By DON WINNER for Panama-Guide.com -
Somebody buy Mitch a beer. And then, fly him and his friends to Washington DC to
talk to the State Department. I received this today via email, and it includes a
further definition and description of how and why Manuel Zelaya was property and
legally removed from the position of President of Honduras. This is good stuff
and should not be missed. Understanding what happened in Honduras is difficult
for foreigners, and this is the best I've seen yet to make it simple to
understand, even for those who are suffering from severe "knee-jerk-itus." The
body of the email follows, but it's not really clear what was written by "Mitch"
and where the comments from the Honduran lawyer and Constitutional scholar
start, but you get the idea... "The following was written by Octavio Sanchez. He
is a Honduran lawyer (J.D. Universidad Nacional Universidad Nacional Autonóma de
Honduras; LL.M. Harvard Law School). He also was a presidential advisor from
2002 – 2005. He served as the Honduran Minister of Culture from 2005 – 2006.
Octavio is tremendously more qualified that I am to discuss the constitution and
what happened this past weekend. I’d like to publicly thank Octavio for taking
the time to write this powerful piece describing the reality of what happened
according to the Honduran constitution." (more)I Think The Following Was Written By Octavio Sanchez:
- If you are not familiar with the
country’s history and the Honduran constitution it is almost impossible that you
would understand what happened here this past weekend. In 1982 my country
adopted a new Constitution to allow our ordered return to democracy. After 19
previous constitution -two Spanish ones, three as part of the Republic of
Central America and 14 as an independent nation- this one, at 28, has been the
longest lasting one. It has lasted for so long because it responds and adapts to
our changing reality, as seen in the fact that out of its original 379 articles,
7 of them have been completely or partially repealed, 18 have been interpreted
and 121 have been reformed.
- It also includes 7 articles that cannot
be repealed or amended because they address issues that are critical for us.
Those unchangeable articles deal with the form of government, the extent of our
borders, the number of years of the presidential term; two prohibitions -one to
reelect presidents and another one to change the article that states who can’t
run for president- and one article that penalizes the abrogation of the
Constitution.
- In these 28 years Honduras has found
legal ways to deal with its own problems. Each and every successful country
around the world lived similar trial and error processes until they were able to
find legal vehicles that adapt to their reality. France had 13 Constitutions
between 1789 and the adoption of the current one in 1958 which has passed 22
constitutional revisions. The USA had one before this one which has been amended
27 times since 1789 and the British –pragmatic as they are- in 900 years have
change it so many times that they have never taken the time to compile their
Constitution into a single body of law.
- Having explained that, under our
Constitution, what happened in Honduras this last Sunday? Soldiers arrested and
took out of the country a Honduran citizen that, the day before, through his
actions had stripped himself of the presidency of Honduras.
- These are the hard facts. Last Friday
Mister Zelaya, with his cabinet, issued a decree ordering all government
employees to take part in the “Public Opinion Poll to convene a National
Constitutional Assembly” (Presidential Decree PCM-020). The decree was published
on Saturday on the official newspaper. With this event, Mister Zelaya triggered
a constitutional protection that automatically removed him from office.
- The key legal elements for that
constitutional protection to be triggered are the following ones. Constitutional
assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. In Honduras, you have 365
articles that can be changed by Congress. When Zelaya published that decree to
regulate an “opinion poll” about the possibility of convening a national
assembly he acted against the unchangeable articles of the constitution that
deal with the prohibition of reelecting a president and of extending his term.
His actions showed intent.
- How is that kind of intent sanctioned in
our Constitution? With the immediate removal of those involved in the action as
stated in article 239 of the Constitution which reads: “No citizen that has
already served as head of the Executive Branch can be President or
Vice-President. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform, as well as
those that support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease
in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of
10 years.” Notice that the rule speaks about intent and that it also says
immediately –as in instant, as in no trial required, as in no impeachment
needed.
- This immediate sanction might sound
draconian, but every country knows its own enemies and it is the black letter of
our supreme law. Requiring no previous trial might be crazy, but in Latin
America a President is no ordinary citizen, it is the most powerful figure of
the land and historically the figure has been above the law. To prevent that
officer from using its power to stay in office Honduras has constitutional rules
such as the mentioned one.
- I am extremely proud of my compatriots.
Finally, we have decided to stand up and become a country of laws, not men. From
now on, here, no one will be above the law.
