Informaciones noticiosas y comentarios.
IsMad Captain Barack Now Steering America Towards the Gates of Hell?
DoesObama Employ the Marxist Doctrine of Creative Destruction?
By Kelly O'Connell Sunday, March 14, 2010Having watchedBarack Obama’s sole economic recovery strategy of spendinghand-over-fist to “heal” our economic malaise and rampant deficits, wemust ask if his theory is a cipher for the mythic phoenix? Is Barack aclassical Marxist seeking to fix a broken society via torching oureconomy to ashes, confident it will arise again, healed by socialismand communism? During a turbulently reckless period he seeks a massivegovernment-directed health care bill. Obama now demands wildexpenditures on top of record deficits, in the midst of a prolongedrecession, against record unemployment. So, what other motivation doessuch illogical decision making suggest?
IsBarack a mad Ahab chasing the giant, evil specter of Capitalism acrossthe globe, hoping to harpoon and sink it to the bottom of the deep?Even Obama is intelligent enough to know his strange belief thatKeynesian “deficit-spending always equals growth” may not work. Infact, it hasn’t so far, a year later. So what is his “Plan B”? Well,perhaps there is no secondary plan because he only means to ruin theeconomy. It’s a distinct possibility that Barack actually intends tobankrupt the US into accepting the socialism he touted to Joe “ThePlumber” Wurzelbacher. In fact, to engage in such an attack against theworld’s greatest capitalist nation would merely make him a superstaracolyte to his Marxist progenitors.
Itis essential non leftists understand that just because Marxism has beenlogically, scientifically and historically disproved, it does not meanit is a spent force. Instead, because of it’s evangelical spirit, itbecomes even more dangerous once discarded and ignored, remaining likea zombie faith. Marxism does espouse a “Doctrine of Destruction” thatmust be implemented by its true followers at every level. It teachescapitalism is theft, and that the rich steal what they have amassedfrom the poor. So the only just response is to confiscate the stolenwealth and return it to the impoverished workers. There isn’t much moreto Marxism than this, but this judgmental and self-righteous conceit isas sacred to a communist as Mecca is to a proper Muslim. Anatomyof Marx’s Creative Destruction A.Socialist Revolution
Atthe very center of Marxism is the call for total “Revolution.” The book“Facts on Communism, Vol. I, The Communist Ideology” says, “the Marxistdoctrine of the Socialist Revolution is the core of Communistideology.” The main strategy for forcing Marxist revolution isfomenting crisis. While most Westerners recoil at the thought of amajor economic collapse, knowing the resultant human pain andheartache, Marxists salivate at the possibility. Their theory teachesthem capitalism must surely fail, and so they have plans ready for whenthis occurs, and they also design stratagems to make certain it does.
Ironically,Karl Marx would claim neither China nor Russia were ideal places for asocialist revolution, since they were both so primitive, having littleeconomic development. In fact, America is logically the best place tostart a genuine communist revolution since it is the most advancedcapitalist state, which is exactly the kind of place Marx called totake over. When the capitalist cycle marks its zenith, then is the timefor revolutionaries to move. The “proletariat” were those who shouldlaunch the strike, which are, according to Webster’s: “the class ofindustrial workers who lack their own means of production and hencesell their labor to live.” The revolution should happen by any meanspossible, especially violence, to free the proletariat to launch theirdictatorship, which shall utterly destroy capitalist society, remakingit upon a socialist and then finally communist model. This, accordingto Facts on Communism.
B.Abstract Theory of Strategies
Thereare several basic strategies Marx taught for fomenting revolution,later vouchsafed by Vladimir Lenin, founding Russian dictator. First,the revolution is led by the Communist Party. This group directs therevolutionary struggle by way of propaganda, agitation and opportunism.All Party members must be a cadre of professional revolutionaries,ready to strike at a moment’s notice at the first chance. The Party isalso a self-chosen “priesthood” to which has been entrusted all truth;the Party itself being the only existent holder of veracity. The Partyexpects and exacts iron discipline; no deviation is allowed. Lenin’s“Two Revolutions” strategy focuses on first helping any groupinterested in upheaval to overthrow society, and then later attackingthose same groups found not morally pure, ie non-proletariatrevolutionaries. Finally, both legal and illegal activities arecountenanced, whatever might help the cause of revolution, at the time,states Facts on Communism.
C.Concrete Communist Revolutionary Strategies
ClarenceB. Carson, in his magnificent study “Basic Communism, It’s Rise, Spreadand Debacle in the 20th Century,” lists nine historic precipitatingstrategies for socialist revolution in his chapter “Stratagems andTactics for International Communism.”
(1.)Communist International: The “Comintern” was an international groupformed to foment revolution worldwide in Russia in 1919, ending in1943, doing much to teach world delegates tactics and theories on howto cause a leftist a revolution.
(2.)The Party: The Communist Party in all countries has the duty to trainand direct professional revolutionaries, or the “vanguard of theelite,” revealing how deeply indebted communism is to top-down controland group-think. Membership is not given, but earned. Being a member ofa leftist type organization, say, an environmentalist group,anti-corporation cabal, or “peace organization,” (often communist frontgroups – see below) is commonly the first sign someone has earned aParty meeting invite. A future member will not be offered Partymembership until a lengthy apprenticeship is done, which includes doingprojects, helping community organizing, and memorizing Marxist-Leninistdoctrines. Marxist acolytes also study current events, economics,socialist theory, revolutionary strategies, and even public speaking,while also fund-raising and recruiting new members. Non-communistfriendships are discouraged. Bouts of intense self-scrutiny and harshcriticism are encouraged. The desire is to create a boot-camp effectcausing an almost evangelical level of personality overhaul for futuremembers. The term “brainwash” comes to mind, here.
(3.)Labor Unions: Communists have always targeted unions and their members,seeing these as a classic example of the sacred proletariat. The modernlabor union not only arose around the time of socialism, but was deeplyaffected by it during its genesis. Unions have a certain collectivistlogic, which ties in with communist theory. Many union leaders weresocialists before they signed up to their local. A union can have aminority socialist membership, yet these vigorous advocates oftencontrol the agenda through sheer zeal. Many American unions have beendominated by socialists and communists, including the AFL/CIO, UnitedMine Workers, United Auto Workers, etc etc. Many strikes have beencoordinated to sabotage work and terrorize bosses ad owners.
(4.)Communist Fronts: A communist front is simply an organization whichdoes not appear socialist, but was either started or is controlled bycommunists to achieve their ends. These were popular in the day ofgovernment crackdowns on leftism. But this tactic is still employed. J.Edgar Hoover mentioned this phenomenon, writing the Party… “hasoperated hundreds of major fronts in practically every field of Partyagitation: ‘peace,’ civil rights, protection of the foreignborn…abolition of H-bomb tests, exploitation of nationality andminority groups,” etc. Modern examples would include ACORN and theACLU. Carson writes that the general dogma of Marxism is sostultifying, that the only way communists can attract thoughtfulmembers is to draw in those who have a concrete agenda, likeimmigration rights, etc.
(5.)Subversion: Communists seek to undermine a non-socialist country byencouraging acts and beliefs that “pervert or corrupt by an underminingof morals, allegiance or faith,” according to Carson. Anything thatdebases the populace will be attempted, such as attacks upon the familystructure, traditional religions, ideas of sexual propriety, notions ofauthority, the legal profession, Art theory, etc. Further, intellectualassaults against common sense ideas regarding economics, the monetarysystem, any university degree discipline, or desecration of greatnational symbols, etc will all be attempted. A classic example of thishas been achieved by the Political Correctness movement, which wasexplicitly designed by German intellectual Marxists to undermineAmerica. They were called the Frankfort School, and immigrated to theStates to avoid Hitler’s wrath.
(6.)Espionage: Any country can use espionage to gain advantage on another.But, as one writer put it about the old Soviets, they…“employedespionage in ways that no other nation in all of recorded history hadever attempted.” Such appears true today about the Chinese, whorelentlessly probe American government Internet sites, and launch manyprobes and attacks to test Yankee defenses. It was also during theClinton administration that Loral Space shared details of rocketry thatallowed the Chinese to stunningly invert their 90% failure rate withtheir ICBM missile launches to one of 90% success. Loral,coincidentally, donated a million dollars to the DNC before beingallowed to sell technology to China, but ended up paying a $14 millionfine in 2002 for passing missile technology to them. J. Edgar Hooverlisted the chief areas of communist espionage, being scientificR&D; strength and methodology of US armed forces; Americanintelligence and counterintelligence; US international relations; andAmerican anti-communist tactics.
(7.)Sabotage: Much like members of a Muslim radical jihad sect, a truecommunist will always be, at least in his or her heart, at war withcapitalism and non-socialist countries. Before the USSR fell, the KGBsecret police was massively involved in global disinformation campaignsthat furthered the goals of communist Russia. Today, there is moreconcern with groups inside America doing whatever they can to underminethe US from inside. For example, the tactic of financial crisis drivenby ramping up demands on the social state to create financial crisis,such as espoused in the Cloward-Pivin doctrine, is such leftistsabotage. (further discussed below)
(8.)Terrorism: Soon after the Russian Revolution, terror was the singulardefining characteristic for Lenin, and then employed by Stalin and Maowith spectacular results in terms of sheer murders and tamping opendissent. Since then, countless global Marxist uprisings have beenpunctuated by terrorist campaigns, such as led by the Communist Partyof Peru, aka the Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso), who killed manyinnocents. Also Castro’s Cuba has tortured and killed countlessresidents, and Cambodia’s Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge, who killed twomillion Cambodians from 1975 to 1979. Overall, the Communists killed atleast 175 million in the 20th century in their terror campaigns againsttheir own people. US terrorists, such as William Ayers and theWeathermen attempted to terrorize Americans into accepting socialism.
(9.)Civil War: Vladimir Lenin returned to Russia from Europe in his sealedtrain and immediately began agitating for a civil war. Why? Because heknew that if Russians engaged in such action, it would make it mucheasier for his tiny group to take over the country. This ended up beinga significant factor in he and his party ascending to power. Such anoutcome in America would be met by most Marxists with joy since theyknow that, short of a military upheaval, it will be quite difficult toovercome a country with such a strong history of capitalism, gunrights, and open democracy. Cloward-PivenStrategy to Cause Economic Collapse DoesObama have something like a Cloward-Piven principle in mind for shakingout resistance to his economic plans to force Americans to acceptsocialism by necessity? The “Cloward-Piven Strategy” was designed byColumbia University professors Richard Cloward and wife Frances Piven.Their strategy was simply a method used by leftists to encourage asmany eligible people as possible into signing up for all the socialwelfare programs available. This is meant to then bankrupt the system.After this occurs, the plan is to push a country towards socialism. Butthe general strategy can also be adapted to other methods ofbankrupting a nation. DavidHorowitz’s site Discover the Networks lists some recent apparentinnovations in the Cloward-Piven Strategy, which include ACORN’s demandfor new lending rules. This caused irresponsible sub-prime (ie,unqualified borrowers) to get loans which helped start the recentfinancial crisis. Further policies apparently meant to undermine USfinancial stability and foment socialist revolution include the bankingbailout TARP and its $700 billion buyout of troubled assets, which hasalready been shown to have been misused. Also the $787 billion StimulusBill, which in addition to creating a supposed economic “stimulation,”also revoked the “Personal Responsibility and Work OpportunityReconciliation Act, the welfare-reform legislation passed by theRepublican Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1996.”
Accordingto the Heritage Foundation, 32% of the Stimulus Bill, averaging $6,700in “new means-tested welfare spending” was set aside for every poorindividual in America. Horowitz says these funds are earmarked for suchprograms as: “Temporary Assistance to Needy Families; Medicaid; foodstamps; the Women, Infants, and Children food program; public housing;Section 8 housing; the Community Development Block Grant; the SocialServices Block Grant; Head Start; and the Earned Income Tax Credit.”Yet such welfare bankrolling is only the iceberg’s tip. Heritagestates, “Once the hidden welfare spending in the bill is counted, thetotal 10-year fiscal burden (added to the national debt) will [be]$1.34 trillion. This amounts to $17,400 for each household payingincome tax in the U.S.”
Heritagenoted increased welfare spending in the Stimulus Bill, being Obama’s“Make Work Pay” refundable tax credit. They state, “This creditrepresents a fundamental shift in welfare policy. At a cost of around$23 billion per year, this credit will provide up to [$400] in cash tolow income adults who pay no income taxes. For the first time, thegovernment will give significant cash to able-bodied adults withoutdependent children. Since most of these individuals have littleapparent need for assistance, the new credit represents ‘spreading thewealth’ for its own sake. The lack of connection between this creditand ‘economic stimulus’ is evident in the fact that the first paymentsunder the program will not be made until April 2010.”
Otherperceived plans to damage the US economy by Obama include the attemptedClimate Change legislation and its staggeringly expensive Cap &Trade legislation. This could drain trillions of dollars out of theworld economy every year, killing millions of poor, per annum. Also theDetroit car maker bailout, the rampant printing of fiat currency. Butthe $2.5-$3 trillion dollar Obamacare bill is the piece de resistanceof government profligacy. Some Democrats now even admit it will causehealth care costs to skyrocket, while decreasing treatment and overallquality, but the program is still being touted as done in the name offairness and justice. How laughable.
But regardless of the worth of anyparticular program, simply basing a large part of the yearly governmentbudget upon perpetually borrowed funds means that the state must, atsome point, go bankrupt. Conclusion Wasn’tit was odd to hear Barack deny his Baltimore address that he is“Bolshevik”? This reveals more nominal familiarity with the vocabularyof the Russian Revolution than his own armed force’s vocabulary, suchas the common term “corpsman”! But fellow uber-leftist adviser RahmEmmanuel’s statement one should never let a crisis pass withoutextracting some normally unacceptable concession, is even more of asocialist slip. Do both men have a heart full of communism, asnonchalantly work toward the demise of the free market andlaissez-faire? Creative Destruction means that if a Marxist destroys abad capitalist society, a better socialist one will arise magically inits place. Will wanton economic chaos and wreckage really createparadise on earth? Do these two ultra leftists genuinely believe suchmadness?
BarackObama has experienced an almost total lifelong immersion in socialism.He has had a nearly complete dependence upon leftist and even communistcontacts and friends during his childhood, education and rise to power.Therefore, wouldn’t it be exceedingly odd if Barack weren’t at least alittle bit communist at heart? But perhaps, like Moby Dick’s Ahab,Obama hisses to himself about the capitalist whale, “from hell’s heartI stab at thee; for hate’s sake I spit my last breath at thee.” But thequestion remains – What will the average patriotic American do now thatthis administration has been outed for what and who they really are?
DoesObama Employ the Marxist Doctrine of Creative Destruction?
By Kelly O'Connell Sunday, March 14, 2010Having watchedBarack Obama’s sole economic recovery strategy of spendinghand-over-fist to “heal” our economic malaise and rampant deficits, wemust ask if his theory is a cipher for the mythic phoenix? Is Barack aclassical Marxist seeking to fix a broken society via torching oureconomy to ashes, confident it will arise again, healed by socialismand communism? During a turbulently reckless period he seeks a massivegovernment-directed health care bill. Obama now demands wildexpenditures on top of record deficits, in the midst of a prolongedrecession, against record unemployment. So, what other motivation doessuch illogical decision making suggest?
Itis essential non leftists understand that just because Marxism has beenlogically, scientifically and historically disproved, it does not meanit is a spent force. Instead, because of it’s evangelical spirit, itbecomes even more dangerous once discarded and ignored, remaining likea zombie faith. Marxism does espouse a “Doctrine of Destruction” thatmust be implemented by its true followers at every level. It teachescapitalism is theft, and that the rich steal what they have amassedfrom the poor. So the only just response is to confiscate the stolenwealth and return it to the impoverished workers. There isn’t much moreto Marxism than this, but this judgmental and self-righteous conceit isas sacred to a communist as Mecca is to a proper Muslim. Anatomyof Marx’s Creative Destruction A.Socialist Revolution
Atthe very center of Marxism is the call for total “Revolution.” The book“Facts on Communism, Vol. I, The Communist Ideology” says, “the Marxistdoctrine of the Socialist Revolution is the core of Communistideology.” The main strategy for forcing Marxist revolution isfomenting crisis. While most Westerners recoil at the thought of amajor economic collapse, knowing the resultant human pain andheartache, Marxists salivate at the possibility. Their theory teachesthem capitalism must surely fail, and so they have plans ready for whenthis occurs, and they also design stratagems to make certain it does.
Ironically,Karl Marx would claim neither China nor Russia were ideal places for asocialist revolution, since they were both so primitive, having littleeconomic development. In fact, America is logically the best place tostart a genuine communist revolution since it is the most advancedcapitalist state, which is exactly the kind of place Marx called totake over. When the capitalist cycle marks its zenith, then is the timefor revolutionaries to move. The “proletariat” were those who shouldlaunch the strike, which are, according to Webster’s: “the class ofindustrial workers who lack their own means of production and hencesell their labor to live.” The revolution should happen by any meanspossible, especially violence, to free the proletariat to launch theirdictatorship, which shall utterly destroy capitalist society, remakingit upon a socialist and then finally communist model. This, accordingto Facts on Communism.
B.Abstract Theory of Strategies
Thereare several basic strategies Marx taught for fomenting revolution,later vouchsafed by Vladimir Lenin, founding Russian dictator. First,the revolution is led by the Communist Party. This group directs therevolutionary struggle by way of propaganda, agitation and opportunism.All Party members must be a cadre of professional revolutionaries,ready to strike at a moment’s notice at the first chance. The Party isalso a self-chosen “priesthood” to which has been entrusted all truth;the Party itself being the only existent holder of veracity. The Partyexpects and exacts iron discipline; no deviation is allowed. Lenin’s“Two Revolutions” strategy focuses on first helping any groupinterested in upheaval to overthrow society, and then later attackingthose same groups found not morally pure, ie non-proletariatrevolutionaries. Finally, both legal and illegal activities arecountenanced, whatever might help the cause of revolution, at the time,states Facts on Communism.
C.Concrete Communist Revolutionary Strategies
ClarenceB. Carson, in his magnificent study “Basic Communism, It’s Rise, Spreadand Debacle in the 20th Century,” lists nine historic precipitatingstrategies for socialist revolution in his chapter “Stratagems andTactics for International Communism.”
(1.)Communist International: The “Comintern” was an international groupformed to foment revolution worldwide in Russia in 1919, ending in1943, doing much to teach world delegates tactics and theories on howto cause a leftist a revolution.
(2.)The Party: The Communist Party in all countries has the duty to trainand direct professional revolutionaries, or the “vanguard of theelite,” revealing how deeply indebted communism is to top-down controland group-think. Membership is not given, but earned. Being a member ofa leftist type organization, say, an environmentalist group,anti-corporation cabal, or “peace organization,” (often communist frontgroups – see below) is commonly the first sign someone has earned aParty meeting invite. A future member will not be offered Partymembership until a lengthy apprenticeship is done, which includes doingprojects, helping community organizing, and memorizing Marxist-Leninistdoctrines. Marxist acolytes also study current events, economics,socialist theory, revolutionary strategies, and even public speaking,while also fund-raising and recruiting new members. Non-communistfriendships are discouraged. Bouts of intense self-scrutiny and harshcriticism are encouraged. The desire is to create a boot-camp effectcausing an almost evangelical level of personality overhaul for futuremembers. The term “brainwash” comes to mind, here.
(3.)Labor Unions: Communists have always targeted unions and their members,seeing these as a classic example of the sacred proletariat. The modernlabor union not only arose around the time of socialism, but was deeplyaffected by it during its genesis. Unions have a certain collectivistlogic, which ties in with communist theory. Many union leaders weresocialists before they signed up to their local. A union can have aminority socialist membership, yet these vigorous advocates oftencontrol the agenda through sheer zeal. Many American unions have beendominated by socialists and communists, including the AFL/CIO, UnitedMine Workers, United Auto Workers, etc etc. Many strikes have beencoordinated to sabotage work and terrorize bosses ad owners.
(4.)Communist Fronts: A communist front is simply an organization whichdoes not appear socialist, but was either started or is controlled bycommunists to achieve their ends. These were popular in the day ofgovernment crackdowns on leftism. But this tactic is still employed. J.Edgar Hoover mentioned this phenomenon, writing the Party… “hasoperated hundreds of major fronts in practically every field of Partyagitation: ‘peace,’ civil rights, protection of the foreignborn…abolition of H-bomb tests, exploitation of nationality andminority groups,” etc. Modern examples would include ACORN and theACLU. Carson writes that the general dogma of Marxism is sostultifying, that the only way communists can attract thoughtfulmembers is to draw in those who have a concrete agenda, likeimmigration rights, etc.
(5.)Subversion: Communists seek to undermine a non-socialist country byencouraging acts and beliefs that “pervert or corrupt by an underminingof morals, allegiance or faith,” according to Carson. Anything thatdebases the populace will be attempted, such as attacks upon the familystructure, traditional religions, ideas of sexual propriety, notions ofauthority, the legal profession, Art theory, etc. Further, intellectualassaults against common sense ideas regarding economics, the monetarysystem, any university degree discipline, or desecration of greatnational symbols, etc will all be attempted. A classic example of thishas been achieved by the Political Correctness movement, which wasexplicitly designed by German intellectual Marxists to undermineAmerica. They were called the Frankfort School, and immigrated to theStates to avoid Hitler’s wrath.
(6.)Espionage: Any country can use espionage to gain advantage on another.But, as one writer put it about the old Soviets, they…“employedespionage in ways that no other nation in all of recorded history hadever attempted.” Such appears true today about the Chinese, whorelentlessly probe American government Internet sites, and launch manyprobes and attacks to test Yankee defenses. It was also during theClinton administration that Loral Space shared details of rocketry thatallowed the Chinese to stunningly invert their 90% failure rate withtheir ICBM missile launches to one of 90% success. Loral,coincidentally, donated a million dollars to the DNC before beingallowed to sell technology to China, but ended up paying a $14 millionfine in 2002 for passing missile technology to them. J. Edgar Hooverlisted the chief areas of communist espionage, being scientificR&D; strength and methodology of US armed forces; Americanintelligence and counterintelligence; US international relations; andAmerican anti-communist tactics.
(7.)Sabotage: Much like members of a Muslim radical jihad sect, a truecommunist will always be, at least in his or her heart, at war withcapitalism and non-socialist countries. Before the USSR fell, the KGBsecret police was massively involved in global disinformation campaignsthat furthered the goals of communist Russia. Today, there is moreconcern with groups inside America doing whatever they can to underminethe US from inside. For example, the tactic of financial crisis drivenby ramping up demands on the social state to create financial crisis,such as espoused in the Cloward-Pivin doctrine, is such leftistsabotage. (further discussed below)
(8.)Terrorism: Soon after the Russian Revolution, terror was the singulardefining characteristic for Lenin, and then employed by Stalin and Maowith spectacular results in terms of sheer murders and tamping opendissent. Since then, countless global Marxist uprisings have beenpunctuated by terrorist campaigns, such as led by the Communist Partyof Peru, aka the Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso), who killed manyinnocents. Also Castro’s Cuba has tortured and killed countlessresidents, and Cambodia’s Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge, who killed twomillion Cambodians from 1975 to 1979. Overall, the Communists killed atleast 175 million in the 20th century in their terror campaigns againsttheir own people. US terrorists, such as William Ayers and theWeathermen attempted to terrorize Americans into accepting socialism.
(9.)Civil War: Vladimir Lenin returned to Russia from Europe in his sealedtrain and immediately began agitating for a civil war. Why? Because heknew that if Russians engaged in such action, it would make it mucheasier for his tiny group to take over the country. This ended up beinga significant factor in he and his party ascending to power. Such anoutcome in America would be met by most Marxists with joy since theyknow that, short of a military upheaval, it will be quite difficult toovercome a country with such a strong history of capitalism, gunrights, and open democracy. Cloward-PivenStrategy to Cause Economic Collapse DoesObama have something like a Cloward-Piven principle in mind for shakingout resistance to his economic plans to force Americans to acceptsocialism by necessity? The “Cloward-Piven Strategy” was designed byColumbia University professors Richard Cloward and wife Frances Piven.Their strategy was simply a method used by leftists to encourage asmany eligible people as possible into signing up for all the socialwelfare programs available. This is meant to then bankrupt the system.After this occurs, the plan is to push a country towards socialism. Butthe general strategy can also be adapted to other methods ofbankrupting a nation. DavidHorowitz’s site Discover the Networks lists some recent apparentinnovations in the Cloward-Piven Strategy, which include ACORN’s demandfor new lending rules. This caused irresponsible sub-prime (ie,unqualified borrowers) to get loans which helped start the recentfinancial crisis. Further policies apparently meant to undermine USfinancial stability and foment socialist revolution include the bankingbailout TARP and its $700 billion buyout of troubled assets, which hasalready been shown to have been misused. Also the $787 billion StimulusBill, which in addition to creating a supposed economic “stimulation,”also revoked the “Personal Responsibility and Work OpportunityReconciliation Act, the welfare-reform legislation passed by theRepublican Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1996.”
Accordingto the Heritage Foundation, 32% of the Stimulus Bill, averaging $6,700in “new means-tested welfare spending” was set aside for every poorindividual in America. Horowitz says these funds are earmarked for suchprograms as: “Temporary Assistance to Needy Families; Medicaid; foodstamps; the Women, Infants, and Children food program; public housing;Section 8 housing; the Community Development Block Grant; the SocialServices Block Grant; Head Start; and the Earned Income Tax Credit.”Yet such welfare bankrolling is only the iceberg’s tip. Heritagestates, “Once the hidden welfare spending in the bill is counted, thetotal 10-year fiscal burden (added to the national debt) will [be]$1.34 trillion. This amounts to $17,400 for each household payingincome tax in the U.S.”
Heritagenoted increased welfare spending in the Stimulus Bill, being Obama’s“Make Work Pay” refundable tax credit. They state, “This creditrepresents a fundamental shift in welfare policy. At a cost of around$23 billion per year, this credit will provide up to [$400] in cash tolow income adults who pay no income taxes. For the first time, thegovernment will give significant cash to able-bodied adults withoutdependent children. Since most of these individuals have littleapparent need for assistance, the new credit represents ‘spreading thewealth’ for its own sake. The lack of connection between this creditand ‘economic stimulus’ is evident in the fact that the first paymentsunder the program will not be made until April 2010.”
Otherperceived plans to damage the US economy by Obama include the attemptedClimate Change legislation and its staggeringly expensive Cap &Trade legislation. This could drain trillions of dollars out of theworld economy every year, killing millions of poor, per annum. Also theDetroit car maker bailout, the rampant printing of fiat currency. Butthe $2.5-$3 trillion dollar Obamacare bill is the piece de resistanceof government profligacy. Some Democrats now even admit it will causehealth care costs to skyrocket, while decreasing treatment and overallquality, but the program is still being touted as done in the name offairness and justice. How laughable.
But regardless of the worth of anyparticular program, simply basing a large part of the yearly governmentbudget upon perpetually borrowed funds means that the state must, atsome point, go bankrupt. Conclusion Wasn’tit was odd to hear Barack deny his Baltimore address that he is“Bolshevik”? This reveals more nominal familiarity with the vocabularyof the Russian Revolution than his own armed force’s vocabulary, suchas the common term “corpsman”! But fellow uber-leftist adviser RahmEmmanuel’s statement one should never let a crisis pass withoutextracting some normally unacceptable concession, is even more of asocialist slip. Do both men have a heart full of communism, asnonchalantly work toward the demise of the free market andlaissez-faire? Creative Destruction means that if a Marxist destroys abad capitalist society, a better socialist one will arise magically inits place. Will wanton economic chaos and wreckage really createparadise on earth? Do these two ultra leftists genuinely believe suchmadness?
BarackObama has experienced an almost total lifelong immersion in socialism.He has had a nearly complete dependence upon leftist and even communistcontacts and friends during his childhood, education and rise to power.Therefore, wouldn’t it be exceedingly odd if Barack weren’t at least alittle bit communist at heart? But perhaps, like Moby Dick’s Ahab,Obama hisses to himself about the capitalist whale, “from hell’s heartI stab at thee; for hate’s sake I spit my last breath at thee.” But thequestion remains – What will the average patriotic American do now thatthis administration has been outed for what and who they really are?
Tags: OBAMA MARXIST