Domingo, 28 de febrero de 2010
 

Rovingpatrol's Blog

News Media Act Stupidly Over Obama’s Birth Certificate…Again

Posted in politics by roving on February 27, 2010
United States President Barack Obama's birth c...
Image via Wikipedia

Yet another news agency spreads misinformation about Obama’s birth certificate. Today Sky News did a story about “birthers” and falsely claimed Obama’s paper birth certificate was burned in a fire that destroyed many state records. There are four problems with this.

1. The Obama people claimed this happen

2. The media reports it as fact.

3. In Obama’s book Dreams of my father he writes he has the birth certificate in his possession.

4. The media Doesn’t seem to put two and two together and see that Obama lied, or they are ignoring this huge lie about the birth certificate being destroyed in a fire.

Glenn Beck compares birthers to terrorists. You see, Obama has been very very good to Beck. If not for Obama, Beck wouldn’t be where he is today. Getting to the bottom of Obama’s birth certificate would get Obama thrown out sooner. Beck, along with Fox News wants to milk this presidency for all its worth. Beck and O’Reilly just repeat things that have been proven false for 2 yrs now and wouldn’t dare look into any of it himself.

Feb 26 it was posted in Post Mail Blog they have received pdf files from Hawaii showing the Hawaiian birth index has no record of Obama listed. This does not surprise me at all. After all, there is no record of Obama or Obama’s mother ever being admitted into any hospital in Hawaii…ever.

The media wonders why they are becoming irrelevant. Well its because every day people are doing the media’s job while they sit there spinning the news, protecting terrorists, covering up stories, and calling every day Americans names.

-----------------------------------------------------------
 

Tags: OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 20:37
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Sky News' Dissembler and Propagandist
As you folks know, I have spent the last two years researching the life and times of the ObamaMessiah, and today I just learned something new.  Barack Obama's birth certificate was destroyed in a fire.

In an article,
entitled, "Obama 'Birther' Row Rears Its Head Again," Greg Milam, identified as a "U. S correspondent" for Sky News, the British version of Fox News, has just introduced a whole new reason for Obama not presenting his birth certificate to confirm his eligibility -- it was burned in a fire! -- poor Barack -- everything seems to happen to him.

Milam correctly claims, "The White House has consistently dismissed the issue (of Obama's eligibility)."

Of course they did.  After all, what can they say?  You couldn't get a driver's license with the three pieces of documentation that Obama has released to establish his eligibility: his autobiography, a Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth," and two old newspaper clippings.

Then, Milan claims that, "Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama's birth...."

This statement is completely false.  No Hawaiian authority, at any time, has ever claimed that Hawaii provided, any one of the THREE evolving copies of Obama's Certification of Live Birth (
COLB), that, over time, were posted on the Internet by Obama's co-conspirators at the left-wing Annenberg FactCheck.com.  I challenge anyone to produce a statement from any Hawaiian official confirming Milan's assertion.  It never happened.

But this statement takes the cake! "...because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state's archives."

Whoaaa Nelly!  Where in the world did Milam get that one?  Google --
Hawaii archive fire -- yourself.  See!  Never happened -- but I guess if Milan wrote that Obama's dog ate it, no one would believe it.

Let's take a look at Obama's bona fides:

1. A supposed "
autobiography," that Obama acknowledges is full of pseudonyms, composite characters, approximated dialogue, and events out of chronological order -- and outright lies.  The life presented in the book is a myth.  Most of what you think you know about Obama comes from this piece of fiction -- and most of what you think you know just ain't so.

2. The "
birth announcements" from two Hawaiian newspapers prove nothing.  They could be real as can be, or forgeries.  It doesn't matter.  There isn't a court in the country that would accept two old newspaper clippings as evidence of anything.  Those two old newspaper clippings are hearsay.

3. And the bogus COLB is the biggest joke of all.  Only the conspirators know where the three COLBs came from.  They didn't come from Hawaii.  Beyond that, as discrepancies in the document were identified, the document evolved, like everything else about Obama's life narrative.

In
this image rich file, a genealogist associated with a leading genealogy website, documents the evolution of the FactCheck.org images:
    

Forgery #1 - The COLB posted on 'Fight the Smears' -- No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery.  Debunked by Ron Polirak, Sandra Ramsey Lines, and the author of this document, among others.

Forgery #2 - FactCheck - Two different COLB's one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL.

Forgery #3 - FactCheck - COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.

So, how can there be three versions of a document that Hawaii NEVER issued?

    
And Milam continues to dissemble, writing, "Democrats in Arizona have dismissed the bill..." -- Well, now, there's a surprise!  Democrats may dismiss the bill, but the bill is currently working its way through the Arizona Senate with twelve co-sponsors.  the Arizona House Committee on Government, chaired by Rep. Judy Burges (R-Skull Valley), voted to
pass her introduced bill, HB2441, by a vote of 6-1 -- similar bills are working their way through the legislative process in 20 states.

Milam quotes a democratic operative as saying, ""The truth is that he was born in the United States and has provided that proof time and time again." -- Watch out! -- a democratic beginning a statement with the words, "The truth is..."  You know a lie is coming.  Not that Obama was born in Hawaii.  I give that statement a 97% of being truthful, but the statement, "[Obama] has provided...proof time and time again -- no he hasn't.  There is no PROOF.  No one has provided PROOF.  As a matter of fact, Obama has illegally disbursed almost $2 million dollars from campaign funds to avoid providing proof of eligibility.  Now that he has the power of the Oval Office, he has civil service attorneys illegally representing him in lawsuits demanding he do so.

Milam gets in a shot at
Birthers, writing, "The 'birthers' are perhaps the most bizarre of the protest movements against the president." -- well the only thing bizarre about that statement is that Milan believes that it is perfectly appropriate for Barack Obama to tell half of America to go screw themselves.  That's bizarre!  WE the People have a need to know, and a right to know who the hell Barack Obama is -- and we don't -- and Obama intends to keep it that way.

The icing on Milan's cake is an opinion from the addled-brained Jimmy Carter, that anybody who questions Obama is a racist.  Sighhhhhhhhhhhh!

This is what stands for journalism in 2010.

Greg Milam, whose previous claim to fame was being attacked by a
cockerel, on air, is either dumb as a brick, or a committed Obama propagandist -- probably both.

Udpate:  NoBarck08 says it seems kind of strange that they find a letter from Lincoln in the archives, if it had a fire.

The Honolulu Star-Bulletin reported that that Daniel W. Stowell, director of the Papers of Abraham Lincoln at the Presidential Library and Museum in Springfield, Ill., and Luella Kurkjian, branch manager of the Hawaii State Archives,
displayed documents signed by Lincoln during a news conference yesterday at the Hawaii State Archives Building.

Tags: OBAMA SKY NEWS

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 14:42
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Viernes, 26 de febrero de 2010

Rovingpatrol's Blog

Rush Limbaugh And Obama’s Birth Certificate

Posted in politics 
Where's the Birth Certificate?
Image by _saturnine 

Every now and then Rush will mention Obama’s birth certificate. Its not much but I think he knows there is a problem. He has told a  joke about it before:

“What do God and Barack Obama have in common?  The answer, that neither one of them has a birth certificate!”

Yesterday on his show he brought it up again by reading a blog written by a blogger. Its very subtle but its there. Makes a person wonder why he picked that blog. Maybe he fears if he makes a big deal out of Obama not producing his birth certificate, the MSM will only only focus on calling Rush a kook so he just puts little jabs in there about it every so often.  I don’t know.

Story #6. RUSH: A blogger… Who is this guy? Bungalow Bill.  Bungalow Bill commenting on the unfortunate death at Sea World yesterday where that whale pulled the trainer in there and it was over: “We Know More About Tilikum the KILLER Whale in Five Hours, Than We Knew About Obama Before the Election … The mainstream media failed to report on Obama’s college days, his birth certificate, his drug use, his associations with Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, his connections to ACORN, his participation with the Annenberg project, how he used the courts to win earlier elections, his direction towards communism, racial beliefs, and all the dirty little secrets hidden so Obama could assume office. Now that he is president, the mainstream media still fails to dig deeply into the healthcare plan, the stimulus plan, and all the other controversial bills leading towards socialism.


by roving on February 26, 2010
via Flickr



Tags: OBAMA LIMBAUGH

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 16:09
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Jueves, 25 de febrero de 2010

BORN IN THE USA?

Lawyer who challenged Obama: Ineligibility could prove costly

USJF chief: 'This is completely uncharted territory'


Posted: February 25, 2010
12:15 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDail
 

An attorney whose legal brief in a case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility revealed a Supreme Court can remove an ineligible chief executive now has released an analysis confirming that if Obama isn't eligible, he could be charged under a number of felony statutes.

And that's just on the federal level; any state charges would be in addition, as would charges against individuals who may have helped him in the commission of any of the acts, according to Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation.

Kreep has been involved in several of the cases that have raised challenges to Obama's occupancy of the Oval Office, including two in California. One is on appeal in the state court system and names California Secretary of State Debra Bowen as defendant. The other, in the federal court system, is on appeal before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Both make claims on behalf of individuals and political candidates in California over Obama's presence on the 2008 election ballot.

WND several weeks ago reported when Kreep's legal research revealed two precedents  he believes would be applicable in the Obama case. In one, state officials arbitrarily removed a candidate from an election ballot because it was not proven the candidate was qualified for office. In another, the North Dakota Supreme Court removed the sitting governor from office when it was documented he was not eligible under the state's requirements.

Now Kreep has released an analysis of the federal laws he believes could be applied should Obama ultimately be shown to be ineligible.

"If he is not eligible, he could be charged not only under with these crimes, but potentially with crimes in a number of states where he falsely represented that he was qualified to run, as well as people who helped him," Kreep told WND.

Further, there could be any number of challenges to virtually anything he did as president: his nominations, his executive orders and his signing of legislation.

"This is completely uncharted territory," Kreep told WND. "It could all be challenged as invalid. There has to be a sitting president for [actions] to be valid. If he's not qualified, if he's not the president, it isn't valid."

The research, done on Kreep's behalf by USJF staff attorney Chris Tucker, cited the following statutes that could apply:

  • False Personation of Officer or Employee of the United States (18 U.S.C. § 912). 

    It states: "Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or 
    employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

    The USJF analysis said, "Basically this statute calls for 1) Fraudulent intent, and 2) an overt act to accomplish the inducement of one giving over a thing of value. If it were found that 
    Barack Obama was not a natural born citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Art. II § 1, he will have assumed the office of president fraudulently to obtain money (among other things) by way of his annual salary. The Supreme Court has upheld convictions for False Personations in U.S. v. Lepowitch, (63 S.Ct. 914), and Lamar v. U.S., (36 S.Ct. 535)."

  • Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to Defraud United States (18 U.S.C. 371).

    It states: "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor."

    The USJF analysis said, "As in all conspiracies, there must be two or more persons working in concert to achieve an illegal act, so the president would need a co-conspirator for this statute to apply. The state of Hawaii is being very secretive about the whereabouts or even existence of Mr. Obama's supposed birth certificate. If the officials in charge of keeping these records know of its non-existence, then they would be co-conspirators with the objective of defrauding the United States as to the citizenship status of Barack Obama. There, however, must be an 'in concert' element met, meaning that these officials are withholding the proof at the direction of Mr. Obama. Is it possible that these officials love Barack Obama so much that they are withholding these 
    documents out of the goodness of their own hearts? Yes, possibly, however unlikely. It is reasonable to infer that the Hawaiian officials are working 'in concert' with Mr. Obama to suppress this information, since each would face both civil and criminal suits, not to mention the loss of furthering their own political goals."

  • Activities Affecting Armed Forces During War (18 U.S.C. 2388(a)).

    It states: "(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or

    "Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both."

    The USJF analysis said: "Intent is fully at issue here; however, President Obama made it clear during his campaign that his full intent when entering office would be to scale down the conflict with Afghanistan and Iraq, eventually leading to a full withdrawal. His statements of being a natural born citizen to obtain the office of commander in chief were in effort to interfere with the attempts by the former commander in chief's attempt at engaging the enemy in these two countries, for the purpose of national 
    security.

    "In the case of Schulze v. U.S. (259 F. 189) Petitioner was convicted under this statute, and the question of intent was at issue. The court stated, 'It is true that in charging the offense it is unnecessary to allege the intent; the offense being one whose very definition necessarily includes intent. In such a case it is necessary only to aver in apt terms the acts done. The intent will be inferred. The charge is not unlike that of treason, the indictment for which needs go no further than to follow the language of the statute which defines the offense. (United States v. Greathouse, 2 Abb.U.S. 364, Fed. Cas. No. 15,254)…

    "This means that intent is inferred from the act itself. Mr. Obama has already announced that the efforts in Afghanistan will be scaled back, and a full withdrawal is planned for 2011. Furthermore, the announcement of this strategy works to the aid of our enemy, who now knows to sit in caves and wait out the U.S. for only a year or so. This certainly works interrupt our operations and promote the success of our enemy."

  • False Statement in Application and Use of Passport (18 U.S.C. 1542).

    It states: "Whoever willfully and knowingly makes any false statement in an application for passport with intent to induce or secure the issuance of a passport under the authority of the United States, either for his own use or the use of another, contrary to the laws regulating the issuance of passports or the rules prescribed pursuant to such laws; or

    "Whoever willfully and knowingly uses or attempts to use, or furnishes to another for use any passport the issue of which was secured in any way by reason of any false statement—Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 25 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 of this title)), 20 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929 (a) of this title)), 10 years (in the case of the first or second such offense, if the offense was not committed to facilitate such an act of international terrorism or a drug trafficking crime), or 15 years (in the case of any other offense), or both."

    The USJF analysis said: "To obtain a U.S. passport one must show a valid birth certificate or some other form of identification showing U.S. citizenship. Barack Obama would have to have furnished some sort of birth certificate or other document showing he is a citizen. Of course, even if he was not a natural born citizen, he could show naturalization or some other citizenship papers. However, if these documents are spurious, then he would be guilty pursuant to the first paragraph, and to then use his illegally obtained passport, he would also be guilty under the second paragraph as well."

  • False Personation of Citizen of the United States (18 U.S.C. 911).

    It states: "Whoever falsely and willfully represents himself to be a citizen of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

    The analysis said: "If Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen, then he must have other proof of United States citizenship. If he has neither of these, then as acting head of state he is holding himself out to be a citizen of the United States, and is therefore liable under this section as well."

  • Perjury (18 U.S.C. 1621).

    It states: "Whoever—(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

    "(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."

    The USJF analysis said: "Mr. Obama has taken the oath of office of POTUS, in front of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts, in which he promises to 'defend the Constitution'. As an illegal alien, or even a non-natural born citizen, he would be acting as an ineligible president. Furthermore, as an attorney, and a former professor of constitutional law, Barack Obama would have full knowledge of the requirements for an eligible candidate for the office of POTUS. This shows that he has willfully stated that he will and is acting contrary to his presidential oath."

The USJF document showed that all of the charges require a specific intent.

"Mr. Obama knows, or at least should know, the place of his birth and the status of his citizenship, as all, or nearly all, adults in the world do. He has, therefore, willfully and knowingly made repeated false claims as to his citizenship, and this makes him absolutely liable for the above mentioned crimes," the analysis said.

The organization's earlier research, now included in its appeal documentation, found that in 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for president of the United States.

The then-California Secretary of State, Frank Jordan, found that, according to Mr. Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for president. Jordan, using his administrative powers, threw him off the ballot.

The other is a court precedent in which the governor of North Dakota was removed from office after the state Supreme Court determined he did not meet the state constitution's eligibility requirements.

"Even though Obama was elected to this office, this ineligibility constitutes a legal disability for the office of president of the United States," the USJF brief states. "In 'State ex rel. Sathre v. Moodie,' after Thomas H. Moodie was duly elected to the office of governor of the state of North Dakota, it was discovered that Thomas H. Moodie was not eligible for the position of governor, as he had not resided in the state for a requisite five years before running for office, and, because of that ineligibility, he was removed from office and replaced by the lieutenant governor," the brief explains.

North Dakota's historical archives document the case.

The Democrat was nominated by his party for governor in 1934 and beat his Republican opponent, Lydia Langer.

"As soon as the election was over, there was talk of impeachment, but no charges were filed," the state's archives report. "After Moodie's inauguration on January 7, 1935, it was revealed that he had voted in a 1932 municipal election in Minnesota. In order to be eligible for governor, an individual has to have lived in the state for five consecutive years before the election. The State Supreme Court determined that Governor Moodie was ineligible to serve, and he was removed from office on February 16, 1935," the state reports.

The president's lawyers in many of the cases have said, and judges have agreed so far, that the courts simply don't have jurisdiction over a question of eligibility because of the Constitution's provision that president's must be removed by impeachment, which rests with Congress.

In one case, the president's lawyers prominently argued, "The Constitution's commitment to the Electoral College of the responsibility to select the president includes the authority to decide whether a presidential candidate is qualified for office.

"The examination of a candidate's qualifications is an integral component of the electors' decision-making process. The Constitution also provides that, after the Electoral College has voted, further review of a presidential candidate's eligibility for office, to the extent such review is required, rests with Congress," the president's lawyers argued.

WND has reported on the multiple legal cases challenging Obama's eligibility in addition to efforts to raise the question at the state and national levels.

Several state legislatures are working on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.

The claims are that Obama does not meet the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen." The lawsuits have asserted he either was not born in Hawaii as he claims or was a dual citizen because of his father's British citizenship at the time of his birth.

The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama's birth could be obtained.

The White House has not replied to numerous requests for comment.

Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

Another significant factor is the estimated $1.7 million Obama has spent on court cases to prevent any of the documentation of his life to be revealed to the public.


"Where's The Birth Certificate?" billboard helps light up the night at the Mandalay Bay 
resort on the Las Vegas Strip.

Because of the dearth of information about Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched a campaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?"

The campaign followed a petition that has collected more than 490,000 signatures demanding proof of his eligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.

The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.

Your donation – from as little as $5 to as much as $1,000 – can be made online at the WND SuperStore. (Donations are not tax-deductible. Donations of amounts greater than $1,000 can be arranged by calling either 541-474-1776 or 1-800-4WND.COM. If you would prefer to mail in your contributions, they should be directed to WND, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, Oregon, 97501. Be sure to specify the purpose of the donation by writing "billboard" on the check. In addition, donations of billboard space will be accepted, as will significant contributions specifically targeted for geographic locations.)

If you are a member of the media and would like to interview Joseph Farah about this campaign, e-mail WND.



Related offers:

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!

Join the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president's birth certificate documentation from the Birth Certificate Store!

Send a contribution to support the national billboard campaign that asks the simple question, "Where's the birth certificate?"

Get your yard signs and rally signs that ask the same question – and make sure it's in time for the next tea party rally

Get your permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers for your car, truck or file cabinet – and join the campaign for constitutional integrity.

Get the most comprehensive special report ever produced on the Obama eligibility issue.


Previous stories:

Courts can remove ineligible chief executive

D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility

Democrats suddenly interested in Obama birth certificate

Race on to demand eligibility documentation

Obama's eligibility becomes war among the states

3 dozen lawmakers want proof of Obama eligibility

Congressional ad mainstreams Obama eligibility

Franks joins demand for eligibility proof

Congressman eyes lawsuit over president's eligibility


Tags: OBAMA Kreep Usurper

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:23
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Mi?rcoles, 24 de febrero de 2010

 

 
February 2, 2010
Obama and Marxist Dems primed to end USA by 2011
By Sher Zieve

Despite his lies to the contrary, the Usurper and Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama was the one (not President George W. Bush) who proposed (and had voted in by his Marxist-Democrat run Congress) the first USA trillion-dollars budget. This was affected by the-One-who-was-chosen-to-decimate-then-completely-destroy-the-United-States-of-America in 2009 for 2010. Now, Obama's 2011 budget at almost $4Trillions ($3.8T) is destined to complete the purpose and mission of this being who is not and never has been a citizen of the country he purports to lead. Note: If he were, he would have produced a real and viable birth certificate instead of paying between $1-2 Millions to keep it and his school records hidden.

This will be a short — make that very short — column, as little more can be said about the now insurmountable-by-normal-means problem that the Obama treason presents. For months, The Obama and his totalitarian minions have become bolder and bolder in their overt message that not only does the USA now belong solely to them (Obama: "I won. We won!") but, that they will pass all of the inane legislation they wish, steal all of the money and possessions of the American people they want and then destroy and discard the depleted country as they so choose. By the way, did you know that Obama's new budget taxes everyone and at higher rates? Obama seems to hate most of us — if not all — equally.

Like the global warming hoax, the Obama administration and seizure of the United States of America was and is based upon lies — the first lie being that he is a natural born US citizen. Money given to his presidential campaign was apparently traced to the Middle East and the terrorist organization Hamas. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's former 'preacher' supported Hamas. Throughout his life, Obama cavorted with and has now appointed avowed Communists, Marxists and Maoists to his Shadow-Congress "the ObamaCzars." And now, if his new all-encompassing/country-destroying budget is passed, we will experience the end of free enterprise (private employers are to be taxed out of existence by the 2011 ObamaBudget), the dollar will be a thing of the past and with the inevitable hyper-inflation brought on by the Obama unsustainable-for-even-one-more-year budget and programs, we're done as a country. This is what Obama was trained to do and sent to the White House to accomplish.

We have only two choices left. As Obama is pushing and punching the American people harder and harder each and every day, no more options are available. End Obama and the Marxists Reign of Terror and Destruction or watch them end our country — forever. Which one is it?

Obama Budget Still Goes to the Moon:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/02/02/obama-budget-still-goes-to-the-moon/

Obama Middle-East/Hamas funding:
1. 
http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3509

2. http://www.zimbio.com/Barack+Obama/articles/1542/Obama+funded+by+Hamas

© Sher Zieve

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)


 


Tags: OBAMA MARXIST

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:59
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
BEFORE ELECTION IN 2008 WE WERE TOLD. AND MOST DID NOT LISTEN,
LIKE IN CUBA OR VENEZUELA.
 
 

A BlackMuslim Communist from Kenya As President?
America Faces Mass Suicide 

American PatrolReport -- October 31   
Jim Jonesand Barack Hussein Obama

Just aTaste of the Future - Obama's Global Poverty Act
    According to polls, Americais about to elect a black man who may have been born in Kenya, may be acloset Muslim, and has extreme left wing or even communist beliefs.Edward Cine characterized Obama's most important piece of legislation,the
Global Poverty Act, as follows:
    "Congress is proposing, in Barack Obama'sGlobal Poverty Act (S.2433, based on H. R. 1302, passed by the HouseSeptember 25, 2007), that Americans be delivered into a state ofindentured servitude as laborers for the United Nations. Perhaps"indentured servitude" is too kind a term, for as horrendous acondition as it is, there is usually a time limit to such servitude.Slavery would be the more accurate term in this instance, for whatCongress is considering is servitude by Americans in perpetuity, inexchange for nothing but the privilege of laboring to "save" the worldwithout thanks or reward, of filling the alleged needs of others, ofperforming unlimited ‘community service' for the offense of merelyexisting."
    If Americans elect Obama as president, it willbe the greatest act of mass suicide since 
Jim Jones' People's Temple.

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

hangeis a Codeword for Communism


Few Americans know that Saul Alinsky, theauthor of Rules for Radicals, was an admitted Communist. The mission ofAlinsky as outlined in his book, was to destroy America's middleclassand turn America into a communist nation. Along with Malcom X, SaulAlinsky was one of Obama's inspirations. Obama was so adept at theAlinsky method, he became a teacher and taught the Alinsky method toothers. Saul Alinsky was considered the "Godfather of communityorganizing." Alinsky's book, Rulesfor Radicals wasdedicated to Satan.

Alinsky's mantra was CHANGE - Obama is simplyparroting the Alinsky tactic of CHANGE - often verbatim!

Once you understand the relationship of Obamaand his Alinsky background it becomes easy to understand Obama'sultimate goal - the destruction of America as a sovereign nation. Thedocumentary, "Codeword Change" exposes Obama's communist background andagenda.

The government's ownership of General Motors,under Obama, is a communist tactic.

The advocacy of gun laws and the push todisarm Americans is a communist strategy for control. During theRussian Bolshevik Revolution, the communists disarmed and slaughteredover 40 million Christians.

Obama taught the Alinsky method - Alinsky wasan ardent communist.

Obama's Mentor was the renowned communist,Frank Marshal Davis. Barack Obama spent his formative years at the feetof Frank Marshall Davis.

Professor Gerald Horne, a history professor atthe University of Houston, noted that Frank Marshall Davis, who movedto Honolulu from Kansas in 1948, "at the suggestion of his good friendPaul Robeson," came into contact with Barack Obama and his family andbecame the young man's mentor, influencing Obama's sense of identityand career moves.

Obama's mother was a communist sympathizer -his father was a psychotic womanizing, radical Islamic nut case. Obamacomes from bad seed.

Stop Obama - Save America!



Tags: OBAMA MUSLIM COMMUNIST

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:05
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
 

The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is the world’s largest Islamic entity

Obama assisting in imposing Islamic Sharia law, prohibiting criticism of Islam

 By Doug Hagmann  Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Barack Hussein Obama, catering to both Muslim and globalist agendas, is exposing his preference to Islamic and globalist agendas and placing yet another nail in America’s coffin by appointing Rashad HUSSAIN as special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. To understand the extreme significance of this appointment, it is vital for Americans to understand the composition and objectives of the OIC, its global influence and potential impact on the U.S., and also be fully aware of the background of Rashad HUSSAIN.

The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is the world’s largest Islamic entity with a membership of 57 Muslim nations and a permanent delegation to the United Nations. Aside from the United Nations, it is the largest international entity of any type.  It was formed on September 25, 1969 by the Islamic heads of state in Rabat, Morocco as an affront to Israel, with its primary objective to regain complete Muslim control and Islamic religious dominance over Jerusalem. It is now based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Top PLO terrorist leader and Muslim Brotherhood descendent Yasser Arafat was given the honorary position of permanent deputy chairman of the OIC in the years following its establishment. Unsurprisingly, the symbol of the OIC is a flag with a green background and an upward facing red crescent within a white circle. Above the crescent are the words “Allahu Akbar” written in Arabic script.

----------------------------

MORE

http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=3532

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/22/obamas-oic-envoy-didnt-just-defend-al-arian/



Tags: obama muslim islamic

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:34
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
 

Cuban political prisoner Orlando Zapata Tamayo has died (UPDATED)

 

 

 

Feb. 23 -  UPDATED at 9:30

"They managed to do what they wanted. They ended the life of a fighter for human rights,'' his mother said. BBC

Amnesty prisoner of conscience Orlando Zapata Tamayo 'unrecognizable' after 85-day fast over beatings The Guardian

U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, of Nebraska, said in his own statement that ''freedom-loving people everywhere should hold the Cuban regime responsible for the fate of Orlando Zapata Tamayo.'' The New York Times

Zapata, 42, went on strike to demand a separate cell from common criminals and permission for his family to bring him food. He also refused to wear the prison uniform. CNN

On February 9, we denounced that prisoner of conscience Orlando Zapata Tamayo was dying in a Cuban prison.

Zapata Tamayo, one of the Group of 75 arrested during the Black Spring of 2003, was originally sentenced to 25 years in Castro's Gulag.

But after spending 7 years in jail, he was tried again and his sentence was extended to 47 years.

To protest that arbitrary decision, he went on a hunger strike last December.

Today, his mother called from Cuba to say that her son was pronounced dead at 3 PM this afternoon.

"I accuse the Castro regime for the murder of my son," she said.

Orlando Zapata Tamayo, a Black Cuban declared prisoner of conscience, died inside Castro's Gulag.

We will see if any of the so called Black leaders or Black organizations in the United States; South African leader Nelson Mandela or anyone anywhere in the world, will denounce this new crime by the racist and fascist tyranny that has been ruling Cuba for 51 long years.

Don't hold your breath.

May this brave and patriotic Black Cuban rest in peace. The peace that the fascist and racist Castro brothers denied him.
---------------------------------------------------

  • Obama: 'We can move U.S.-Cuban relations in a new direction' - ...

    Apr 17, 2009 ... President Obama said Friday he is seeking "a new beginning" in US relations with Cuba.

    www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/17/obama.latinamerica/in... -

  • Obama eases Cuba travel restrictions - CNN.com

    Apr 13, 2009 ... Before he was elected president, Obama promised to lower some of the barriers in Cuban-American relations. Provisions attached to a $410 ...

    www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/13/cuba.travel/in... -

     


  • Tags: OBAMA CUBA

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:08
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
     

    Add One More to Obama’s Impeachable Offenses

    WHITE HOUSE ALLEGEDLY TRIED BRIBERY IN SENATE RACE

    News Summary by Harry Hunter

    Congressman Joe Sestak, who was the subject of attempted bribery by the Obama Regime for challenging Arlen Specter in the Democrat Senate Primary

    (Feb. 24, 2010) — Congressman Joe Sestak (D-PA) has stated on tape that he was offered a high-level post in Barack Obama’s administration to keep him from running against turncoat Senator Arlen Specter in the upcoming Pennsylvania primary election. It happened as Larry Kane interviewed Sestak for Comcast Network’s “Voice of Reason” program of Feb. 21.

    Larry Kane says that after taping the interview with Sestak he called the White House press office, played the tape for them, and invited a response, which came the next day: “The White House strongly denies the Sestak claim.” The denial is not surprising, since bribing a federal official is a crime.

    Here is Kane’s original account of Joe Sestak’s revelation:

    During the taping of my Comcast Network “Voice of Reason” show, which airs Sunday night at 9:30, I asked Congressman Joe Sestak: “Is it true that you were offered a high-ranking job in the administration in a bid to get you to drop out of the primary against Arlen Specter?”

    Sestak looked a little surprised.  He said, “Yes.”

    I asked him if the job was Navy Secretary.  He said, “I can’t comment on that.” In the next few seconds, he admitted that it was a “high-up” job, that it came from the White House, and that he didn’t accept the offering.

    That sure sounds like attempted bribery. The Feb. 19 “Corruption Chronicles” ofJudicial Watch provides some background on this deplorable business:

    A five-term incumbent, Specter switched from Republican to Democrat last spring after giving Obama the critical vote for his disastrous and fraud-infested $787 billion stimulus program. The president clearly wants to return the favor by helping the controversial lawmaker keep his job. In fact, Obama endorsed Specter at the White House and has raised money for the 80-year-old lawmaker. Besides the president, many top Democratic leaders have also tried to dissuade Sestak, a retired Navy admiral, from challenging Specter.

    Trying to persuade someone by jawboning is one thing, but dangling something of value before someone as a quid pro quo is whole different matter.  Commenting on the Judicial Watch report of Obama’s alleged bribery, The Obama File of Feb. 22 quotes a pertinent law:

    “Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.” — 18 USC Sec. 211 — Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest:  Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office.

    After seeing how Congress and the courts have given de facto approval to Barack Obama’s usurpation of the presidency, the public cannot expect either of those branches of government to do anything to challenge Obama’s reign at present.  However, the elections in November may open many doors that are now tightly closed and locked.

    © 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


    Tags: OBAMA SESTAK

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:40
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Martes, 23 de febrero de 2010

    February 22, 2010

     

    Attorney Appeals to UN for Protection from Persecution in United States

     

    Geneva:

     

    Today the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has confirmed that American attorney Dr. Orly Taitz has applied for urgent action under the mandate for human rights defenders.

     

    Dr. Taitz, a well known Constitutional attorney, has been under increasing attack in the United States from groups and individuals opposed to her legal actions challenging the Constitutional qualifications of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of President of the United States.

     

    The California attorney has been the victim of death threats, vandalism, false complaints, and a suspected assassination attempt.  Her reports to law enforcement and the judiciary have been ignored.

     

    This office has been retained by Dr. Taitz to support her efforts for a UN investigation of her claims.

     

    For more information contact:

     

    Dr. Jonathan Levy

    Attorney

    1629 K Street NW Suite 300

    Washington DC 20006 USA

    Tel/Fax 1-202-318-2406

    [email protected]

    www.brimstoneandcompany.com

    Attorney Appeals to UN for Protection from Persecution



    Tags: OBAMA TAITZ

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:41
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    Obama’s Marxist beliefs deep-rooted but hidden

    February 22, 2010

    Dear Editor:

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/22/obamas-marxist-beliefs-deep-rooted-but-hidden/

     

    Obama declared himself a Marxist while in college, but not a word was uttered by any mainstream media outlet during the campaign

    “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.” – Barack Obama, The Audacity of Hope

    “I wasn’t a casual acquaintance of Obama. I was an important leader in the larger social, cultural environment he chose to associate himself with. Many of the people that Obama and I knew are still friends with each other. I was well-known on the Occidental campus as one of the top radical student leaders. I ended up teaching at Williams College with two of Obama’s radical professors. I knew the “structural feminists” he talks about inDreams from My Father. Most of my friends and relatives think going public with this story will cause physical and financial harm to me and my family. I think I deserve some credit for having the courage to share my observations with the rest of the world.” – Dr. John C. Drew

    In past interviews by Dr. John C. Drew regarding his encounters with fellow student Barack Obama’s Marxist ideology as a student at Occidental College and before, I have come to many conclusions.

    What I find amazing is that anyone in this country, especially people who are intelligent and educated, could be converted to Marxist theory. It is absolutely irrational! The only theory I can come up with is that they are mental cases – perhaps psychopaths who see in Marxism a means to gain power over people out of criminal motives. Dr. Drew came to his senses in 1984 and joined the human race; however, it is clear Obama is still the same piece of work today as he was yesterday. I pray that some day soon this vile creature named Obama will be tried for treason and sentenced to a long prison term.

    If we could only have a glance at the liberal socialist Obama’s SAT and LSAT scores, this might shed a bit of light on things. Obama was clever enough to have gotten his way through many pro forma academic situations with a whole lot of help from Affirmative Action in exchange for the “favors” the liberal socialist agenda now is providing. In a way, I feel Obama is like a rapper being exploited by a far more sophisticated record company…

    There is no doubt that this now liberal socialist man called Obama is a “Red Diaper Baby.” He is a good argument for the Constitution’s denial of the right to serve as president to anyone except a “natural born citizen.” No matter where he was born, he cannot be one, since his father was a British colonial subject, not an American citizen.

    As far as being a student at Columbia University: Obama was more than likely in the School of General Studies, not Columbia University. The only requirement for entrance: a checkbook! By carefully selecting a course of study, one can actually get a Columbia degree. Bill Ayers, and his sister-in-law, a Columbia professor, were probably of some help there.

    I believe we are stuck with Obama as the de facto, rather than the de jure, president, until 2012. He is now beginning a new phase of attempting to rule as an “Executive Order” president. That’s going to bring a whole lot of trouble to our nation.

    Congress vets cabinet positions, the news media vets candidates, and the New York Times has discredited itself as a news organization. Just take a glance at the leadership in the liberal party: Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, three of the biggest flops ever assembled at one time in American history.

    American citizens should read Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” so that they can recognize the ideas that this so- called liberal socialist regime is initiating. At this time there is a relevant reactionary movement seeking to reclaim the glory days of the past, even when it calls itself Progressive. The progressive liberal socialist Marxists are living in a very different time with a concept that most of us will not embrace.

    I think many of us picked up on the fact that Obama was a fraud early on and failed to realize just how dumbed-down our populace has become by the leftist government schools. People have a very hard time thinking in terms of political veracities conjoined to financial realities. By being poor judges of persons due to the lack of ethics, morals and civics in education coupled with revisionist history and a forced disdain of Americanism, the stage was set for completion of the subversive leftist takeover of America. Many parts fit into the puzzle of how our current plight came about. Dishonesty and the vast corruption of politicians, bankers, investors, teachers, preachers, and anyone in positions of leadership reveals the proclivity of human beings to degenerate into selfishness inflamed by the desires of pleasure, gigantic ego, and pride of life-killing national identity. Today we make way in the suppurated remains of our once great Republic.

    Too bad the American majority did not see the light before the liberal socialist Obama was put in the White House. If the American people actually knew what a Marxist/Fascist/Liberal/Socialist/Progressive Obama and his racist America-hating wife were before the last election, he would never have been sent there.

    I believe the American people were deceived and betrayed first by the mainstream media, the Democrat-controlled Congress, and Obama all at the same time. Not only is he a Marxist; he is a Muslim sympathizer as well, thus endangering us all the more by ignoring our self-declared enemy, Islam.

    Lies and deception are our biggest problem with Obama. An honest socialist is one thing and bad enough, but a person who lies so seamlessly and is grounded in narcissism and socialism and has the power of the US presidency is truly a dangerous man.

    Sincerely,

    Phil S. Dedrick

    © 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


    Tags: Obama Marxist

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:02
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
     

    Monday, February 22, 2010


    Court Grants Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal

    On January 19, 2010, I filed theAppellants' Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissingour case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama's alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” which is a child born in the country to citizen parents. We maintain that Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” because he lacks unity of citizenship and allegiance from birth which is obtained when a child is born in the United States to a mother and father who are both United States citizens at the time of birth. Obama’s father was only a temporary visitor to the United States when Obama was born and never even became a resident let alone a citizen. Not being an Article II “natural born Citizen,” Obama is not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief.

    We also maintain that Obama has failed to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii by publicly presenting a copy of a contemporaneous birth certificate, a long-form birth certificate providing the name of the hospital in which he was born and other corroborating data which was generated when he was born in 1961 and not simply a digital image of computer generated Certification of Live Birth [COLB] allegedly obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health in 2007 which some unknown person posted on the internet in 2008, or other contemporaneous and objective documentation. At the bottom of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth (COLB), it states: "This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding." Under the concept of prima facie evidence, the presumption that the fact exists fails when evidence contradicting that fact is presented and in such case the interested party needs to present other competent evidence to prove the existence of that alleged fact. If he fails to do so, the alleged fact is not proven, even if the opposing party produces no further evidence. There exists a considerable amount of evidence which puts serious doubt on Obama’s allegation that he was born in Hawaii. To date, Obama has presented no additional evidence other than the internet image of his Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and two unreliable newspaper announcements regarding where he was born. Hence, the prima facie validity of the Certification of Live Birth (COLB) must fail and Obama should be compelled to produce other objective, credible, and sufficient evidence of where he was born such as a contemporaneous birth certificate from 1961. Having failed to meet his constitutional burden of proof under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, we cannot accept Obama as a “natural born Citizen.”

    Circuit Court of Appeals rules provide that an appellant’s opening brief is not to exceed 14,000 words. Because of the extraordinary nature and complexity of the question of whether putative President Barack Obama is an Article II “natural born Citizen” and therefore eligible to be President, whether my clients (the plaintiffs) have standing to bring an action against Obama and Congress in which they maintain that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” and that Congress failed to meet its constitutional duty to protect my clients by assuring them that Obama is a “natural born Citizen,” and whether plaintiffs’ action presents a nonjusticiable political question which the courts cannot address, I was compelled to file a brief which contained 20,477 words. So that the Court would accept the overlength brief, I filed a motion with the Court for leave to file the overlength brief

    By order dated February 22, 2010, 
    the Honorable Circuit Judge Michael A. Chagares on behalf of the Motion's Panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file the overlength brief. This is great news because the case will now continue forward as scheduled. Obama’s and Congress’s opposition brief was initially due on February 22, 2010. The Department of Justice obtained a 14-day extension to file that brief, making the new due date March 8, 2010. After they file their opposition brief, I will then have 14 days within which to file a reply to that brief. All briefs will be posted at this blog and it is my hope that the public will read these briefs so as to stay fully informed on this issue that is critically important not only to my clients but also to our Constitutional Republic. 

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 
    February 22, 2010
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com
    Posted by Puzo1 a7:37 PM 3 comments  Links to this post

    Tags: Obama Apuzzo Kerchner

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:33
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Domingo, 21 de febrero de 2010

    SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2010

    Obama and his Muslim connections

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/02/obama-and-his-muslim-connections.html

    Obama admits that he is a Muslim. Obama bowing before a Muslim king. Obama talking about his Muslim family. Obama quoting from the Koran. Obama defending Islam. Obama visiting a Mosque. And many more clips of Obama and his Muslim connections.



    Tags: OBAMA MUSLIM

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:15
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    http://www.therightsideoflife.com/

    Obama’s Incomplete Dossier; HI State Sen Intros “Vexatious Requests,” Birth Cert Bills

    Submitted by Phil on Fri, Feb 19, 201010 Comments
    #eligibility: Obama’s Incomplete Dossier; HI State Sen Intros “Vexatious Requests,” Birth Cert Bills

    On a tip from Lyle Rapacki, Ph.D.: If you ever wanted to have a concise collection of data on President Obama concerning both what we know and what we don’t know about his background, the below YouTube video is for you. While most of the data included in the video is not new, this appears to be the first time that all prominent facts and figures concerning Mr. Obama’s background have been conveniently put together.

    Readers will recall that I highlighted Dr. Rapacki’s work on March 25, 2009, when he had released a report on presidential eligibility as a white paper for InfraGard. His personal commentary from a recent email on the video sums up my thoughts as well:

    WE THE PEOPLE were ridiculed, even threatened each time we asked to have clarified Mr. Obama’s status insofar as citizenship and background. Our elected representatives told us there was “nothing to the claims.” Senator McCain wouldn’t even raise the issue during his campaign for the Office of the Presidency, even though the same issues were raised on the floor of the Congress about McCain’s citizenship having been born in the Panama Canal Zone. Even conservative commentators, like Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity relegate those who raise this issue as “birthers” -- a left handed dismissal by more learned and wise individuals with whom we should just take our cues. With the exception of a very few brave souls who have risked their reputation and personal safety, almost anyone with a large arena, a national microphone, or a pen (computer) who can reach the farthest corners of our Nation refuses to stand and force the subject out of the dark closet into the daylight where the details can be seen, and the subject can be decided once and for all!

    Where have the Patrick Henrys and John Adams of our generation gone; those brave young Americans sitting in a Contential Congress not afraid to challenge a tyrant King. Who will be the next John Hancock who is NOT afraid to sign his name so large that the King can not miss reading it? The issue remains unsettled. The subject, so many are afraid to touch, will not go away. The topic of being rightfully seated as the duly constituted President of the United States continues to fester, and even appears to still be infected with grave doubt, fear, oozing anger and disdain.

    Look below at the YOUTUBE site now making the rounds. Listen to the sobering message, the chilling account, the provocative questions begging to be answered. WE THE PEOPLE want to know what is the truth? What is so wrong with our question? Why are our elected representatives castigating us for asking; for performing by ourselves the due diligence they should have accomplished? Look at the YOUTUBE site below…the issue remains, the questions persist. There is fear that our American political process has been infected, and merely putting a bandaid over the site will not clear the infection. WE THE PEOPLE have asked for help in resolving this challenge. Something is not right, and we don’t feel well at all about this issue.

    So, like the patient whose doctor doesn’t listen because afterall, they are the doctor and know better, WE THE PEOPLE will continue to look for another health care provider who will listen and investigate with us the issue at hand. We have to, it is critical, our health and welfare as a nation is at stake.

    LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
    Protective Intelligence and Assessment Specialist
    Consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
    Independent Intelligence and Information Warfare Analyst

    Lyle is an independent intelligence analyst who receives and disseminates critical intelligence and policy information from and to law enforcement, intelligence and homeland security officials and operatives, and government and community leaders. He is the author of dozens of white papers, bulletins and briefings, and he is frequently called on to share his expertise with public and private security directors and organizations.

    The video, entitled, “Dossier:”


     

    As always, it cannot be emphasized enough that the vetting process for all political candidates is strictly voluntary and entails little to no legal enforcement — basically an honor system. As FamilySecurityMatters.org pointed out back in September, 2008, “Who Vetted Obama?

    The answer? Nobody.

    Post continues below
    Advertise on this site


    Even more interesting is late news coming out of the great State of Hawaii on a story I covered back in August, 2009 concerning State Senator Will Espero’s promise to introduce legislation concerning vital records (via “butterdzillion” on FreeRepublic):

    On Jan 27, 2010 Hawaii State Senator Will Espero has introduced a bill to label some people “vexatious requestors” who can be denied responses from the DOH. This action was taken 2 weeks after I posted “Red Flags in Hawaii”, (see at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/ ), a blog post documenting how Hawaii government officials have broken laws and rules in order to cover for Obama.

    The Honolulu Advertiser has an article about it. Apparently I can’t post anything from the HA because they won’t allow it, but it’s in an article online today. In it, Okubo claims that she gets about 50 requests/month for Obama’s BC.

    First off, I call BS on that number. I requested all the UIPA requests involving Obama for a 2-week period and there were 7 requests -- only 2 of which were for a BC, and both for a non-certified abbreviated birth certificate, which the Administrative Rules expressly authorize to be released to anybody who asks for it.

    Second, I believe this firmly places us in phase 3 of the saying, “First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”

    From the HonoluluAdvertiser:

    “They’re spurred on by these ‘birther’ blogs who direct them to bombard the Health Department even though they have no legitimate right to the information,” [Health Department spokeswoman Janice] Okubo said.

    “They’ve been misled to believe that the state of Hawai’i gives out birth information to anyone who requests it, but really our law protects birth information. We’re entrusted with protecting people’s vital records. To open them up would mean opening them up to identity theft and other types of concerns.”

    State law allows birth certificates to be issued to family members, legal guard- ians, representatives of a person’s estate, or by court order or other legal purposes.

    Okubo said those who have been requesting Obama’s birth certificate don’t meet the legal standards.

    Sorry, Ms. Okubo, but some of us already know that certain records are private. What has been requested are certain facts surrounding these documents — but more on this process in a moment.

    The article continued:

    Rick Newbold, a defense contractor from North Carolina now working in Iraq, asked the Health Department and the White House for Obama’s birth records, in part, because Newbold believes it’s “hypocritical of the president to proclaim that his administration is transparent when it obviously is not,” he wrote in an e-mail to The Advertiser.

    “My interest in discovering and defending the truth about our chief executive is to maintain the integrity of the office of the president and to protect our republic from subversion, especially from foreign powers. America is in decline as a result of the globalist mindset and monied interests who seek to destroy America and integrate it into a global system of governance and taxation.”

    The continuing issue over Obama’s birthplace — and, therefore, his eligibility to serve as president of the United States — has led state Sen. Will Espero, D-20th, (’Ewa Beach, Waipahu) to introduce two bills this session on different sides of the issue.

    Senate Bill 2056 would open up Hawai’i birth records under strict conditions to people who currently have no legitimate right to see them. Senate Bill 2937 would allow state agencies to label people who persistently “abuse” the public information process as “vexatious requestors,” which would allow state officials to deny their requests for documents.

    Espero does not necessarily believe that everyone should see birth certificates that are now restricted, but said he wrote the bills to trigger legislative hearings to discuss the issue.

    “It’s all because of the noise about the president not being born here,” Espero said.

    “I believe he’s born here. Most of Hawai’i believes he’s born here and it’s not an issue here as it is with these Mainland birthers. It probably would not end all of the controversy because I believe the people that are these birthers have some other motives. Whatever you say or provide to these people, they will not be happy with anything.” …

    Attorney Jeff Portnoy, who represents The Advertiser, has made a career out of fighting for public access to government records and believes that county and state officials need to be more open about what they do.

    “On paper, the present state laws regarding access are very impressive, both philosophically and technically, in talking about that in a democracy, the public should have access to the workings of government,” Portnoy said. “Practically, the interpretation of those laws leaves a lot to be desired.”

    The reality, Portnoy said, is that “Hawai’i has a significant reputation as being a hostile place to obtain records and access and, frankly, a history of executive and legislative leaders who have been fairly hostile, either through their attorney general or corporation counsels or the bureaucracy itself.”

    Portnoy understands the desire among some people to see Obama’s birth records, but he does not put their requests in the same category as seeking openness to government dealings, such as details of public works projects or private meetings among officials to decide who will chair city councils, commissions and boards.

    “That’s the people’s business,” Portnoy said. “We’ve never brought an action to get somebody’s Social Security number and there are legitimate reasons to keep birth records private. Identity theft is a legitimate, serious issue.”

    Then, Ms. Okubo stated the following:

    The majority of the people who e-mail or send letters to Okubo asking for Obama’s birth certificate do not challenge her response once she tells them they have no legal right to the information, she said.

    But about a dozen people continue to hammer Okubo with follow-up requests.

    “They want all of the organizational charts for our Office of Health Status Monitoring that handles vital records and for our health informations systems, our IT office,” Okubo said. “They request from me every single communication or every single document or request every record available related to President Obama’s vital records.”

    Okubo readily acknowledges that she hasn’t always been able to reply to a request within 10 working days as required under Hawai’i’s Uniform Information Practices Act, the state’s version of the federal Freedom of Information Act.

    But she adamantly disagrees with the “birthers’ ” interpretation of Hawai’i law.

    “They usually say that by not giving out his birth certificate we’re breaking the law,” Okubo said.

    “But we would be breaking the law by giving out a birth certificate to someone who does not have a right to it.”

    When Okubo told one writer they did not have a right to Obama’s birth certificate because they were not related to the president, the person wrote back saying they, indeed, had a common ancestor.

    “They said they have a tangible right to his birth certificate because they’re descended from Adam,” Okubo said, referring to the biblical figure. “We told them they need to provide some type of legal documentation.”

    Frankly, Ms. Okubo, it sounds like you may need a bit of cheese with that whine! This sounds harsh because applications like Microsoft Word and/or Outlook could make your job 75% easier.

    You see, all you have to do is create a form letter that could be sent and/or attached via email back to the “illegitimate” requester stating that they cannot request the kind of data they’re requesting (if that’s the case).

    So, the real issue is with approximately one dozen concerned citizens asking your office (”hammering,” to the article’s term) for info? Wow. We, the People must be really effective if all it takes is for 12 individuals to cause you to begin griping.

    The bottom line is this: we have the government complaining that concerned citizens are making a number of requests of it, when there is no law that disallows such requests to be made. Yet, somehow, we are supposed to be sympathetic to the bureaucrat who appears to be tired of doing her job.

    Guess what, Ms. Okubo? It’s not your job to characterize any citizen as a “birther” or any other such label, simply because you dislike the insinuated intention of these requests. Your job is to do your job without respect to person, according to the law; nothing more, nothing less.

    Here is the status page for Mr. Espero’s SB2937 concerning “vexatious requests;” here is the actual language of the bill.

    And here is the status page for SB2056 concerning birth certificate viewing; here’s the language.

    See the following links regarding the eligibility saga:

    -Phil

     


    Tags: Obama Dossier

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:26
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Lunes, 15 de febrero de 2010
     
    CONGRESS REFUSES TO BRING HOME MILLIONS OF JOBS
    PART 1
    of 2

     

     

    By: Devvy
    February 15, 2010
    © 2010 - NewsWithViews.com

    "He, therefore, who is now against domestic manufacture, must be for reducing us either to dependence on that foreign nation, or to be clothed in skins, and to live like wild beasts in dens and caverns. I am not one of these; experience has taught me that manufactures are now as necessary to our independence as to our comfort; and if those who quote me as of a different opinion, will keep pace with me in purchasing nothing foreign where an equivalent of domestic fabric can be obtained, without regard to difference of price, it will not be our fault if we do not soon have a supply at home equal to our demand, and wrest that weapon of distress from the hand which has wielded it." The Letters of Thomas Jefferson: 1743-1826. To Benjamin Austin Monticello, January 9, 1816

    I was in Denver recently. As I refuse to fly commercial, I drive. From Big Spring, Texas, where I live, to Denver and back, the number one subject of discussion is jobs. People are very afraid; you can see it in their eyes and hear it in their voice as they say, "I thought we were in a recovery."

    It is not the job of the federal government to create jobs, yet the thieves in the Outlaw Congress right now are bickering over another con job called a "jobs bill". This is just more of the same: increasing the debt, weaning more Americans into government jobs and possibly another extension of unemployment benefits:

    "Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) worked for weeks with Reid's blessing and frequent involvement to craft an $85 billion jobs bill, a measure that seemed destined to break the partisan logjam that has ground the Senate to a halt.

    "[Reid's] trying to keep it simple," Harkin said emerging from the meeting, "but what I think ought to be in the package is unemployment insurance for one year."

    The Marxist usurper in the White House just (without any legal authority) signed another law raising the public debt limit from $12.4 TRILLION "dollars" to $14.3 TRILLION "dollars".

    Heck, what's another $85 BILLION tacked on for you, me, our children and grand children to labor like oxen under the yoke to do nothing more than pay the interest on that debt for our entire lifetimes? The people's purse is overdrawn, well, go look at the debt clock; it runs faster than I can type. But, the Outlaw Congress wants to spend another $85 BILLION "dollars" that will have to be borrowed? Create jobs out of borrowed debt? Does anyone see the insanity of this? Remember: you are going to work today to help pay $800 MILLION dollars a week just on the interest to commie China for "our" debt.

    It is impossible to pay off this Congressionally created debt, signed off by every president for the past 100 years:

    "A lot of people are very upset about the rapidly increasing U.S. national debt these days and they are demanding a solution. What they don't realize is that there simply is not a solution under the current U.S. financial system. It is now mathematically impossible for the U.S. government to pay off the U.S. national debt. You see, the truth is that the U.S. government now owes more dollars than actually exist. If the U.S. government went out today and took every single penny from every single American bank, business and taxpayer, they still would not be able to pay off the national debt. And if they did that, obviously American society would stop functioning because nobody would have any money to buy or sell anything.

    "And the U.S. government would still be massively in debt."

    Unemployment checks are replacing paychecks. This has done nothing to restore our most important and good paying job sectors. This has done nothing and will do nothing towards putting Americans back to work. More Band Aids to cover the massive bleeding. Employers will not hire unless there is an increase in their business and 17 MILLION unemployed Americans are only buying diapers, food, gas and other essentials. Too many are living in tents or their cars. Then, there are consumers like me who will NOT buy Made in commie China or India. I go without if I can't find what I want, so retailers are not getting our money. Employers also cannot hire when being hit by massive unemployment taxes.


    Advertisement

    Folks have been sending me their candidate of choice for Congress in the coming November elections. The only problem is -- why are none of the candidates (that I've seen so far) addressing real solutions instead of just more pap and warmed over political rhetoric? John Dennis is running against Marxist Nancy Pelosi. He is a great constitutional candidate, except I don't see him stepping forward with the taking the first step in bringing home MILLIONS of good paying jobs: "As a country we should welcome trade with all countries, resolve our outstanding disputes with countries considered unfriendly and have diplomatic relations with all."

    Well said, but, like so many of the other candidates for Congress, where is your pledge to introduce and fight to get passed, bills that will get America out of three unconstitutional treaties: NAFTA, CAFTA and GATT?

    Full page ad, NY Times, April 15, 1994:1944. Bretton Woods: The IMF and the World Bank. 1945. San Francisco: The United Nations. 1994, Marrakech: The World Trade Organization. History knows where its going. The final act of the Uruguay Round....to the WTO, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the UN and the IMF." Henry Kissinger, a tried and true traitor and Soviet agent recently said when asked the most important role Marxist Obama can play regarding the middle East: "Obama can give a new impetus to American foreign policy....his task is to step forward to create a new world."

    People like me fought tooth and nail against all of those treaties. Job killers. The destruction of our most important job sectors, agriculture, manufacturing and industrial have been destroyed by those treaties. The Republicans had 12 years to get us out of those treaties and out of the communist controlled UN. Instead, they did NOTHING while this nation hemorrhaged jobs by the millions.

    Voters, tired, hungry and jobless or having lost their good factory job now working for minimum wage, continue to vote back into the office the same turncoats who voted for these job killing treaties: John Boehner, Dana Rohrabacher, Newt globalist Gingrich, Tom Delay, Dennis Hastert, Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer and so many more; the list is here. On the senate side: Grassley sold us out as well as McCain, Lott, Shelby, Kay Bailey Hutchinson and more; the list is here. Some of the crooks are gone (Hastert, Gingrich, Lott), but I can tell you that the aforementioned (with possibly the exception of Pelosi and Hutchinson who is running for Governor in Texas) will all be rewarded with reelection for their treachery in handing over our jobs to communist countries. Pro-communism is anti-American.

    The Pelosi/Reid team has had control of Congress since January 2007. They have done NOTHING to get us out of those destructive trade treaties. Instead, they continue to spend more debt, not money, and creating more government jobs from borrowed, worthless paper that produce nothing but higher taxes to pay for those jobs. What they have done is simply light a bigger bonfire for what's coming very soon and it can't be stopped. The same policies pursued by FDR are being replayed today and the results will be the same - financial Armageddon - just on a grander scale. As Bob Chapman so correctly states in his recent International Forecaster:

    Revising The Economic Problems Wont Make Them Go Away. "The inflationary depression still dominates and probably will continue to do so. In time the stimulus will fail to work and the world will slip into total insolvency and deflationary depression. The old M3 is about 3%, but we still have $23.7 trillion floating around. Not only is the US bankrupt, but also so is the rest of the world. It is now only a question of when the dominos will fall.

    It looks like the first wave in the collapse of the bear market rally is underway. Bonds will follow with higher interest rates and eventually commodities will be hit. Only gold and silver will survive, as the bankers and Wall Street complete their destruction of the world economy." For part two click below.

    Click here for part -----> 2,

    © 2010 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved

    Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
    E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale


    Congress refuses to bring home millions of jobs
    Part II

    By: Devvy
    February 15, 2010

    Agriculture, manufacturing and industrial -- all crippled and dying a slow death because of destructive trade treaties signed by Bill Clinton (NAFTA & GATT) and George Bush, Jr. (CAFTA) to keep a "one world trading system" operating. George Bush, Sr., spearheaded the NAFTA treaty with Canada and Mexico; Billy was selected to continue the destruction. Obama is to cement the final stakes through the heart of this republic.

    How many times have you heard on the boob tube, "Those are millions of jobs that will never come back."

    Why the hell not? I'll tell you why: Because the Outlaw Congress is corrupt and cowardly. Those poltroons are afraid of communist China and will do nothing to get us out of those destructive treaties and bring home millions of jobs for Americans.

    Of course, Americans are to blame, too. Before NAFTA and GATT were passed, 97% of all shoes were made here in OUR country. From toasters to hand tools, clothing to cars, we made our own products. We paid our workers good wages. Our factories hummed, our farmers and ranchers fed our people and millions around the world. Our industrial sector made the steel, we kept the money and the jobs. America kept her wealth where it should be: in the pocketbooks of her people. Instead of buying Made in America - even though it takes extra time - tens of millions of Americans bought and continue to buy "cheap" made in other countries. In reality what they've done is fire themselves. I know that sounds harsh, but it's the truth.

     Did we have trade with other nations prior to NAFTA, CAFTA and GATT? Of course we did and we had tariffs. Fair trade is good. Free trade is financial suicide for any nation.

    As those millions of jobs left our country for places like Bangladesh, commie Hong Kong, commie Viet Nam, commie China and India, Americans were forced out of small to medium towns and cities. They were driven to the major metropolitan cities which couldn't handle the massive numbers. As a result of that and the sickening burden of paying the way for illegal aliens, their infrastructures are collapsing. Oh, yes, let us not forget the impact on our economy because MILLIONS of criminals (illegal aliens) are illegally holding jobs that belong to Americans and naturalized Americans who came to our country the legal route. Juan McCain, Obama and
    Sarah Palin now want to reward some 20 MILLION of those criminals with amnesty.

    Those millions "displaced" by those toxic treaties began to buy "cheap" junk from China and other countries. American manufacturers struggle to compete with products coming from China - a communist country that murders their people at will. They monitor women's menstrual cycles to force abortions on them if they get pregnant twice. A country that condones the
    skinning of dogs and cats alive so the fur can be illegally sold in parkas, doll clothes and sweaters sold in the US. I'd rather wear rags.

    Back in 1994, a lame duck Congress voted on the hideous "free" trade treaty, GATT, whereby the United States of America totally and completely abrogated it's sovereignty to a foreign body - the WTO. At the time of the vote, Bob Dole said, "Any way you cut it, we're the big beneficiary." Counterfeit U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings had just the opposite prediction, "...described the vote as 'the gravest mistake the U.S. has ever made on economic policy.'"

    Hollings' statement turned out to be right; Dole walked from the Senate a millionaire. Our nation has been plundered as a result of GATT and We, the People, our businesses, our commerce, and our livelihoods, have been under attack ever since, losing virtually every single challenge made by some foreign country. On September 26, 2002, counterfeit U.S. Senator Max Baucus said he was deeply troubled by the WTO dispute settlement process: "Things are looking more and more... like a kangaroo court against U.S. trade laws."

    <>Funny thing about Baucus' stand on trade. He's a "free" trader. On his web site it states, "I've also been a leader in the successful efforts to open Chinese markets to U.S. products and to bring China into the World Trade Organization." Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. The vote on GATT was 76-24. Guess how many members of the entire Congress read the fine print? One! Former counterfeit Senator Hank Brown (R-CO). He's the only one who read this 28,000 page treaty and declared that in no way would he vote for it.

    During the hearings on this monster, French financier Sir James Goldsmith testified in front of Earnest Hollings' committee. He demonstrated that GATT would gut the American textile market. The following are some quotes from the Washington Times, December 6, 1993; they accurately reflect Sir Goldsmith's statements during the hearings, which I watched on TV:

    "Global free trade will force the poor of the rich countries to subsidize the rich in poor countries. What GATT means is that our national wealth, accumulated over centuries, will be transferred from a developed country like Britain to developing countries like Communist China, now building it's first ocean going navy in 500 years."

    "China, with its 1.2 billion people, three Indochinese states with 900 million, the former Soviet republics with some 300 million, and many more can supply skilled labor for a fraction of Western costs. Five dollars in Communist China is the equivalent of a $100 wage in Europe."

    "It is quite amazing that GATT is sowing the seeds for global social upheaval and that it is not even the subject of debate in America....If the masses understood the truth about GATT, there would be blood in the streets of many capitals. A healthy national economy has to produce a large part of its own needs. It cannot simply import what it needs and use it's labor force to provide services for other countries."

    "We have to rethink from top to bottom why we have elevated global free trade to the status of sacred cow, or moral dogma. It is a fatally flawed concept that will impoverish and destabilize the industrialized world while cruelly ravaging the Third World."

    Sir Goldsmith could see into the future, only it's been far worse than he predicted.

    The architects of a one world government crushed our freedom and independence with those treaties and here we are today. The Plan was written long ago and I hope you can take the time to read this column I wrote back in 2002. It has opened many eyes over the years: Americans Committing National Suicide.



    Have you heard any candidate or incumbent talk about getting America out of the Bretton Woods agreement? This should be a priority. Bretton Woods was brought into being to reorder the world's financial structures and banking system. It has been POISON for our sovereignty and our financial survival. Bretton Woods was and is a major tool for stripping you of every last penny you make and illegally pumping it into totalitarian operations like the IMF and BIS. A complete failure because the dominos are getting ready to topple globally and it won't be much longer.

    Congressman Ron Paul has introduced several bills in the past that would boost the economy and create jobs through spending. All ignored by those caring Republicans and Democrats in Congress.

    December 12, 2000:
    Paul Calls for an End to Withholding Taxes

    April 4, 2001.
    Congressman Paul Introduces Legislation to Abolish Withholding Taxes

    January 29, 2009:
    Ron Paul Introduces Tax Free Tips Act

    On November 16, 2009, I wrote a column titled: Demand Congress Stop Withholding Taxes Now. That is another solution being completely ignored by Congress AND the American people.

    At the risk of sounding like a broken record: Buy American.
    Yes, you can. If might require a little extra time, but if we don't support our own industries, we will be supporting our own destruction. The more we buy Made in America, the more American companies will hire. Through a free market, the prices will be affordable and the money stays HERE in America. Not India or some communist country.

    Vote out every incumbent in Congress who voted for NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT. Throw them out for destroying and betraying our republic. How can any voter reward any incumbent who has sold out their own country? Contact candidates and get their pledge to get us out of the UN, all those treaties and no more of our money stolen to illegally feed the IMF, BIS or foreign aid to ANY country and that includes Israel. Congress never had the legal authority under the U.S. Constitution to steal the fruits of our labor to simply give to any foreign country on this earth. That's why I call them the Outlaw Congress.

    [Note: My new columns are posted regularly on my web site. You can also
    sign up for my free email alerts. What I can't get done in a column, I use the email alert system.]

    Links:

    There will be more rape because there is no way
    to stop the Democrats from more illegal bail outs:

    1 - Kanjorski Admits There Is A "Growing Bubble In
    Commercial Real Estate" As S&P Observes Recognition
    Of CRE Losses Could Wipe Out Banking System
    2 - US Banks Face $1.4 Trillion Commercial Prop Crisis
    3 - Commercial Real Estate Collapse Bigger than Subprime
    Implosion – Why is the Market Ignoring the $3.5 Trillion
    Commercial Real Estate Market Implosion? Pricing in Another Bailout.
    4 - Banking and Housing Payments Devoured the Middle Class Income
    1 out of 10 Americans on Food Stamps and how the Fed
    Slowly Devalued the Dollars in your Wallet.
    5 - U.S. Foreclosure Filings Top 300,000 for 11th Month
    6 -
    Rising FHA default rate foreshadows a crush of foreclosures
    7 - Government Labor Statistics: Lies and Damned Lies
    8 -Global Economy: What Really Killed Argentina?
    (2002). Look out America.
    9 - Free trade: cheap labor and expensive recalls
    (2007)
    10 -Bretton Woods (What is it?) (2008)
    11 - Collapse of the Euro is inevitable (2010)
    12 - The case was just one of a long list in recent years
    stemming from contaminated products fromChina.
    13 - '
    Made in USA' stages comeback
    14 - Bretton Woods Agreements



    Part one click here.

     

    Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies distributed. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.

    Visit Devvy's website at: http://www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.

    Copyright © 2010 Devvy Kidd
    All right
    s reserved. 


    Tags: OBAMA Marxist USURPER

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:52
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    S?bado, 13 de febrero de 2010

     
     

    Saturday, February 13, 2010

    Obama's College Marxism

    Newsmax has an interesting report from Ron Kessler on Barack Obama's college Marxism.

    As a college student, Barack Obama expressed Marxist views, including the need for a new socialist U.S. government, according to a student who says he shared the future president’s opinion at the time...

    Dr. John C. Drew, a grant writing consultant in Laguna Niguel, Calif., tells Newsmax he met Obama in 1980 when Obama was a sophomore at Occidental College in Los Angeles. Drew had just graduated from Occidental and was attending graduate school at Cornell University.

    Drew’s then girlfriend, Caroline Boss — now Grauman-Boss — knew Obama because she shared classes with him at Occidental.

    During Christmas break, Drew says he was at Grauman-Boss’ home in Palo Alto when Obama came over with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, his roommate from Pakistan.

    “Barack and Hasan showed up at the house in a BMW, and then we went to a restaurant together,” Drew says. “We had a nice meal, and then we came back to the house and smoked cigarettes and drank and argued politics.”

    For the next several hours, they discussed Marxism.

    “He was arguing a straightforward Marxist-Leninist class-struggle point of view, which anticipated that there would be a revolution of the working class, led by revolutionaries, who would overthrow the capitalist system and institute a new socialist government that would redistribute the wealth,” says Drew, who says he himself was then a Marxist.

    “The idea was basically that wealthy people were exploiting others,” Drew says. “That this was the secret of their wealth, that they weren’t paying others enough for their work, and they were using and taking advantage of other people. He was convinced that a revolution would take place, and it would be a good thing.”

    Drew concluded that Obama thought of himself as “part of an intelligent, radical vanguard that was leading the way towards this revolution and towards this new society.”

    In contrast, “My more pessimistic Marxist perspective indicated this was not a realistic possibility, that we really hadn’t seen a sort of complete revolution take place anywhere in Western Europe, and that this isn’t what had happened in more socialistic Germany or in France,” Drew says. “He was pretty persistent, that I didn’t know what I was talking about.”

    Drew’s viewpoint that a revolution was unrealistic “made me very unpopular that evening. It was considered a reactionary and insensitive thing to argue,” says Drew.

    Drew saw Obama again at a party Obama and Chandoo gave in June 1981 at the house they shared. Drew went on to become an assistant professor of political science at Williams College.

    In 1981, Obama left Occidental to attend Columbia University. During that year, Obama spent “about three weeks” visiting Chandoo and his family in Karachi, Pakistan, according to the account of Obama spokesman Bill Burton during the campaign.

    Chandoo is now a financial consultant who was formerly a broker at Oppenheimer & Co. He has contributed to Obama’s campaign and helped raise more than $100,000 for him as a bundler.

    “If that’s what John Drew said, that’s what he said,” Chandoo commented. “I can’t remember Obama ever talking like that. It sounds a bit absurd to me, but that’s my opinion. I can’t remember him ever expressing an interest in being a Marxist.”

    Much of what is known about Obama’s past has been revealed and defined by Obama himself, largely through his two bestselling books “Dreams from My Father” and “The Audacity of Hope.”

    In that memoir, Obama said that at Occidental, “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.”

    Congratulations Mr Drew - let's hope a few more people from mr Obama's past are willing to come forward with what they know.



    Tags: OBAMA MARXISM Drew

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:28
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
     

    Friday, February 12, 2010

    Obama and Congress Request and Obtain Extension of Time to File Opposition Brief to Kerchner Appeal

    On January 19, 2010, I filed the Appellants' Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama's alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” which is a child born in the country to citizen parents. We maintain that Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” because he lacks unity of citizenship and allegiance from birth which is obtained when a child is born in the United States to a mother and father who are both United States citizens at the time of birth. Obama’s father was only a temporary visitor to the United States when Obama was born and never even became a resident let alone a citizen. Not being an Article II “natural born Citizen,” Obama is not eligible to bePresident and Commander in Chief.

    We also maintain that Obama has failed to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii by publicly presenting 
    a copy of a contemporaneous birth certificate (a long-form birth certificate generated when he was born in 1961 and not simply a digital image of computer generated Certification of Live Birth [COLB] allegedly obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health in 2007 which was posted on the internet by some unknown person in 2008) or through other contemporaneous and objective documentation. Having failed to meet his constitutional burden of proof under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, we cannot accept him as a “natural born Citizen.”

    The defendants had 30 days within which to file their opposition brief. Defendants have requested and obtained from the Court an extension of time to file their brief. The Court has granted them until March 8, 2010 to file it. After that filing, I will then have a chance to file a reply brief within the next 14 days.

    You may obtain a 
    copy of my brief at this site . We will be posting here the defendants' opposition brief after it is filed along with my reply brief. I hope that many of you will take the time to read these briefs so that you may learn first hand what the legal issues and arguments are regarding whether the plaintiffs have standing and/or are precluded by the political question doctrine to challenge Obama on his eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief, and what the meaning of an Article II “natural born Citizen” is.

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    February 12, 2010
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com

    If you can, help the cause.
    CDR Kerchner, Lead Plaintiff
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

    3 comments:

    cfkerchner said...

    As Lead Plaintiff in this case it looks to me like the Defendants are having great difficulty finding a way to knock down the constitutional, historical, and legal arguments made by Attorney Mario Apuzzo in the Appellant's Opening Brief to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals filed in Philadelphia PA, the city where our U.S. Constitution was written in 1789.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/25461132/Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Appellant-s-Opening-Brief-FILED-2010-01-19

    The truth about Obama's constitutional ineligibility for the office he sits in, and the fundamental law of our nation, the U.S. Constitution, will win the day in the end.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/26563415/Citizen-v-natural-born-Citizen-It-s-Don-t-Ask-Don-t-Tell-20100208-Issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-15

    It is only a matter of time before the fraud of Obama in the 2008 election will be revealed. And because of that the progressives are trying to run out the clock to keep him in office as the putative president as long as possible. But in my opinion Obama's days of deceit and fraudulently occupying the Oval Office are numbered.

    Charles Kerchner
    Commander USNR (Retired)
    Lead Plaintiff
    Kerchner v Obama & Congress
    Lawsuit details: 
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com
    To Help Visit this Site and Make a Donation to the Cause: http://www.protectourliberty.org
    ####

    February 12, 2010 6:11 PM
    jayjay said...

    Indeed it looks as though you may be right. The defense couldn't even come up with a written request outlining WHY they needed more time ("because Barry wants it"???) but had to make a verbal request.

    Seems as though their feathers may be ruffled. The wicket gets a lot
    stickier for them from here on, I think.

    February 12, 2010 6:19 PM
    James said...

    Classic Legal Technique to stall things. They need more time but really probably don't need more time and are just stalling. Mario, remember to try to anticipate their plan of attack and be ready to combat it.

    February 12, 2010 6:32 PM

    Post a Comment


    Tags: OBAMA KERCHNER APUZZO

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:13
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Viernes, 12 de febrero de 2010

    WND
    By Chelsea Schilling

    Miki BoothNASHVILLE – Just as a tea-party convention crowd gathered to discuss strategy for the movement, one woman stepped forward to the microphone – holding up two Hawaiian long-form birth certificates and a copy of President Obama’s purported short-form certification of live birth – and, referencing the short form, she told the crowd, “This piece of junk is what you get when you don’t have one of these!”

    The crowd went wild, clapping and cheering.

    When the forum was over, tea partiers scrambled around a table to see and photograph her original documents.

    The woman, Miki Booth, originally from Hawaii, is running for the U.S. House of Representatives in Oklahoma’s second district as an independent constitutional conservative. She had presented original long-form birth certificates belonging to her son and husband, dated 1981 and 1949.

    “They are the ‘vault’ copies of the original ones filled out at the hospital and sent to the Hawaii State Department of Health Vital Statistics Office,” Booth told WND. “It is from this office that the newspapers get their stats for births, deaths and marriages to announce in the newspapers.”

    Her husband, Fred, and son, Alan, were born at the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii – the same hospital declared as Obama’s birthplace in a purported letter from the president.

    “If he is going to claim he was born in Kapi’olani like my husband and my son, then I want him to show proof,” Booth said, explaining that a certification of live birth only shows that a live baby was born – and not necessarily in Hawaii.

    “What he’s given us perpetuates the mystery of what he’s covering up and gives us more reason to not trust him,” she said.

    booth bc 1
    Booth presented this 1981 long-form Hawaiian birth certificate belonging to her son. It contains information about the doctor, birth hospital, time of delivery and other information.

     

    Asked what she thought of the crowd’s overwhelmingly positive reaction when she presented the documents, Booth said, “I was pleased but not surprised, since I get that reaction every time I do it. I think people really appreciate when someone shows them they’re not stupid. They know what’s going on.”

    Most of the convention attendees appeared to rally around WND founder Joseph Farah as he presented his speech at the national convention Friday, referencing the eligibility issue. They gave him a standing ovation at the end of his speech. However, a small number of people suggested the topic shouldn’t have surfaced at a tea party event.

    “I would say those people have bought into the notion that it’s a dead issue since it was ‘proved’ to them that Obama was born in Hawaii,” Booth explained. “What proof were they convinced by? Bill O’Reilly saying so? Newscasters saying so? ACORN saying so? The Internet copy?”

    booth bc 2
    Booth also presented this 1949 long-form Hawaiian birth certificate belonging to her husband. It contains information about the birth attendant, birth hospital, time of delivery and other information.

     

    She continued, “I wonder if these same people think we shouldn’t question his record of what passport he traveled to Pakistan with – or his Occidental records of foreign student funding and his Columbia records or his Harvard records or his Punahou records.”

    read the entire story here on World Net Daily..


    Tags: OBAMA BIRTH STORY

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:51
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
     
    washingtonpost.com
     
     
    Mr. Obama should press for change at the OAS

    Wednesday, February 10, 2010; A16

    SINCE ITS founding in 1948, the Organization of American States has defined its two top purposes as "to strengthen peace and security" and "to consolidate and promote representative democracy." On the second count, it is failing.

    Despite the adoption in 2001 of a "democracy charter," the OAS has done little to stem what has been a steady erosion of free elections, free press and free assembly in Latin America during the past five years. When Honduras's president was arrested and dispatched to exile by the military last year, the organization was aggressive but clumsy -- and ended up making a democratic outcome harder to achieve. In the case of countries where democracy has been systematically dismantled by a new generation of authoritarian leaders, including Venezuela and Nicaragua, the OAS has failed to act at all.

    The embodiment of this dysfunction has been OAS Secretary General José Miguel Insulza. A Chilean socialist, Mr. Insulza has unabashedly catered to the region's left-wing leaders -- which has frequently meant ignoring the democratic charter. Last year, he pushed for the lifting of Cuba's ban from the OAS, even though there has been no liberalization of the Castro dictatorship. When Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chávez launched a campaign against elected leaders of his opposition, stripping them of power and launching criminal investigations, Mr. Insulza refused to intervene, claiming the OAS "cannot be involved in issues of internal order of member states." Yet when leftist Honduran President Manuel Zelaya tried to change his own country's internal order by illegally promoting a constitutional referendum, Mr. Insulza supported him, even offering to dispatch observers.

    Now Mr. Insulza is up for reelection; a vote is scheduled for late next month. The United States, which supplies 60 percent of the funding for the OAS's general secretariat -- $47 million in 2009 -- ought to have a prime interest in replacing him with someone who will defend democracy. Yet the Obama administration is paralyzed: It has yet to make a decision about whether to support a new term for Mr. Insulza. Partly because of that waffling, no alternative candidate has emerged.

    There is some reason for this. Five years ago, an effort by the Bush administration to promote a couple of friendly candidates backfired, and a U.S.-backed nominee this year would surely trigger pushback by Mr. Chávez and his allies, and by center-left governments such as Brazil. But the potential resistance to Mr. Insulza is growing. Panama, Colombia, Canada and Mexico could be enlisted in the search for an alternative. Even Chile's new center-right president has so far declined to endorse his compatriot.

    At a minimum, the administration should embrace the recommendation of a recent Senate report on the OAS drawn up by the staff of Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.). It calls for the OAS permanent council to require that Mr. Insulza make a presentation about his proposals and priorities for a second term, and for any other candidate who steps forward to offer such a presentation as well.

    The United States should make clear that it will not support any secretary general whose platform on democracy issues is inadequate. Congress should meanwhile consider whether the United States should continue to provide the bulk of the funding for the OAS when it fails to live by its own charter. 


    Tags: OBAMA OAS INSULZA

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:16
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Lunes, 08 de febrero de 2010
     

    Like Rodney Dangerfield, ‘the Constitution don’t get no respect’ either, 

    If you, as do I, respect the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, and;

    If you, as do I, respect the Office of the President and Commander in Chief;

    Then you, as do I, must dis-respect (and reject) anyone who dis-respects the Constitution and the Office of President and Commander in Chief.

    The Constitution is a ‘contract’ between we, the sovereign citizens only (not illegal aliens or enemy terrorist combatants) and our elected representatives (they represent us and our rights, not the other way around), and when our public servants violate or withdraw from the terms of our mutual ‘contract’, that ‘contract’ becomes null and void, and their representation of (and remuneration by) We, the People, ceases immediately. ($15,000+ per month is nothing to sneeze at, and termination for cause can cancel that lifetime pension immediately).

    And I’m sure that you, as do I, completely dis-respect any violators of that ‘lifetime’ ‘contract’. That ‘contract’ consists of less than 5,000 words (a 10 page booklet), with an introductory Declaration of Independence, a Body of 9 Articles, and 27 carefully deliberated and lawfully approved Amendments.

    Article II, Section 1 of that ‘contract’ requires that whomever we allow to represent us in our Office of President and Commander in Chief MUST BE a Natural Born U.S. Citizen.

    Barry Soetoro/aka Barack Hussein Obama has admitted publicly that he is NOT, repeat NOT, a Natural Born U.S. citizen (since his father was not even a legal immigrant, never mind not even a U.S. citizen – he was British, then Kenyan), and has therefore treasonously ‘dis-respected’ these Offices. He has knowingly violated that ‘contract’ (with the complicity of the entire 111th Congress plus the 9 members of the Supreme Court, the elected Judges, Sheriffs, A/G’s, Governors, and the Secretaries of State across this vast but Sovereign nation), and therefore must step down or be removed by force of law, and be tried for the crime of treason, as spelled out in our ‘contract’, the Constitution of the United States of America.

    You can help to respect the Office of the President and Commander in Chief by dis-respecting all those who disrespect that ‘contract’.

    And you can begin to help in the removal of all those ‘dis-respecters’ of that ‘contract’ by:

    1. Exercising one of your rights enumerated in Amendment V, by joining www.AmericanGrandJury.org;

    2. Listening to The Manning Report “Let Justice Run Like Water”, and follow up on it daily – culminating in a mass demonstration and Obama Treason Trial at Columbia University in D.C. in May, 2010;

    3. Contacting your Representative and demanding that s/he signs on to H.R.1503 – the Presidential Eligibility Act;

    4. Making sure that all currently running candidates you support will be committed to all terms of that ‘contract’ (The Constitution Party platform may just meet that criteria) – to include enforcing Article II, Section 1, - that the Office of President and Commander in Chief is held by a Natural Born U.S. citizen ONLY!

    Disrespect my Constitution INDEED!

    We hold this Truth to be Self- Evident:
    Any action, by any branch of the Government, that is repugnant to the Constitution, is null and void.

    Neil B. Turner
    American Grand Jury
    Charter Member

    Posted by Bob 


    -------------------------------------------------
     

    Tags: OBAMA CONSTITUTION

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:27
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

     


    America’s Bolshevik

    Obama denies being an ideologue or a Bolshevik, why?  Is he ashamed of his heritage and convictions, just intent on keeping his motivations covert until the right time to spring his true nature upon us, or is there a technicality that we need to grasp?

    Perhaps we should analyze the term Bolshevik.  Historically, the Bolsheviks were a faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP), founded by Vladimir Lenin.  They split from the Menshevik faction in 1903, during the Second Party Congress.  They eventually gained control during the October phase of the Revolution in 1917.  Bolshevik means "majority" or "large" and the nickname resulted from having the majority rule in a crucial vote.  Later on after gaining complete control, Lenin maintained that since there was no opposition, there was no longer the need to call themselves the majority party or Bolsheviks, thus they named themselves the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

    Eventually, Lenin died and Stalin gained control of the party.  Trotsky was exiled and wrote extensively condemning Stalin’s "incorrect" version of Communism by referring to it as Bolshevism, a derivative of Bolshevik, in apposition to Leninism.  Consequently the term Bolshevik developed negative connotations for the "pure" Communist; perhaps this explains Obama’s displeasure at being called a Bolshevik.  He like many others must feel the sting of those who are critical of Stalin’s regime.

    The term, Ideologue, evolved in the highly contested political and philosophical debates of the French Revolution; coined by Destutt de Tracy, initially, it referred to the study of the science of ideas or the study of ideas and the means and logic of those ideas. 

    Later, Napoleon used the term as a pejorative toward his political opponents, since that time it has been used as a term of derision in political discussion to point out an opposing politician’s inability to grasp ideas that are different than those of his party line, thus reflecting a pettiness and lack of cognitive ability.

    Obama's taking exception to being considered an Ideologue becomes a matter of conjecture when examining the platform of America’s Communist Party.  Although Obama denies any association with the Communist Party of the United States, (CPUSA) they are in express agreement with all of his policies.  They could not have had a better representative if they had won the election.

    The CPUSA’s 
    stated goals are to achieve a free, prosperous, and peaceful society free of racism, sexism, homophobia, and exploitation, in which all people have the opportunity to develop to their full potential.  These same goals were espoused by Obama during his campaign, the same goals of the Social Democrats and of the Progressive Democrats.  The Communists above all maintain that they advocate a peaceful Socialist Revolution and a peaceful transition to Socialism.  Obviously if they didn’t, the Communist Party would be outlawed; therefore the claim is probably one of expediency and is purely academic. 

    All things considered, I understand why a true Marxist in the Russian tradition balks at being labeled a Bolshevik.  It is an insult from the days of Trotsky’s bitter writing over his ouster and banishment.  Being upset at being labeled an Ideologue is a matter of history.  In the context of the early days of the French Revolution, Obama should consider it a compliment to be called an ideologue.  If his frame of reference is from the Napoleonic perspective, he is indeed an Ideologue, after all Karl Marx frequently implied that it was essential to be an Ideologue.  Obviously Obama is confused over these issues as he seems to be over many issues.  It would probably be a much easier if he would just be honest with the American People and admit that he is a Communist Ideologue, with his reelection chances diminishing daily, he has reached the point where honesty can only improve his ratings.  Of course if he had been honest in the beginning, he would have never been elected. 

    Posted by 
    Skookum on the Flopping Aces blog.
         
    There can be little argument that the agendas of Obama, the Democrat Party, and the CPUSA are strikingly similar -- cursor down on the Flopping Aces link to review a condensed version of the CPUSA platform.
       

     


    Tags: America?s Bolshevik

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:42
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    S?bado, 06 de febrero de 2010
     

    Who are the 300 terrorists held in U.S. prisons?

    By: BYRON YORK 
    Chief Political Correspondent
    February 5, 2010

    "The Bush administration used the criminal justice system to convict more than 300 individuals on terrorism-related charges," writes Attorney General Eric Holder in a new letter to Republican critics in Congress. The letter is part of the Obama administration's aggressive defense of its decision to grant full American constitutional rights to al Qaeda soldier Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the accused Christmas Day bomber. That defense boils down to one sentence: Bush did it, too.

    Republicans on Capitol Hill object. They argue that one of the reasons some terrorists were handled in the criminal justice system is that it took George W. Bush and Congress years to establish a military tribunal system that satisfied constitutional requirements -- a process that was lengthened by legal challenges filed by some of the same lawyers who now work in Holder's Justice Department.

    You can argue about that forever. But there's one serious factual debate going on about Holder's letter, and that concerns those "300 individuals." Just who are they?

    It turns out some lawmakers have been trying for months to get an answer. They're not saying the claim is false -- they just want to see what it's based on. But so far they haven't been able to find out.

    It started back in May 2009, when President Obama gave his famous National Archives speech outlining the plan to close the Guantanamo Bay terrorist detention center. "Bear in mind the following fact," Obama said. "Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal 'supermax' prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists." Although the president did not put a number on it, various figures, ranging up to 300, have been tossed around in the months since.

    To Republican Sen. Jon Kyl, something didn't sound right. Are there really that many convicted terrorists in U.S. prisons? And are they really comparable with the inmates at Guantanamo?

    "It's a disingenuous argument," says Kyl. "There haven't been 300 high-profile, dangerous terrorism cases in the United States -- if there were, we would have heard about them."

    A few days after the president's speech, Kyl sent a letter to Holder asking for the names and crimes of the terrorists held in federal prisons. "It is not my understanding that there are 'hundreds' of federal inmates who have been convicted of a level of terrorism comparable to that of Guantanamo detainees," Kyl wrote.

    The senator got no response. Then, on June 17, Holder appeared at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which Kyl is a senior member. Kyl asked again. Holder didn't have the information at hand, so Kyl sent another written request.

    Weeks passed, and then months, with no response. Then, last October, Kyl got an answer, of sorts, from Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich. Citing federal regulations, Weich said he "cannot provide ... a list of Bureau of Prisons inmates," although he said the department could give Kyl "briefings about terrorism suspects housed in federal prisons generally."

    As for whether the inmates' crimes are comparable with those of high-value prisoners at Guantanamo, Weich responded, "A number of individuals with a history of, or nexus to, international or domestic terrorism are currently being held in federal prisons, each of whom was tried and convicted in a [civilian] court. The attorney general considers all crimes of terrorism to be serious."

    Weich's words raised all sorts of red flags. "History of, or nexus to" -- what did that mean, precisely? "International or domestic terrorism" -- what about that? Just who was the Justice Department including in the 300 figure?

    On Nov. 18, Holder appeared again before the Judiciary Committee. Asked yet again, he was perfectly agreeable. "I will supply you with those 300 names and what they were convicted of," Holder said. "I'll be glad to do that."

    Now, two and a half more months have passed, with no answer. And in Holder's new letter, he repeats the "300 individuals" claim.

    Republicans aren't accusing the attorney general of making anything up. But they want to know the evidence behind the claim, which is, after all, key to the Obama administration's case that the civilian justice system is the best way to handle Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

    But the fight is also about something bigger. It's about a minority party struggling to find out what the administration is doing on an issue critical to national security. So far, it's been a hard slog. "What do you do," asks Jon Kyl, "with an administration that hides the ball, won't answer questions and makes up reasons as it goes along?"

    Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at [email protected]. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com ExaminerPolitics.com.





    Tags: OBAMA HOLDER TERRORIST

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:51
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
     

    Obama, like most Progressives, seems to have a problem identifying the U.S. Constitution

    The Constitution, Nazis, and the Corpse Man

     By Jim O'Neill  Saturday, February 6, 2010

    imageRecently I’ve noticed several things that the Progressives are having trouble with.  Well, actually a LOT of things, but this article will focus on just a few of them.

    First of all, Obama, like most Progressives, seems to have a problem identifying the U.S. Constitution. 

    In his State of the Union address, Obama stated that “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal….” 

    Darn near made me want to stand up and salute, (something our POTUS could use some lessons in, by the way).  There’s a problem here, however.  It turns out that “the notion that we are all created equal” is not “enshrined in our Constitution”—it’s from the Declaration of Independence.

    Doesn’t say much for Obama’s grasp of the Constitution, when he confuses the U.S. Constitution, with the Declaration of Independence

     

    This mistaken attribution is an understandable faux pas for your average “Joe six-pack,” but Obama’s supposed to be a Harvard-trained Constitutional lawyer.  It doesn’t say much for Harvard Law School, or Obama’s grasp of the Constitution, when he confuses the U.S. Constitution, with the Declaration of Independence.

    (Note to the White House (and Harvard Law School): they are two totally different documents, with different wording, and different purposes.  They are not interchangeable.  I know—bummer).

    One can imagine Obama’s final exam on Constitutional Law:

    Harvard Law professor:  “Mister Obama, what are the opening words of the U.S. Constitution?”

    Obama:  “Uh, ‘When in the course of human events….’”

    Harvard Law professor:  “Close enough!  You pass!”

    No wonder these folks have so much trouble following the Constitution.

    If I may, let me make a suggestion to the Progressives (and Harvard).  The Cato Institute sells a small book that contains a copy of both the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence.  It’s inexpensive, so there’s really no excuse for you not to have one—as a handy reference, you know..................


    Tags: OBAMA CONSTITUTION

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:45
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar


    Ron Russell says we've all heard the expression, "a mirror image."  Most think the image and the reflection are the same when in reality -- they are opposites. 
        
         
    What we saw and heard from Obama on the campaign trail was one thing (the mirror image), and what we are getting now is the true Obama.  A far left politician with an almost alien agenda.  He simply wants to change American into his personal vision of what he thinks America should be.  His ideals come from years of influence by people who believe that capitalism is an evil and corrupt system.  He is using the economic downturn, which is a normal part of a free market system, to advance his agenda.  An agenda not of the European socialist kind, but one far more radical and foreign to the traditional American system.  This is a power grab that puts the efforts of Hugo Chavez to shame.  Its beginning to take shape and some see the looming danger it presents while others stand in awe waiting for the next words of the great orator.
        

     


    Tags: OBAMA TWO FACED

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 9:34
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Jueves, 04 de febrero de 2010
     

    "You can question my policies without questioning my faith, or, for that matter, my citizenship."  (01:03)
        
    Obama today at the National Prayer Breakfast raised the issue of his own eligibility for office -- saying that people shouldn't be questioning his "citizenship."

    The questions, however, over Obama's "citizenship," actually go to the core of the American republic.  Multiple lawsuits have challenged that he is not qualified for the Oval Office under the Constitution's requirement that U.S. presidents be a "natural born citizen." 

    The plaintiffs -- who run into the hundreds so far and who still have a number of cases pending at the appellate level -- have alleged that failing to meet that constitutional requirement means he actually is a usurper, with no actual authority to be president. 

    On a forum page at The Hill newspaper, one commenter wrote that Obama has only himself to blame for the questions. 
        

    "Personally I am no birther… but I am curious as to why Obama continues to beat on this issue... is it a political ploy by his handlers to continue to use this as a divisive issue?  To try and embarrass a certain segmen of the population?  And if not, why doesn't he just provide the certificate and end all the speculation for the conspirators once and for all?  Obama has certainly been a little less than forthcoming on his grades, his Harvard review publications and many other accomplishments…"

         
    The reference apparently was the first time the issue has been addressed by Obama, even though he did not provided any answers.  His press secretary, Robert Gibbs, repeatedly has ridiculed questions related to the subject, and the White House itself has declined to respond to any of a multitude of questions submitted over months on the issue.

    Despite his protestations, I have to question the anointed one, since we have absolutely nothing in common.  I'm an American -- I don't know what the hell Obama is. 
           -----------------------------------------
     
    Jerry Phillips   February 4th, 2010 - 9:36 am

    WOW! The teleprompters working again, huh???

    DEUT28   February 4th, 2010 - 9:38 am

    THE JOKE is on You Barry…….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1tGLJjY7Ds …. Disobedience to God Always leads to Disaster!

    Dave, Tn   February 4th, 2010 - 9:38 am

    Who is he praying to there? Oh I know.

    I wanna talk about me
    Wanna talk about I
    Wanna talk about number one
    Oh my me my
    What I think, what I like, what I know, what I want, what I see
    I like talking about me me me me, usually, but occasionally
    I wanna talk about meeeeee (me,me,me,me-background singers)
    I wanna talk about me (me,me-background singers)

    moe   February 4th, 2010 - 9:39 am

    only questioning what country is your citizenship

    smart independent   February 4th, 2010 - 9:42 am

    this POS kenyan born muslim usurper needs to be impeached & deported before he bankrupts America and brings it down to 3rd world status.

    you libtards who voted in this fraud to appease your white guilt have ruined America.

    i will never shop at any libtard establishment again.
    i call ahead and ask their political affiliation.
    I hate libtards with a passion.

    Imagine if EVERYONE in America called ahead?

    try it

    Nalora   February 4th, 2010 - 9:48 am

    A man who does not bow his head in prayer, but raises his nose.

    PatrickTX   February 4th, 2010 - 9:50 am

    “challenge our motives?”

    OK. I see, so we’re NOT racist misogynist homophobes….

    He really should check with his PMSNBC mouthpieces on that one, because that ain’t what they are saying.

    Yazoo   February 4th, 2010 - 9:51 am

    Everytime I see Obama speak………………………………………………..I’m reminded of a
    tennis announcer………………………………………………………….look right,then
    look left………………………………………………………………..I think Obama does it
    to keep from resting………………………………………………………one side of his mouth
    as he lies out of the other.

    Paul Thompson   February 4th, 2010 - 9:52 am

    His refusal to put this to rest is causing many different doubts.
    This is not leadership and this country is suffering
    because he won’t release anything, including college
    records so that our country and get on with it’s
    business.

    I don’t know how anybody can defend his lack of caring
    about these matters and the consequences it’s having on
    this country’s focus on what are our true priorities.

    CommonSense   February 4th, 2010 - 9:56 am

    This guy is a blatant moron.

    the untouchable   February 4th, 2010 - 9:58 am

    Sign of a professional liar, he jokes about his lies, cuz he is untouchable!

    Staged18   February 4th, 2010 - 9:59 am

    You lie boy.

    Staged18   February 4th, 2010 - 10:00 am

    This is an example of what affirmative action gets a company or for that matter a country.

    uberVU - social comments   February 4th, 2010 - 10:01 am

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by CodyHanshaw: Obama Jokes About His Citizenship at Prayer Breakfast http://tinyurl.com/ybam7d9…

    dennisl59   February 4th, 2010 - 10:03 am

    We, as Citizens of the United States of America, should thank God(or your Higher Power, etc) that this Monster does not have a Son. Think about it.

    K   February 4th, 2010 - 10:08 am

    Gosh, this idiot from Kenya can’t even BUY class.

    RepublicansRTraitors   February 4th, 2010 - 10:09 am

    “Birther” = TRAITOR

    LIAR = CONSERVATIVE THROWBACKS

    HATRED = COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE BIGOTS

    TELEPROMPTER = WHY NOT? YOUR REPUBLICAN BOYS ^BOBBLE^ THEIR HEADS UP AND DOWN WHEN THEY TRY TO READ THEIR NOTES.

    IMPEACH SCOTT BROWN

    tell_it_Like_it_Is   February 4th, 2010 - 10:11 am

    Right on !! you tell those LOSERS MR. President. all in all many do need to get a life.

    K   February 4th, 2010 - 10:15 am

    just kidding , people who say he wasn’t born here 2 things happening there , the david duke complex is there and i would say they are on some type of drug.

    Eric B   February 4th, 2010 - 10:22 am

    I see, so the message here is ‘don’t question his motives’.

    Ah ha.

    Krystal   February 4th, 2010 - 10:23 am

    The question is whether he is a NATURAL born citizen which is required by the constitution. Birth announcements mention he was born to certain parents, the certificate of live birth shows he was born live – the only real important document is the birth certificate which shows actual place of birth, hospital, doctor, father’s name etc. Until that one piece of information is reviewed by perhaps a panel (the same ones who reviewed John McCain’s) then of course there will be those small doubts. Obama is responsible for that himself. He refuses to release it. And the word of the Health Secretary in Hawaii is no good to me…strange how the MSM doesn't hover around Hawaii interviewing hospitals, doctors, neighbors of young Obama. But will swarm to Alaska ….

    claspur   February 4th, 2010 - 10:24 am

    The joke’s on us Maobummercorn as soon as you produce your long-form birth certificate.
    Until that time, you are nothing but an invalid, and a usurper to the Presidency of the United States of America.<period.net *Next

    bitterweed   February 4th, 2010 - 10:37 am

    A strange man to question other’s civility..and he never wants us to question his motives..This is a man who is arrogant, always remember his comment “We won.” With that statement..he told about 50% of us we didn’t matter..

    I’ll question anything I wish..it’s still a free country.

    claspur   February 4th, 2010 - 10:37 am

    He doesn’t have a birth cerificate. If he had the long-form, he’t show it…the issue would’ve been moot fifteen months ago.

    linda   February 4th, 2010 - 10:38 am

    He is hiding something what I don’t know…… but you can be sure something……

    Commieobamie   February 4th, 2010 - 10:41 am

    I don’t question your faith. I know you believe and worship the fairy moon devil allah. I don’t question your citzenship. You yourself stated your earthly father was a British citizen, therefore you are NOT eligible for the presidency of the United States.

    BlackTree   February 4th, 2010 - 10:42 am

    He’s spent over $2.5 million to cover his document tracks. Why? What is in these documents to merit such wasted resources?

    Jackie J.   February 4th, 2010 - 10:44 am

    Translation: “I (Obama) am always right and you are always wrong.”

    Did you hear the news? Because of the failure of Obama he was “saved or created” over 2 million people who will vote for the Republican candidates in 2010….

    I.B. Wright   February 4th, 2010 - 10:44 am

    1 why’s he hiding his birth certificate

    2 why doesn’t the press care

    3 is there hope left for our country

    martifr   February 4th, 2010 - 10:44 am

    If the fraud thinks that his “citizenship” is such a joke, then why does he have an army of LA lawyers protecting every shred of evidence of his background from public scrutiny? As Bush was castigated for being a dolt because of his undergrad and grad school grades, hussein and his enablers cannot even engage that argument without bringing attention to the fact that his records have been sealed. He wanted to keep his thoughts concealed from the public so that his true marxist ideology was not obvious. Well, the cat’s out of the bag now. We all know what this man is about.

    Xenaite 69   February 4th, 2010 - 10:45 am

    Yeah, this pompous a** likes to make Jokes. The thing is, he’s the joke. He may have foo
    fooled some of the masses, but there are those of us who have been able to see right
    through him from the start. Wake up people, Obama will be remembered as the worst
    President the United States has ever seen. I find that it is ironic that this tool is
    on TV every frackin day! Why can’t he just go back to the White House and do his
    job and stop campaigning! There are terror plots being planned for within the next
    three to six months. And this jerk has to keep talking and talking and talking.
    I would have rather had Hillary has President!

    one hundred bottles of beer on the wall   February 4th, 2010 - 10:47 am

    claspur February 4th, 2010 – 10:37 am
    the issue would’ve been moot fifteen months ago.

    No it wasn’t moot then, that is why he hid ALL HIS RECORDS by Executive Order 12.5 months ago!

    The subject has been in play since he began his campaign!

    It was in play when McCain was forced to show proof of his citizenship!

    jleinf   February 4th, 2010 - 10:47 am

    Since No Hawaiian hospital claims him he was either born at home and his mother failed to document it or he’s Kenyan. Either way he is an ILLEGAL POTUS!

    fulljump   February 4th, 2010 - 10:49 am

    He was going to unite evrybody right, and then he flips us the bird.

    wimperwimper   February 4th, 2010 - 10:49 am

    this loser just cannot help himself – he just digs the hole deeper!!! he even has to use the National Prayer Breakfast to spew more of his hate, arrogance, egotistical “in your face” garbage that he displays on a daily basis!!! ELECTIONS TRULY HAVE DAMAGING CONSEQUENCES – better wake up America before it is too late and we are rapidly approaching that!!!

    Dave, Tn   February 4th, 2010 - 10:51 am

    RepublicansRTraitors February 4th, 2010 – 10:09 am

    Thanks for helping “your President” reach out to the other side. I hope you’re in a area full of people just like you when he crashes the system.

    Scott Berdan   February 4th, 2010 - 10:51 am

    …about your Aunt…

    oxbobend   February 4th, 2010 - 10:52 am

    It would seem that too many of you here are consummed by negativity.
    I prefer positive poeple who are able to see the glass half full, not half empty. So many of you with your head in the sand. So many of you who cannot accept the fact that Mr. Obama IS a U.S. citizen and was elected to the office of the president in a fair legal election. Can’t wait until the next election? Get your guns and starter up boys, I can out shoot anyone of you.

    Staged18   February 4th, 2010 - 10:52 am

    Take hold my friends, For here we see our first affirmative action president in action. A man with no ideas and no leadership. One who let those surrounding him his whole life dictate his thoughts and hand him his course work. He is in essence the actual joke.

    Staged18   February 4th, 2010 - 10:55 am

    oxbobend..Why don’t you try consuming yourself with reality?

    EricaThunderpaws   February 4th, 2010 - 10:57 am

    We will question, and question, and question until this coward stops hiding behind his attorneys:

    These are graphics that simplify the Article 2, Sec. 1, Clause 5 definition of eligiblity, which supercedes the place of birth. The founders did not want candidates with dual citizenship to serve as President because they feared dual allegiances would compromise national security. BO is a dual citizen with the U.K., regardles of where he was born.

    Obama is a Coward!
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bBlNFyLU7Ik/S2TmCEt-keI/AAAAAAAAAVI/F3OtF1TzM30/s1600-h/Obama+is+a+Coward.jpg

    Graphic Defining Natural Born Citizen
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bBlNFyLU7Ik/Svgd–sQX-I/AAAAAAAAAC8/rrQ2RL3wj3U/s1600-h/NBC+Defined+Graphic.jpg

    Graphic Defining Citizen vs Natural Born Citizen
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bBlNFyLU7Ik/SwCxx6UzjpI/AAAAAAAAAEU/GOvuQdjO4go/s1600/Citizen+vs+Natural+Born+Citizen.jpg

    A Constitutional Crisis
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_bBlNFyLU7Ik/SyxNUeSo5-I/AAAAAAAAAJ4/yl7bv0VB-7s/s1600-h/Constitutional+Crisis.jpg

    Obama is a Usurper
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bBlNFyLU7Ik/SwiU3AGkj-I/AAAAAAAAAFs/k7_qwa948f4/s1600/Obama+The+Unconstitutional+Usurper.jpg

    one hundred bottles of beer on the wall   February 4th, 2010 - 10:59 am

    oxbobend February 4th, 2010 – 10:52 am
    I prefer positive poeple who are able to see the glass half full, not half empty

    Stupid cliches, if ya want more fill the glass, if yer done pour it out and wash the glass!

    IF THAT FOOL WAS A CITIZEN HE WOULD PROVE IT!

    HE CAN’T PROVE IT!

    McCAIN HAD TO PROVE IT! AND HE DID PROVE IT!

    BTW, optimists are constantly disappointed, a pessamist can ONLY be pleasantly surprised!

    DROP THE CLICHES AND THINK FOR YOURSELF!

    Barney   February 4th, 2010 - 10:59 am

    Why don’t you just show your birth cerificate, Barry?? Whatcha hiding?

    Redd   February 4th, 2010 - 11:00 am

    WHO sez he is joking??? The headline writer? Obama is totally serious, dont question his citizenship! Thomas Jefferson sez question with boldness, obama is a communist and a usurper.

    noislamocommie   February 4th, 2010 - 11:01 am

    There will be on march on Washington for him to produce his paperwork sponsored by Phil Berg. He was the first attorney to challenge Obama. It is not whether he is a citizen that is the crux of the matter but whether he is eligible under the Constitution. He is not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN which is a specific class of folks delineated in the Constitution by the framers to ensure allegiance/loyalty. NBC must have two citizen parents at the time of birth which Obama did not have.
    Also, Dept. of Health Hawaii will not officially back his cyber-forgery posted online.

    Go to Citiizen Wells blog for info on Berg’s march on DC.

    Linda B.   February 4th, 2010 - 11:02 am

    Give Barry some credit for showing up at a prayer breakfast. He must have heard the call. Hey, Barry, how’s you bro in Kenya doin’?

    And the cradle will rock   February 4th, 2010 - 11:02 am

    Dennisl59, He may not have a son now but I bet you they will attemp to have a baby before they leave the White House.

    Nellie   February 4th, 2010 - 11:03 am

    He wants to condition people (and especially the press) to not address this issue, because he knows it’s his Achilles’ heel. See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

    And see John Charlton’s article at Post & Email about Hawaii Deputy AG Jill Nagamine refusing to confirm Fukino’s statement of Obama’s eligibility.

    What IS the Difference?   February 4th, 2010 - 11:03 am

    On the matter of a challenge to his faith he really doesn’t give a sh*t. He simply doesn’t bother going to church.

    On the matter of his citizenship, that seems to be different thing. That challenge to his citizenship seems to matter because so far, they say, he’s spent a million bucks or so on lawyers making sure the true documents aren’t made public.

    Xenite 69   February 4th, 2010 - 11:03 am

    Redd February 4th, 2010 – 11:00 am
    WHO sez he is joking??? The headline writer? Obama is totally serious,

    dont question his citizenship! Thomas Jefferson sez question with boldness,
    obama is a communist and a usurper.

    Redd…….. you nailed it buddy!
    Obama is a commie!

    My nightly prayer   February 4th, 2010 - 11:04 am

    Dear Lord, In the past year you have taken away my favorite actor, Patrick Swayze, my favorite actress Farrah Fawcett, my favorite singer Michael Jackson, my favorite salesman Billy Mays and my favorte athlete Chris Henry. I just wanted to let you know my favorite President is Barrack Obama…. AMEN!

    Weew   February 4th, 2010 - 11:05 am

    After 8 years of liberal whining about the 2000 election and questioning Bush’s legitimacy… you libs sure can’t take what you’ve been dishing out.

    Illegitimate! No birth cirtificate! Muslim!

    (of course I don’t believe any of it but if it pisses off the libtards I’m all for it)

    Michelle   February 4th, 2010 - 11:07 am

    Obama- two American Presidents would like to have a word with you.
    President John F. Kennedy’s
    “So let us begin anew–remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”
    President Ronald Reagan, warned us to “trust, but verify.” It was good advice, except for one hitch: What happens when the verifiers are the ones who can no longer be trusted?
    Bad jokes don’t cut it, proof does.
    No negotiation on lack of proof of eligibility-as the Constitution requires. It is the law of our land, none of us are allowed to break it.

    BeeMan   February 4th, 2010 - 11:07 am

    Part of the new health care proposal is mass bolimia. He makes me want to THROW UP.

    Steve in Phoenix   February 4th, 2010 - 11:07 am

    Did he just suggest the he was civil. what a joke. Oh by the way you are the first and only president of the free world with a favorite Aunt who lives in the projects and is on welfare. Can’t you and Michelle afford 15 to 20K to get her off of welfare. It’s not like you have 2 or 3 other relatives you are taking care of. Is this how you spread the wealth. What do you have planned for those of us who are not even related to you.

    Debalee   February 4th, 2010 - 11:09 am

    The Prevaricator of the United States/POTUS is the most awful speaker ever–even worse than George W. Bush–even with a teleprompter. He developed his arrogant, lecturing tone, that he is still using every day on us, while an INSTRUCTOR, never a professor, at U of Chicago. Can you imagine how boring those classes must have been? He only steps it up a bit while campaigning. Then he starts that rap cadence that goes over so well with the younger crowd. Ugh. As far as I’m concerned every time he opens his mouth out springs a lie. Yes, Congressman Joe Wilson, you were most brave when you uttered that truth. Michelle Obama also lies every time she opens her mouth. Expect to see and hear her every day from now til election day in November 2010 and 2012. The two of them are in full campaign mode since Scott Brown’s win.

    Possum Dearie   February 4th, 2010 - 11:10 am

    Doesn’t his neck hurt from having his head so far up his ass? No one even laughed at his jokes.

    Michelle   February 4th, 2010 - 11:12 am

    This article will show exactly how the dirty deeds were accomplished. Have faith America, currently in the hands of Attorneys General in applicable states. You may live in applicable states and be able to file your own complaints.
    http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/

    Ann   February 4th, 2010 - 11:16 am

    Obviously, he is delusional if he thinks Americans aren’t going to question his motives or those of any elected politician. He must have us confused with the Chinese.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Obamas-green-policies-a-boon-for-employment—-in-China-83541147.html
    “Obama’s ‘green’ policies a boon for employment — in China.”

    “One picture is worth 1,000 denials.” – Ronald Reagan

    Steve in Pa.   February 4th, 2010 - 11:20 am

    At this event Obama stated that he has been praying a lot lately. I bet his prayer rug is almost worn out.

    fantum   February 4th, 2010 - 11:21 am

    I DO question Obama’s policies!
    I DO question Obama’s faith!
    I DO question Obama’s citizenship!
    I DO question Obama’s ideas!
    I DO question Obama’s motives!
    I DO NOT share Obama’s dreams!
    I DO NOT share Obama’s plans!

    Obama is a Muslim dedicated to the destruction of America!

    Obama’s Own Words
    http://usataxpayer.org/?0097519370

    Obama Mocks Christian Faith
    http://usataxpayer.org/?0033881580

    MiPain   February 4th, 2010 - 11:23 am

    Dont question motives??? okay so if motive doesnt matter what the hell does? Why is he bringing up the BC perhaps this is just the red meat distraction to keep the eyes off the game. Honestly these clowns are hard to figure out; Stupid or crafty?, Progressives or thieves?, Egomaniac or God? Just maybe all the above.

     

    Tags: Obama File

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 17:06
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar


    BORN IN THE USA?

    Obama'sprayer: 'Don't question my citizenship'

    Raisesissue of eligibility in speech at annual breakfast gathering


    Posted: February 04, 2010
    11:34 am Eastern

    © 2010 WorldNetDaily

    President Obama today at the NationalPrayer Breakfast raised the issue of his own eligibility for office –saying that people shouldn't be questioning his "citizenship."


    Talking about the issue of"civility," he said, "Now, I am the first to confess I am not alwaysright. Michelle will testify to that. But surely you can question mypolicies without questioning my faith, or, for that matter, mycitizenship."


    The video:





    Obama continues, "Challenging eachother's ideas can renew our democracy. But when we challenge eachother's motives, it becomes harder to see what we hold in common. Weforget that we share at some deep level the same dreams – even when wedon't share the same plans on how to fulfill them."


    The questions, however, over Obama's"citizenship," actually go to the core of the American republic.Multiple lawsuits have challenged that he is not qualified for the OvalOffice under the Constitution's requirement that U.S. presidents be a"natural born citizen."


    The plaintiffs – who run into thehundreds so far and who still have a number of cases pending at theappelllate level – have alleged that failing to meet thatconstitutional requirement means he actually is a usurper, with noactual authority to be president.


    On a forum page at The Hillnewspaper, one commenter wrote that the president has only himself toblame for the questions.


    "Personally I am no birther … but Iam curious as to why Obama continues to beat on this issue .. is it apolitical ploy by his handlers to continue to use this as a divisiveissue? To try and embarrass a certain segment of the population? And ifnot, why doesn't he just provide the certificate and end all thespeculation for the conspirators once and for all? Obama has certainlybeen a little less than forthcoming on his grades, his Harvard reviewpublications and many other accomplishments…"


    The reference apparently was thefirst time the issue has been addressed by Obama, even though he didnot provided any answers. His press secretary, Robert Gibbs, repeatedlyhas ridiculed questions related to the subject, and the White Houseitself has declined to respond to any of a multitude of questionssubmitted by WND over months on the issue.


    The multiple Obama eligibility caseshave cited Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, which states, "NoPerson except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the UnitedStates, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall beeligible to the Office of President."


    Some of the lawsuits question whetherObama was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out ofthe country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too youngat the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her sonunder the law at the time.


    See the movie Obama does not want youto see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidentialeligibility mystery!


    Other challenges have focused onObama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to thejurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thusmaking him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of theConstitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.


    Further, others question hiscitizenship by virtue of his attendance in Indonesian schools duringhis childhood and question on what passport did he travel to Pakistanthree decades ago.


    Adding fuel to the fire is Obama'spersistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers andthe appointment – at a cost confirmed to be at least $1.7 million – ofmyriad lawyers to defend against all requests for his documentation,such as his original birth certificate. While his supporters cite anonline version of a "Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii as hisbirth verification, critics point out such documents actually wereissued for children not born in the state.


    Among documentation not yet available for Obama is hiskindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental Collegerecords, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard LawSchool records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles fromthe University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from hisyears as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Associationrecords, any baptism records and his adoption records.


    Because of the dearth of informationabout Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched acampaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simplequestion: "Where's the birth certificate?"


    The campaign followed apetition that has collected more than 490,000 signatures demanding proof of hiseligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent,detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.


    The "certification of live birth"posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does notin any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form"document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true"long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as thename of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the onlydocument that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he hasnot permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.


    Oddly, though congressional hearingswere held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionallyeligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controllinglegal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.


    Your donation – from as little as $5to as much as $1,000 – can be made online at the WND SuperStore.(Donations are not tax-deductible. Donations of amounts greater than$1,000 can be arranged by calling either 541-474-1776 or1-800-4WND.COM. If you would prefer to mail in your contributions, theyshould be directed to WND, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, Oregon, 97501. Besure to specify the purpose of the donation by writing "billboard" onthe check. In addition, donations of billboard space will be accepted,as will significant contributions specifically targeted for geographiclocations.)


    If you are a member of themedia and would like to interview Joseph Farah about this campaign, e-mail WND.




    Tags: Obama citizenship

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 16:23
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    I have AOL service since 1996, and today is the first time ever that I send a short
    e mail about Obama and they transfer it to attach zip file that must people do not open.
    Sorry the mail is in spanish talking about this blog that this week has one year, and exposed what Obama said today.
    Miriam (Corazon7)


    --------------

    Estimados
     
    Esta semana se cumple un año delinicio de mi blog sobre el
     
    Usurpador Obama/Soetoroen http://usurpador.blogcindario.com
     
     donde mes tras mes publico lo que acontece
      
     principalmente sobre la Inconstitucionalidad de Obama ocupar 
     
     la Casa Blanca.
     
    Pues bien hoy Obama hablo sobre su caso se puede

    leer en:
     
     http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/04/obama-takes-on-birthers-u_n_449087.html
     
    La nota contiene un video con sus palabras.
     
    En otro articulo que publico tambien en el blog JohnCharlton  explica lo que
     
     dijo el Usurpador:
     
    “You can question my policies without questioning my faith —
     
     or for that fact,my citizenship“!
     
    "Pueden cuestionar mis politicas sin que cuestionen mi fe  —
     
    o por ese hecho, mi ciudadania “!
     
    A buen entender pocas palabras.  Sera Obama musulman de fe , lo cual no
     
    es cuestionable sino su negacion de que lo sea , sin que
     
    se le pueda cuestionar por eso a pesar de su debilidad ante los ultimos hechos
     
    terroristas de musulmanes que no seran juzgados como tales sino como
     
    como simples criminales con todo derecho Constitucional?
     
    Rush Limbaugh comentaba los otros dias que cuando miembros de la
     
    adminitracion decian que esos detenidos serian juzgados y ejecutados,
     
    bajo las leyes americanas los acusados son inocentes y dicha afirmacion
     
    daba paso a que sus juicios fueran declarados nulos.
     
    "Pueden cuestionar mis politicas sin que cuestionen mi fe  —
     
    o por esehecho, mi ciudadania “!
     
    Cuando Obama dice que por el mismo hecho de fe no se le puede
     
    cuestionar su ciudadania, en mi entender se esta burlando de la
     
    propia Constitucion que juro defender cuando fue iniciado como
     
    presidente.
     
    En el articulo mencionado que se puede leer en
     
    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/04/obamas-final-act-has-begun/
     
    el autor recomienda escuchar un programa de radio desde Washington DC
     
     este viernes al mediodia en The Jeff KunerShow  en  WTNT 570 AM,
     
     from noon to 3 PM, Eastern Time.  
     
    Se puede escuchar en: 
     
     
     
     Para participar en el programa (301) 984-9570.
     
    Escuche  por Fox lo que Obama dijo pero silenciaron lo
     
    de la ciudadania en la primera mencion en la segunda una hora mas tarde si lo

    mencionaron.

     
    Finalmente como titula su articulo Charlton : "Obama’s Final Act has begun!"

    Ha comenzado el acto final de Obama.

    MiriamMata

    http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/

    02/04/10

     

    __._,_.___


    Tags: OBAMA AOL INTERNET

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:53
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    Obama’s Final Act has begun!

    AS POLITICIZATION OF BIRTH STORY EXPLODES NATIONWIDE, HIS 3 YEAR BLUFF WILL BE PUT TO THE TEST

    by John Charlton

    Obama surfed to power on a tidal wave of liberal whiners; but the winds of politics have changed drastically against him.

    (Feb. 4, 2010) — The final theatrical act of the greatest shyster and swindler in the history of the world has begun, and there seems to be no exit strategy which will save his goose.

    I speak of the Eligibility Crisis and Obama’s phony claims to legitimately hold the office of the U.S. Presidency.

    The opening words of the final act were uttered by Obama himself, at this year’s National Prayer Breakfast, this morning:

    “You can question my policies without questioning my faith — or for that fact,my citizenship“!

    To explain why Obama said this, and why he has begun to run scared, one needs to consider the present political climate.

    Following the Democrats’ stunning and historic loss of the U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts — who would believe that one year ago? — Obama’s party put in motion a political strategy which is pure Hillary-esq.  While appearing to defend Obama by politicizing his birth story, the decision to engage head-on on that issue is undeniably the most byzantine and machiavellian way to get rid of him!

    According to Politico, it was the initiative of Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Robert Menendez.  Among the ten litmus-test questions for a politically acceptable Republican opponent in the upcoming 2010 elections, Menendez’s committee chose one wing-dinger:

    The memo urges Democratic candidates to force their opponents to answer a series of questions on health care, taxes and some of the favorite causes of the far right:

    “Do you believe that Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen? Do you think the Tenth Amendment bars Congress from issuing regulations like minimum health care coverage standards? Do you think programs like Social Security and Medicare represent socialism and should never have been created in the first place? Do you think President Obama is a socialist? Do you think America should return to a gold standard?”

    Let’s not forget that Menendez was floated as a Hillary VP Candidate just two years ago.  Matt Friedman, writing for PolitickerNJ.com on Jan. 24, 2008, wrote:

    Menendez would be the first vice president from New Jersey since Garrett Hobart, a former State Senate President from Paterson who ran with William McKinley in 1896.

    In a phone interview, Graham said that the idea is his own, and has not discussed it with anyone until today. But he said that Menendez has been working hard for the Clinton campaign, traveling to Nevada, Florida and California to make appeals to Latino voters – and has done so effectively.

    My point is, someone of his caliber won’t take a political move without Hillary’s approval, especially now, when the Democrats need more than anything else to get rid of Obama and distance themselves from him.  And what could be more exquisite a maneuver than letting the big Zero hoist himself on his own petard?

    This move by Menendez has caused an explosion of political commentary on the issue, even if, the real issue is not so much whether Obama is a citizen of the United States, which is unknown, but whether he is a natural born citizen, which he certainly never was, if his father was Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr..

    O’Reilly proudly announced on his show, just last night, that he had investigated the issue and having found the  two birth announcements from 1961, he can confirm that Obama was born in Hawaii!

    Where did O’Reilly find them?  The Post & Email is the only site on the web whereboth have been published.  Did he perhaps just read The Post & Email, or did he do actual research?

    If he had read The Post & Email, he would have noticed my commentary, where I point out the obvious problem with the birth announcements:  they do not announce Obama’s birth; they announce a male child born to Mr. & Mrs. Barack Hussein Obama at an address where such a couple never lived.

    What that means about Barry Jr.’s birth, we do not know.  But what kind of idiot looks in newspapers to confirm something when the guy making the claim in the first place won’t show you his birth certificate?  Is Obama some sort of mythical figure who cannot be interviewed?

    One of the top 100 political blogs on the Internet, Citizen Wells, has responded to Glenn Beck’s notorious bias on the issue with his own political challenge in video format:



    According to 
    Andrea Shea King, who hosts a pro-Republican show on BlogTalk Radio, Obama’s eligibility will be the topic of the day for a three-hour radio program in the National Capitol on Friday at noon:

    With the top dogs in the media seemingly muzzled or unwilling to take a dispassionate look at the question of Barack Obama’s background, it is refreshing to see that a Washington DC radio host will.

    One of my radio program listeners has informed us of a special three-hour program this Friday on WTNT 570 AM that will focus on Obama’s mysterious background and the “Constitutional eligibility” issue.  The program will be streamed, so even if you aren’t in the Washington, DC listening area, you will be able to tune in on your computer.

    The Jeff Kuner Show will air on WTNT 570 AM, from noon to 3 PM, Eastern Time.  You can listen online: at http://www.freedom570am.com/.  Make sure you have his call-in phone number to participate in the program: (301) 984-9570.

    Considering the above, I believe that public interest is going to grow, at this point, at such an astronomical rate that politicians will begin disclosing their own birth certificates to prove that they are Natural Born citizens; others, such as the Lt. Gov. of Tennessee, will start to openly admit that they are not certain Obama was born in the USA; and others might even get the manliness to challenge Obama to disclose his.

    For that reason I believe this will come to a head, as it were, within the month.  Let’s see how long Obama tries to stand against the political winds and how much of a fool he makes of himself doing so: if, in fact, he can actually make a greater fool of himself than he already has on this issue.

    © 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified.



    Tags: OBAMA BIRTH STORY

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:33
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Mi?rcoles, 03 de febrero de 2010
    http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/02/obama-and-las-vegas-at-odds-again-1-2/1 

    President Obama is in trouble -- again -- with Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman overa comment citing Sin City.

    Namely, this one yesterday in New Hampshire about saving money in tough economic times: "You don't blow a bunch of cash on Vegas when you're trying to save for college. You prioritize. You make tough choices. It's time your government did the same.".....

    --------------------- 

     Do what I say but not what I do. 




     

     
    http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2010/jan/judicial-watch-uncovers-new-documents-detailing-pelosis-use-air-force-aircraft 

    House Speaker’s Military Travel Cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over a Two-Year Period, Including $101,429 for In-Flight Expenses

    Contact Information:
    Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305
    Washington, DC -- January 28, 2010

    Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents from the Air Force detailing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s use of United States Air Force aircraft for Congressional Delegations (CODELs). According to the documents, obtained by Judicial Watch through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Speaker’s military travel cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over a two-year period — $101,429.14 of which was for in-flight expenses, including food and alcohol. The following are highlights from the recent release of about 2,000 documents:............

    ------------------------------ 

    "In my own life, in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much," she said. "See, that's why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service, "... Michelle Obama
     
     No, Michele Obama does not get paid to serve as the First Lady and she doesn't perform any official duties. But this hasn't deterred her from hiring an unprecedented number of staffers to cater to her every whim and to satisfy her every request in the midst of the Great Recession. Just think, Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china  for the White House during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower  had to shell out the salary for her personal secretary from her husband's salary.
    Total Personal Staff members for other first ladies paid by taxpayers:
    Mamie Eisenhower : 1 paid for personally out of President's salary
    Jackie Kennedy: 1
    Roseline Carter: 1
    Barbara Bush: 1
    Hilary Clinton: 3
    Laura Bush: 1
    Michele Obama: 22
     How things have changed! If you're one of the tens of  millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning  less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart  or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of Ms Michelle are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by YOU, John Q. Public:
    Michele Obama's personal staff:
     1. $172,200 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
     2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Dep Asst to President and Dir of Policy And Projects for  First Lady)
     3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Spec Asst to the President and WH Social Sec for Mrs. Obama)
     4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Spec Asst to President and Dir of Communications for First Lady)
     5. $100,000 - Winter, Melissa E. (Spec Asst to President and Dep Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
     6. $90,000 - Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
     7. $84,000 - Lel yveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)
     8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)
     9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)
     10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
     11. $64,000 - Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
     12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Dep Director of Scheduling & Events Coord For The First Lady)
     13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)
     14. $57,500 - Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)
     15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Assoc Dir and Dep Press Secretary To The First Lady)
     16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Spec Asst for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
     17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A.. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)
     18. $43,000 - Tubman, Samanth a (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
     19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
     20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)
     21. $35,000 - Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
     22. $35,000 - Jackson, Deilia A. (Dep Assoc Dir of  Correspondence for the First Lady)
     (total = $1,591,200 in annual salaries)
     There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense.
     Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and "First Hairstylist" Johnny
     Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One to   Europe .
     
     Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com
     
    canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652
     
     Yes, I know, The Canadian Free Press had to publish this perhaps because America no longer has a free press and  the USA media is too scared that they might be considered racist or suffer at the handsof Obama. Sorry America !
     
     SICKENING.........ISN'T IT?
    by Dr. Paul L..... Williams
     
     

    Tags: OBAMA PARTIES

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:11
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

    End Obama and the Marxists Reign of Terror and Destruction or watch them end our country--forever

    Obama and Marxist Dems Primed to End USA by 2011

     By Sher Zieve  Tuesday, February 2, 2010

    Despite his lies to the contrary, the Usurper and Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama was the one (not President George W. Bush) who proposed (and had voted in by his Marxist-Democrat run Congress) the first USA trillion-dollars budget. This was affected by the-One-who-was-chosen-to-decimate-then-completely-destroy-the-United-States-of-America in 2009 for 2010.

    Now, Obama’s 2011 budget at almost $4Trillions ($3.8T) is destined to complete the purpose and mission of this being who is not and never has been a citizen of the country he purports to lead. Note: If he were, he would have produced a real and viable birth certificate instead of paying between $1-2 Millions to keep it and his school records hidden.

    This will be a short—make that very short—column, as little more can be said about the now insurmountable-by-normal-means problem that the Obama treason presents. For months, The Obama and his totalitarian minions have become bolder and bolder in their overt message that not only does the USA now belong solely to them (Obama: “I won. We won!&rdquoGui?o but, that they will pass all of the inane legislation they wish, steal all of the money and possessions of the American people they want and then destroy and discard the depleted country as they so choose. By the way, did you know that Obama’s new budget taxes everyone and at higher rates? Obama seems to hate most of us—if not all—equally.

    Like the global warming hoax, the Obama administration and seizure of the United States of America was and is based upon lies—the first lie being that he is a natural born US citizen. Money given to his presidential campaign was apparently traced to the Middle East and the terrorist organization Hamas. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s former ‘preacher’ supported Hamas. Throughout his life, Obama cavorted with and has now appointed avowed Communists, Marxists and Maoists to his Shadow-Congress “the ObamaCzars.” And now, if his new all-encompassing/country-destroying budget is passed, we will experience the end of free enterprise (private employers are to be taxed out of existence by the 2011 ObamaBudget), the dollar will be a thing of the past and with the inevitable hyper-inflation brought on by the Obama unsustainable-for-even-one-more-year budget and programs, we’re done as a country. This is what Obama was trained to do and sent to the White House to accomplish.

    We have only two choices left. As Obama is pushing and punching the American people harder and harder each and every day, no more options are available. End Obama and the Marxists Reign of Terror and Destruction or watch them end our country—forever. Which one is it?

    Obama Budget Still Goes to the Moon:
    Obama Middle-East/Hamas funding 1:
    Obama Middle-East/Hamas funding 2:


    CFP Tools

    Bookmark and Share

    (7)
    Reader Feedback | Subscribe | Print friendly | Contact Us | Send this page to a friend! |

    Author
    Sher Zieve  Bio

    Sher Zieve is an author, political commentator, and staff writer for The New Media Alliance. Zieve’s op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Boston Star, Massachusetts Sun, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple university websites. Ms. Zieve is currently working on her first political book: “The Liberal’s Guide To Conservatives.”  Sher can be reached at [email protected]



    Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

    Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2010 the individual authors.

    Site Copyright 2010 Canada Free Press.Com
    Privacy Statement

    Tags: Obama Marxists Reign

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:14
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
    Martes, 02 de febrero de 2010
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123843

    BORN IN THE USA?

    Courts can remove ineligible chief executive

    Precedentcited in appeal of California challenge to president's tenure


    Posted: February 01, 2010
    9:58 pm Eastern

    By Bob Unruh
    © 2010 WorldNetDaily



    In the United States, courts can, in fact, remove a chiefexecutive officer of a government if that officer is found to beineligible, according to a court precedent cited in an appeal of aCalifornia lawsuit that challenges Barack Obama's legitimacy in theWhite House.


    A multitude of cases have beenbrought over the issue of Obama's eligibility. Some are by critics whohave doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he haswritten, and others are from those who question whether the framers ofthe Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's fatherwas a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from beingeligible for the presidency.


    The disputes revolve around theConstitution's demand that the president be a "natural born citizen."


    Now in an appeal of a statecourt case in California that named as a defendant California Secretaryof State Debra Bowen, attorney GaryKreep of the United States Justice Foundation is arguing that therealready are two precedents that should be applied: one in a court casein which state officials removed from the ballot a nominee forpresident simply because he did not meet the Constitution's eligibilityrequirements.


    "In 1968, the Peace and FreedomParty submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for president of the UnitedStates. The then-Secretary of State, Mr. Frank Jordan, found that,according to Mr. Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old,one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as acandidate for president," the brief, being filed this week, argues.


    "Using his administrative powers, Mr.Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver,unsuccessfully, challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of theState of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates, which affirmed the actions."

    The other is a court precedent inwhich the governor of North Dakota was removed from office after thestate Supreme Court determined he did not meet the state constitution'seligibility requirements.


    The arguments have been submitted tothe 3rd Appellate District Court of Appeal in California in the casethat was brought in state court on behalf of Alan Keyes and Wiley Drakeas well as California elector Markham Robinson.


    It alleged Obama was not eligible forthe office and Bowen failed to investigate his qualifications beforeallowing his name on the 2008 presidential election ballot.


    This case is separate from anothercase brought on behalf of some of the same plaintiffs in federal courtover similar concerns. That case, dismissed last year by U.S. DistrictJudge David Carter, is on appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court ofAppeals.


    Kreep alleges the dismissal of thestate case by Judge Michael Kenny was in error because the defendants"failed to establish that there was no triable cause of action on thecritical constitutional issues of whether Obama has met the eligibilityrequirements to serve as president of the United States and whetherBowen has the duty, as chief elections officer of the state ofCalifornia, to verify the eligibility of candidates for federal officerunning in the state of California."


    The president's lawyers inmany of the cases have said, and judges have agreed so far, that thecourts simply don't have jurisdiction over a question of eligibilitybecause of the Constitution's provision that president's must beremoved by impeachment, which rests with Congress.


    In one case, the president's lawyersprominently argued, "The Constitution's commitment to the ElectoralCollege of the responsibility to select the president includes theauthority to decide whether a presidential candidate is qualified foroffice.


    "The examination of a candidate'squalifications is an integral component of the electors'decision-making process. The Constitution also provides that, after theElectoral College has voted, further review of a presidentialcandidate's eligibility for office, to the extent such review isrequired, rests with Congress," the president's lawyers argued.


    But the issue, however, alreadyhas been adjudicated by courts, and the resolution is that courts dohave the authority to review eligibility and even remove an ineligiblechief executive, the appeal brief cites.


    "Even though Obama was elected tothis office, this ineligibility constitutes a legal disability for theoffice of president of the United States," the brief states. "In 'Stateex rel. Sathre v. Moodie,' after Thomas H. Moodie was duly elected tothe office of governor of the state of North Dakota, it was discoveredthat Thomas H. Moodie was not eligible for the position of governor, ashe had not resided in the state for a requisite five years beforerunning for office, and, because of that ineligibility, he was removedfrom office and replaced by the lieutenant governor," the briefexplains.


    North Dakota's historical archives, in fact, document the case.


    The Democrat was nominated by hisparty for governor in 1934 and beat his Republican opponent, LydiaLanger.


    "As soon as the election was over,there was talk of impeachment, but no charges were filed," the state'sarchives report. "After Moodie's inauguration on January 7, 1935, itwas revealed that he had voted in a 1932 municipal election inMinnesota. In order to be eligible for governor, an individual has tohave lived in the state for five consecutive years before the election.The State Supreme Court determined that Governor Moodie was ineligibleto serve, and he was removed from office on February 16, 1935," thestate reports.


    "We're seeking to bar anyone fromgoing on the presidential ballot in 2012 unless they can prove thatthey're eligible," Kreep told WND.


    "Appellants contend that Bowen has aduty to ensure that all candidates in the state of California, for bothfederal and state offices, meet the eligibility requirements for theoffices sought, that Bowen did not fulfill said duty, and that a courtdetermination is needed to ensure that the California secretary ofstate comply with this duty in the future," the brief said.


    The original case sought to preventBowen from certifying California's electors for the Electoral Collegevote; it later was amended to correct the deficiencies it identified infuture elections.


    It explains the appellants havestanding in the case because court precedent states "a candidate or hispolitical party has standing to challenge the inclusion of an allegedlyineligible rival … on the theory that doing so hurts the candidate's orparty's own chances of prevailing."


    "Keyes … and Drake … have beeninjured because they did not have fair competition for the office," thepleading states.


    Further, courts can address theproblem.


    While the dispute has "significantpolitical overtones," it is, nonetheless, "an issue which the court canmake a determination on, because the requirements are clearly stated inArticle II, Section 1, Clause 4, of the U.S. Constitution and courtsroutinely decide questions of law and of fact such as the issue in thiscase."


    "A provision of the Constitution maynot be disregarded by means of a popular vote of the people, as thereare specific guidelines for amending the Constitution of the UnitedStates," it continues.


    "Respondents denied that this Cleavercase had any relevance to the underyling issue … Similary, in 1984, thePeace and Freedom Party listed Mr. Larry Holmes as an eligiblecandidate in the presidential primary. When the then SOS checked hiseligibility, it was found that Mr. Holmes was, similarly, not eligible,and Mr. Holmes was removed from the ballot… It this case, we have asimilar situation in that the Democratic Party submitted the name ofObama as a candidate for president," the breif argues.


    WND has reported on the multiple legal caseschallenging Obama's eligibility in addition to efforts to raise thequestion at the state and national levels.


    Several state legislatures areworking on proposals that would require presidential candidates tosubmit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced inCongress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.


    The claims are that Obama does notmeet the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "naturalborn citizen." The lawsuits have asserted he either was not born inHawaii as he claims or was a dual citizen because of his father'sBritish citizenship at the time of his birth.


    The Constitution, Article 2, Section1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen ofthe United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,shall be eligible to the Office of President."


    However, none of the cases filed todate has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, sothat information about Obama's birth could be obtained.


    The White House has not replied tonumerous requests for comment.


    Besides Obama's actual birthdocumentation, the still-concealed documentation forhim includes kindergartenrecords, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, ColumbiaUniversity records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records,Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University ofChicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as anIllinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, anybaptism records, and his adoption records.


    Another significant factor is theestimated $1.7 million Obama has spent on court cases to prevent any ofthe documentation of his life to be revealed to the public.




    "Where's The Birth Certificate?"billboard helps light up the night at the Mandalay Bay resort on theLas Vegas Strip.


    Because of the dearth of informationabout Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched acampaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simplequestion: "Where's the birth certificate?"


    The campaign followed apetition that has collected more than 490,000 signatures demanding proof of hiseligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent,detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.


    The "certification of live birth"posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does notin any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form"document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true"long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as thename of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the onlydocument that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he hasnot permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.


    Oddly, though congressional hearingswere held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionallyeligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controllinglegal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.


    Your donation – from as little as $5to as much as $1,000 – can be made online at the WND SuperStore.(Donations are not tax-deductible. Donations of amounts greater than$1,000 can be arranged by calling either 541-474-1776 or1-800-4WND.COM. If you would prefer to mail in your contributions, theyshould be directed to WND, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, Oregon, 97501. Besure to specify the purpose of the donation by writing "billboard" onthe check. In addition, donations of billboard space will be accepted,as will significant contributions specifically targeted for geographiclocations.)


    If you are a member of themedia and would like to interview Joseph Farah about this campaign, e-mail WND.

     


    Tags: OBAMA REMOVAL

    Publicado por Corazon7 @ 10:19
    Comentarios (0)  | Enviar