Viernes, 31 de julio de 2009

MACHINE TRANSLATION BY  Babel Fish Home -


  View page in its original language

 By   Armando Ribas

Honduras before of the continental challenge

 
“… It is a true contradiction between the policy of President Obama and the constitutional principles of the United States, supporting the position of the OAS, as much with respect to the incorporation of Cuba like the expulsion of Honduras…” Arming Ribas
The present political situation of Honduras, has again brought to the arena the evident prevailing contradiction in Latin America, between democracy and freedom. That contradiction that threatens the freedom in our continent, was set out clearly by Lord Acton, that it said: “the dogma of which the absolute power, by the hypothesis of its popular origin, can be as legitimate as the constitutional freedom, has begun to darken the atmosphere”.

That darkened atmosphere is the one that reigns to a large extent of the countries of Latin America, in which their respective presidents have modified the constitution in order to extend their power and to aprbar the successive re-election. That is the perpetuation in the power.

During some time I thought that the reality of that existing ideological political confrontation in Latin America, would make appearance in a war between Colombia and Venezuela. War of which it would be divides the United States, by all means of the side of Colombia. The one is that country that at present negotiates a military agreement with the United States, so that it uses three Colombian military bases in the fight against the drug trafficking and the terrorism. Despite the reality of the collaboration of Chávez with the CRAF, the war one did not take place.

That collaboration properly was verified during the Colombian operation in Ecuador against a camping of the CRAF in that country, under the rule of another AT látere of Chávez, Mr. Correa. In spite of it president Uribe met finally with tyrant the elective one of Venezuela, to reach an agreement, that everything seems to indicate that Chávez does not fulfill except for the maintenance of the commercial relations with Colombia.

Already in that one opportunity the OAS, directed by Mr. Insulza, took party by Ecuador blaming the Colombian Armed Forces by to have violated the Ecuadorian sovereignty. We do not know that position will have to take now that a representative of the CRAF informed on his economic collaboration for the presidential campaign of Strap. A second manifest step of the prevailing ideology in its thought and as well as dependency of Chávez, was when it proposed “DULL” the proposal to incorporate to Cuba to the OAS. Proposal that obtained the support of president Obama, and today Cuba can be in the OAS, and Honduras is on the brink of madness being expelled from the same, by “to have violated the principles of the Inter-American Democratic Letter”.

I would say that Honduras is today before crossroads, by to have committed the CRIME to demote a president who violated the National Constitution. At the time of to have made that decision would seem that the destinies were not to him favorable, as it happened to him to Cuba when John F. Kennedy gained the elections of 1960. That electoral triumph marked the destiny of Cuba that outside given to the Soviet orbit and the Cubans to suffer the communist dictatorship by more than fifty years.

One feels like to me that the shade of Kennedy goes up to around the White House. Thus we have been able to see what I consider an unhealthy tendency in the relations with Latin America, according to which Obama seems to accept the prevailing anti-imperialist principles in the zone. A policy according to that attitude was carried out also by Mr. Carter, who desaconociera the reality of which the military, errors and excesses separate, avoided that the continent to the South of the Rio Grande became Cuba.

He was so under the influence of Mr. Sun Linowitz and by all means of his adviser, today again in the White House, the Brzesinski Marxist also would try an approach with Fidel Castro. That policy was disqualified by Jeane Kirpatrick, as of double moral in its book “Dictatorships and Double Stantandards”, (Dictatorship and Double Registers Morals). There it maintained that the Department of State supported the dictators who him oponín and was overthrown alos supported that it. Example the Shah of Iran.

That double moral is to him today being applied to Honduras by the United States. It does not surprise of course that the same is shared by the countries of Latin America, today supposedly living in a democracy that based on the supposed majorities, does not know the individual rights… One is unknown that role of the Constitution is indeed the one to limit the political power. In that situation are the defending majors of Zelaya, tales.com Chávez, Strap, Morals and Grouse. In Cuba I castrate took that work not even to manage to hold absolute the political power. To the eyes of Insulza and apparently of Obama, I castrate seems democratic whereas Micheletti would be coup participant.

That the majority of the Latin American countries has incurred that double moral is not to be surprised. As we can be strange to us that Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay unconditionally support to Zelaya and the intransigente position of Insulza, if their respective presidents have been going to render pleitesía to Fidel Castro. However that the United States tries to not know the fact that the freedom is based on the limitation of the political power and the recognition of the individual rights, it is as Thomas Sowell would say, a mortal although nonimmediate danger…

. The principles of the constitutional freedom based on the limitation of the political power and the respect by the individual rights, are recognized in the history of the United States, and as well as eloquently specified by the Founding Fathers. I must remember then Letter 51 of the Federalist where James Madison expressed: “a society under the form of which the most powerful faction can be united and press to weakest, can say that the anarchy really reigns, like in the nature state where the weakest individual is not safe against the violence of more hard”.

That was the evident intention of Zelaya when to called a plebiscite, that violated the national constitution, to modify the constitution. Therefore I consider a true contradiction between policy of President Obama and the constitutional principles of the United States, supporting the position of the OAS, as much with respect to the incorporation of Cuba like the expulsion of Honduras.

We would not have to continue confusing the problems of the terrorism with the drug trafficking. That confusion apparently has implied historically that they are not solved neither. The terrorism is ideological and its intention is the search of absolute the political power, (Tyranny). The drug trafficking is the product of the economic interest, that superb by the illegality of drugs. The thus United States in this aspect at the same time as it provides the market, because the consumers are not delinquent, considers the production and sale of drugs criminal. The collusion of the drug trafficking with the terrorist guerrilla in an act of circumstantial common interests, and also corrupts the supposedly legal governments.

Recently a new report of the United States involves to Chávez with the drug trafficking. We hope that this data modifies the Kennediana policy favorably, and clearly the ideological one faces problematic that more and more the freedom in Latin America threatens. Finally it is not that it is in discord with the possible elimination of the embargo (called blockade by the left) to Cuba. Although the establishment of the embargo was a indubitable legal right at the time, its result has been politically counter-productive.
What if I am it is completely in discord it is that it is tried to have a discussion in the government more criminal than human eyes will see in the Earth more Fermosa.

Source: Foundation ATLAS

 
   Arming Ribas
Honduras before of the continental challenge
“… It is a true contradiction between the policy of President Obama and the constitutional principles of the United States, supporting the position of the OAS, as much with respect to the incorporation of Cuba like the expulsion of Honduras…” Arming Ribas
The present political situation of Honduras, has again brought to the arena the evident prevailing contradiction in Latin America, between democracy and freedom. That contradiction that threatens the freedom in our continent, was set out clearly by Lord Acton, that it said: “the dogma of which the absolute power, by the hypothesis of its popular origin, can be as legitimate as the constitutional freedom, has begun to darken the atmosphere”.

That darkened atmosphere is the one that reigns to a large extent of the countries of Latin America, in which their respective presidents have modified the constitution in order to extend their power and to aprbar the successive re-election. That is the perpetuation in the power.

During some time I thought that the reality of that existing ideological political confrontation in Latin America, would make appearance in a war between Colombia and Venezuela. War of which it would be divides the United States, by all means of the side of Colombia. The one is that country that at present negotiates a military agreement with the United States, so that it uses three Colombian military bases in the fight against the drug trafficking and the terrorism. Despite the reality of the collaboration of Chávez with the CRAF, the war one did not take place.

That collaboration properly was verified during the Colombian operation in Ecuador against a camping of the CRAF in that country, under the rule of another AT látere of Chávez, Mr. Correa. In spite of it president Uribe met finally with tyrant the elective one of Venezuela, to reach an agreement, that everything seems to indicate that Chávez does not fulfill except for the maintenance of the commercial relations with Colombia.

Already in that one opportunity the OAS, directed by Mr. Insulza, took party by Ecuador blaming the Colombian Armed Forces by to have violated the Ecuadorian sovereignty. We do not know that position will have to take now that a representative of the CRAF informed on his economic collaboration for the presidential campaign of Strap. A second manifest step of the prevailing ideology in its thought and as well as dependency of Chávez, was when it proposed “DULL” the proposal to incorporate to Cuba to the OAS. Proposal that obtained the support of president Obama, and today Cuba can be in the OAS, and Honduras is on the brink of madness being expelled from the same, by “to have violated the principles of the Inter-American Democratic Letter”.

I would say that Honduras is today before crossroads, by to have committed the CRIME to demote a president who violated the National Constitution. At the time of to have made that decision would seem that the destinies were not to him favorable, as it happened to him to Cuba when John F. Kennedy gained the elections of 1960. That electoral triumph marked the destiny of Cuba that outside given to the Soviet orbit and the Cubans to suffer the communist dictatorship by more than fifty years.

One feels like to me that the shade of Kennedy goes up to around the White House. Thus we have been able to see what I consider an unhealthy tendency in the relations with Latin America, according to which Obama seems to accept the prevailing anti-imperialist principles in the zone. A policy according to that attitude was carried out also by Mr. Carter, who desaconociera the reality of which the military, errors and excesses separate, avoided that the continent to the South of the Rio Grande became Cuba.

He was so under the influence of Mr. Sun Linowitz and by all means of his adviser, today again in the White House, the Brzesinski Marxist also would try an approach with Fidel Castro. That policy was disqualified by Jeane Kirpatrick, as of double moral in its book “Dictatorships and Double Stantandards”, (Dictatorship and Double Registers Morals). There it maintained that the Department of State supported the dictators who him oponín and was overthrown alos supported that it. Example the Shah of Iran.

That double moral is to him today being applied to Honduras by the United States. It does not surprise of course that the same is shared by the countries of Latin America, today supposedly living in a democracy that based on the supposed majorities, does not know the individual rights… One is unknown that role of the Constitution is indeed the one to limit the political power. In that situation are the defending majors of Zelaya, tales.com Chávez, Strap, Morals and Grouse. In Cuba I castrate took that work not even to manage to hold absolute the political power. To the eyes of Insulza and apparently of Obama, I castrate seems democratic whereas Micheletti would be coup participant.

That the majority of the Latin American countries has incurred that double moral is not to be surprised. As we can be strange to us that Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay unconditionally support to Zelaya and the intransigente position of Insulza, if their respective presidents have been going to render pleitesía to Fidel Castro. However that the United States tries to not know the fact that the freedom is based on the limitation of the political power and the recognition of the individual rights, it is as Thomas Sowell would say, a mortal although nonimmediate danger…

. The principles of the constitutional freedom based on the limitation of the political power and the respect by the individual rights, are recognized in the history of the United States, and as well as eloquently specified by the Founding Fathers. I must remember then Letter 51 of the Federalist where James Madison expressed: “a society under the form of which the most powerful faction can be united and press to weakest, can say that the anarchy really reigns, like in the nature state where the weakest individual is not safe against the violence of more hard”.

That was the evident intention of Zelaya when to called a plebiscite, that violated the national constitution, to modify the constitution. Therefore I consider a true contradiction between policy of President Obama and the constitutional principles of the United States, supporting the position of the OAS, as much with respect to the incorporation of Cuba like the expulsion of Honduras.

We would not have to continue confusing the problems of the terrorism with the drug trafficking. That confusion apparently has implied historically that they are not solved neither. The terrorism is ideological and its intention is the search of absolute the political power, (Tyranny). The drug trafficking is the product of the economic interest, that superb by the illegality of drugs. The thus United States in this aspect at the same time as it provides the market, because the consumers are not delinquent, considers the production and sale of drugs criminal. The collusion of the drug trafficking with the terrorist guerrilla in an act of circumstantial common interests, and also corrupts the supposedly legal governments.

Recently a new report of the United States involves to Chávez with the drug trafficking. We hope that this data modifies the Kennediana policy favorably, and clearly the ideological one faces problematic that more and more the freedom in Latin America threatens. Finally it is not that it is in discord with the possible elimination of the embargo (called blockade by the left) to Cuba. Although the establishment of the embargo was a indubitable legal right at the time, its result has been politically counter-productive.
What if I am it is completely in discord it is that it is tried to have a discussion in the government more criminal than human eyes will see in the Earth more Fermosa.

Source: Foundation ATLAS

 
 

Tags: HONDURAS OBAMA RIBAS

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 18:46
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Comentarios