject, several writers placed the advantages of independence in various points of view. Among these Thomas Paine in a pamphlet, under the signature of Common Sense, held the most distinguished rank. 5

An important impact from Thomas Paine?s Common Sense was the suggestion that no government could be instituted with the blessing from Heaven, that revealed,

? convincing proof, that Great-Britain had thrown them out of her protection, had engaged foreign mercenaries to make war upon them, and seriously designed to compel their unconditional submission to her unlimited power. It found the colonists most thoroughly alarmed for their liberties, and disposed to do and suffer any thing that promised their establishment. 6

With the realization of Great Britain?s plan against the people and pondering the oppressive ramifications of subjugating themselves to it, the colonists declared their independence. On that day, July 4, 1776, millions pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor for the sake of liberty and freedom and rejected ?lusting after kings? to rule and provide over them; embracing republican ideas instead. These millions of former British subjects became the first citizens of a sovereign America and are included in the Constitution as being a party to it at the time of its execution. This was the cornerstone ideology of the new nation to come and deserves clarification in the history books; that what was on the line was far more serious than just taxation without representation. It was about a power grab at its core.

However the conviction of the colonists may be measured, it was still no match for the sheer logistical numbers of the British troops and their mercenaries. France was keenly aware that it was in her best interests to support the independence of the United States rather than have England continue to dominate. Dr. Ramsay records the pivotal events:

The news of the capitulation of Saratoga reached France, very early in December, 1777. The American deputies took that opportunity to press for an acceptance of the treaty, which had been under consideration for the preceding twelve months. The capture of Burgoyne?s army convinced the French, that the opposition of the Americans to Great Britain was not the work of a few men who had got power in their hands, but of the great body of the people, and was like to be finally successful.7

It was therefore determined to take them by the hand, and publicly to espouse their cause. The commissioners of Congress were informed by Mr. Gerard one of the secretaries of the King?s council of State, that it was decided to acknowledge the independence of the United States and to make a treaty with them. That in the treaty no advantage would be taken of their situation to obtain terms which, otherwise, it would not be convenient for them to agree to. ?

That his most Christian Majesty was fixed in his determination not only to acknowledge, but to support, their independence. That in doing this he might probably soon be engaged in a war, yet he should not expect any compensation from the United States on that account, nor was it pretended that he acted wholly for their sakes, since besides his real good will to them, it was manifestly the interest of France, that the power of England should be diminished, by the separation of the colonies from its government.

Marquis de la Fayette8, a French soldier who was enamored with the American cause and despite the order for his arrest on account of it, had already joined the Revolution in June of 1777 of his own accord. He was among the first to receive news of a treaty and alliance between France and America signed on February 6, 1778. However, the caliber of dedication in comparison to de la Fayette?s character was striking. These French counterparts to the cause varied from obliged volunteers, to demanding stipulations for pay, then advanced pay and ultimately rank within Washington?s army. When the latter was assumed, a morale disturbance and upset was felt among the American troops. The situation was summed up best by George Washington?s numerous letters addressing the subject directly:

?You are not to enlist any person who is not an American born, unless such person has a wife and family, and is a settled resident of this country.? George Washington, Given at headquarters, at Cambridge, this 10 July, 1775.

Here we see the first seeds of nativity, connections to the country and residency as being the fundamental criteria of fidelity. Then later, adding to the list, Washington?s preference for natives who own property. In a letter from Gen. Washington to Col. Spotswood, dated in 1777, in a publication entitled ?Maxims of Washington,? p. 192, the following passage occurs: ?

?You will therefore send me none but natives, and men of some property, if you have them. I must insist that in making this choice you give no intimation of my preference for natives, as I do not want to create any individual distinction between them and foreigners.?

The same is promulgated in Washington?s subsequent General Orders, where we see Washington raise the bar again to include verification. In Commander Washington?s General Orders of July 7, 1775 given at Head Quarters, Cambridge by Horatio Gates, Adj. General to Parole-Dorchester, Countersign-Exeter:

?The General has great Reason; and is highly displeased, with the Negligence and Inattention of those Officers, who have placed as Centries at the out-posts, Men with whose Character they are not acquainted. He therefore orders, that for the future, no Man shall be appointed to those important Stations, who is not a Native of this Country, or has a Wife, or Family in it, to whom he is known to be attached. This Order is to be consider?d as a standing one and the Officers are to pay obedience to it at their peril.? - 11 Fox, Adj. Gen. of the day. 9

Sound reasoning existed behind what may seem a harsh edict at first glance to those without any military experience. However, the explanation is contained in Washington?s many pleas to Congress expressing what was being experienced on the battlefield as justification for his actions. There was a morale problem and there was an abuse problem affecting the operations of Washington?s military. The problem was so severe, the tone was reflected in literally hundreds of letters, speeches and essays, all the way through to his infamous Farewell Address.10 Some of his direct misgivings are noted in the following examples.

Regarding the morale problem noted on May 7th, 1777 at Morristown:

?Dear Sir: I take the liberty to ask you what Congress expects I am to do with the many foreigners that have at different times been promoted to the rank of field-officers, and by their last resolve two of that of colonels? These men have no attachment for the country further than interest binds them. Our officers think it exceedingly hard, after they have toiled in the service and have sustained many losses, to have strangers put over them, whose merit perhaps is not equal to their own, but who effrontery will take no denial. It is by the zeal and activity of our own people that the cause must be supported, and not by the few hungry adventurers. I am, &c., GEO. WASHINGTON.?

Regarding the frustration, future reflections and regret; a letter to Gouverneur Morris, Esq., White Plains, July 24th, 1778:

?Dear Sir: The design of this is to touch cursorily upon a subject of very great importance to the well-being of these states, much more so than will appear at first sight ? I mean the appointment of so many foreigners to offices of high rank and trust in our service.

The lavish manner in which rank has hitherto be bestowed on these gentlemen, will certainly be productive of one or the other of these two evils, either to make us despicable in the eyes of Europe, or become a means of pouring them in upon us like a torrent, and adding to our present burden. But it is neither the expense nor the trouble of them I most dread; there is an evil more extensive in its nature and fatal in its consequence to be apprehended, and that is, the driving of all our officers out of the service, and throwing not only our own army, but our military councils, entirely into the hands of foreigners. ?

The expediency and policy of the measure remains to be considered, and whether it is consistent with justice or prudence to promote these military fortune-hunters at the hazard of our army. Baron Steuben, I now find, is also wanting to quit his inspectorship for a command in the line. This will be productive of much discontent. In a word, although I think the Baron an excellent officer, I do most devoutly wish ? that we had not a single foreigner amongst us, except the Marquis de Lafayette, who acts upon very different principles from those which govern the rest.

Adieu. I am, most sincerely yours, GEORGE WASHINGTON.?

Regarding the abusive greed fostered by a lack of personal resolve. A letter of George Washington to Gouverneur Morris. White Plains, 24th July, 1778

?? The officers, my dear sir, on whom you most depend for the defence of this cause, distinguished by length of service, their connections, property, and, in behalf of many, I may add, military merit, will not submit, much if any longer, to the unnatural promotion of men over them, who have nothing more than a little plausibility, unbounded pride and amibition, and a perseverance in application not to be resisted but by uncommon firmness, to support their pretensions; men, who, in the first instance, tell you they wish for nothing more than the honor of serving in so glorious a cause as volunteers, the next day solicit rank without pay, the day following want money advanced to them, and in the course of a week want further promotion, and are not satisfied with any thing you can do for them.? 11

With the success and security of the country in mind, it became incumbent and necessary to review this portion of history that lays down the initial rules and conditions required from the direction of the first Commanding Officer. It encapsulates how fidelity was identified, measured and enforced in order to secure the objectives of liberty and freedom. The evidence begins with the Revolution as it illustrates the evolved requirements in leadership that take shape as a matter of course and experience. It illuminates the criteria set in choosing those worthy and trusting of rank; that being: A native-born American, who has verifiable connections and family who reside and hold property within the country.

This sets the stage for the legislative review of the second section which further developes this criteria in the same vein as George Washington, the ?father genius? of the Revolution and framer of the Constitution of the United States of America.

?His last scene comported with the whole tenor of his life. Although in extreme pain, not a sigh, not a groan escaped him; and with undisturbed serenity he closed his well-spent?life. Such was the man America has lost ? such was the man for whom our nation mourns.

?Cease, sons of America, lamenting our separation. Go on and confirm, by your wisdom, the fruits of our joint councils, joint efforts, and common dangers; reverence religion; diffuse knowledge throughout your lands; patronize the arts and sciences; let liberty and order be inseparable companions. Control party spirit, the bane of free government; observe good faith to, and cultivate peace with, all nations; shut up every avenue to foreign influence; contract rather than extend national connections; rely on yourselves only; be Americans in thought, word and deed. Thus will you give immortality to that union which was the constant object of my terrestrial labors; thus will you preserve undisturbed, to the latest posterity, the felicity of a people to me most dear; and thus will you supply (if my happiness is now ought to you) the only vacancy in the round of pure bliss high Heaven bestows?.

Methinks I see his august image, and hear falling from his venerable lips these deep-sinking words?; ?

Recollections of George Washington by Henry Lee in Washington?s funeral oration before the House of Congress on December 26, 1799.

? to be continued

-Undead Revolution

?????????????

1. The French and Indian War (Summary) ? http://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/frenchindian/summary.html

2. The Magna Carta ? http://www.magnacharta.com/articles/article04.htm

3. Dr. David Ramsay ? Princeton Short-Biography
http://etcweb.princeton.edu/CampusWWW/Companion/ramsay_david.html

4. Dr. David Ramsay, The History of the American
Revolution, vol. 1 [1789] pg. 237
http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/814

5. Thomas Paine, Common Sense, February 14, 1776, Philadelphia: W. & T. BRADFORD, 1776; and New York: Bartleby.com, 1999 ? http://www.bartleby.com/133/index.html

6. Dr. David Ramsay, The History of the American Revolution, vol. 1 [1789] pg. 237 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/814

7. Dr. David Ramsay, The History of the American Revolution, vol. 2 [1789] pgs. 44-45
http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/547

8. Marquis De Lafayette ? http://www.marquisdelafayette.net

9. Image ? Commander Washington?s General Orders dated July 7, 1775: http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mgw3&fileName=mgw3g/gwpage001.db&recNum=10

10. Washington?s Farewell Address ? http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp

11. The Rover, Vol. 3, Edited by Seba Smith, New York, S.B. Dean & Co. 1844, pg. 364

One Response to ?Historical Documents Prove Vattel?s Writings Were Used By Our Founders To Define ?Natural Born Citizen??

  1. And the proven evidence for usurpation grows as the American People are ignored. What a disgraceful country we live in.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:42
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

The Domestic Enemy

ARE WE AT THE BRINK?

by Arnie Rosner

Admiral Michael Mullen became Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on October 1, 2007, after serving as Chief of Naval Operations and Navy Commander in several areas of the world

June 27, 2010

Dear Admiral Mullen:

Many of us share the concern about the position in which Mr. Obama has placed you. ?We recognize the tenuous and critically explosive nature of the processes in which you are engaged to determine a correct course of action. ?We recognize that a man of less honor and proven long-term duty to country would not be faced with such a heavy task.

At ?exactly what point is the precarious balance tipped, the point at which a dedicated, courageous, fiercely loyal, conscientious military leader,?a distinguished leader?with an insatiable love for this country,?a respected leader with a highly-developed sense of loyalty, respect and appreciation for the balance required to maintain the equilibrium of justice and reason between the forces of good and evil, the forces of public and political opinion and the rights of freedom guaranteed by the founding documents by which previous generations of our military guardians have successfully guided our way for over 200 years?

We are speaking of not only a military leader but a leader of men and one who is also unique in the sense that you posses the unusual blend of executive and administrative expertise and experience rarely even understood by most people in our society, regardless of their political orientation.

But besides all of the technical reasons you bring to the table, Admiral, you also being your tempered judgment, one more quality which also qualifies your sense of balance to sort out the differences among the elements I have mentioned, with their biased orientation from the point of a concerned citizen, with your intimate perspective, a view only possible to attain from your vantage point within the government.

History has placed you in a position where you appear to be faced with assuming the role of a modern-day Samson. However, the decision you face is even more critical than can be resolved by suggesting the baby be cut in half. ?Only a skilled executive with years of administrative and military experience, together with the special qualities of balance, described above, can possibly make an accurate determination as to whether the current civil administrator with a questionable level of authority, an authority to which you report through the established chain of command, ?has exceeded the limits of appropriate legal, ethical and moral conduct by a government based on the Constitution as empowered by the people of the United States.

In my view, Admiral Mullen, the Obama regime and Congress have consistently rejected and ignored the will of the people on many occasions. I base this conclusion on the execution of a constant unrelenting stream of events, oppressive legislation and abusive executive orders, ?where the will of the people has been repeatedly expressed, in good faith, and flatly ignored by those who have seized power. Many of the disenfranchised people of this country,?me included, have classified the current administration and the Congress as our ?domestic enemy,? a term in the Constitution of the United States which describes this specific state of affairs.

Certainly many factors must be taken into consideration when weighing the gravity of this situation which has been developing over the last 18 months, a situation which has exhibited a pattern of repeated administrative abuse headed in a direction where even you must have some questions and concerns about the legitimacy of those in charge.

Stepping back for a moment, let?s examine just a few of the issues in question. For starters, there is the issue of the eligibility of Mr. Obama.? Does it make sense that a man who promised the people of the United States the most transparent and open government ever? then refuses to produce a simple document such as his birth certificate? Further, does it seem logical that Mr. Obama would spend over $1.2 million to ensure the people to whom he made this promise of transparency would be denied all access to his basic information?

Many concessions can be made to excuse the behavior of a person who, like Mr. Obama, was placed in a position of trust, if indeed the actions of this person would seem to be consistent with acting in the best interest of those who elected him. However, upon closer examination, is taking over several segments of the private sector in the best interest of the American Republic?

For more proof of his intent, just look at the extent of the conspiracy which planned and?executed the?deception surrounding his attempt to legitimize his fraudulent birth certificate:

?

?

?

?

?

Further examination must be given to the manner in which health care was dealt by Mr. Obama?s administration.


??Putting aside the political portion of the argument, again, is the manner in which this legislation illegally bypassed the normal legislative process consistent with the will of the American people?

There are many other issues in which the Obama administration seems to be questionably involved, too many for my taste. However, this may simply be reflected by my attitude. I am confident that you?also must share some concern about the way our missile program has been compromised, how our allies have been alienated and our strongest ally in the Middle East, Israel, has been marginalized.

Of course, the fact that Mr. Obama now openly embraces what appears to be the Islamization of our nation, when before the election he presented himself as a Christian, should begin to wave a caution flag.

But even more importantly, I would think the lack of his commitment to win the war in Afghanistan would weigh the heaviest on your mind. Admiral, I am not a military expert, and what I am about to say would most probably be considered politically incorrect.

The way Mr. Obama has handled decisions regarding the war effort has left me with the distinct impression that he is attempting to carefully orchestrate a balancing act designed to cover his real position. ?In some cases he acts to demonstrate to many Americans his leadership abilities to direct the war and at the same time do as little as possible to risk offending his friends, our enemies, in the Middle East.

On the one hand, he dare not leave the impression that he is against the war, although clearly I expect this is his true position. On the other hand, he must leave an impression that as purported commander-in-chief, he is indeed in charge and competent to make such leadership decisions.

However, I must question the intent of a commander-in-chief who asks of his field commanders, whom he himself had appointed, what is needed to win the war, and then proceeds to delay making a basic decision on this information for months, thereby providing our enemies with valuable time to rebuild defenses. ? What was even more telling, in my opinion, was when Obama was apprised of the likelihood of only partial success if fewer than the requested number of troops were provided, he authorized only a portion of the total number of troops requested. ?I am not sure of your take on this, Admiral, but to me this was a clear sign he did not intend to win this war.

In my view, Admiral, it was a sure-fire way to insure defeat, a decision that was definitely biased in favor of our enemy. As I see it, Admiral, this act of treason was as deliberate as was possible for someone acting as our domestic enemy. Could it be any more clear?

This lack of commitment indicates to me that Mr. Obama is not genuinely committed to winning the war in Afghanistan. In my view, Mr. Obama is not genuinely committed to those in the Armed Forces who are risking their lives, to the military leadership, or to the people of the United States.

Obama is treating Afghanistan in the same manner as the Gulf oil spill. ?In this crisis he?appears to be attempting to manipulate the outcome for his own political maneuvering.

I see his reluctance to totally identify himself as committed to a plan of action to assure complete victory in Afghanistan as a preliminary plan for defeat. ?When the war effort is lost, ?as is his typical modus operandi, he will blame the failure on you and the rest of the military and throw the entire military leadership and our courageous men and women in uniform under the bus as a political expediency. He will do this when he believes it will be convenient to assure his reelection in 2012.?At that time I predict he will represent himself as having been against the war from the beginning. ?He will attempt to present himself as the emerging hero of the republic.

This dangerous and treasonous set of circumstances demonstrates the very reason the Commander-in-Chief of the United States military must be a natural born Citizen, a special kind of citizen who cannot be placed in a position of divided loyalties such as in the case of Mr. Obama, who had a foreign parent and might even be foreign-born himself.

I am not sure if it occurred to you, but it did to me:? when Obama is in a position to determine military options, is he thinking of the American people or his benefactors in the Middle East?

Admiral Mullen, will you honor your oath and, along with Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, take the necessary steps to insure that any and all orders from your ?Commander-in-Chief? are, in fact, lawful orders from a Constitutionally-qualified and eligible person for that position, and, if not, also take the necessary steps to remove him from the chain of command? I and a desperately-awaiting nation are awaiting your response to this burning question:? Can any orders, Executive or Commands, ?from an illegitimate Commander-in-Chief, be considered ?Lawful Orders??

? 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:36
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Two Questions to Ask Putative President Obama?s Enablers Regarding Where Obama Was Born

?
We have seen the responses we get from Putative President Obama?s enablers, aka Obots, when we ask to see Obama's long-form birth certificate (not the Certification of Live Birth or COLB someone posted on the internet) and when we say that Obama has yet to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii. Here is a typical one:?

"These arguments have been debunked numerous times by media investigations, every judicial forum that has addressed the matter, and Hawaiian government officials, a consensus of whom have concluded that the certificate released by the Obama campaign is indeed his official birth certificate. Asked about this, Hawaiian Department of Health spokeswoman Janice Okubo stated that Hawaii "does not have a short-form or long-form certificate." Moreover, the director of her Department has confirmed that the state "has Sen. Obama?s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

Apart from identifying and commenting on the many outright lies contained in this answer, we need to ask these enablers the following two questions and caution them that they are not to evade answering them as they have done so far. Here are the questions and accompanying instructions:?

If what you say is all true, then please answer for me two questions:?

1. Where specifically in Honolulu, Hawaii was Obama born? Do not just tell me in Honolulu. We are talking about the President of the United States. Hence, I want to know the exact address in Honolulu where he first saw the light of day. We are only dealing with 1961 and such information is readily available, especially since Obama says he was born in a hospital. Also, do not simply say that he was born in some-named hospital, for you will have to provide me with credible and sufficient evidence from such an institution to support your answer. Also, some unconfirmed letter that Obama allegedly wrote on January 24, 2009 to Kapi?olani Medical Center is not such evidence, for Obama never confirmed that he wrote it and the letter is not from the hospital.?

2. Who was physically present when Obama was born? I doubt that in 1961 an 18-year-old girl could give birth to a baby all alone. Hence, since as you claim Obama's birth has been confirmed by all these authorities, then you or at least one of these authorities should be able to tell me who was present to witness baby Obama come out of his mother's womb. Also, we can assume that the person who was present would be the person who would have "officially" reported Obama's birth to the Hawaiian health department authorities, for surely neither Nancy Pelosi nor any past or present Hawaiian authority of whom you so glowingly speak claims to have been personally present during his alleged birth in Honolulu or to otherwise have personal knowledge of how, when, and where Obama was born. In your answer, please provide the name of the person that was present during and actually witnessed the alleged birth and his/her function at that time. Please do not whine that my question is burdensome or otherwise unreasonable given the time lapse. Again, we are only talking about 1961 and we are told that Obama's birth was in a modern hospital. Hence, the answer to my question should be rather easy to obtain from the medical file that is in the possession of the alleged birth hospital.?

Please do not answer my questions by telling me that the burden of proof is on me and not Obama or that my questions are intrusive of Obama?s privacy. After all, we are talking about Obama wanting to be the President and Commander in Chief of the Military of the United States of America and leader of the free world and our Constitution requires that in order to be eligible for those powerful and singular civilian and military offices he produce such information for the people he is supposed to serve and protect in that capacity.?

Please do not answer my questions by telling me that the courts have already answered these questions, for we know that they dismissed eligibility cases because of standing, political question, or some other threshold ground, and have yet to rule on the question of where Obama was born.?

Please do not answer my questions by telling me that Obama has already released to the public his birth certificate (which is really a Certification of Live Birth or COLB and not a Certificate of Live Birth) by posting it on the internet and that the state of Hawaii has confirmed the existence of Obama?s birth certificate which is in the Hawaii Department of Health file, for the only birth certificate the public has seen so far is a questionable 2008 computer image of an alleged 2007 COLB which someone posted on the internet, we know that the state of Hawaii has yet to confirm that internet image, and the alleged COLB that appears on the internet does not in any event tell us where in Honolulu Obama was born or who was present when he was so born.?

Please do not answer my questions by telling me about what we all learned in some high school government class or that the people already voted in the 2008 election, for you should know that what we learn in any such class or what occurs in the polling booth is neither sufficient nor indicated in our constitutional republic as a means to answer constitutional questions.?

Please do not answer my questions by telling me that the people who want answers to my questions should not be taken to be rational people because they also believe the JFK assassination was a grand conspiracy, the earth is flat, the moon landing was made on some Hollywood stage, or the 9/11 attack was preplanned by our own government.?

Please do not answer my questions by accusing me and the people who want answers to my questions of posting on the internet false Obama birth certificates or other fabricated Obama life stories, for we know that you yourself probably posted those things to make it look like we did.?

Please do not answer my questions with a question, or with otherwise evasive answers, or with personal attacks on me, my motives, my politics, my patriotism, my religion, my views on race, my work, my ancestors, or my pets.?

And finally, please do not answer my questions by telling me that the questions and answers have already been generously twittered by our smart populace.?

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.?
June 27, 2010
http://puzo1.blogspot.com?
####

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:55
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
?


by Bruce Walker

President Obama?s image of leadership flounders in the Gulf of Mexico. While Governor Jindal displays the true qualities of leadership, our president is stuck in Saul Alinksy gear, demonizing a foreign corporation instead of actually doing anything constructive. Disgust at Obama?s genuine incompetence at this genuine ecological disaster stretches across party lines and the ideological spectrum.

Barry blames Bush for everything about our dismal economy. A partisan rubber-stamp Congress has given Obama the wild and wasteful expenditures which his childish, failed, quasi-Keynesian witches? brew prophesies will spend us into prosperity. It hasn?t worked. Now, oddly, congressmen facing electoral apocalypse have stopped writing our wise leader a blank check against the federal treasury.

Wearing the hat of Commander in Chief, Obama explicitly sought a general in sync with his plan to end the war in Afghanistan. Then, when General McChrystal snickered too publicly at Obama?s cartoon leadership, the president replaced him with the old Bush team ? the man Obama and his pals three years ago were calling ?General Betray Us.? Does this cause a ?willing suspension of disbelief? in Obama?

The nomination of radical leftist women to the Supreme Court simply reinforces the image of Obama as a closet Marxist. His cabinet choices reinforce this image of radicalism. The American people, during Obama?s administration, profess to be conservative ? and increasingly conservative according to Gallup, a poll that already shows that conservatives outnumber liberals in every single state of the Union.

The Blagojevich trial, which has already hinted at Obama?s connection to the thoroughly seamy side of Chicago political corruption, may do more than hint at criminal misconduct in the future. Other creepy people, like Tony Rezko, keep popping up with common connections to Obama and Blago. How dirty is Obama? No one knows, but no Democrat could rise out of the cesspool of Chicago politics without some ethical problems.

The cumulative impact of these corrosives on Obama?s presidency is becoming very clear. Although polls differ in the precise measurement of unhappiness with Obama as president, the trends in all the polls are consistent, and the combined average of these various polls is clear and stark: Confidence in President Obama has fallen dramatically, and a plurality of Americans now disapprove of the job he has done as president.

What, then, is preventing a total collapse of Obama? In a word, it is Obama?s likability. Before my conservative friends commit me to an asylum, we must be objective: Many millions more Americans like Obama than see him as an effective leader. He is (or is seen as) a loving father, a good husband, a sincere man who rose out of difficult circumstances into high office. Obama speaks well, he talks about sports, he is seen in every flattering photo-op which the servile leftist press can engineer. Americans like him.

Since television became king in politics, presidents who appeared ?likable? to the camera ? Eisenhower, JFK, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, George W. Bush, and now Obama ? have had a huge advantage in connecting to the American people. Why? The reason is largely because Americans are naturally optimistic, friendly, and receptive people. We want to like our leader.

Likability, however, is a two-edged sword. When pettiness peaks its pointy head in a president ? Jimmy Carter is the perfect example ? then Americans sour on the man in the White House. Few Americans ever expected to ?like? LBJ, Nixon, or George H.W. Bush. The national judgment on these politicians is more or less connected to their actual accomplishments or failures. When the American people saw Carter as a failure in governance and a more unpleasant person than they imagined, then he became toxic in politics. When Obama, already a catastrophe as a chief executive and policy innovator, loses his kismet with Americans, then his presidency will simply implode. Hillary Clinton might well challenge Obama just like Teddy Kennedy took on a Carter, who at times was almost running third in election polls (behind, or close to behind, maverick Republican John Anderson).

What might make average, otherwise only mildly political Americans begin to really dislike Barack Obama? If he shows a thin-skinned temper to questions or challenges. Anger comes off very badly on television. If Obama gets caught in a transparent lie, then that deceit could be a quick and deep stinger. If he appears condescending and arrogant, as he did on the infamous San Francisco tape when he was talking about people ?clinging to their religion and guns,? then the people may see a different Obama.

Will one or more of those incidents occur before the public eye during his presidency? The more appropriate question is: When will Obama show his true character before the American people? Obama?s choreography is tight, but national and world events are wildly unpredictable. Who could have guessed that Obama would now be grappling with an oil spill? Who knows what the next time bomb will be?

In fact, the real time bomb is probably Obama himself. As Robin of Berkeley observed in her truly scary article, Barack Hussein Obama may well be have been a traumatized victim in his youth, perhaps of sexual abuse. If he is, then Obama will have personality disorders which simply cannot be cured (read Robin?s article for the details). If Robin is right, then at some point, the true, hopelessly sick Obama will show himself before a horrified nation. Average Americans will no longer like the president. They will, instead, be saddened and repelled ? and they will emphatically expel Obama and his supporters from power or influence in our lives. When folks stop liking Barry, the party is over.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:33
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??

I strongly suggest that what Obama has effected constitutes the high crime of treason against the USA and its citizens

Dictator Obama reaches Day 70 of his Gulf Destruction

?By Sher Zieve??Monday, June 28, 2010

Although Barack Hussein Obama may not have pulled the trigger on the BP Gulf oil rig explosion, his abrogation of sand berms and virtually all other means to minimize the damage from the toxins and protect this US coastal region places him the position of destroyer-in-chief.?


Through his actions involving apparent criminal mischief leading to the destruction of entire ecosystems and their attendant wildlife?including but, not limited to human life and livelihoods?Obama has placed himself firmly in the position of the most destructive and vicious leader of the USA that America has ever witnessed.? And what has The Obama done to warrant such a statement?? Let?s take a look.

1.? Obama?s federal government refused to allow any foreign skimmers to assist in collecting the gushing oil that had surfaced.? Note:? The tyrant initially cited the Jones Act (Merchant Seaman Protection and Relief) as his excuse?an act sponsored by unions and initially passed to protect merchant seaman from having to compete with foreign entities in US waters.? Suffice it to say, this act has been suspended numerous times by true US presidents in times of emergency.? Obama, however, had his excuse for additional and total destruction of a large portion of the United States of America and was unwilling to give it up

2.? Obama?s insistence that ?studies be affected? (aka ?foot-dragging? and ?fiddling while the Gulf States are decimated?) before anything would be done to assist the disaster-impacted Republican-run states of Louisiana and Mississippi.? Note:? Florida may be given a ?pass? as soon-to-be former Florida Republican Governor Charlie Crist, now running as an ?Independent? in the Florida Senate race, is giving strong indications that (if elected) he will vote with the Democrats

3.? Obama orders Louisiana to stop protecting itself from the oil onslaught by ceasing the building of sand berms. Apparently, these sand berms were operating too effectively for the Obama.? They worked so, Obama has ordered their building be stopped.? Note:? Obama gave Louisiana a death sentence and the dictator expects Governor Jindal and the rest of Louisiana?s residents to accept their deaths for the dictator and a suppressive to all humans Obama Cap & Trade bill!

In no uncertain terms, Obama is showing all of us that he has decided and is now demanding that OUR country be destroyed.? He?s doing it all over the USA from more and more Obama massive land grabs resulting in displaced persons, to his refusal to protect a US State?notably Arizona?from illegal invasion.? Instead, with Arizona he is not only bringing the entire US government to bear against the State (with a lawsuit) for attempting to protect itself from massive Mexican drug cartels and other illegals that cannot be sustained by the system but, is now siding with the enemy country.? Obama has encouraged Mexico to file a lawsuit against Arizona for the State?s attempting to uphold the laws of our land, while he has ordered the ObamaGov not to uphold them.?

Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution reads:? ?The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.?? I strongly suggest that what Obama has effected constitutes the high crime of treason against the USA and its citizens.? Again, if he is allowed to continue with his behaviors (please note that as he is allowed more and more latitude and with no one stopping him he seizes more and more power away from us all) the United States of America may very well end before any November elections can be held.? If our representatives in Washington D.C. still refuse to assist their own country against this depot and his minions, again We-the-People are required by the original Declaration of Independence to take back our government and our country.

A method to begin our take-back needs to start on the local level.? One of my readers (?Debbie?) said she and a small group are going door-to-door in their respective neighborhoods to advise neighbors of what is going on with our now tyrannical federal government and asking for their help.? She tells me that the initial response has been very encouraging and that the local movement is growing.? Debbie wrote:? ?My motto has become ?I can?t save the world, but maybe I can save my neighborhood?.? That is what a few of us are doing,? going door to door?engaging in issues in a very polite way, talking to people and doing what we can because that is still our right as Americans.? I can?t tell you what a good feeling it is to stop and talk to a young man doing yard work and ending up with a new volunteer because he is fed up too!?? Debbie also says that all you need is a clipboard, paper and a pen.?

This is the beginning and it needs to start in neighborhoods and communities across this great nation before Obama & Co steal it from us completely and we become their slaves.? It must begin today in communities all over the country.?

In addition to TEA Parties, we must have volunteers on a street-by-street basis with local leadership dispensing vital information on what to do and what to have on-hand in the now almost visible and upcoming major additional Obama ?man-made? emergency; a to-be-created ?emergency? that he seems bent upon employing against We-the-People.? My instincts tell me that this Obama-manufactured emergency will be coming VERY soon.? Therefore, it behooves us all to begin the neighbor-to-neighbor and neighborhood-to-neighborhood process now.? We must provide ourselves with any and all available knowledge and shields from the onslaught that is to come.? There is protection in ORGANIZED numbers, folks.? And the organization needs to begin with your next door neighbor and grow from there.? And as We-the-People grow to extraordinary numbers and become more and more organized, we must prepare ourselves for the inevitable take-back of OUR country.? Godspeed!

More Sabotage:? Feds Order Louisiana to stop building sand berms (Update):

Governor Jindal To Feds: Restart Dredging Operations In Louisiana Now:

?Jones Act?:?
Declaration of Independence:

-----------------------------


?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/hannity/

Fla. Senate candidate Marco Rubio sounds off on government's oil spill mismanagement Send to a Friend |

Feds Halt Gulf Coast Protection Tactic


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:23
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Domingo, 27 de junio de 2010

In a letter to President Obama this week, 87 Senators urged the president to support Israel?s right to self-defense against the threats of terrorism from Hamas and Hezbollah and a nuclear-bound Iran that has repeatedly pledged to wipe Israel off the map. In another time, such counsel would be redundant. For most of Israel?s 60-year existence, the Jewish state has been able to count on the stalwart support of its American ally against the many enemies arrayed against it. As Arab states launched wars with exterminationist intent, and as the international community undermined Israel through the agency of the United Nations, America alone stood in Israel?s corner.

Under President Obama, however, such support for an embattled friend is no longer automatic. As Iran races virtually unimpeded toward a nuclear weapon, the Obama administration scolds Israel for daring to build new houses in its capital of Jerusalem. While Hamas, aided by Turkish jihadists, arms for a new war against Israel, the White House demands that Israel exercise a suicidal restraint. As Israel becomes ever more isolated, the Obama administration continues to reach out to its enemies in the Arab and Muslim world. In their new pamphlet, David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin trace the deterioration of the U.S.-Israeli relationship under President Obama, now at its lowest point in three decades. And they show that by emboldening Israel?s enemies, the administration is sowing the seeds of a new conflict, one will that could make it complicit in a new and devastating war against Israel. As a result of President Obama?s wrongheaded policies, Israel?s security ? and America?s ? is increasingly imperiled.

To read the pamphlet, click here.

To order the pamphlet, click here.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:47
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??
Mugshot
**FILE** Actor Jon Voight (Associated Press)

An open letter to President Obama from Jon Voight

  • ?
An open letter from actor Jon Voight to President Obama:

June 22, 2010

President Obama:

You will be the first American president that lied to the Jewish people, and the American people as well, when you said that you would defend Israel, the only Democratic state in the Middle East, against all their enemies. You have done just the opposite. You have propagandized Israel, until they look like they are everyone's enemy ? and it has resonated throughout the world. You are putting Israel in harm's way, and you have promoted anti-Semitism throughout the world.

You have brought this to a people who have given the world the Ten Commandments and most laws we live by today. The Jewish people have given the world our greatest scientists and philosophers, and the cures for many diseases, and now you play a very dangerous game so you can look like a true martyr to what you see and say are the underdogs. But the underdogs you defend are murderers and criminals who want Israel eradicated.

You have brought to Arizona a civil war, once again defending the criminals and illegals, creating a meltdown for good, loyal, law-abiding citizens. Your destruction of this country may never be remedied, and we may never recover. I pray to God you stop, and I hope the people in this great country realize your agenda is not for the betterment of mankind, but for the betterment of your politics.

With heartfelt and deep concern for America and Israel,

Jon Voight

? Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

?

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:21
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
??

We, the People of the United States of America, demand that impeachment proceedings be initiated

Barack Obama: A Bill of Indictment

?By Alan Caruba??Sunday, June 27, 2010

imageOyez! Oyez! Oyez! All those with business before the court of public opinion will draw near. A bill of indictment has been issued for Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America. It is a call for justice from the people of the United States who allege that he is engaged in the destruction of their nation.

For the court?s consideration, it is alleged:

  • That he secured the office of President by falsely stating he is a natural born citizen of the United States without providing irrefutable documentation and witnesses thereof,
  • That he associated with persons known and unknown to hold anti-American views antithetical to the conduct of his office, to include a convicted felon, an unrepentant former domestic terrorist, among too many others to innumerate,
Why does a company that brings in so much money need a bailout from Congress?
?

  • That he has created an unaccountable level of governmental policy-making with the largest expansion of presidential advisors, ?czars?, in the history of the executive branch,
  • ?

  • That, while in his first six months, he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia and Emperor of Japan, an act that contradicts the primacy of the office of the U.S. presidency,
  • ?

  • That, in contradiction to his sworn duty to protect the nation, he announced the termination of the U.S. space defense system the day after North Korea launched an ICBM,
  • ?

  • That he ordered the release of memos regarding the interrogation of terrorists interned in U.S. facilities at Guantanamo, making known to the Islamist enemies of the nation the manner of their interrogation,
  • ?

  • That he appointed as Secretary of Homeland Security, an individual who ordered that the word ?terrorism? be replaced by the term, ?man made disasters,?
  • ?

  • That, during his first six months in office, he doubled the U.S. national debt, currently at an unsustainable level, threatening the value of the U.S. dollar,
  • ?

  • That he signed into law a ?stimulus? bill, the bulk of whose funds were allocated to government employee unions under the guise of generating millions of new jobs in the private sector,
  • ?

  • That he signed into law a ?Troubled Asset Relief Program? that, contrary to the Constitution, promoted short term private benefit, rather than the general welfare, while evading the constitutional requirement of equal protection, saving some businesses while letting others expire,
  • ?

  • That he by-passed the established legal process of bankruptcy to seize control of General Motors and Chrysler auto manufacturers, benefiting unions to the loss of creditors,
  • ?

  • That, in collusion with the majority leaders of the House of Representatives and the Senate, he initiated and engineered the passage of legislation that nationalized the healthcare industry despite overwhelming opposition by the American People,
  • ?

  • That he has participated in national and international conferences to advocate the discredited theory of global warming and continues to advance Cap-and-Trade legislation based on it; a massive tax on energy use that will undermine the recovery of the economy,
  • ?

  • That he has failed to protect the United States by failing to secure its southern border with Mexico and is threatening to take legal action against Arizona, a sovereign State that has passed legislation in lieu of that failure,
  • ?

  • That he has consistently advocated ?global government? over the sovereignty of the United States,
  • ?

  • That he declared his intention to ?bankrupt? the coal industry, responsible for one half of the electricity generated to serve the needs of Americans,
  • ?

  • That he failed to take immediate and effective action to deter widespread ecological and economic damage to States bordering the Gulf of Mexico following an accident on a BP deepwater oil rig, including a ?moratorium? on oil drilling that threw thousands out of work,
  • ?

  • That he continues to advocate ?a clean energy future? when such energy, solar and wind, exist only because of government subsidies and mandates, are a dangerously unpredictable source of electricity, and produce less than three percent of the electricity generated nationwide,
  • ?

  • That two private investigators have asserted he is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in that State and that the number was issued between 1977 and 1979. Obama?s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins in Oahu, Hawaii,
  • ?

  • And, for these and other hidden records regarding his birth, his overseas travel to Pakistan, college records, medical records, and other means of verifying a legitimate claim to hold the office of the President,
  • We, the People of the United States of America, demand that impeachment proceedings be initiated or that cases pending before the courts be adjudicated at the earliest possible time to prevent further damage to the economy and security of the nation.

    ? Alan Caruba, 2010


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:05
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    S?bado, 26 de junio de 2010
    ??

    aturday, June 26, 2010

    "Manchurian President " Reviewed

    ?
    Buy this book!!!!!!!!!! New Zeal is extensively referenced.

    From?
    Noisy Room.net

    A review of ?THE MANCHURIAN PRESIDENT?

    Barack Obama?s ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists

    By; Aaron Klein, with Brenda J. Elliott

    Reviewed by: FERN SIDMAN


    American journalist, author and radio host, Aaron Klein, along with historian and researcher, Brenda J. Elliott blow the lid off the dome of silence surrounding the Obama administration as they boldly unmask the nation?s 44th president in their latest chilling monograph entitled. ?The Manchurian President: Barack Obama?s Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists? (WND Books ? May 2010). Providing close to 900 footnotes and countless pages of documentation they reveal surreptitious ties to radical leftists of all stripes. If the title of this book sounds at all familiar, it is a takeoff on the 1959 political thriller novel by Robert Condon called ?The Manchurian Candidate? in which the son of a prominent US political family has been brainwashed into being an unwitting assassin for the Communist party.

    While Klein does not infer that President Obama is part of a Communist sleeper cell, he does present an exhaustive investigation into President Obama?s background and his radical ties to pivotal figures in the Communist movement, both inside the White House and out who also happen to be major players in crafting legislation, including the economic stimulus package. This weighty tome weaves a complex spider?s web of a narrative that is replete with a plethora of names and organizations of radical leftists, hitherto unknown by the public who helped shape Obama?s ideology and career.

    Starting with Obama?s childhood affiliation as a Sunday school attendee at the First Unitarian in Honolulu, a radical activist church that not only served as sanctuary for draft dodgers in the 1960s and 70s but had strong links to the even more radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Klein embellishes on the movement that gave birth to the underground terrorist offshoot called the Weathermen. It was through this organization that Obama liaison Bill Ayers achieved fame as a Pentagon bomber-conspirator and a notorious leftist student agitator. Ayers summed up the Weathermen ideology which he referred to as ?an American Red Army? by saying, ?Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents.?

    Klein informs us that Obama worked directly with Ayers in Chicago back in 1988, after Ayers resurfaced from his underground status amid multiple criminal charges related to his extremist activities. The charges were dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct. The two were introduced by Gerald ?Jerry? Kellman, a Marxist acolyte of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, and thus, a professional association was forged as Obama served with the Ayers? run community advocacy coalition called the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools, or ABC. When Obama launched his political career in 1995, the venue for his first fundraiser was the Chicago apartment of Bill Ayers and the two served alongside each other from 1995 to 2000 on a $100 million education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge or CAC.

    Says Klein, ?To underscore Ayers? radical mentality in 1995, while he worked closely with Obama, the unrepentant terrorist gave an interview in that year for author Ron Chepesiuk?s book Sixties Radicals, in which Ayers stated, ?I?m a radical, leftist, small ?c? communist.?

    Following the guidelines of Alinsky-like tactics of working within the system to overthrow the capitalist structure of American government, Klein speaks of Obama?s direct links to the CAC?s role in ?disbursing money through various far-left community organizers, such as ACORN.? Such Socialist led organizations and unions like Project VOTE!, the SEIU (Service Employees International Union), the AFL-CIO (the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations), AFSCME (American Federation of State and County Municipal Employees) and the Apollo Alliance are also directly linked to ACORN and Obama cronies with ?questionable? ties. Quoting from a 2001 book by Jarol B. Manheim, ?The Death of a Thousand Cuts: Corporate Campaigns and the Attack on the Corporation,? Klein says that ?by 1986, ACORN had forged institutional ties with AFL-CIO Central Labor Councils in at least 30 cities? and that ACORN?s ?People?s Platform? included such radical reformist objectives as ?free medical care, a public defender system, the elimination of the state income tax for low income people and higher welfare benefits.?

    Obama?s associations with the Nation of Islam, Black Liberation Theology and black political extremists are also revealed in nuanced detail, as Klein reveals that Obama attended the million man march organized by Nation of Islam leader and rabid Jew hater, Louis Farrakhan. For over 20 years Obama attended the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago where Farrakhan gave guest lectures at the behest of anti-American extremist preacher Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Klein also uncovers the fact that the Nation of Islam was on Obama?s payroll in the early days of his political career and that his senior advisor, David Axelrod also maintained ties to radical Islam through his association as a board member of St. Sabena?s Church in Chicago which served as a haven for black nationalists of the Nation of Islam variety.

    The backgrounds of other key Obama advisors and ?Czars? such as Valerie Jarrett, Van Jones, Andy Stern, Cass Sunstein and John Holdren are also carefully scrutinized by Klein as well as their political leanings and the influence they wield in this current administration. Ghastly epiphanies proliferate, as Klein documents the fact that Communist Party member, Frank Marshall Davis who would become a mentor to the young Barack Obama in Hawaii worked closely with Vernon Jarrett, Valerie Jarrett?s father-in-law in at least three communist dominated organizations in Chicago in the late 1940s. Former Green Jobs Czar Van Jones, who resigned his post in September of 2009, was forced out of his job by allegations of association with a Marxist group during the 1990s. Having been arrested several times during the 90s for political activism, Jones was quoted in a November 2005 interview with the East Bay Express as saying that while in jail, ??I met all these young radical people of color ? I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ?This is what I need to be a part of.??

    ?The Manchurian President? also exposes how Obama?s health-care policy, masked by moderate populist rhetoric, was pushed along and partially crafted by extremists. Some of them reveal in their own words that their principal aim is to achieve corporate socialist goals and a vast increase in government powers.

    Klein was recently quoted on FOX news as saying, ?It is clear that Barack Obama has ties to an anti-American fringe nexus that was instrumental in building his political career from the beginning all the way through now.? He adds that, ?I believe this work is crucial to Americans from across the political spectrum, including mainstream Democrats who should be alarmed that their party has been hijacked by an extreme-left bent on permanently changing the party to fits its radical agenda.?

    This meticulously documented piece of outstanding investigative research is a must read for all good citizens of this great country who are concerned with the future of our cherished freedoms and values.


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:46
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2010/06/j-christian-adams-doj-atty-quits-over.html

    ?

    Saturday, June 26, 2010

    J Christian Adams DOJ Atty Quits Over New Black Panther Dismissal

    In an incident that rocked the foundation of America's voting system, the New Black Panthers stood in front of a Philadelphia polling place and threatened and intimidated voters in the November 2008 elections. The DOJ took the case to court and won a default judgment against the three men when they refused to show at court for five months. Then the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ got involved and attorneys were told to dismiss the case. Rep. Frank Wolfe was prevented from interviewing the trial team. "This whole thing stinks to high heaven," said Wolfe. Now a DOJ trial attorney has resigned over the dismissal, we learned that in May, but now he has made some very provocative accusations. See a video below.

    New Black Panthers
    Look at this quote:
    Most disturbing, the dismissal is part of a creeping lawlessness infusing our government institutions. Citizens would be shocked to learn about the open and pervasive hostility within the Justice Department to bringing civil rights cases against nonwhite defendants on behalf of white victims....Open contempt is voice for these types of cases. ~ J. Christian Adams
    ?J. Christian Adams is a hero in my books. We know this is happening, but of course, we could not prove it. I hope we do not forget this man and this inside information in the coming months. I thank God for him and would put money on others inside the Obama administration feeling the same way.

    From The Washington Times via Velvet Hammer on Twitter and Velvet Hammer Blog?where you can see Eric Holder testifying before the Senate Judiciary committee - testimony which reveals only some groups are protected by American Justice.

    These are the main points of Mr. Adams piece in the Washington Times. You can read the entire article at one of the links above:

    According to Adams:

    1) The dismissal of the Black Panther case "was motivated by a lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law."?


    2) Some in the Department "abetted wrongdoers and abandoned law-abiding citizens victimized by the New black Panthers.

    ?3) Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, Tom Perez "inaccurately" testified to the House Judiciary Committee

    4) "Most corrupt of all, the lawyers who ordered the dismissal - Loretta King, the Obama-appointed acting head of the Civil Rights Division, and Steve Rosenbaum....

    5) Some inside Justice say this is an isolated incident, but other similar cases happened at polling places in Philadelphia, including one targeting Hillary Rodham Clinton. Adams says "the law clearly prohibits even isolated incidents of voter intimidation.

    6) The evidence shows that voters were affected by intimidation, but even if it didn't, the law demands punishment of "an attempt."

    7) Some co-workers argued the law should not be used against black wrongdoers because of the long history of slavery and segregation. "Some called it payback time."

    Note that Mr. Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign gave a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick. Mr. Bull's testimony was not considered and he was not contacted by the Department of Justice.
    "In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll," he declared. "In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi ... I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location." ~ Bartle Bull
    Related and Background:

    DOJ Dismisses Black Panthers: Black Panther Voter Intimidation Dropped

    Black Panthers Win: Voter Fraud Wins: Voter Rights Lose


    Black Panthers at Philadelphia Polling Spot (video)

    J. Christian Adams resignation letter 051910


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:31
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/

    Bombshell: Hawaii Official, Janice Okubo?s birth certificate used to forge Obama?s COLB, Amended Obama?s Records, Got Politifact!?

    The plot thickens! Dr. Ron Polland is reporting that Obama?s COLB was forged using Hawaii Communications Officer, Janice Okubo?s, 2007 issued COLB.? Dr. Polland names 4 other people, among the many, complicit in this long known fraud and cover-up, including Hawaii Governor, Linda Lingle, and, Politifact Reporter, Amy Hollyfield. Can?t forget Factcheck!

    Dr. Polland also reports that Obama?s vital records were amended between 2008-2009.

    Dr. Polland points out; ?for the past two years, Hawaii has refused to confirm that the online COLB copy is a genuine 2007 COLB issued to Obama on June 6, 2007.??? More details and names in the video below? Bonus info below Dr. Polland?s new video?

    ?

    Via TheDrRJP; FRAUD IN THE USA EXCLUSIVE! - Blue Hawaii - Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino?s two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama?s birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification) was issued to him. The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that ?President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website? even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama?s birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery and Fukino knows it! That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH: watch the video to find out the shocking truth. Source.

    ?

    ?

    Faked

    [6/11/10]Dr. Polland?s new report regarding Factcheck.org, Politifact, Hawaii DoH, and Obama?s Organizing for America.

    by Dr. Polland and some; Clear, concise, and clever, ?It?s the conspiracy, Stupid!? takes you behind the scenes of the greatest birth certificate fraud in history and exposes the four groups who collaborated in hiding Obama?s real birth certificate passing off a fake one instead to deceive and defraud the American public. The whole point of calling it a ?wacky conspiracy theory? is to prevent people from finding out what?s really going on. It is no different than the guilty saying they are innocent. For the first time anywhere, here are the facts and evidence gathered during my two year investigation that clearly explains the rationale for doing it, the propaganda they used to pull it off, and the campaign they have mounted to discredit conservatives.

    The first video below is Dr. Pollands? new video report. It?s a must see video!? Previous reports on Dr. Polland can be seen here and here.? Birth Certificate fraud is nothing new in America. [image source]

    ?

    ?

    Dr. Ron Polland?s Playlists; http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=C2281523DF8C0230
    Dr. Ron Polland?s Youtube Channel; http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP

    ?

    ?

    Continue here for BIRTHER REPORT RECAP;


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 19:46
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    ??

    We must now enact a Declaration of Independence from Obama Tyranny

    ?

    ?WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS??

    by Sher Zieve, ?2010

    ?

    Thomas Jefferson was the primary architect of the Declaration of Independence, drafted 234 years ago, almost to the day

    (Jun. 25, 2010) ? Until recently, most people in the United States of America did not believe that Marxist Obama?s mission was actually to destroy our country.? The majority of US citizens believed that?before all else?like other presidents of the United States, Obama would eventually place this country before his and his masters? debauched and perverted desires.? But, Obama is not like other presidents of this country and, it strongly appears, legally he may not be POTUS at all.

    Millions of our countrymen and women have finally awakened to the truth of his dark assignment:? To destroy anything and everything that even remotely resembles America and its delivered promise of freedom and liberty to its citizens and the world.? The Shining City Upon the Hill that President Ronald Reagan spoke about was part of the Obama planned demolition.

    During his farewell speech to the nation, President Reagan said:? ?I?ve spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don?t know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind-swept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace, a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity, and if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That?s how I saw it, and see it still.?

    President Reagan?s Farewell Address to the Nation can be read here.

    That city of which a true President of the United States brilliantly spoke has now been blown up by a defiant radical usurper and, if we are to survive as a nation and a people?or simply survive at all?we will have to rebuild it almost from the ground up.? In order to do so, we will have to rid ourselves of the Marxist traitors to this country who now inhabit and infest the Congressional and Executive branches of government in Washington, D.C. and many of our State elected offices.? If we are to survive and, again, begin to live, we must never allow an anti-human Marxist and/or Maoist contingent to enter any form of government?let alone the office of president.

    The US Declaration of Independence, our nation?s first founding document, tells us what is required of We-the-People.? It reads in part:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

    Of particular significance is the last sentence which I reiterate:? ?That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.?? We can either choose to write a new Declaration of Independence or defer to the resplendent original that tells us what we must now do.

    We-the-People have reached the point of making a decision to live under a now openly spoken-about-by-Obama tyranny or fight?once again?for the right to be free men and women.? As we are being herded more and more every day into the fenced-in Obama dictatorship, you?WE?must now make our choice.? But, before you make your decision, please remember this:? To do nothing is to submit.? We either choose to live in the shining city on the hill or the squalor The Obama has planned for us.

    There is something we can all do now.? Go here to take action.? Then spread the word.

    ? 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

    


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:44
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Viernes, 25 de junio de 2010

    Al-Qaeda Lawyer to Fill Top Justice Department Post

    Jennifer Rubin - 06.25.2010 - 8:39 AM

    The Senate blocked the nomination of Dawn Johnsen, who holds extreme views on everything from abortion to detainee policy, to head the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel. OLC is a key office that renders opinions on key constitutional issues for Justice and the entire government.?Now word comes that an attorney who formerly represented al-Qaeda terrorists will fill the spot. The New York Times reports:

    David J. Barron, the acting head of the Justice Department?s powerful Office of Legal Counsel, will step down next month and be replaced by one of his current deputies, Jonathan G. Cedarbaum, the department said Thursday. ?

    Much of the work of the Office of Legal Counsel is confidential, but over the past 18 months Mr. Barron has handled a variety of issues including wartime questions like how much involvement with Al Qaeda is necessary to make a terrorism suspect subject to detention without trial and domestic matters like whether stalking and domestic violence laws apply to same-sex couples. . .Mr. Barron?s replacement, Mr. Cedarbaum, came to public attention earlier this year after Fox News named him as one of several Justice Department lawyers who had previously advocated for detainees.

    As I?ve previously reported, there are serious concerns regarding conflicts of interest for those who previously represented detainees when they ?switch sides?:

    The limited information the Justice Department has so far released raises real concerns as to whether former advocates for detainees were properly recused from matters involving Guant?namo detainees and policy decisions that would inevitably involve their former clients. Did they violate obligations to former clients by construing their recusal obligations too narrowly? Did they damage their current client, the United States, by shading their advice for the sake of consistency with their prior representation?

    Professor Richard Painter, an ethics expert from the University of Minnesota, wrote to Holder in April raising such issues. He noted, ?There are legitimate concerns about client conflicts for lawyers who previously represented detainees and now work for the Department.? The ?simplest? approach he advised would be to have them recused from all detainee matters. ? Painter explained that there are multiple risks for these attorneys. ?One danger is that you give an issue to the detainee who is convicted. Another is that you actually disclose information [you obtained] from a former client. A third is that the lawyer in an effort to avoid one and two bends over backwards by underrepresenting? the United States. Clients (even the government) have a right to be fully represented.

    If he is appointed to fill the spot on a permanent basis, the Senate should not confirm Cedarbaum until he reveals which cases he has and?will recuse himself from. That he would even be nominated for this position tells us volumes about the Obama-Holder mindset. Their preference for appointing to sensitive positions those attorneys?whose sympathies and efforts were devoted to terrorists should concern us all.


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:41
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    ??
    Friday
    Jun 25th
    ?
    ?
    Soldier Speaks: What about Some Respect From Obama? Print E-mail
    Written by Jonah Knox ??
    Friday, 25 June 2010 06:32
    ?
    ?
    ?
    By Jonah Knox*

    Now that General McChrystal is gone, liberals and conservatives seem to agree that McChrystal did not show sufficient "respect" for President Obama. But what about respect from Obama and his ruling liberal elite for our system, our country, and its values? What about the chain of command that makes Obama answerable to the American people and the system that he is so brazenly attempting to transform into something completely foreign to what our founders intended?

    ??

    ?
    ?

    Whatever differences the liberals and conservatives have on this issue, most commentators agree that General McChrystal-and his aides-should not have said what was in the Rolling Stone interview. The agreement explains why the liberals have won the battle over the long-term fate of the United States of America. They are controlling the debate over what is appropriate and what is not.

    As an Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran who was stationed in the Middle East, I am not a fan of General McChrystal. But that doesn't matter in this situation because the key point is that many of those supposedly on the Right who like General McChrystal nevertheless agreed with the liberals that it was wrong for an active duty general to "undermine" or "disparage" the commander-in-chief. They said that it's something that you just don't do-that it violates the way things are done and breaks rules. What nonsense.

    The liberals in power constantly do things that you are not supposed to do, violate the way things are done, and break rules and laws. The liberals in the White House and Congress have firmly established that the only rule is that there are no rules. And they stand firmly together and applaud themselves for it even as they face no serious consequences for their immorality. So if the Right believed that General McChrystal was the correct guy for the job, they should have rallied around him and defended him, instead of joining with the liberals.

    Here are a few examples of things that we once did not do (and which still break the law or rules) but which the liberals have normalized through unilaterally and unapologetically doing:
    • It is now acceptable to have the police escort a mob of thugs to a banker's home so the mob can terrorize innocent civilians.

    • It is now acceptable to have the New Black Panthers wield weapons outside a voting station in order to increase liberal voter turnout.

    ??

    • It is now acceptable to appoint a homosexual advocate as a "safe schools czar" and boast of it. Those who condemn such perverts and their advocates are deemed "hateful" and of "leading a vicious smear campaign." Telling the truth is now a smear.

    ??

    • It is acceptable for the president to try to force the troops, involved in two wars, to accept open homosexuals in the ranks so that a political special interest group can be appeased.

    ??

    • It is now acceptable to have a U.S. President who is personal friends with a communist terrorist.

    ??

    • It is now acceptable to have a U.S. President who goes around the world "apologizing" for America and debasing it.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable for elected officials such as Senator Harry Reid to disparage our troops and give comfort to the enemy.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to beat an old woman on live TV and "protest" against laws attempting to preserve the last vestiges of morality (see the homosexual reaction to the Proposition 8 measure in California).

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to attack a beauty pageant contestant with the most vulgar of language because she did not completely embrace the sodomite agenda.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to destroy the institution of marriage, even though the institution of marriage is sacred, according to the Bible that tens of millions of Americans still embrace.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to promote sodomy and indoctrinate our children into it.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to slaughter the unborn in the name of "choice."

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to deny and legally subvert the Christian heritage of this nation.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to aid illegal aliens and bring lawsuits against states like Arizona which choose to enforce the law that the federal government refuses to enforce.

    ?

    • It is acceptable to side with foreign invaders and prosecute American citizens who are trying to protect our sovereignty and lives.

    ?

    • It is now acceptable to practice and promote socialism, communism, or statism, or whatever one wants to call it.

    ?

    • It is acceptable to bow down at the altar of Islam and put no preconditions on talking with the most evil of terrorists and regimes.

    ?

    • And it is now acceptable to declare Tea Partiers, proponents of national sovereignty, and other law-abiding citizens of the United States of America "enemies" of the state, even as one allies with communists and Mexican invaders.

    ?

    The liberals do all these things that you are not supposed to do. They break all these laws and rules and more. Yet the Right does not call them on this-at least not with any backbone or conviction.

    And so it is laughable to hear those supposedly on the Right say that while they like General McChrystal and wished that he could have stayed, President Obama had no choice but to ask for his resignation because General McChrystal said things "you just don't say" and was "disrespectful."

    I've known for some time that the Republicans are a spineless joke but now it appears that the conservatives are, too.

    ?

    There are no rules of "civility" any longer. One must simply fight if one hopes to win this war. But it does not appear that the Right will be able to do this because the Right cannot identify that there is a war, doesn't realize that there are no rules of engagement, and cannot even identify who the domestic enemy is.

    And so the liberals will keep talking about General McChrystal's forced resignation and what other courses of action will now follow. But the key point will never be discussed and never even be realized.

    But it remains the key point nonetheless: unless the Right stops condemning people like General McChrystal, whose contempt for the President he voted for is obviously shared within the ranks, the Right will ensure that it will stay on the defensive. The complete destruction of the nation will inevitably follow.

    *Jonah Knox is the pseudonym for a noncommissioned officer and analyst in the United States Army Reserves. He is an Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran who recently returned from an eight-month active duty tour in Iraq where he helped in the counter-improvised explosive device (C-IED) fight. Mr. Knox has also worked for the Army as a civilian contractor

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:27
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Martes, 22 de junio de 2010

    General McChrystal: Now is your time to stand up for your country

    ?

    COMMANDER OF NATO FORCES ?CALLED HOME? BY FUHRER OBAMA?WILL HE BOW TO THE IMPOSTOR OR DEFEND THE REPUBLIC?

    by Sharon Rondeau

    ?

    General Stanley A. McChrystal was given his current assignment in Afghanistan just over a year ago on June 15, 2009, by the man usurping the presidency. Therefore, his appointment and all other military appointments and directives have been illegally given and followed.

    (Jun 22, 2010) ? A?report?today stated that Obama has ?recalled? General Stanley McChrystal,commander?of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, after the publication of an interview in Rolling Stone magazine in which the generalcriticized??several top U.S. officials and said he felt betrayed by the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan.?? Excerpts from the article can be read?here.

    McChrystal has since?apologized?for his comments, citing ?bad judgment.?

    But did McChrystal really use bad judgment?

    Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has already?conveyed??his deep disappointment in the piece and the comments.?? And even though McChrystal reportedly?voted?for Obama, he was?chastised?last fall for asking for more troops from the usurper-in chief, which apparently amounted to a grave offense in the mind of Fuhrer Obama.

    General McChrystal, I and millions of Americans now say to you:

    Your ?special assistant,? Duncan Boothby, who?arranged?the Rolling Stone interview, has resigned.? Your immediate supervisor, Admiral Mullen, has thrown you under the bus.? At the meeting you are expected to attend?tomorrow, the dictator-in-chief will most likely excoriate and fire you in shades reminiscent of Josef Stalin and Adolf Hitler.

    You are serving under a tin-pot usurping dictator from Africa who is no more American than the Muslim religion he promotes and tries at every turn to appease.

    You, sir, took the following oath when you became an officer:

    I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.?(DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

    You can rescue this country from a tyrannical, megalomaniacal, ineligible, fraudulent Chicago thug. right now. You have the ability to do it at your meeting with all of the other bad actors who know that Obama is ineligible to serve.? Of course there was going to be a difference of?opinion?between them and you:? as a foreign-born domestic enemy, Obama cares nothing for this country and will do the same thing to you that he did to your predecessor, General?McKiernan:? oust you in what he hopes will be a disgrace.? What will happen to your pension then?

    There is therefore nothing to lose in challenging his authority to hold the office he has fraudulently seized.? He wasn?t born in Hawaii, but instead was born a dual citizen which alone is enough to disqualify him.? He is no more a ?natural born Citizen? than Arnold Schwarzenegger or Bobby Jindal.? If you can criticize him in an interview, you can do it to his lying, conniving face.

    This is an opportunity for you to relieve this nation of the horrors of the last 16 months in which a foreigner who hates America and everything about her has wrought the worst kind of abuse on every single citizen of this country.? Contrary to what the mainstream?media?says, he has no authority to fire you because he is illegitimate.? Instead of going along with this charade, you can end it tomorrow.? Stand up to the usurper, challenge his eligibility publicly, and force him to demonstrate his eligibility.? We all know that he cannot do it.

    General, ABC News has reported that you were ?disappointed? in your first meeting with Obama after he was illegally installed in the White House.? Well, we, the American people, will be even more disappointed if you do not uphold your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and confront this usurper who is like a cancer on our nation.? Or are you part of the corrupt military establishment which has carried on this national nightmare in which our republic is systematically being destroyed?

    You have a choice.? You could assume the distinct honor of demanding the arrest of Obama and all of his illegitimate cronies tomorrow.? You could use this opportunity to save America, or you can continue to play along with Obama?s pretense of eligibility and authority because it is the easy way out.?? Which will it be?

    Which will it be, General?

    ????????

    Editor?s Note:? According to a Twitter?post?picked up by Time Magazine and then CNN, McChrystal has ?offered to resign.?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ? 2010,?The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.



    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:30
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Lunes, 21 de junio de 2010

    I've been thinking about the way the president takes care of America
    June 21, 2010
    Marie Jon, RA analyst

    I've been thinking and thinking about the way President Barack Obama has been taking care of our country. And my emotional reaction has been one of sadness, anger, shock, disgust, and dismay.

    For most Americans, as well, the news of the day has become a bit too much concerning the state of the Union. We feel abandoned, bullied, pushed, and intimidated by our "historical" president. Dare I say he seems to have some issues?

    Frankly, Obama's recent address to the nation did little more than add insult to injury. He gave no answers that made any sense. He only became "wee weed up" while spending a great deal of his time telling us we can no longer depend on oil and shamelessly pandering his green energy propaganda.

    Outmoded fear-mongering

    On Hannity the other evening, my colleague Erik Rush nailed it
    while discussing his new book titled Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal ? America's Racial Obsession. The Democrat Party purposefully misleads people of color by reinforcing their fears, Erik pointed out. And certain pastors in the black community do the same, he noted. Within too many of the sanctuaries of black churches, the congregants are made to feel that the world is against them. From the pulpit, these same pastors will look to government, rather than to God's instruction for taking personal responsibility. In John 10:10, Christ says, "I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." The apostle John writes, "Beloved, I wish above all things that you may prosper and be in health, even as your soul prospers" (3 John 1:2).

    We were told throughout Obama's campaign that if it were possible, he would bring racially-diverse Americans closer together than ever before. I viewed this promise as empty rhetoric because, like my friend Erik, I do not believe for one moment that America is deeply embedded in racial problems. We moved forward a long time ago. Americans intermarry and raise wonderful children together. And anyone can be whatever he or she chooses to be when they are willing to put their mind and effort to it. This is 2010, and we're not gawking at the color of each others' skin.

    However, ever since the Obamas moved into the White House, we've heard ? with incessant racial-mindedness ? something much different. Americans of all nationalities and ethnicities on the conservative side are not going to tolerate or embrace the progressives' downtrodden, race-baiting lies being tossed out in the public arena. We're in touch with the heart of America. The radical liberals are not.
    Have you seen the recent polls?

    Bigotry masquerading as religion

    When Rev. Jeremiah Wright first stepped onto the political scene, he opened the door to unabashed bigotry. For the very first time, most Americans were shocked to learn about Black Liberation theology. It had nothing to do with biblical Christianity whatsoever. It was about hatred of others who happened to be of European white descent. Liberation theology also has to do with being anti-Semitic.

    There in an ungodly mix is a theology that demands a payback of sorts. It's about what some white and black people did during the very distant past days of slavery. And sadly, in the minds of some, it does not matter what was accomplished during the Civil War. It does not matter what Martin Luther King, Jr., accomplished in the 60's as Americans came together for heart-felt healing.

    Today, we actually do have open bigotry. Let's call it out where it exists. It emanates from those who want to continually live off the bygone past. There are race baiters within the worlds of politics, media, and faith. The number of such radicals serving with the president is staggering. We should be more outraged. We need to ask why other politicians continue to give this president and his corrupt cabinet any respect, much less the time of day.

    Marxists posing as Christians

    Pastors of many denominations are in close contact with Rev. Jim Wallis, an openly avowed socialist/Marxist who is a member of President Obama's "Faith Council" and is described as a spiritual adviser to the president. These pastors are behind the scenes busily helping the president. They're defiantly cheering Obama on as he becomes more unbending and aloof in his thoughts. Yes, he is a master at working out a very successful strategy of redistribution of wealth, or what is cleverly called "social justice." If anyone of importance says one word against the president or his big-government policies, they are demonized.

    Americans need to understand the destructive role that churches and pastors of once-conservative denominations are playing. They have allowed progressives into their fold and given them high offices within their churches. They stand ready to help re-elect Obama. They will gladly help him pass his green agenda ? Cap and Trade. These denominations are no longer America's friend. The United Council of Churches consists of little more than progressive ideologues. They neither love their country nor respect the Word of God. They are on the side of tyranny. Any denomination that mirrors their teachings should be viewed with suspicion. "While I pray that God will have mercy on their souls, we must show them no mercy politically. They are but another well-organized group of traitors to this nation" ? Erik Rush.

    Excerpts from "What Exactly Is 'Social Justice'?"

    In a May 16 article at American Thinker, Jayme Sellards writes:

    "
    The term 'social justice' is now commonly used by leftist activists, clergy, educators, judges, and politicians to describe the goal they seek to achieve with many of their policies. No precise definition of 'social justice' is ever offered by the left. Instead, the term is always used in a vague way ? as if everyone already knows, or should know, what the seemingly well-intentioned phrase 'social justice' means.

    "So, what exactly is 'social justice'?

    "Social justice is the complete economic equality of all members of society. While this may sound like a lofty objective, what it really means is that wealth should be collected by the government and evenly distributed to everyone. In short, social justice is communism. It is rooted in the Marxist idea that the
    money people make and the property they own do not rightfully belong to the people who make the money and own the property." Full Article

    Deceptive faith

    It seems that when faith and the biblical gospel message should be at the apex in rebuilding America's moral and material stamina, we as a nation are thrown into more chaos. To understand what is happening to our country, we need to understand Obama's faith. Only then will our eyes see our unfortunate destiny.

    The president will not handle our foreign allies with dignity or respect because he has none for them. It's absolutely shameful how Israel has been treated by this president and his czarist administration.
    Matters of a deceptive faith held by the president have everything to do with why our country is being purposely trashed and dismantled.

    Welcome to Obama's America. How do you like socialism?
    The progressive, quasi-Christian faith of Black Liberation Theology will lead our country right into the throes of Marxism. And let it be known that Obama has never denounced his anti-Christian belief system. So please, Mr. President, do not talk about Jesus Christ to born-again Christians who have the gift of discernment. You're not up to their spiritual "pay grade."

    Plenty to fear

    As we wrestle with the fact that a once-thriving free-market society has been taken to the woodshed by a narcissistic, vengeful man, there is plenty of fear to go around. How does one reckon with a president who personally believes he has the right to mete out social justice to all of America?

    How is social justice applied? In plain English, the process is denigrating. It takes away personal liberties, property, and money from hard-working people and fritters them away in big government programs steeped in nebulous, sweeping agendas. It reaches across the abyss to punish an entire nation.

    This mindset belongs to a president who wants to force a new view upon our country in a short period of time. Obama is changing America's image for his own sake and in dogmatic deference to those who've shaped his way of thinking. His father was a communist and his mother was a Marxist sympathizer.

    Look what the tide brought in

    Week after week, we see disaster looming on the horizon. America's president can't be counted on to tackle an emergency such as the BP oil spill. It's now become a scandalous nightmare for both man and animal.

    Where was Obama's concern for the people?
    What about the beautiful helpless creatures that are dying from the thick sludge? So much for the care of Mother Earth!

    Thirteen anxious, committed foreign countries and the UN stand ready to help with the rescue effort ? yet the president has turned them away. And for what reason wouldn't he waive the
    Jones Act? Regardless of the spin Vice President Joe Biden gives, there have been no overtures from the White House to clear the way so foreign vessels will feel comfortable committing their time and energy to help clean up the mess.

    People believe that Obama's hesitation to allow other nations to help us clean up the spill has more to do with big unions than the constraints of federal laws that a president can set aside when need be, as President G.W. Bush did during the Katrina disaster. Who in a rational state of mind would behave so unconscionably? Obama is instrumental in the destruction of our ecological system, along with people's livelihoods.

    What type of a man would willfully turn down desperately needed help that could spare our ocean and shores and secure our wildlife? Here is a picture of a man we need to vote out of office. He and his so-called "social justice" have done enough to bring this magnificent country to its knees.

    Marie's Choice Song:
    YouTube ? "The National Anthem" USA (Tim Davis)

    Related Readings:

    Not again! Meet Obama's new controversial pastor

    The Green Shepherd | The Weekly Standard American Thinker

    American Thinker: Obama and Oil: Greasing America's Decline

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:10
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Domingo, 20 de junio de 2010
    ??
    "Obama tells Kyl in private Oval Office meeting: I won?t secure border b/c then Republicans will have no reason to support ?comprehensive immigration reform.?
    ?
    Saturday, June 19th at 8:47PM EDT

    On June 18, 2010, Arizona Republican Senator Jon Kyl told the audience at a North Tempe Tea Party town hall meeting that during a private, one-on-one meeting with President Obama in the Oval Office, the President told him, regarding securing the southern border with Mexico, ?The problem is, . . . if we secure the border, then you all won?t have any reason to support ?comprehensive immigration reform.?? [Audible gasps were heard throughout the audience.] Sen. Kyl continued, ?In other words, they?re holding it hostage. They don?t want to secure the border unless and until it is combined with ?comprehensive immigration reform.??

    Sen. Kyl also said he reminded President Obama that the President and the Congress has an obligation, a duty, to secure the border.

    watch video...


    (This part of Sen. Kyl?s remarks begins at the 3:17 mark of the video below.)
    ??
    ?

    ?

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:14
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    Obama working for communism
    ?
    Saturday, June 19, 2010

    Bart Sullivan (Public Forum, June 14) cruelly attacked Brenda Corbin, ignoring that President Barack Obama, his czars and Democratic Party lackeys do hate a free America and are attempting to establish a Communist regime. Did Obama acquire a Communist doctrine from Bill Ayers and other Communist associates?

    An FBI agent who infiltrated the Ayers? Weather Underground in 1982 asked what is going to happen after they conquer America. How will they rule?

    Ayers? group answered that ?the Cubans, North Koreans, North Vietnamese, Communist Chinese and Russians would want to occupy different portions of the United States.? They then need to establish re-education centers in the Southwest where people needing re-education can be taken.

    Ayers? group was asked, ?What will you do with people that cannot be re-educated, diehard capitalists?? They answered that an estimated 25 million such diehards will be eliminated, ?killed.?

    These are the methods of Mao Zedong, Josef Stalin, Fidel Castro and other Communist dictators. Obama, brainwashed from infancy, and his Communist appointees are more surreptitious.

    Obama?s Democratic-passed 2,300 page health care plans hire 16,000 additional IRS agents to audit your monthly finances and establish control of citizens. Death panels ration life or death health care. Obama?s Democratic House passed ?carbon tax? legislation now being pressed in the U.S. Senate that subdues by taxes industries they are incapable of operating. Obama Communists perceive that the power to tax and regulate is better than ownership.

    About one-half of U.S. citizens pay no income taxes and believe Obama?s promised free ride at the expense of higher income workers. Their standard of living will crumble with high energy and medical taxes, rationed health care, high interest rates and high unemployment from Obama?s mismanagement.

    Will you vote for your children?s inheritance to be massive debt and an oppressive, murderous, Communist regime?

    HOWARD D. MOYE JR.

    Greenville


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:51
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    Obama and Holder: YOU have NO standing to ask any questions!

    ?

    DICTATOR OBAMA

    by JB Williams, ?2010

    ?

    Is this man even an American citizen, let alone "natural born"?

    (Jun. 20, 2010) ? No matter the political agenda of any American citizen, one reality should send shivers down every American?s spine. The Obama regime has made it known that according to their form of ?justice,? NO soldier or citizen has ?legal standing? to question anything about Obama, his eligibility, his many corrupt friends, his anti-American policies or his full-court press to destroy all things American.

    Barack Hussein Obama remains a complete mystery. His birth, college, travel, passport records and entire personal history remain under lock and key unlike any president before him. His policies have proven destructive to the US economy and US sovereignty and security as well as both states? and individual rights.

    The Obama regime is operating like a pure dictatorship at odds with the vast majority of American citizens.? Regardless? of which peaceful course of redress the people attempt, they have repeatedly been informed that they have ?NO STANDING? to ask any questions.

    Lt. Colonel Terrence Lakin

    LTC Lakin is not a private fresh out of boot camp who lost his nerve for the field of battle and refused to comply with deployment orders. He is a senior officer who stands charged with upholding his oath:

    I ? do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, so help me God.

    As reported by Family Security Matters,?LTC Lakin?s numerous awards and decorations include the Army Flight Surgeon Badge, Combat Medical Badge, the Bronze Star Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with three Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Achievement Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the National Defense Service Medal with Bronze Service Star, the Armed Forces Expedition Medal, the Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon sixth award and the NATO service medal.?He has served previously in Honduras, Bosnia, Korea, and Afghanistan.

    Until very recently, his senior command described him as ?an extremely talented, highly knowledgeable senior Army clinician with significant field and consultant experience??

    Like all military officers, Lakin is obligated under his oath to question his command when he suspects that the orders being given are in any way ?unlawful.? Unlawful orders would most certainly include orders given by an ?unlawful? Commander-in-Chief.

    Yet LTC Lakin risks court martial for attempting to uphold his officer?s oath, and he is indeed guilty of attempting to uphold his oath. He is prepared to present what he believes to be clear and convincing evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a ?lawful? Commander-in-Chief. An increasing number of soldiers and citizens agree, but it is LTC Lakin who faces charges, not the illegal Command.

    LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III

    Most Americans know only this definition of the word ?riot?:

    a noisy, violent public disorder caused by a group or crowd of persons, as by a crowd protesting against another group, a government policy, etc., in the streets;

    But the thuggish, Obama-run justice system prefers to use this definition of ?riot? as a means to silence all voices of dissent:

    a disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons;

    This definition provides very broad powers to law enforcement anytime three or more persons gather in public for any purpose. Under this definition, any public assembly of three or more individuals can be accused of participating in or inciting a ?riot.?

    Such was the case on April 1, 2010, when LCDR Fitzpatrick attempted to effect a citizen?s arrest of local officials whom he accuses of corruption and obstruction in Monroe County, TN.

    When a small group of supporters showed up to videotape the citizen?s arrest in Monroe County, Fitzpatrick found himself arrested and charged with ?committing actual RIOT? ? resisting arrest (better described as resisting assault) ? interrupting an [illegal] meeting, and disorderly conduct.

    Fortunately, videotape of the incident is available on YouTube which clearly demonstrates that these charges are false. LCDR Fitzpatrick sought peaceful redress via a criminal complaint filed with the Monroe County Grand Jury more than a year earlier. Tennessee law supports the actions of Mr. Fitzpatrick, but evidence of local corruption brought to light through his efforts has made him the target of judicial vengeance in his local community.

    LCDR Fitzpatrick has since been arrested a second time on June 8, 2010, a retaliation from the Monroe County Grand Jury which has added two felony charges to the previous misdemeanors dated April 1.

    Taking a page right out of Obama?s Southern Poverty Law Center book on ?domestic terrorism,? the Monroe County Grand Jury is now claiming that Fitzpatrick is acting against illegal Grand Jury Foreman Gary Pettway on the basis of ?race? in violation of civil rights laws.

    Of course, unlike his accusers, Fitzpatrick has spent decades defending the United States in uniform, working alongside soldiers of all races and religions in the common defense of the American way of life. Further, Pettway is far from the only individual whom Fitzpatrick has accused of criminal wrongdoing, although he is the only ?black? individual listed in Fitzpatrick?s criminal complaint. All others are white.

    LCDR Fitzpatrick has uncovered numerous violations of Tennessee law in the existing justice system operating in Monroe County. He possesses very compelling evidence to support his accusations of corruption and obstruction in Monroe County.

    On the basis of recently uncovered evidence concerning Jury Foreman Gary Pettway and Foreperson Angela Davis, Fitzpatrick is openly accusing the Monroe County justice system of ?jury rigging? in addition to his past charges of corruption and obstruction.

    This entire ongoing circus is the direct result of Fitzpatrick?s efforts to present evidence against Barack Hussein Obama in a courtroom allegedly intended for just such a purpose. He is scheduled to face his accused (and accusers) in Monroe County court on June 28, 2010.

    Major General Paul Vallely

    Former FOX News military analyst Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (Ret.) is openly calling for the immediate resignation of Barack Hussein Obama and all of his co-conspirators in his regime and Congress:

    Being a representative republic, not a democracy, ?rising up? means something other than revolution by means of arms. The people must ?rise up? from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power?resignation, natural death, elections, and impeachment.

    ?We the People? have had enough. The Obama Administration and identifiable Members of Congress are now on a death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office.?

    ?We, the People? cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen?s interests above self-interest by resigning immediately. Therefore the ?people? must decide. A civil uprising is brewing. We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA Barack Hussein Obama)?based on Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty, and Violation of the US Oath of Office and the Constitution.

    This is as serious as it gets, folks!

    Career military officers face jail sentences for their efforts to stand by their oaths.

    These are not young soldiers who have had a change of heart about serving in a forward combat position. These are decorated career officers who have more than earned the right to ask who Barack Hussein Obama really is and why he seems bent upon destroying the greatest nation ever known to mankind.

    Whether you like Obama?s political leap into global socialism or not, no decent American citizen or soldier can afford to tolerate the idea that these brave men have ?no standing? to demand a ?lawful? command. We the People cannot afford to let these men fall victim to a corrupt government intent upon imprisoning them for attempting to uphold their oaths.

    This isn?t about any single individual, including Barack Obama or Barry Soetoro, or whatever name or social security number he is operating under this month.

    This is about the US Constitution and American justice.

    Every American citizen, but especially those who have served in uniform have not only the right, but the responsibility to demand answers to questions from which Obama has been running since 2004.

    Candidate for US Senate Barack Obama was quite proud to refer to himself as ?Kenyan-born.? But presidential candidate Barack Obama has since insisted that he is American-born and meets the constitutional eligibility requirements for the office of Commander-in-Chief. One of the two stories is not true?

    A growing number of decorated officers are stepping forward to demand answers that Obama is ill-prepared to give. I personally believe that there is no actual birth certificate from Hawaii and that this is the reason he has spent more than $2 million in legal fees to avoid making that birth certificate public. I also believe that he cannot meet Article II, Section 1 requirements for the Oval Office no matter where he was born.

    As a writer who has done extensive research on Barack Obama and the subject of ?natural born Citizen,? I am completely convinced that these military heroes and others like them are right to question the legitimacy of their command. There can be no legitimate orders from an illegitimate Commander-in-Chief. Every order would be illegal.

    God help us if the American people fail to stand with these men who demand answers to their very legitimate questions. If we allow the corrupt justice system to jail these men, then that system will be free to jail any individual who dares to question elected officials in support of the Law of this Land.

    If the people allow these men to fall prey to this corrupt government, they will stand alone against this government in the end.

    The time for true patriots to stand and be counted has arrived.

    Obama MUST answer these charges or NO citizen will be free.

    ? 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:39
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Jueves, 17 de junio de 2010
    ??

    Thursday, June 17, 2010

    Obama to Demand Americans Allow Him Even More Theft of their Earnings?

    ?
    by Sher Zieve - June 15, 2010

    After almost two months of doing little-to-nothing to take charge of the BP oil rig explosion and continuing leakage of millions of gallons of oil, Obama has been to the disaster area several times in the past 2 weeks. Note: Under both the US Clean Water Act and the Oil Pollution Act the POTUS is responsible for taking charge of the catastrophe.

    Since grabbing the office of the President of the United States, Obama and the Democrat-run Congress have passed one bill after another that had the real ? if not truthfully expressed ? purpose of stealing from the American people. The "stimulus" bills have done nothing to stimulate jobs but, have done a great deal to place monies in Democrat leaders pockets, war chests and have enriched the coffers of other countries; China comes readily to mind. The Obama has seemingly paid off and continues to pay off his Chicago cronies, his labor union thugs (most notably SEIU) to intimidate a number of "ObamaEnemies" and much of the leftist judicial system to continue to 'illegally' block anything he does not want to have made public. Congressional Democrats are STILL passing one bill after another (marked as "stimulus" or "emergency spending" bills) that amount to abject theft from the American taxpayers; that's We-the-People.

    But, most egregious and wicked of all is the way in which The Obama has used, and continues to use, the Gulf of Mexico Oil catastrophe for what inescapably appears to be his own crooked and depraved purposes. Wildlife are now said to be dying in the hundreds, perhaps thousands. However, We-the-People may never know the real magnitude of this latest horror as the Obama regime is now regulating ALL news from the area and is allowing NO photographs to be made by the media and beaches have been largely scrubbed clean by crews before The Obama has affected his Louisiana photo-ops.

    Utah's Spectrum reports "The Coast Guard and FAA have denied flights booked by news photographers looking to shoot aerial pictures of the spill. The Department of Homeland Security nixed a visit by a group of reporters who were to be escorted into the waters by Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. A reporter and photographer from the Daily News of New York were denied access to a public beach on Grand Isle, La. ? one of the most heavily affected areas, or so we are told ? by a BP Oil contractor, who then called the local sheriff, who escorted them from the area. And, last month, a CBS News crew was threatened with arrest for trying to shoot video of a soiled beach."

    Note: Although couching it as BP's 'controlling the area,' BP has no power or authority to dictate anything, whatsoever, to either the US Coast Guard or the US FAA. But, of course, the US dictator-in-chief does; and only he does.

    As we know, one of the Obama regime's mottoes is "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." Therefore, during TV Prime Time Tuesday 15 June, The Obama is expected to tell the American people that they 'must sacrifice even more,' in order to keep another oil spill disaster from occurring. Obama is said to have planned a demand that Americans now allow him and the Obama-controlled Congress to push through the newly named "America's Power Act" ? formerly known as "Cap & Trade." Note: Remember, this catastrophe would never have occurred if the Leftist Environmentalists hadn't lobbied incessantly for 'no shallow oil drilling, only deep...deep...sea drilling' to be allowed. In that sense, as the Left is The Obama's base, Obama is responsible. It's his people that caused and forced the problem to occur, in the first place.

    Secondly, the patent and disgusting arrogance of Obama and his Marxist Dems ? both his Czars and his Congress ? demanding of the American people that they allow ALL of these miscreants to dig deeper into their pockets and control them even more (Obama: "Energy rates will necessarily skyrocket").

    After the passage, over the unwilling minds and bodies of the American people, of ObamaCare ? which controls who will be allowed to live and who MUST die ? Cap & Trade (or "America's Power Act") will effectively and most likely irrevocably end our Republic and the USA as we have known it. No more liberty, no more freedom. No more money, decreased mobility. Obama Government control of our minds, bodies, travel and the ability to heat and cool our houses in our now-completely regulated homes. Did you know The Obama wants to shove through the licensing (H.R. 2454) of homes, so the ObamaGov will determine how And if you can sell your own property. OOPS! Make that "Obama's property."

    Have you had enough America? Can We-the-People even last until November? Or will The Obama and his Marxist Dems destroy us all before then? Isn't it time to finally rise up against this increasingly violent tyranny? Isn't it???

    BP's [Obama's] controlling of facts more dangerous than oil spill:
    http://www.thespectrum.com/article/20100612/OPINION/6120312/BP+s+controlling+of+facts+more+dangerous+than+oil+spill

    Media claim access to spill site has been limited:
    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hJlgFI9Bf1mqu8Q8tmq-jOYa79GAD9G0V1B81

    Stimulus Money sent Overseas:
    http://investigativereportingworkshop.org/investigations/wind-energy-funds-going-overseas/story/renewable-energy-money-still-going-abroad/

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:38
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    WHY HAS ARIZONA BEEN VILIFIED FOR

    WANTING TO PROTECT ITS CITIZENS?


    ?

    by Stevex09, blogging at http://stevex09.wordpress.com/

    (Jun. 17, 2010) ? The United States is a much different place than it was 20 years ago. It is still the best place to live in spite of a massive, ever-expanding government that?s seeking to control every facet of American life. Those within our government are frauds and tax cheats and are trying to bankrupt the United States and break down America?s sovereignty. The words of General Douglas MacArthur are ringing very true:

    I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.

    In checking the latest news concerning the Arizona Immigration Law, I see that the city of Sacramento is boycotting Arizona in an attempt to hurt the state?s economy. One Sacramento city councilman, Rob Fong, said, ?For those who would criticize us for using our time to address this critical issue in our country?s history, I would say this:? ?How can we not??? Then Fong added, ?I?ve never been more proud of us? and said the city was ?standing on the right side of history.?

    ?The right side of history.? What???? It becomes more evident to me every day why liberals defend evolution. They have to have evolved from apes. The problem is they must still be evolving because they haven?t quite caught up with the rational reasoning that a fully-developed human has.

    While the freaks in bankrupt California are trying to hurt the economy of Arizona, the violence of Mexican drug smugglers and human traffickers along the Arizona-Mexico is so bad that about 3,500 acres in Arizona is closed to American citizens. And what is the response of the Obama regime to this? Suspend the construction of the fence along the border. We have a faux president, an occupant in the White House who is so far out of touch with the American citizenry that it?s incomprehensible. His regime will not enforce the law; instead,? Obama sends in his thugs from the Department of Jihad (Justice) to file a lawsuit against the state of Arizona. This is in spite of the fact that there are already five federal lawsuits pending that are covering every conceivable Constitutional issue. This is typical Chicago- style bullying on the part of the Obama regime.

    The worst part about all this is that the entire Congress, Supreme Court and the ?elite? in the military know about the fraud in the White House. They are complicit in one of the greatest frauds perpetrated on the American people. As the violence continues in Arizona against American citizens by illegal aliens, the Obama? regime and all those responsible for allowing him in office are also responsible for the deaths, rapes and kidnappings occurring in Arizona.

    ? 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:18
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Mi?rcoles, 16 de junio de 2010

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/perfect-storm-for-constitutional-crisis.html

    Wednesday, June 16, 2010

    The Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis! Where are the Patriots of today in Congress?

    ?

    Commander Kerchner;?The 'Cone of Silence' continues in Washington DC. There apparently are no real statesman or Citizens with courage left in Washington DC who value the Constitution and adhere to the common core values that built our nation. All we have left in DC apparently are a bunch of cowardly corrupt politicians who think only of their own hide and are being intimidated by a bunch of Chicago mafia gangster type politicians who are corrupting and destroying the USA and all our institutions and systems further and further each and every day. Where are the Patriots of today in Congress? We need people in Congress to speak up about the conman/grifter, liar, and criminal in the Oval Office. Is there no one left in Congress to talk about and call for Congressional hearings on the elephant in the room in DC that everyone in power is choosing to ignore, Obama's lack of Article II Constitutional eligibility? Is the RNC leadership, which sold out to Obama and the DNC leadership in the 2008 election to get a pass for McCain to run unfettered by questions about his natural born Citizenship status because of his birth in Panama, going to continue to protect the Usurper-in-Chief even at the risk of seeing the country and our legal system and institutions destroyed before their eyes. And then there is the major media shilling for and covering up for Obama every day. It's a national disgrace. The "4th Estate" of our government is totally in that tank for Obama and has been from day one, all to protect their "chosen one". They enabled this monster to take control of the USA. How they can look in the TV camera each day and spew out their Obama eligibility cover up stories is totally beyond me considering all the evidence that is now out there that demands an investigation of Obama's early life and hidden records. Obama's life narrative is nothing more than a self-created fabrication. It's all lies. I will keep fighting the battle in the courts until justice is served or we learn that even our U.S. Supreme Court has been intimidated by Obama. After that it is up to We the People.

    Much more?here;?http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/i-believe-fix-was-in-for-2008-election.html

    Charles Kerchner
    Commander USNR (Retired)
    Lead Plaintiff
    Kerchner v Obama & Congress
    http://www.protectourliberty.org
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com
    ####



    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 23:39
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    ??

    Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely: We need to demand resignations of Obama, his cabinet, and members of Congress

    ?

    ?THIS HAS NEVER OCCURRED BEFORE IN AMERICA?

    by Sharon Rondeau

    ?

    Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (Ret.) is the founder of www.standupamericaus.com, a multimedia organization which promotes constitutional principles and a strong national defense.

    (Jun. 16, 2010) ? Paul E. Vallely, Major General, US Army (Ret.) was born in DuBois, PA. He retired in 1992 from the US Army as Deputy Commanding General, US Army, Pacific in Honolulu, Hawaii. General Vallely graduated from the US Military Academy at West Point and was commissioned in the Army in 1961, serving a distinguishing career of 32 years. He served in many overseas theaters to include Europe and the Pacific Rim Countries as well as two combat tours in Vietnam. He has served on US security assistance missions on civilian-military relations to Europe, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Indonesia and Central America with in-country experience in Indonesia, Colombia, El Salvador, Panama, Honduras and Guatemala.

    General Vallely is a graduate of the Infantry School, Ranger and Airborne Schools, Jumpmaster School, the Command and General Staff School, The Industrial College of the Armed Forces and the Army War College. His combat service in Vietnam included positions as infantry company commander, intelligence officer, operations officer, military advisor and aide-de-camp. He has over fifteen (15) years? experience in Special Operations, Psychological and Civil-Military Operations.

    He has served as a consultant to the Commanding General of the Special Operations Command as well as the DOD Anti-Drug and Counter-Terrorist Task Forces. He also designed and developed the Host-Nation Support Program in the Pacific for the DOD and the State Department. He has in-country security assistance experience in Israel, Iraq, Kuwait, El Salvador, Colombia and Indonesia in the development of civil-military relations interfacing with senior level military and civilian leadership.

    General Vallely has been a military analyst on television and radio for over nine years. He is a guest lecturer on National Security matters and the War against Global Jihad. He co-authored the books ?Endgame ? Blueprint for Victory for Winning the War on Terror,? ?Warfooting? and ?Baghdad Ablaze.? He is a member and founder of the Iran Policy Committee. He was the senior military analyst for the Fox News Channel from 2000 -2007. His new book, ?Operation Sucker Punch,? was released in January 2009. He is Chairman of Stand Up America and Co-Chairman of Veteran Defenders of America.

    He and his wife, Marian, are the co-trustees of the Scott Vallely Soldiers Memorial Fund and reside in Montana.

    MRS. RONDEAU: I heard the broadcast on Chalice?s show last Monday wherein General Cash and you called for having Obama and his regime removed from office.? How do you think the American people could get that done?

    GEN. VALLELY: When you go back to the Constitution, it says that it?s the people?s right to remove a government, hopefully through a peaceful process.? If you look at what?s out there, as far as the people and the government are concerned, there are only about four ways for a peaceful transfer of power.? One way, of course, is through the elections.? The second is to demand resignation, where the people actually demand that a sitting president resign as they did when the pressure was put on Richard Nixon, for example.? Now with that pressure and declining popularity dipping into 40% support, then 30, then 20%?basically, it?s a no-confidence vote of the people that this executive is not doing the job for America.? So then you have the demand-resignation pressure that could occur on the part of the people of the country, and other leadership, corporate as well as political, that could create a tremendous demand that this administration resign.? And I?m not talking only about Obama resigning for incompetence, corruptness, fraud, lying, and treasonous occurrences in his administration which are violations of his oath and violation of the Constitution, but also his entire political apparatus in Washington and those who contributed to the corruption.? So there is plenty of material there that should create enough public support that they demand his resignation.

    MRS. RONDEAU: Do you think that we?ve reached that point in America?

    GEN. VALLELY: We?re reaching that point, absolutely; we?re almost to the point of no return here.??? There has been so much destruction to the country already that we cannot wait around until the election of 2012, in my opinion.? The other important point that I mentioned was impeachment, which is another peaceful transfer of power.? In my opinion, this situation involves the creation of that demand-resignation option which will then force an impeachment.? Of course, officials can die in office from a heart attack or health problems; that?s another way power can be transferred.? But when you look at where we are now, which I consider to be a gray area, we?re actually holding to the process that leads to anarchy or revolution.? We are already, in some ways, involved in some kind of a revolution or revolt by the people now when you look at our financial situation, the health care plan, and Obama?s inability to be an executive who can deal with crises.? He?s basically a community organizer who has no experience in the executive world.? My opinion is that he is very naive, very immature.

    So for all of these reasons, for the first time in our history, we need to demand a resignation not only of him but of his entire cabinet and political appointments.? At the same time, there has to be a resignation of those members of Congress who have been involved in the corruption and fraud of the administration and violating the Constitution.

    This has never occurred before in America, so we?re calling now for this to happen in order to save the country from total demise.? As more agony and pain occur within our society, and the more we go downhill as a power in the world economically and militarily, the more pain and angst there will be to bring the country back.? So we?re trying to forgo all that tremendous pain by having this country go completely in the dumpster by asking that we put in a new executive branch of people who can run this country the way it should be run today.

    MRS. RONDEAU: How could this process begin, and how could it be brought to a conclusion?

    GEN. VALLELY: First of all, the people have to act; they have to get off their derri?res and take action.? That means in their local communities; they have to take action in their daily lives to indicate that we?re not going to take this any more; enough is enough.? So there has to be a groundswell of public support out there that says, ?This government is not in confidence with the people, it?s not in sync with the majority of the people, and we are a majority-rule country.? So you know the socialists and the progressives who are on the side of Obama are not going to participate, and they will fight. But through this process, we have seen groundswell support from the tea parties gathering around the country, which is encouraging.

    However, we don?t see strong members of Congress standing up enough.? I see a few Republicans here and there, but even the Democrats and the Independents aren?t fighting enough for us; they?re not getting mad enough.? We? are now over $13 trillion in debt, and we see this Congress continuing to spend money that we don?t have.? We just sent $400,000,000 to the Palestinians in Gaza who are avowed terrorists under the leadership of Hamas.? Are we crazy?

    MRS. RONDEAU: I just wrote an article about that.

    GEN. VALLELY: And then we?re throwing our good friends, the Israelis, under the bus.? I just wrote an article last week entitled, ?Who Are Our Friends??? We are gaining more enemies in the world than we are friends.

    MRS. RONDEAU: Is that creating a dangerous situation?

    GEN. VALLELY: Oh, absolutely, because our enemies out there are going to take advantage of it.? I?ll give you a good example:? Russia and China are not our friends.? As we go down in power, they increase their influence and power.? And with China holding most of our debt, the Russians dealing directly with Iran and the nuclear development program, selling them arms, doing the same thing with Syria, we are in an extremely precarious position.? We just? received news last month which StandUpAmerica reported of the new scud missiles being delivered by Syria into the Bekaa Valley with 60,000-70,000 rockets and missiles in southern Lebanon ready to launch preemptively, which is a sign or signal for Iran to hit all the airfields and cities in Israel.

    We know that is there and that is being planned.? That?s why the article and the talk I gave a month ago indicated that the summer of 2010 is the tipping point in the Middle East.? We could well see, next month, a tremendous increase in tensions there that could cause Iran to take preemptive action against Israel or Israel take preemptive action against Iran and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.? If that happens this summer, it will change the whole world.? So this summer of 2010 is very, very critical to the future of our nation.

    MRS. RONDEAU: Do you have intelligence sources that are on the ground in these areas?

    GEN. VALLELY: I have two people in Jerusalem this week, so we?ll see what happens when they return.? They just left on Sunday.? We?re working very closely with some proxy elements in southern and northern Lebanon, so our information is very much on track with what we?ve presented on radio and television and in our articles.

    So when you consider all these spears that are being thrown into the body of the United States like a big dragon, you can?t bleed it to death with one spear, but certainly, many spears into the body of the dragon will bleed it to death.? And that?s what our enemies, domestic and foreign, are trying to do.? At the same time, you have a totally incompetent administration that can?t deal with or solve anything, leaving us in a very precarious position in America.? That?s why, if you look back in history, any revolutions, the French Revolution, whatever or wherever, has all been because of tremendous pain that was put on the population, and the population rose up and did something about it.? We?re approaching that situation in the United States.

    MRS. RONDEAU: In your opinion, what is the first thing that citizens who are angry about this can do?

    GEN. VALLELY: Get up off your derri?res and do something.? Get involved.? Make sure if you?re going to be involved in the Tea Party movement that you get out there.? Make it known to your representatives that enough is enough.? Those are the peaceful things you can do.? Get behind organizations such as StandUpAmerica.? We have people who are doing things, but of course, we need continual support from the people to do that.? They can go there, get all of our information which is posted daily, and they can assist monetarily if they are so inclined.? If we had 10,000,000 at $5.00 a person just to help us in our StandUpAmerica endeavors, there are many more things we could do:? we could go on radio, interview with the likes of writers, talk-show hosts, and those who are doing what you are doing.? That?s how we get the word out.

    People are so ignorant today that it?s just amazing.? As I go around speaking with people, they just seem to be clueless of what?s going on in the world today.? That has to change.

    MRS. RONDEAU: What percentage of the American population do you think knows how serious the situation could become?

    GEN. VALLELY: I think probably about 30% understand that there?s a major problem.? As Obama?s support goes down into the low 40s, more people are becoming concerned about his lack of leadership.? It?s as if the Jewish population, which voted almost 80% for Obama, has been hoodwinked.? So you have many of the Jews who typically vote left-wing liberal Democrat who now are saying ?What the heck have we done to ourselves?? This guy has thrown Israel under the table, under the tracks.?? So there is a transition going on, but some of us who are taking leadership positions here are saying that we have to do it faster because the further we go down over the cliff, the harder it is to come back up.

    MRS. RONDEAU: It seems as if we have a two-pronged challenge with the current regime.? As you mentioned, we have the incompetence:? a regime which doesn?t seem to know what to do, which has angered and alienated Israel and our other allies such as France.? But then there is also the question of whether or not Obama is even constitutionally eligible to serve.? What do you think could be done about that?

    GEN. VALLELY: More pressure.? There is Lt. Col. Lakin?s court martial in September, when they?re really going to go for discovery.? Then there is Tim Adams, who was an elections official in Honolulu, has come out and been all over the internet for the last four days and stated that there was no real birth certificate; that the copy of the birth certificate is fraudulent.? It?s going through the courts, but I feel we have a very corrupt court system now.? Many of the Congressmen ? as a matter of fact, almost all of them ? and even your major media, won?t even touch this birth certificate issue.? I firmly believe Obama is a Muslim in nature. There is no proof that I?ve seen that he was born in Honolulu, because the copy of the alleged birth record certainly doesn?t list any witnesses or the doctor who delivered him, and there?s no record that anyone knows he was born there.? In fact, it appears that his mother or his grandparents somehow tried to make it a matter of record that he was born in Hawaii to make him a U.S. citizen.

    MRS. RONDEAU: Hawaii now has five ways to obtain some kind of birth record of your birth, including walking in as an adult with minimal evidence to obtain a ?Certification of Live Birth.?? Given all of this, in regard to Lt. Col. Lakin?s court martial, do you think he will finally be allowed full discovery?? Is the court martial even legitimate if Obama is not a legitimate commander-in-chief?

    GEN. VALLELY: That?s a great question.? Some parties, according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, would say ?No, it?s not legal.?? I think the fix is on and the administration has threatened anybody in the Department of Defense who pushes for discovery with removal.? It?s a typical Chicago ploy:? ?We?re going to silence you,? and I think that?s what?s going on.? With the Article 32, the woman judge came out ahead of time and said, ?We will not allow any discovery which the defense is going to present.?? They made that decision, so you know from that point, the fix was on.

    MRS. RONDEAU: Do you think that?s why Lt. Col. Lakin waived the Article 32?

    GEN. VALLELY: I know it is.

    MRS. RONDEAU: So is he figuring that going right to the court martial is the best way to get an answer?

    GEN. VALLELY: Yes, but the fix will be on such that they?re not going to allow any discovery.? They?ll do everything to cover up some eight of the ten records that have not been released by Obama such as school records, and even his name change.

    MRS. RONDEAU: If they will not allow discovery even for the court martial, what do you think will happen?

    GEN. VALLELY: Well, I think the word then will be reinforced that it?s a corrupt administration. They will do anything to silence the truth; they will do anything to keep this man in office, even though he?s totally incompetent to hold office.? That?s going to happen.? So again, the people have to take the country back, so they have to understand that.? Get up and do something. Don?t just sit there and expect somebody else to do it.

    MRS. RONDEAU: I had interviewed a gentleman named Ernest Huber who is running in the eighth district in the state of Washington.? One of the things he said is that if he gets into Congress, he?s going to push the House Judiciary Committee to issue a subpoena asking for Obama?s records next January.? He said if that is not successful, he will ask the Commandant of the Army in the District of Washington, DC to arrest Obama and those working for him.? Do you know anything about that?

    GEN. VALLELY: Yes, but they won?t do it.? The reason is that they?re protecting their own position and power. Many people within the administration have resigned, but I can tell you that our system is so corrupt today that these people are more willing to protect their jobs and their positions than to be good citizens of America.

    MRS. RONDEAU: So you don?t think the Commandant will do anything?

    GEN. VALLELY: No.

    MRS. RONDEAU: Even if Obama is a natural born Citizen as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, with all of the things he is allowing to happen and causing to happen, what do the military brass expect to hold on to?? It would seem that ultimately, there may not be anything left.

    GEN. VALLELY: Well, that?s right, and that?s why they?re so short-sighted. You?ll certainly see a lack of men and women volunteering for the military, you?ll see more? retirements, and you?ll see more of these people leaving the Armed? Forces. This is what your enlisted and lower-ranked officers will do.? They?re not going to take it any more.? I would hope that we can get some outstanding generals and admirals who will finally stand up and be counted.? Certainly, there?s a group of generals under Bush who stood up to be counted and retired, but you haven?t seen any under the Obama administration. They?re probably the weakest we?ve ever had in our history.

    MRS. RONDEAU: What about the Joint Chiefs of Staff?? Even aside from the eligibility question, they must know that something is terribly wrong.

    GEN. VALLELY: Well, they do, but they won?t do a thing about it.? They won?t address it; they won?t even talk about it.? The fix is on.? The Obama administration is a bunch of Chicago gangsters, and they put the fear of God in all these people that you?re not to say anything about this, and if you do, you might as well retire and move on.? But that?s the type of mindset we have now in Washington.

    One of my big concerns is the lack of leadership and strength and actions on the part of our members of Congress of both parties.? Republicans are voting to quash what they can, but they need to go beyond that.? I don?t see the rage there; it?s as if they?re protecting themselves.? But we have a lot of people now who are coming into office such as Ilario Pontano, Marco Rubio, and Lt. Col. Allen West down in Florida; so we have some outstanding young people coming into politics in November, and they?re going to win.

    But my concern is the overall administration and the further damage they can do to the country, and that?s why we have to demand the resignation of these people and put in a new government:? for the first time in America, request early elections due to a constitutional crisis.? Now people may say, ?Well, General Vallely, you?re overreacting; it?s not that serious,? and I can tell you, from my analysis of the situation (I?ve been on this planet about 70 years), I?m not exaggerating.? The facts bear me out.

    MRS. RONDEAU: You also have extensive experience in the military.? One more question:? are you still affiliated with Fox News?

    GEN. VALLELY: No, my contract ended there in 2008.? I also moved out to Montana, and the satellite reception isn?t good here.? However, I have a new relationship with PJTV, and I?ve been doing interviews with them via Skype.? There is also a new organization which I launched with Brigitte Gabriel called Veteran Defenders of America.? We encourage all of our veterans to join that, as it?s a good way to provide solidarity and also support if we get hit with a nuclear attack or whatever in this country.

    MRS. RONDEAU: I really appreciate your time, General, and thank you for including me on your mailing list.

    GEN. VALLELY:? Thank you.

    ?

    ? 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:38
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    Wednesday, June 16, 2010

    ?

    School children are lead by a teacher in a chant that begins with "I will be anything I want to be."

    At one point during the incantation the teacher asks the students to repeat the phrase "I am an Obama scholar." (Real Clear Politics)

    Producing a generation of marxist morons. Of course the teachers unions are against charter schools; kids might actually learn something.

    OT Related: ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: Obama Organizing in High School - Atlas Shrugs

    February 2010: OFA Organizing in the Classroom -- One Parent: "I Can't Even Pass Out Flyers in the School for Girl Scouts Without Permission from the Superintendent's Office"

    September 2009: ?Brainwashing for Barack: More Schools Programming Obama Propaganda ...

    Obama's Brownshirts in School: Thuggery and Intimidation ...

    Obama in the Classroom: Keep Your Kids Home from School?


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:24
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    Oval Office speech: Piling on of one lie after another

    Obama Asks America to Commit Suicide

    ?By Alan Caruba??Tuesday, June 15, 2010

    imagePresident Obama is one of the most articulate we have had in that office. His ability to deliver a speech or a short talk such as his first from the Oval Office Tuesday evening is impressive. He knows how to deliver an address.

    What he doesn?t know or doesn?t care about is the difference between the truth and a lie.

    His fifteen-minute address was the piling on of one lie after another regarding America?s use of energy and its needs for the future.

    It is a lie to say America is ?addicted? to ?fossil fuels.? Oil is not a fossil fuel. It is not the result of dead dinosaurs. It is created deep in the bowels of the planet. There is an abundance of oil, but with the wealth it creates there is also massive corruption in many of the nations that possess it.

    ?

    We are no more addicted to oil than we are addicted to oxygen. This extraordinary mineral is a part of every aspect of our lives; used to create plastic, used in pharmaceuticals, used for the asphalt that pave our highways, and used as the fuel for our cars, trucks, and for countless other applications.

    Oil is not ?finite? as the president suggested. There is no end of oil.

    There are, however, tremendous challenges and costs to find it, drill for it, transport it, and refine it. It is an industry that requires huge amounts of money to discover new reservoirs of oil and even more to acquire it. It involves tremendous risk as well. Oil companies that hit too many dry wells are no longer in business.

    The president cited China as a nation pursuing ?clean energy?, but the president said nothing of the new coal-fired plants to generate electricity that China has been opening every week in recent years and will continue to do in the years ahead. The president did not mention that China is literally drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Cuba. Like every modern nation, China needs oil.

    The president is lying. There is no ?clean energy future? when he talks of solar and wind energy

    America needs oil, but the policies of previous administrations from the 1970s onward have stymied production, shut down existing wells, driven oil companies to seek it anywhere but here!

    Instead, he devoted the thrust of his address to tell Americans they must ?embrace a clean energy future?, must ?transition away? from so-called fossil fuels, and that the nation must, in fact, ?accelerate? that effort.

    The president is lying. There is no ?clean energy future? when he talks of solar and wind energy.

    Neither solar or wind can begin to compete with oil, coal and natural gas. If they were viable, the government would not have to plunder the national treasury to provide them with subsidies, requiring that they be included as a source by utilities.

    Together, after many years of propaganda, they only provide about three percent of the nation?s energy requirements. They will never provide enough because the wind does not always blow and the sun does not always shine. Every wind and solar farm must be backed up by a traditional plant, be it coal-fired, nuclear, natural gas or hydroelectric.

    Instead, this administration has declared war on the most abundant source of energy we have in America, coal. We are the Saudi Arabia of coal.

    Coal provides fifty percent of our electricity and it could provide even more; a source that could last for centuries, except that the Obama administration is doing everything it can to thwart the building of new coal-fired plants, to shut down coal mining operations.

    If Americans continue to believe this president?s lies, if we continue to believe decades of lies by environmental organizations, many of whom have been the happy recipients of oil industry largess and support, and if we abandon the very sources of energy on which our entire economy and way of life depends, this president will have led America off the cliff.

    President Obama is asking America to commit suicide.

    ?


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:21
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Martes, 15 de junio de 2010
    ??
    Resolving the Obama eligibility question

    Posted: June 15, 2010
    1:00 am Eastern

    By Paul R. Hollrah
    ??2010?
    ?

    ?

    Never in American history has a national leader served under a darker cloud of suspicion than Barack Hussein Obama. Was he born in Hawaii or in Kenya? Did he become an Indonesian citizen in 1967? Where did he spend the summer of 1981? Did he actually attend classes at Columbia? Did he write "Dreams From My Father"? These are all interesting questions, but not the most critical ones. By far the most critical question relates to his eligibility. Is he eligible to serve as president, or is he a usurper? Let's analyze what we actually know to be true.

    First, we have the absolute and unequivocal requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States."

    We know that Obama was not a citizen of the United States at the time the Constitution was ratified, we know that he was at least 35 years of age when he took office in January 2009, and we know that he has been a U.S. resident for at least 14 years. But is he a natural born citizen? What is a "natural born" citizen? And how do we prevent an individual who is not a natural born citizen from becoming president or vice president?

    To answer these questions we must examine how our political leaders, from the Founding Fathers through the present day, have defined the term "natural born"; we must understand U.S. government policy on dual citizenship; we must examine the circumstances of Obama's birth and citizenship; and finally, we must examine the vetting process that was designed to prevent an ineligible person from ascending to the presidency or the vice presidency.

    What is a 'natural born' citizen?

    When the Founding Fathers met in Philadelphia in September 1787 to approve the final draft of the U.S. Constitution, the physical scars of the War of Independence from Great Britain were still visible all around them, and a deep-seated animosity toward all things British colored every aspect of their daily lives. So is it conceivable that, just five years and 11 months after the British surrendered at Yorktown, the founders would have presented to the states for ratification a Constitution that would allow an individual with divided loyalties ? i.e., an individual with dual U.S.-British citizenship ? to serve as president or vice president of the United States? Not likely.

    The only one of its kind in the world -- check out what's new at the WND Superstore's "Birth Certificate Store"

    That is precisely why the framers found it necessary to include the words, "or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution." At the time the Constitution was adopted, every citizen of the 13 colonies was a British subject. And since they wished to exclude those with dual citizenship from serving as president or vice president at any time in the future, they provided an exemption of limited duration for those who were alive at the time and who might later aspire to lead the nation.

    Expressing the prevailing concerns of the time, Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers, "These most deadly adversaries of republican government (cabal, intrigue, etc.) might actually have expected to make their approach from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?"

    In 1866, John A. Bingham, chief framer of the 14th Amendment, which granted citizenship to the freed slaves, wrote as follows:?"Every human being born within the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty (emphasis added) is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen."

    Clearly, those who drafted the U.S. Constitution and subsequent amendments knew what it meant to be a natural born citizen, but what of our political leaders of today?

    In the early months of 2008, at a time when Hillary Rodham Clinton was the front-runner for the Democratic nomination and only those in the "tinfoil hat" brigade of the party were taking Barack Obama seriously, a number of lawsuits were filed questioning whether Sen. John McCain, having been born in the Panama Canal Zone, was a natural born U.S. citizen.

    Former U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson, a conservative Republican, and Harvard Law professor Laurence H. Tribe, a liberal Democrat, were assigned the task of researching the issue. In a March 19, 2008, memorandum, Olson and Tribe concluded that, "based on original meaning of the Constitution, the Framers' intentions, and subsequent legal and historical precedent, Sen. McCain's birth, to parents who were U.S. citizens serving on a U.S. military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936, makes him a 'natural born Citizen' within the meaning of the Constitution."

    Weeks later, in an April 10, 2008, statement, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said, "Based on the understanding of the pertinent sources of constitutional meaning, it is widely believed that if someone is born to American citizens anywhere in the world they are natural born citizens. Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen (emphasis added)."

    This was followed by an April 30, 2008, Senate resolution, approved by a vote of 99-0. The resolution declared: "Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a 'natural born citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States."

    It is important to note that all four references ? the 1866 Bingham statement, the Olson-Tribe Memorandum, the Leahy statement and the U.S. Senate Resolution ? utilize the plural terms "parents" or "American citizens," strongly implying that the "natural born" question rests, in large part, on the necessity of both parents being U.S. citizens.

    U.S. government policy on dual citizenship

    The official U.S. government policy regarding dual citizenship is found in publications of the Consular Affairs Division of the U.S. Department of State, as follows:

    The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a citizen of two countries at the same time. Each country has its own citizenship laws based on its own policy. Persons may have dual nationality by automatic operation of different laws rather than by choice. ?

    U.S. law does not mention dual nationality or require a person to choose one citizenship or another. Also, a person who is automatically granted another citizenship does not risk losing U.S. citizenship. However, a person who acquires a foreign citizenship by applying for it may lose U.S. citizenship. ?

    The U.S. Government recognizes that dual nationality exists but does not encourage it ... because of the problems it may cause. Claims of other countries on dual-national U.S. citizens may conflict with U.S. law. ? However, dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries. ? (emphasis added)

    Barack Obama's citizenship status

    Barack Obama tells us that he was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, to an American mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, and to Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a citizen of Kenya, a British colony at the time.

    Part 2, Section 5(1) of the British Nationality Act of 1948, reads, in part, as follows: "Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth. ?"

    Obama's father, a Kenyan, was a British subject at the time of his birth. Therefore, under British law, it is clear that Obama was born with dual U.S.-British citizenship "by descent" from his Kenyan father and his American mother. However, following Kenya's independence from Great Britain on Dec. 12, 1963, Kenya's newly-adopted constitution went into effect.

    Chapter VI, Section 87[3] of the Kenyan Constitution provides as follows: "(1) Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (Barack Obama Sr.) ? shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December 1963. Provided that a person shall not become a citizen of Kenya by virtue of this subsection if neither of his parents was born in Kenya. [Both of Obama's paternal grandparents were born in Kenya.]

    "(2) Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (Barack Obama Jr.) ? shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963."

    In other words, on Dec. 12, 1963, Obama lost his dual U.S.-British citizenship and became, by automatic operation of Kenyan law, a dual citizen of the United States and Kenya. However, Kenyan dual citizenship had its limits. Chapter VI, Section 97 of the Kenyan Constitution provides as follows:

    "(1) A person who, upon the attainment of the age of twenty-one years, is a citizen of Kenya and also a citizen of some country other than Kenya shall, subject to subsection (7), cease to be a citizen of Kenya upon the specified date unless he has renounced his citizenship of that other country, taken the oath of allegiance and, in the case of a person who was born outside Kenya, made and registered such declaration of his intentions concerning residence as may be prescribed by or under an Act of Parliament."

    Subsection (7), referenced above, gave the Kenyan parliament the option to provide a grace period during which dual citizens could make their election of nationality after reaching age 21. Obama did not actively seek British or Kenyan citizenships; they were his by "automatic operation" of British and Kenyan law and "by descent" from his father. There is no evidence that he ever took steps to renounce either his British or his Kenyan citizenship.

    The vetting process for president and vice president

    The process established for the selection of a president and vice president provides three vetting opportunities. The first occurs immediately following the nominating conventions when the parties certify their candidates to the state election boards so ballots can be prepared.

    All of the documents provided to the 50 state election boards by the Republican National Committee in 2008 contained, verbatim, the following affirmation:

    "We do hereby certify that (at) a national convention of Delegates representing the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the city of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States, and the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of Vice President of the United States, were nominated for such offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008, viz. ..."

    The documents contained the names and home addresses of John McCain and Sarah Palin and were signed by John A. Boehner and Jean A. Inman, chairman and secretary, respectively, of the 2008 Republican National Convention, and notarized by Sheila A. Motzko.

    (Column continues below)

    ?

    ? ?

    However, certifications provided to the state election boards by the Democratic National Committee were not uniform. The certification provided exclusively to the state of Hawaii, pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes ?11-113, contained the following affirmation:

    "THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though (sic) 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

    The remaining 49 states received the following certification:

    "THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though (sic) 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:"

    Affixed were the names and home addresses of Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The document was signed by Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond, chairman and secretary, respectively, of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, and notarized by Shalifa A. Williamson.

    The phrase, "? and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution" was purposely omitted. Other than that, the two documents were identical ? even to the misspelling of the word "through" in the second line of the certifications.

    This tragic anomaly of American political history was first reported by writer J.B. Williams in a Sept. 10, 2009 article, titled, "The Theory is Now a Conspiracy and Facts Don't Lie." Immediately upon publication of Williams' article, Obama doubters across the country began contacting their state election boards, requesting copies of the Democrat and Republican Party candidate certifications, and the full scale of the Democrats' deception was uncovered.

    So, why would the Democrats eliminate the language certifying that Obama and Biden were both eligible to serve "under provisions of the U.S. Constitution"? Is it not reasonable to assume that they knew when they nominated him that Barack Obama was ineligible to serve by virtue of the fact that he is not a "natural born" U.S. citizen?

    So the question arises: What did Nancy Pelosi know, and when did she know it? And is it Pelosi's certification of Obama's eligibility that the state of Hawaii now relies upon in their refusal to disclose the details of his long-form birth certificate?

    The second vetting opportunity occurs on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December, when the Electoral College meets to elect a president and vice president. Between Nov. 4, the date of the General Election, and Dec. 15, the date the Electoral College met to cast their votes, most Democratic electors were made aware of serious questions relating to Obama's eligibility. None of the Democratic electors raised a serious question about Obama's eligibility prior to casting their electoral votes ? a complete and total subversion of the very purpose of the Electoral College.

    The third and final vetting opportunity occurs on Jan. 6 following each election when the Congress meets in joint session to certify the votes of the Electoral College. As the final fail-safe step in the electoral process, the members of Congress have the duty to ensure themselves of the qualifications of the individuals selected by the Electoral College.

    So if, in fact, the Democratic National Committee knowingly certified a candidate for the November ballot who was ineligible to serve, what are the possible alternatives? Is it possible, as some suggest, that we simply ignore the constitutional requirements of Article II, Section 1?

    In a Dec. 8, 2008, discussion of the congressional certification process, Edwin Vieira Jr., Ph.D., J.D., a leading authority on the Constitution, argues, "The question of Obama's eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of Congress to skirt or decide as its Members may deem politically or personally expedient.

    "Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense with the requirement that Obama must be 'a natural born citizen,' by simply assuming that he is such, or by accepting what lawyers refer to as the 'best available evidence' (Obama's published certification of live birth, versus a certified Hawaiian birth certificate)."

    But what if the members of Congress fail in their responsibility? Dr. Vieira argues that, if no objection is made on the basis that Obama is not a natural born citizen ? "the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a 'constitutional sufficiency' (emphasis added)," because Congress has no power to simply waive the eligibility requirement.

    Conclusion

    What Dr. Vieira asserts, and what any sixth-grade student would understand, is that it is not within the power of the Congress to waive the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1 by simply ignoring them ? as they have attempted to do since Jan. 6, 2009. Nor is it within the power of the people, the states or the courts to waive the eligibility requirements, short of a constitutional amendment.

    That being the case, and assuming that Obama could not be convinced to voluntarily evacuate the White House, what are the alternatives? Is it possible to impeach a usurper president or vice president when the impeachment process is designed to apply only to individuals who are fully qualified, legally elected and officially inaugurated?

    The most likely answer lies in the Nixon model, in which leaders of his own party would go to the White House to demand Obama's resignation. In Obama's case, that is unlikely to happen until a substantial majority of Americans becomes convinced that he is a usurper and his approval rating drops below 20 percent. Then, and only then, can we expect Democrats, in the interest of protecting their own careers, to demand that he leave. And that will occur only after some courageous American, such as Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, is able to force Obama to produce his bona fides.

    With each passing day, the damage Obama does makes the future of our democratic republic more and more problematic. Will the nation be able to survive six more months, let alone two and a half more years, of his social and economic tinkering?

    If consensus can be reached on the questions surrounding Obama's dual citizenships and the definition of the term "natural born," then all of the remaining questions about his origins and his true identity will become academic ? mere fodder for the history books.

    ??


    Paul R. Hollrah is a freelance writer living in the lakes region of eastern Oklahoma. He is a retired corporate government-relations executive and a two-time elector in?the U.S. Electoral College. He is a contributing editor for FamilySecurityMatters.org, the New Media Journal and the National Writers Syndicate.




    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:50
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    ??

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010

    The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the Briefs with No Oral Argument

    ?

    The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals which sits in Philadelphia has notified me today by letter dated June 15, 2010 that there will not be any oral argument on the Kerchner appeal to that Court. The case will be submitted on the briefs on Tuesday, June 29, 2010. Our presence is therefore not required.

    The Court also informed me that the Third Circuit Panel that will decide the appeal will be comprised of Circuit Judges Sloviter, Barry, and Hardiman.

    The court can call for oral argument when it has questions. As we know, the Federal District Court granted Obama?s/Congress?s motion to dismiss the complaint/petition for lack of standing and political question. The Kerchner plaintiffs have appealed that decision to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. On a motion to dismiss the complaint on its face for lack of standing and political question, both the trial and the appeals courts are supposed to accept the facts alleged in the complaint/petition as true and in a light most favorable to the non-movant. We have alleged and shown that Obama is not and cannot be an
    Article II "natural born Citizen" because he was born a subject of Great Britain through descent from his British subject/citizen father who was never a U.S. citizen, making Obama born with dual and conflicting allegiances if he was born in the U.S. or with sole allegiance to Great Britain if he was born in Kenya. We have also alleged and shown that Obama has not conclusively proven that he was even born in Hawaii. Obama and Congress have presented no evidence or argument to the Federal District Court or to the Court of Appeals contesting these arguments. The issues of standing and political question are well briefed. We have presented in our briefs how the Kerchner plaintiffs have standing and how the Obama eligibility issue does not present any objectionable political question for the Court. Hence, the Court might not have any questions and so it did not see any need for oral argument.

    Of course, it is our hope that the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals reverses the decision of the Federal District Court which dismissed the complaint/petition for lack of standing and political question and returns the Kerchner case to the District Court for discovery and trial. If the Third Circuit Court affirms the District Court, we will then be filing a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court which will have the final word in any event.

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    June 15, 2010
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 15:17
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    ??
    permalink??Executive Order Gives Interagency Council Control over American Lives

    Brother O has signed an Executive Order designed to control people?s lives under the guise of disease prevention and health promotion. The Order establishes the??National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council,?

    ( Executive Order not published yet at

    http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/2010.html

    Read Executive Order June10, 2010

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-establishing-national-prevention-health-promotion-and-public-health

    ?an interagency council to interact with the departments of HHS, Agriculture, Education, Labor, Transportation, and others to implement national prevention and health promotion policies.

    ?In order to create a true, wellness society and rein in chronic disease, all federal agencies must be engaged. ? The President ? in signing this executive order ? mark[s] another significant milestone in our goal of coordinating federal efforts and improving the health and wellbeing of our society.? ?Leftist Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA)

    Actually, the Council?s principal purpose?involves ?lifestyle behavior modification??for some Americans who do not practice ?healthy behavior.? Section 6 (c) of the Order focuses on Brother O?s desired lifestyle behavior modifications:?

    • smoking cessation,
    • proper nutrition,
    • appropriate exercise,
    • mental health,
    • behavioral health,
    • sedentary behavior (see Sec. 3 [c]),
    • substance-use disorder, and
    • domestic violence screenings.

    The Order also creates a 25-member ?Advisory Group? of hand-picked medical experts from public health fields and other areas of expertise in the private sector to modify the lifestyles and behaviors of people the government deems unhealthy.?

    According to Section 4 (b) of the Order, lifestyle behavior modification advisors will actively carry out:?

    • worksite health promotion,
    • community services, including community health centers,
    • preventive medicine,
    • health coaching,
    • public health education,
    • geriatrics, and
    • rehabilitation medicine.

    Brother O?s ?lifestyle behavior modification? Order is open-ended in areas of ?mental? and ?behavioral? health, ?proper nutrition,? ?sedentary behavior,? and ?appropriate exercise? so that some Americans will think and act and eat and drink for the ?health and wellbeing of our society.??

    However, Brother O seems to have omitted the unhealthy sexual practices of some Americans from the list of lifestyle behavior modifications. The diseases associated with Americans who engage in anal sex include: HIV, anal cancer, typhoid fever, Tuberculosis, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Herpes simplex, Amoebiasis, Cryptosporidiosis, E. coli infections, Giardiasis, Human papillomavirus, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Salmonellosis, and Shigella.?

    Medical doctors know that the shape of the bowel is not designed for sexual intercourse. The bowel lining is a single cell layer, and the anal sphincter muscle has to be forced open during anal intercourse, which results in trauma and tearing. The action of intercourse damages the bowel lining making it easy for bacteria and viruses to enter the body.?

    The health risks to heterosexuals and homosexuals engaging in anal sex have been hushed up by political correctness and a reluctance to speak about the subject.?

    I am politically incorrect ? I am unreluctant ??

    For additional information on Brother O?s National Prevention, Health Promotion and Public Health Council, see?Obama Issues Executive Order Mandating ?Lifestyle Behavior Modification??from the?Nanny State Liberation Front.

    Bookmark and Share

    ? Jerry A. Kane, all rights reserved. Jerry A. Kane works part-time as a technical writer and editor. He has spent almost two decades as an adjunct English professor and over a decade as journalist. His commentaries have appeared on WorldNetDaily, the American Thinker, Canada Free Press, and in daily and weekly newspapers in western Pennsylvania. Visit his blog,?The Millstone Diaries, for more commentaries and musings.

    Send a link:??Tell a friend about this.
    Link to this post:??Permalink
    Send us your link:??Trackback link
    Filed under:?Big Brother,?Health care,?Healthcare


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:47
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Lunes, 14 de junio de 2010

    http://canadafreepress.com/

    Obama?s Destruction Of Capitalism

    By?Dr. Tim Ball??Monday, June 14, 2010

    Obama?s administration is rapidly replacing capitalism, markets and free enterprise with socialism and total government control. In Marxist theory socialism is a stage on the way to the overthrow of capitalism and establishment of communism.? It?s doing this by finding examples of capitalist ?failures? and using them to justify government regulation and takeover.


    It?s easy because there are always examples. It?s made easier by the inherent distrust and dislike of people successful in industry and business, a continuation of the historical social struggle underscored by the Industrial Revolution. They?re natural targets for environmentalism, which as Vaclav Klaus says, is ?a political movement that originally began with the protection of the environment ? a humble and perhaps even legitimate goal ? but has gradually transformed itself into an ideology that has almost nothing to do with nature.? The problem is industry and business, a political minority, are best equipped to deal with energy and environmental issues.

    Best-Equipped For Real Problems

    Global?warming?is central to the plan of total government control as identified in the 1974 Club of Rome report titled, ?Mankind at the Turning Point.? However, there were other issues including water shortages, famine and pollution. As the report notes, ?All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.? Capitalist countries were the targets for causing pollution, but contrary to general knowledge pollution, environmental degradation and cleanup records were worse under communism. This does not absolve capitalist nations, however, once the problem was identified and environmentalism became the new paradigm they moved to resolve the issues.

    They did this whether the issue was real, like air pollution, or manufactured, like ozone. All levels of pollution have declined in democratic capitalist nations. They could be lower and would be if time, money and effort wasted on global warming and?climatechange?was reassigned. The Congressional Budget Office?estimated?this was $99 billion between 1998 and 2009.

    Add billions spent in subsidies for alternate energies and most pollution problems are resolved. The infuriating part is all the money is spent unnecessarily because of the false objective of reducing CO2. Even with subsidies, alternate energies can?t compete.

    No country has achieved CO2 reduction levels set out in the Kyoto Accord. In fact levels have increased in every single country. The US is the only country that has reduced the rate of increase and this was done through a voluntary program. In countries where attempts were made to tackle CO2 through carbon taxes and green jobs, serious problems quickly emerged. Economies were devastated and as in Spain each green job cost 2.2 regular jobs. Many believe Obama is pushing toward European socialism. He had the vote as the first African American President and appeared centrist but will he have the vote now his hidden agenda is exposed?

    Non-producers Attack The Producers

    What percentage of people are involved in the various segments of a society? How many are entrepreneurs, inventors or innovators willing to take risks to set up a business or pursue an opportunity? We?re told small businesses are the engine of the US economy, but what percentage are they? The US was built around immigrants, almost a gene pool of those who sought freedom to pursue enterprise and opportunity, and as a nation has the greatest chance of resisting the socialist insurgence. Immigrants left behind those who had a greater trust in government. It is a major difference between Canada and the US.

    Obama?s support comes from socialists and even communists like Van Jones, most academics, Union leaders, bureaucrats and environmental groups. They all feed at the public trough while undermining those who generate the wealth. They are the parasites of society who produce nothing and advance by destroying or feeding off others. A parasite is defined as ?an organism that lives in or on another organism and benefits by deriving nutrients at the host?s expense.? Margaret Thatcher said, ?Socialism only works until you run out of other people?s money.? You can appear to get ahead by pulling yourself up or by pushing others down. It is much easier to push others down and that is the pattern and actions of all these groups. But what happens if the organism on which the parasite feeds, dies? Even worse, and illogical is when the parasite deliberately sets out to destroy the host?

    Ultimately, environment and climate change are of no consequence to this administration. Despite all the rhetoric they?ve done virtually nothing to deal with the oil disaster in the Gulf and they?ve let BP fumble. It suggests political opportunities of denigrating industry outweigh environmental concerns. They are simply vehicles to achieve political control. Every poll shows public priorities don?t match professed priorities of the administration. A 2009 Pew Research Centre Poll illustrates the difference (Figure 1).

    image??
    Figure 1: US Public priorities.?Source:

    Further proof?it is not a concern is the deliberate increase in debt. Initially Obama could blame the debt on the Bush administration, but in doing so he acknowledged it was a problem. However, instead of dealing with it, his policies cause dramatic increases. As the debt grows, money to deal with climate and environmental issues diminish rapidly. It has risen from $7.7 trillion in 2005 to $13 trillion now. Last week a Treasury Department Report to Congress says it will rise to $19.6 trillion by 2015.

    Another part of the strategy is devolution of authority from Congress to bureaucracies. In Europe bureaucracies effectively control every aspect of people?s lives. Obama pursues the same pattern such as the powers granted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over CO2.? Some Senators saw the danger and presented legislation to remove the EPA power. On June 10, it was defeated 53 to 47 with Senator Boxer making the incredible comment that voting for the bill was equivalent to repealing the laws of gravity. This fits Melanie Phillips? definition of the?Age of Irrationality?in which she argues we are entering a new era of anti-enlightenment. She claims,??all the ideologies so prevalent today in ?progressive? circles are deeply reactionary, illiberal and coercive.??That is because the ideology, ?by wrenching evidence to fit a prior idea, is inimical to reason and sacrifices truth to power.?

    Bullying, intimidation, and suppression of debate replace reason. It condemns the people who can deal with problems, the ones who seek personal freedom through invention, and innovation. They?re the leaders of industry and business demonized by the Club of Rome and now Obama. Julian Simon challenged the hypothesis and projections of the Club of Rome, which have proved completely wrong, yet continue to pervade left wing ideology. Simon?s assessments and projections were far more accurate, indeed his work inspired Bjorn Lomborg, author of?The Skeptical Environmentalist.? Simon was one founder of free market environmentalism, a proven ideology that Obama?s actions are designed to prevent.?

    He has a right to criticize, who has a heart to help. Abraham Lincoln



    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:36
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    http://www.thepostemail.com/

    Obama admits what we?ve known all along

    WHO CAN NOW DEFEND THIS LIAR?

    by Sharon Rondeau

    The Egyptian Foreign Minister claims that Obama told him privately, "I am a Muslim."

    (Jun. 14, 2010) ? Obama has apparently confirmed what many have suspected since the presidential campaign:? that he is a Muslim, not a ?committed Christian,? as he professed during the presidential campaign.

    The periodical Israel Today has reported that in a private meeting with the Egyptian Foreign Minister, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Obama told Gheit that he is a Muslim.? The exchange was aired on Nile TV.

    Last year the mainstream press would say only that Obama ?seeks to win Muslim hearts and minds? as he prepared for his trip to Cairo and other parts of the Middle East.? Their fawning included coverage entitled ?Meeting High Expectations in the Middle East? and ?In Turkey, Obama Reaches out to the Muslim World.?? The media extolled Obama?s qualifications to do so by citing ?his biography, which ranges from his international family, which included Muslim members, to his opposition to the Iraq War.?

    Obama has openly admitted that he has ?family members? who are Muslim.

    Yet throughout the presidential campaign, the American media continued to vehemently deny that Obama could be or ever had been a Muslim.? Factcheck.org, the group which defended Obama?s Certification of Live Birth as authentic and issued by the state of Hawaii, also insisted that Obama was not a Muslim.

    Early in the campaign, Robert Gibbs, now White House Press Secretary, insisted that ?Senator Obama has never been a Muslim.?? Even Obama?s ?Fight the Smears? website warned the public that ??shameful, shadowy attackers have been lying about Barack?s religion, claiming he is a Muslim instead of a committed Christian. When people fabricate stories about someone?s faith to denigrate them politically, that?s an attack on people of all faiths. Make sure everyone you know is aware of this deception.?

    Another page declared him a ?committed Christian? but presented no evidence of the claim.? Obama defended himself by saying that he had ?very little connection to the Muslim religion.?? While campaigning, Obama repeatedly denied that he was a Muslim, even though he had previously referred to his school in Indonesia as ?the Muslim school.?

    According to Israel Insider, ??the accumulated research from primary sources who knew Obama from his childhood indicate that he was a devout Muslim, the son of a devout Muslim, the step-son of a devout Muslim and the grandson and namesake (?Hussein?) of a devout Muslim. He was registered in school as a Muslim and demonstrated his ability to chant praise to Allah in impressive Arab-accented tones even as an adult.?

    Obama reportedly stated in one of his books that he attended ?Qur?an class.?? But the liberal media continued to refute his Muslim connections, taking whatever Obama said at a given time to be the truth, without investigating.? Even when he slipped and said, ??my Muslim faith,? the media did not question him; they simply ?corrected? him.

    But apparently the deception was perpetrated by Obama, not toward him, if what the Egyptian Foreign Minister claims is true.

    Obama has refused to participate in the National Day of Prayer in both 2009 and 2010.? His first telephone call after being installed in the Oval Office was to Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian Authority.

    In 2007, Obama campaigned for his Marxist Muslim cousin, Raila Odinga, in Kenya.? Odinga had promised that if he won the election, he would impose Sharia law in the country. After Odinga lost, violence broke out in which Muslims burned Christians inside of churches and looted businesses and homes.? As many as 600,000 people were displaced.

    The Right Truth blog has described a connection between Obama, his support for Odinga, Sharia law, and Obama?s half-brother in Kenya.

    According to Don Swarthout, founder of Honor America PAC,? the ?Christian? church which Obama attended for 20 years promotes a belief system called ?Black Liberation Theology? which is ?that it is not faithful to the teachings of Jesus Christ.?? Dr. Anthony Bradley, a professor of theology and research fellow at the Acton Institute, described Black Liberation Theology as ?the black struggle for liberation from various forms of ?white racism? and oppression.?? He stated that Black Liberation Theology has Marxist roots and ?actually encourages a victim mentality among blacks.?

    A former Jew, Karl Marx wrote of the Jews in his essay, ?About the Jewish Question,? ?The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the moneyed man generally.?? ?What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money ? Out of its entrails bourgeois society continually creates Jews.? Emancipation from huckstering and from money, and consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our era.?

    In 2007, two Jewish researchers predicted that many Jews would help to elect Obama president, unknowingly bringing about ?as much havoc, destruction and confusion to the world as all the 10 plagues together brought to Egypt.?? They said that his name alone is clear evidence that he is a Muslim and not a ?friend of Israel.?? Based on a passage from the Torah, the researchers identified Obama as ?the evil that will befall us at the end of days??

    The researchers wrote that Obama?s election would come about because ?With our very own hands, we finance and work to put the wrong people in power over us?By putting into power leaders in Israel who don?t believe in G-d, we help bring about a spiritual collapse?We vote for these people, we put them in power, and we raise money for them.?

    A recent article by Roger Gitlin appears to support that contention.

    Israeli officials are now calling Obama a ?Strategic Catastrophe? and a ?real problem for Israel.?? Some congressmen have voiced their opposition to Obama?s Israel policy, including members of his own party.? One candidate for Congress has stated that Obama?s ?actions have minimized our strategic relationship with Israel and needlessly endangered its national security,? and last year the House of Representatives approved a resolution affirming ?Israel?s right to defend itself against attacks from Gaza.?

    Obama has changed America?s policy of referring to terrorists as ?jihadists? or ?Islamic extremists? and promised Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the Palestinian Authority, $400,000,000 in U.S. aid while Hamas, a terrorist group, ?continues to wield power in the Palestinian territories? after carrying out suicide bombings and rocket attacks on Israeli civilians.

    Turkey is reportedly working with the Iranians to build an industrial park on their common border.? On June 8, DEBKAfile reported that Osama bin Laden has been hiding in Iran for the last five years with the knowledge of Turkish officials.? Ryan Mauro, founder of World Threats, wrote that ?The most significant outcome of the Mavi Marmara incident is that there can no longer be any doubt that Turkey has joined the anti-Western bloc that includes Hamas, Iran and Syria.?

    Obama now appears to favor tyrannical terrorist regimes over democracies.

    Were Americans ?victims of a bait and switch? in November 2008 perpetrated by Barack Obama and his handlers?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ? 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.



    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:28
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Domingo, 13 de junio de 2010
    ::
    ???AIP is 'the Citizen-Led Campaign to Save America'?->?America's Forum - 'We are the Media!'


    [Alleged] President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama pose for a photo during a reception at the Metropolitan Museum in?New York?with Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Arab Republic of Egypt, and H.E. Laila Kamal El Din Salah

    Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, in which [Alleged] President Obama told him that?he was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.

    Finally, during the week of 14-18th of January 2010, just on the eve of my winter tour to the US, Rachel picked up a Nile TV broadcast in which Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said on the "Round Table Show" that he had had a one on one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda. He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some?domestic?American problems?(Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel.?(more here)

    This is according to?Israel Today here. Here is the passage from the May 2010 issue of "Israel Today." It is on page 3 in an article titled "Obama, a 'Strategic Catastrophe,'" by Aviel Schneider:


    Read the full report, with many supporting links, at?Atlas Shrugs.

    Posted?2010-06-13 6:15 AM (#39254) By:?TomKovach-AIP-TN


    Muslims around the world know that Obama is a Muslim, and react accordingly.

    Muslims?know that?Obama has?never?publicly renounced Islam and Allah.

    Muslims know that, without?such renunciation,?Obama is not?really?a Christian.

    Muslims know that?most American Christians know so little about their own faith that they do not understand the need for such a renunciation.

    Muslims know that?God and Allah are?not?the same.? But, they allow people around them?(such as gullible American Christians) to?think?that they are the same, because it lulls those gullible people into laziness.? That laziness, in turn, is what enabled the current occupier?(not"occupant")?of the White House to get there and remain there.

    Muslims know that?Obama is merely practicing?taq'qiya?-- strategic deception to advance Islam -- by pretending to be a Christian in order to advance his true goals.

    Why don't most?Christians know these things??? Sadly, in many cases, it is because their own preachers tell them the opposite.??(True?Christians?do?know these things, because they have "studied to show yourself approved".)

    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee ..."?(Hosea 4Helloween

    Posted?2010-06-13 7:00 AM (#39260 - in reply to #39254) By:?TomKovach-AIP-TN


    And remember this interview from the 2008 campaign:?

    ?

    Obama: "My Muslim Faith"?

    September 2008?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M&feature=player_embedded?



    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 13:36
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    ?
    ?
    ?
    ?
    http://EnergyTomorrow.org?Jack Gerard, President and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute (API) discusses the history of the oil and natural gas industry in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as the need to continue Gulf energy operations in the future.
    ??

    President Obama paying unions back as wildlife dies and the livelihood of millions of American is destroyed for decades to come

    Unions Preventing a Timely Cleanup of Oil in the Gulf?

    ?By?Warner Todd Huston??Sunday, June 13, 2010

    Joseph Carafano of the Heritage Foundation has made an?interesting observation?and wonders if President?Obama?is allowing unions to make it harder to effect a timely and effective cleanup of the BP oil spill in the Gulf?

    ?

    The offer of aid from foreign companies has been refused by the Obama administration and the Jones Act is cited as the reason why Obama will not allow foreign ships to enter our waters to assist in the cleanup.

    The Jones Act is a 1920s protectionist law put in place to assure that boats and crews working in American waters are American crews and union members. Carafano thinks that Obama is using the Jones Act as a sop to unions despite what it is doing to slow the cleanup.

    ? ??Cause this is a big thing for unions,? Carafano said. ?The unions see it as ? protecting jobs. They hate when the Jones Act gets waived, and they pound on politicians when they do that. So ? are we giving in to unions and not doing everything we can, or is there some kind of impediment that we don?t know about?

    Once again, just as with car manufacturing and education, we see unions getting in the way of best practices, safety, and the creation of the optimal American lifestyle. In this case, we see?President?Obama?paying unions back as wildlife dies and the livelihood of millions of American is destroyed for decades to come.

    ?




    Author
    Warner Todd Huston??Bio
    Warner Todd Huston?Most recent columns

    Warner Todd Huston?s thoughtful commentary, sometimes irreverent often historically based, is featured on many websites such as renewamerica.us, townhall.com, opinioneditorials.com, and americandaily.com, among many, many others. He has also written for several history magazines, and appears in the new book ?Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture,? which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of?Publius? Forum.

    Warner can be reached at:?[email protected]


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:28
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    S?bado, 12 de junio de 2010
    ?
    ?
    ?
    ??

    Hawaii elections clerk hits

    YouTube

    Features WND story

    exposing allegations Obama

    birth certificate doesn't exist


    Posted: June 12, 2010
    1:00 am Eastern

    ??2010?WorldNetDaily

    A WND report on a former Hawaii elections clerk's claim that President Obama was not born in the state has hit YouTube:

    The video was produced and posted by Carl Gallups, a Christian pastor in Milton, Fla., who has posted dozens of videos on the Web, including others highlighting questions about Obama.

    Gallups notes that YouTube has frozen its view counter at 301 views, and thinks the Google-owned company has done this to prevent the video from being promoted to its featured video section.

    "Every time we put up a film that has something to do with Obama, they freeze the counter on us," he said. "And they won't respond to any of my e-mails [asking for an explanation]."

    Gallups also noted his local congressman, Republican Jeff Miller, has steadfastly refused to look into the matter of Obama's constitutional eligibility for office.

    "Our congressmen are terrified," Gallups said. "Congressmen don't want to touch it."

    The WND report cites statements from Tim Adams, a college instructor who worked as a senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in 2008, that Obama definitely was not born in Hawaii as the White House claims.

    ?


    Tim Adams, a former senior elections clerk for Honolulu, now teaches English at Western Kentucky University.

    "There is no birth certificate," said Adams, a graduate assistant who teaches English at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, Ky. "It's like an open secret. There isn't one. Everyone in the government there knows this."

    Adams, who says he's a Hillary Clinton supporter who ended up voting for John McCain when Clinton lost the Democratic nomination to Obama, told WND, "I managed the absentee-ballot office. It was my job to verify the voters' identity."

    He says during the 2008 campaign when the issue of Obama's constitutional eligibility first arose, the elections office was inundated with requests to verify the birthplace of the U.S. senator from Illinois.

    The hottest book in America is the one that exposes the real Obama and all his men (and women)! Get your autographed copy only from WND!

    "I had direct access to the Social Security database, the national crime computer, state driver's license information, international passport information, basically just about anything you can imagine to get someone's identity," Adams explained. "I could look up what bank your home mortgage was in. I was informed by my boss that we did not have a birth record [for Obama]."

    At the time, there were conflicting reports that Obama had been born at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, as well as the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children across town. So Adams says his office checked with both facilities.

    "They told us, 'We don't have a birth certificate for him,'" he said. "They told my supervisor, either by phone or by e-mail, neither one has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were present at this man's birth."

    To date, no Hawaiian hospital has provided documented confirmation that Obama was born at its facility.

    WND confirmed with Hawaiian officials that Adams was indeed working in their election offices during the last presidential election.

    "His title was senior elections clerk in 2008," said Glen Takahashi, elections administrator for the city and county of Honolulu.

    Takahashi also confirmed Adams' time frame at the office from spring until the month of August.

    However, when WND asked Takahashi if the elections office could check on birth records, he said, "We don't have access to that kind of records. [There's] no access to birth records."

    Adams responded, "They may say, 'We don't have access to that.' The regular workers don't, the ones processing ballots; but the people in administration do. I was the one overseeing the work of the people doing the balloting."

    The issue of Obama's birth goes to the heart of the questions that have been raised in dozens of lawsuits and other challenges that allege Obama may not be eligible to be president under the Constitution's demand that a president be a "natural born citizen."

    Another of the videos posted by Gallups addresses the "blasphemies" of President Obama.:

    ?

    It cites statements from Obama ? and about him ? that attribute to him a supernatural power, including such headlines as "New Great Redeemer" and "Obama the savior."



    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:52
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Jueves, 10 de junio de 2010

    breakingnews

    DECORATED ARMY DOCTOR LTC TERRY LAKIN WAIVES PRELIMINARY HEARING AND ANNOUNCES NEW YOUTUBE VIDEO. CASE TO NOW PROCEED DIRECTLY TO GENERAL COURT MARTIAL.
    HEARING WILL NOT PROCEED ON JUNE 11, 2010.

    Read the Press Release
    * Watch the Video

    frontpage201004222LTC Lakin faces lengthy prison term for refusing to deploy to Afghanistan

    Obama Administration unleashes Army lawyers instead of releasing birth certificate

    A vigorous defense of this case presents the ONLY present hope that Americans will finally learn whether their president lawfully holds office. If you want the proof, you can only hope to get it by supporting LTC Lakin NOW. MAKE A TAX DEDUCTIBLE CONTRIBUTION NOW TO TERRY'S DEFENSE FUND NOW.

    Terry Lakin has now been officially charged in writing with two crimes.

    • The first is "Missing Movement" a serious crime in the nature of a felony for failing to deploy to Afghanistan.
    • The second is disobeying a direct order, and there are four specifications (separate instances) of this charge. Any soldier convicted on all charges and specifications would expect to be sentenced to years at "hard labor" in the penitentiary.

    In facing court-martial, LTC Lakin is just the latest victim of the determined effort of the President not to provide simple proof of his eligibility under the constitution to hold office.

    American Patriot Foundation's Legal Defense Fund will pay for all of LTC Lakin's attorneys fees and costs, and so we urgently need your tax deductible contribution. A noted civilian California trial lawyer has now been hired to be LTC Lakin's lead counsel. It is expected these fees and costs will exceed $500,000 and therefore it is essential that LTC Lakin's supporters come to his aid NOW.

    ?

    ?

    ?

    MAKE A TAX DEDUCTIBLE CONTRIBUTION NOW TO TERRY'S DEFENSE FUND... CLICK HERE.

    Click here to watch Terry's Video.

    To leave comments or ask questions please visit our website at? http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com


    LTC Terry Lakin has tried in vain to get the same verification from our President that he has been asked to provide countless times in his career, for many jobs, and to obtain a security clearance for the trusted positions he has held within the U.S. Armed Forces. LTC Terry Lakin has tried in vain to get the same verification from our President that he has been
    asked to provide countless times in his career, for many jobs, and to obtain a security clearance for the trusted positions he has held within the U.S. Armed Forces.


    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:29
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Martes, 08 de junio de 2010
     BREAKING NEWS - GENERAL VALLELY DEMANDS OBAMA'S RESIGNATION - TONIGHT

    http://www.patriotsheartnetwork.net/events/event/show?id=2833032%3AEvent%3A85715&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_event

    Time: June 8, 2010 from 9pm to 11pm

    Location: Patriot's Heart Network on Blog Talk Radio 9-11pm EDT


    Website or Map:
    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/…

    Phone:
    347-215-6929

    In what promises to be an explosive interview, General Paul Vallely and General James Cash.

    General Vallaly demands for Obama's resignation!


    Tonight we welcome General Paul Vallely and General Jim Cash to discuss the Obama administration and the current Congress, and their violation of their oath of office.

    General Vallaly's websites:

    Stand Up For America
    Veteran Defenders
    Soldiers Memorial Fund
    Please read the General's words.

    THE FULL TEXT IS LINKED HERE

    From General Paul Valley: Lincoln Reagan Dinner -June 5th, 2010 Virginia City, Montana
    The Declaration of Independence states: “To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”

    We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and Halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to lead us down the road of Progressive Socialism and destruction of America. This is the current battle that we Constitutionalists face and we must be aggressive in our efforts. Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution and oaths of office of officials now come into play as relates to our National Character, National Security, Economy and the Nation’s well-being and is the rationale for resignations. Demand Resignation of derelict officials by the people of this country in now required.

    Where is our Moral Compass?

    The oath of office is simple and reads: “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder.

    The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of authority and individual liberty was understood. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution, which granted with a certain and meaningful intent for check and balances.

    Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address, “Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.” Being a representative republic, not a democracy, “rising up” means other than revolution by means of arms. The people must “rise up” from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power…resignation, death, elections, and impeachment.

    The rest of the speech is
    HERE

    Tags: obama resignation Wallaly

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:56
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Lunes, 07 de junio de 2010
     A Call for the Resignation of Barry Sotero

    By Paul E. Vallely  |  Monday, June 7th, 2010 at 1:43 am

    [These remarks were delivered at the Lincoln Reagan Dinner held this past Saturday night, June 5th, 2010 in Virginia City, Montana.]

    The Declaration of Independence states:

    “To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”

    We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and Halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to lead us down the road of Progressive Socialism and destruction of America. This is the current battle that we Constitutionalists face and we must be aggressive in our efforts. Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution of officials now come into play as relates to our National Character, National Security, Economy and the Nation’s well-being and is the rationale for resignations. Demand Resignation of derelict officials by the people of this country in now required.

    Where is our Moral Compass?

    The oath of office is simple and reads:

    “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder.

    The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which granted the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of authority and individual liberty was understood. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution with a certain and meaningful intent for check and balances.

    Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address:

    “Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”

    Being a representative republic, not a democracy, “rising up” means other than revolution by means of arms. The people must “rise up” from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power … resignation, death, elections, and impeachment.

    “We the People” have had enough. Enough is Enough. The Obama White House and identifiable Members of Congress are now on a progressive socialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. “We, the People” cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen’s interests above self-interest by resigning immediately. Our so-called Representatives and Senators are more interested in party loyalty than performing their duties. So, do not expect them to resign en masse or be impeached. Therefore the “people” must decide. A civil uprising is still not out of the question. They know which side of the bread their butter is on and it is not on our side.

    We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Sotero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) — based on Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution.

    And a call for a National Petition for new elections to select the next President of the United States of America must be initiated. We can wait no longer for a change of Power and new Government.


    Reference:

    Diana West“The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama”

    ….The fact is, the birth certificate controversy is only the beginning of the presidential mystery. There is so much we don’t know for certain about President Obama. Inexplicably but intriguigingly, he has failed to produce his bona fides, while the media (and the White House media in particular), who could ask for them, don’t care, or don’t want to care….

     1) the original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate….
     2) Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) — not found, not released
     3) Obama’s baptism records — sealed
     4) Obama’s adoption records — sealed
     5) Records of Obama’s and his mother’s reptriation as US citizens on return from Indonesia — not found, not released
     6) Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama) records — not found, not released
     7) Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) — not released
     8) Punahou School financial aid or school records — not released
     9) Occidental College financial aid records — not released. (These records were, however, subpoenaed but Obama lawyers succeeded in quashing the subpoena in court. No other Occi records have been released.)
    10) Columbia College records — not released
    11) Columbia senior thesis — not released
    12) Harvard Law School records (not mentioned below, but not released)
    13) Obama’s law client list — sealed
    14) Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator — sealed
    15) Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association — sealed
    16) Obama’s medical records — not released
    17) Obama’s passport records — not released

    Read all of the evidence accumulated by Ms. West here.

    Bookmark and
 Share

    © Paul E. Vallely, all rights reserved, published with permission. Paul E. Vallely, MGEN, US Army, (ret) is a graduate of West Point who served his country from 1961 through 1993, retiring as Deputy Commanding General, Pacific. He is currently a senior military analyst for Fox News and Chairman of Stand Up America USA.

    Send a link:  Tell a friend about this.
    Link to this post:  Permalink
    Send us your link:  Trackback link


    One Response to “A Call for the Resignation of Barry Sotero”
    1. Ralph A Kennedy says:
      June 7th, 2010 at 2:17 am

      As a Vietnam Veteran and believer in the Constitution I am in full support of these observations and comments. It seems that even the military forces have been in decline along with the political culture in our country since Mr. Obama has been in place. Fear seems to have overcome leadership and the “politically correct” mantra like many great ideas has been abused in covering fraud and abuse in our Presidential Office as well as Congress. Trickle down indeed has hit every station of the political process under the current Democratic rule. People are afraid to speak out because of retribution and the critical needs to support families. It seems that we need to find strength in standing together and indeed say “No Mas”. I applaud the courage and the common sense exhibited by Mr. Vallely in his statement. I encourage all who still hold our freedoms as sacred to join his voice and stand up against this form of tyranny. I implore all to join ranks with like minded Americans and support this call for resignation even before the electoral process begins in November.

      Thanks Paul.


    Tags: Resignation Barry Sotero

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:12
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Domingo, 06 de junio de 2010
    http://weaselzippers.us/2010/06/06/oh-great-now-the-us-defense-secretary-is-bowing-this-time-to-the-azerbaijans-minister-of-defense-general-colonel-safar-abiyev/

    Oh Great! Now The US Defense Secretary Is Bowing! This Time To The Azerbaijan’s Minister of Defense, General-Colonel Safar Abiyev

    Why the hell is our Defense Secretary bowing?

    BAKU, AZERBAIJAN – JUNE 6: U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates (R) bows as he shakes hands with Azerbaijan’s Minister of Defense, General-Colonel Safar Abiyev on the tarmac at the Heydar Aliyev International Airport June 6, 2010 in Baku, Azerbaijan. On the table in front of Aliyev is a letter from President Barack Obama. Gates left Singapore earlier today after participating in the Shangri-La Dialogue’s Asia Security Summit, which ran from June 4 to 6, 2010. DL


    Tags: Defense Gates Bowing

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 22:37
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    S?bado, 05 de junio de 2010

    Letter to Investigating Officer in Lt. Col. Lakin Case

    BY REFUSING DISCOVERY TO ARMY OFFICER CHALLENGING OBAMA’S LEGITIMACY, HAS THE ARMY TURNED ITSELF ON THE CITIZENRY?

    June 4, 2010

    The U.S. Constitution is the oldest, yet shortest, written constitution still in use today. Or has it been suspended for Obama's usurpation?

     

    Dear Editor:  The following letter was sent to the Investigating Officer for the Article 32 hearing scheduled for June 11, 2010, at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center:

    Dear LTC Driscoll,

    I understand you are the investigating officer in the upcoming trial of LTC Terry Lakin. First of all, you have made a huge strategic error by refusing to allow discovery that would exonerate Lakin in his refusal to take orders from an ineligible commander-in-chief. The whole world now knows that Barack Obama has usurped the presidency and the commander-in-chief position. We have all been made aware for the past 18 months or more that our Constitution requires that the presidency can only be given to a natural born Citizen. Obama does not pass that test with a Kenyan father who passed on his British citizenship and allegiance to his son. Obama was not, and can never be, eligible to hold the office he fraudulently holds. And you, sir, are now complicit in the cover-up by refusing to allow LTC Lakin the discovery that would exonerate him.

    I don’t think anyone would argue with your position that “…constitutional jurisprudence allows Congress alone, and not a military judicial body, to put the president’s credentials on trial…” if the president was not also our commander-in-chief. However, the president of the U.S. is also the commander-in-chief of our military forces. You have no excuse, Col. Driscoll, for failing to allow a fellow military member discovery which would exonerate him. You have taken the road that no officer of integrity would take: the low road, the path of least resistance, the going-along-to-get-along way that only a coward and hater of our Constitution would take. Passing the buck to Congress and abrogating your responsibility to constitutional jurisprudence in this military matter just does not wash and will not go unnoticed by America, or the world, for that matter.

    You, sir, also took an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and you just showed that that oath means nothing to you. No person of integrity would withhold discovery from a defendant who has simply done what he swore to do: to support and defend the Constitution. The Army has lost the respect of all of us who believe in the rule of law and are shocked that it is being denied to defendant Lakin.

    I worked with the Army for many years during my federal career and never expected to see this day of disgusting cowardice and miscarriage of justice against a decorated Army officer of sterling credentials and character. LTC Lakin has put his oath, his principles, his career, and his life on the line and deserves to be afforded full discovery of Obama’s credentials. You need to know that LTC Lakin represents millions of us who are absolutely appalled at the conspiracy of silence and cover-up in which the Army is engaging to carry out this miscarriage of justice. You know the truth. You know Obama is not qualified to serve as the president and commander-in-chief, and it is highly likely that you are aware that Obama has falsified his credentials on many fronts. Misprision of felony would look really ugly on your next ER.

    Disgusted with the Army,

    Kathleen Gotto

    ———————–

    Editor’s Note: LTC Driscoll’s contact information is:

    Daniel J. Driscoll
    LTC, JA
    Investigating Officer
    [email protected]


    Tags: obama Lakin LEGITIMACY

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:00
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Viernes, 04 de junio de 2010
     

    Army slams door on Obama Eligibility details

    Posted by Caleb on June 4, 2010 · Comments (56) 

    An Army “investigating officer” has banished evidence about the controversy over President Obama’s eligibility – or lack thereof – to be commander-in-chief from a pending hearing for a career military doctor who announced he is refusing orders until Obama documents his constitutional status.

    Military Tribunal will not examine Obama’s eligibility

    “In my view our constitutional jurisprudence allows Congress alone, and not a military judicial body, to put the president’s credentials on trial,” wrote Daniel J. Driscoll in a memorandum determining what evidence the defense for Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin will be allowed to explore at next week’s hearing.

    “It is my opinion the discovery items pertaining to the president’s credentials are not relevant to the proof of any element of the charges and specifications set forth in the charge sheet,” he continued. “Consequently I will not examine the documents or witnesses pertinent to the president or his credentials to hold office.”

    The ruling came prior to a scheduled Article 32 hearing for Lakin, who posted a video inviting his own court hearing because of the status of the president and questions over whether his eligibility means orders given under his control would be invalid.

    Read More: By Bob Unruh, WND


    Tags: obama army Lakin

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 19:50
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    June 4, 2010

    Obama's Friends Ayers, Dohrn, and Evans Behind Pro-Terrorist "Freedom Flotilla" Stunt

    Posted by Van Helsing at June 4, 2010 9:23 AM

    I wouldn't insult Moonbattery readers by suggesting that any would be dim enough to think the "Freedom Flotilla" had anything but the purest evil of intentions, but as a service to trolls, it should be pointed out that the spectacle was arranged by communist terrorists:

    Former Weather Underground leaders William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, as well as Code Pink founder Jodie Evans, helped organize the Free Gaza Movement, which launched the six-ship flotilla from Turkey to Israel that ended in a violent clash with Israeli Defense Forces, BigGovernment.com reported.

    Other misdeeds by Ayers and Dohrn include leading the Maoist terrorist cult the Weather Underground; publicly advising people to kill the rich and their own parents; instigating riots; participating in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters, the Capitol building, and the Pentagon; killing police officers; inventing the "fork salute" in honor of the Charles Manson killings; plotting to set off a nail bomb at an officers dance at Fort Dix; boasting in the September 11, 2001 New York Times of having no regrets about acts of terrorism; and worst of all, using their own living room to launch the political career of Barack Hussein Obama.

    Jodie Evans of Code Pink has a rap sheet that includes smuggling $600,000 to terrorists fighting American troops in Fallujah and serving as one of Obama's top fundraisers. She now seems to hold the position of the Taliban's ambassador to Washington.

    Readers will recall that Ayers, Dohrn, and Evans have teamed up on behalf of Hamas before. Assisting the bloodthirsty terrorist outfit in its campaign to annihilate Israel appears to be their follow-up to the disastrously successful Manchurian Moonbat project.

    That these vermin have placed one of their own in the White House means it is not a good time to be Israeli — or American.

    Bill Ayers and protégé.

    On a tip from Byron.


    Tags: obama flotilla ayers

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:42
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    The Obama Administration Sides With Hamas

     By Joseph A. Klein  Friday, June 4, 2010

    Hamas’ allies have achieved what theyset out to do – to push Israel into a corner by provoking aconfrontation against the blockade-breaker flotilla of ships and thenusing Israel’s response to force an end to the blockade against theHamas-controlled Gaza Strip.

    If the humanitarian needs of thepeople of Gaza were the first concern of the Free Gaza Movement andtheir co-sponsors from Turkey and elsewhere, they wouldhave accepted Israel’s repeated offers to allow their cargoto be delivered to Gaza after the Israelis had an opportunity toinspect to ensure that there were no weapons aboard.  They refusedbecause embarrassing Israel was their primary objective.
    Israel’s blockade, which Egypt wasalso instituting at its border, is perfectly legal under internationallaw according to the law of blockade which was derived from customaryinternational law, codified in the 1909 Declaration of London andupdated in 1994 in a legally recognized document called the “San RemoManual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea.” Asrequired by this international law, Israel declared the blockade,notified it to all belligerents and neutral states, and blockaded onlythe area under enemy control. Hamas rules Gaza and is engaged in armedhostilities with Israel, which it has vowed to destroy.
    Under international law, Israel canuse force when boarding a ship headed for the belligerent areacontrolled by its enemy Hamas even if the ship’s passengers and cargowere truly all peace-loving humanitarians. In this case, the so-calledhumanitarian flotilla included a number of non-humanitarian Islamicjihadists, some of whom were armed and ready for a fight.
    According to information quoted byMEMRI, the Egyptian flotilla delegation included two members of theMuslim Brotherhood bloc in the Egyptian parliament: Muhammad Al-Baltajiand Hazem Farouq. Two of the Jordanian participants in the flotilla,according to MEMRI, were Wael Al-Saka, a Muslim Brotherhood member, andSalam Al-Falahat, who was general guide of the Muslim Brotherhood inJordan from 2006 to 2008. The Lebanese flotilla delegation was headedby attorney Dr. Hani Suleiman, who also participated in a February 2009Gaza flotilla. In 2006, he signed a communiqué supporting armedresistance in Palestine, Lebanon, and Iraq.
    The Free Gaza Movement, which hadorganized smaller efforts to break Israel’s blockade in the past,teamed up this time with a Turkish group, Insani Yardim Vakfi (known asIHH), to raise money and assemble the larger flotilla, whichprecipitated the confrontation.  IHH has connections with Hamasand other radical Islamic groups.
    Israel was acting lawfully inimposing and enforcing its blockade against Hamas. However, in theinternational community - reflected at the United Nations -international law is regularly stood on its head.  Unfortunately,Israel took the bait, and the propaganda machinery of the UnitedNations was immediately put into the service of the Palestinian“victims” of Israeli “aggression.”
    At the United Nations SecurityCouncil this past weekend, the Obama administration sidedwith Israel’s enemies in putting Israel on the defensive over itsblockade of Hamas-controlled Gaza.
    The UN Security Council unanimouslyagreed on a Presidential Statement that placed all of the blame onIsrael for the fatalities that occurred during the latestattempt by Hamas supporters to break the Israeli blockade. The Obama administration gave the Lebanese representative who wasserving as the rotating president of the Security Council, and hisIslamic ally from Turkey who also sits on the Security Council,its blessing.  As usual, the UN document contains no contextbehind the tragic incident.
    After the Security Council acted, therabidly anti-Semitic UN Human Rights followed up on June 2nd with adecision to dispatch a “fact-finding” mission to investigate Israel’sinterdiction, having already declared Israel guilty.  That sameday at UN headquarters in New York, I witnessed first-hand the blatantincendiary propaganda of the Libyan UN ambassador and the PalestinianUN observer as they attacked Israel and demanded another“international” investigation of Israel’s conduct by UN SecretaryGeneral Ban Ki-moon. But they must have known something about the Obamaadministration’s intentions, because they indicated that the UnitedStates was now in line with the other members of the Mideast quartet -the European Union, United Nations, Russia - in demanding an immediateend to Israel’s blockade.
    Sure enough, senior administrationofficials were quoted the next day in the New York Times as declaringthat the Obama administration considers Israel’s blockade of Gaza to be“untenable” and “plans to press for another approach to ensure Israel’ssecurity while allowing more supplies” into Gaza.
    How exactly does the Obamaadministration intend to “ensure Israel’s security” if the Israeliblockade is lifted?  Will it dare cross its Islamicallies including Turkey, a member of NATO and one of the more“moderate” Islamic states until taken over by an Islamic ruling party,which is leading the charge against Israel? I’m quite certain that theanswer is resounding “no.”
    Will Obama press for a UNSecurity Council resolution prohibiting the transport of arms and oftrained jihadist fighters to Gaza?  Even if such a resolutioncould be passed over the objections of the Council’s Islamic membersTurkey and Lebanon, it will be no more effective than its ban on armsto Hezbollah that Iran and Syria regularly violate.
    Could some sort of multinationalnaval and land contingent be put into place to inspect for arms inplace of Israel’s blockade?  Unlikely, to put it mildly. Doesanyone seriously think that the Obama administration, much less anyEuropean or non-aligned country, would risk putting its ownstanding with the “international community” at risk by replacing Israelas an enforcer and confronting another Free Gaza activist ship?Again I think not.
    Israel gave peace a chance five yearsago when it withdrew its soldiers and settlers from Gaza. Extensive imports into Gaza and exports out of Gaza wereallowed until Hamas forcibly took the Gaza Strip over and kickedout the Palestinian Authority.  Humanitarian supplies, includingfood and medicines, continue to be allowed in, despite repeatedprovocations from Hamas.
    Nothing has changed on Hamas’side. It is still dedicated to destroying the Jewish state. It smuggles arms to use in carrying out its threat, how andwhenever it can.  It continues to hold Israeli soldier StaffSgt. Gilad Shalit in captivity.
    It is Hamas, not Israel, that mustfundamentally change, before the blockade can be safely lifted. Withthe Obama administration’s willingness to reward Hamas for itsintransigence by continuing to pressure Israel for more and moreunilateral concessions, Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groupswill only become more emboldened. And that should worry Israelis andfreedom loving Westerners alike.
    The Obama Administration Sides With Hamas

    Joseph A. Klein Bio
    Joseph A. Klein Mostrecent columnsJoseph A. Klein is the author of Global Deception: The UN’s StealthAssault on America’s Freedom.
    Joseph can 



    Tags: obama Hamas Israel

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:33
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Martes, 01 de junio de 2010
    Monday, May 31, 2010

    First, some of our founding principles:

    “A Constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people constituting a government, and government without a constitution is power without a right.” Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man, Chapter IV, Of Constitutions.

    “If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.” George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796.

    "Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." John Adams.

    "If virtue and knowledge are diffused among the people, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great Security." Samuel Adams

    "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." Abraham Lincoln.

    With these time-honored principles in mind, let us now examine who is protecting the Constitution and the Nation, the “birthers” or Obama and his enablers. Let us review why the "birthers" maintain that Obama is ineligible to be President and by usurping that office is subverting the Constitution and presents a grave and present danger to our Nation. They make a two-part argument. First, they argue that Obama does not meet the original and only doubt-free, definition of an Article II "natural born Citizen" which, apart that i
    t is the only definition that best serves the national security interests of the United States, has been confirmed by religious and secular history, Founding era evidence, U.S. Supreme Court cases, Congressional Acts, and many notable international and constitutional law scholars. That definition is that a “natural born Citizen” is one who is born in the country (or its equivalent) to U.S. citizen parents (mother and father). Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 first edition which was written in French; 1759 first edition written in English). They argue that this, and not the English common law definition of a “natural born subject,” is the only definition of a “natural born Citizen” which, like the 35-years of age and 14-years of residency requirements, creates no doubts as to its meaning, and therefore would have been the only definition the Framers would have adopted when establishing the presidential eligibility standards in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. They argue that under the British Nationality Act 1948, when Obama was born in 1961, Obama’s father, who was born in the then-British colony of Kenya, was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was also born a British subject/citizen by inheriting that allegiance by descent from his father. Hence, because he is missing one of two U.S. citizen parents at birth, through his father, who never became a U.S. citizen or even a U.S. legal permanent resident, and through himself, Obama was born with as much natural allegiance to Great Britain which at age 2 converted to Kenyan as he was born with to the United States (if he was born in Hawaii). Hence, being born without unity of citizenship and allegiance to the United States and rather with conflicting natural allegiance to Great Britain and then to Kenya, there is no way that Obama can be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States and the President and Commander in Chief of its military.

    Second, the “birthers” argue that Obama, who unjustifiably refuses to satisfy his burden of proof and present to the public his readily available 1961 contemporaneous birth certificate and his education, work, and travel documents,
    has yet to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii. Hence, presumably not being born in the United States and not being able to resort to any Congressional Act to make him a “citizen of the United States” let alone a “natural born Citizen,” Obama cannot be President.

    How do Obama's enablers respond? Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 itself distinguishes between a “citizen of the United States” and a “natural born Citizen,” and commands that today only a “natural born Citizen” is eligible to be President. But Obama’s enablers just forget about all that and argue that the meaning of an Article II “natural born Citizen” was finally clarified in 1898 (only 120 years after the Constitution was adopted) by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, despite previous Supreme Court cases defining it as Vattel did in 1758 and despite that
    the Wong Court was only asked the question of whether Wong was a born “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment. They say, although without providing sufficient evidence thereof, that Obama was born in Hawaii and that he is therefore a Wong Fourteenth Amendment "citizen of the United States." Then they take the Obama Fourteenth Amendment born “citizen of the United States” and, with a quantum leap in logic and without any support from anything stated in the Wong majority decision, and despite the Wong majority confirming the same Vattelian original and only definition of a “natural born Citizen” which it recognized to be a different class of citizen from a “citizen of the United States,” equate him to an Article II "natural born Citizen." They justify their twisted reading of the Wong decision and the Fourteenth Amendment by arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment amended Article II's "natural born Citizen" clause which in effect would mean that it amended the Presidential eligibility requirements of the U.S. Constitution to say that anyone who is a born “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment is also an Article II “natural born Citizen.” They do all this by arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment amended Article II’s “natural born Citizen” clause even though the Constitution tells us in Article V how to amend it which does not include amending it by stealth, implication, and without notice to and vote by the People.

    On Obama's place of birth, despite that Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 and the Twentieth Amendment provide that a would-be President before qualifying for the Office of President must, among other things, show that he or she is a "
    natural born Citizen," they argue that it is up to those who question his place of birth to prove he was not born in Hawaii rather than up to Obama to prove that he was in fact born there. They have the face to make this argument even though they enable Obama to refuse to release to the public his 1961 contemporaneous birth certificate and education, work, and travel documents, they let him get away with not being otherwise transparent with the public, and they confuse the American people by telling them Obama has released his original birth certificate when in fact the only thing he did was release an alleged 2007 Certification of Live Birth, aka COLB, (which does not provide the name of the birth hospital, the delivering doctor, and other corroborating information) by posting a questionable image of it on the internet in 2008. Finally, on the question of whether their definition of a “natural born Citizen” provides the same national security for the American people and the Nation as does the birthers’ definition of the clause, Obama’s enablers will hear none of that and simply pooh-pooh the "birthers'" concern for the safety of America.

    Now let us be honest. Who is protecting the Constitution and the Nation, the “birthers” or Obama and his enablers?

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    May 31, 2010
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com%20/

    Tags: obama Eligibility

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:02
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar